Pome

2.9.23 Projection densities and incidence3E5438AF5E6E

We now show that a measure of finite Riesz $(2n-2)$-energy on $\mathbb C^ n$, $n\geq 2$, projects onto almost every complex hyperplane with a square-integrable density, and we deduce the incidence theorem. The first step expresses averages over hyperplanes as a weighted integral over $\mathbb C^ n$.

Lemma 2.9.24.7D4E3784406E Let $n\geq 2$. For every nonnegative Borel function $f$ on $\mathbb C^ n$,

\[ \int _{\mathcal H}\int _ H f(\xi )\, \mathrm d m_ H(\xi )\, \mathrm d\nu (H) =a_ n\int _{\mathbb C^ n}f(\xi )|\xi |^{-2}\, \mathrm d\xi , \qquad a_ n=\frac{s_{2n-3}}{s_{2n-1}}. \]

Proof. We write the inner integral in polar coordinates on $H$ and show that the normalized surface measures of the unit spheres of the hyperplanes $H$ average to the normalized surface measure of $S^{2n-1}$. For $H\in \mathcal H$, let $S_ H$ be the unit sphere of $H$, and let $\tau _ H$ be the image under $T_ H$ of the normalized surface measure $\mathrm dS/s_{2n-3}$ of the unit sphere $S^{2n-3}$ of $\mathbb C^{n-1}=\mathbb R^{2n-2}$. We regard $\tau _ H$ as a Borel probability measure on $S^{2n-1}$ carried by $S_ H$; it does not depend on the frame, since surface measure is invariant under orthogonal transformations (subsection 3.1.1). Polar coordinates (3.1.2) on all of $\mathbb C^{n-1}$, transported to $H$ by $T_ H$, give

\[ \int _ Hf\, \mathrm d m_ H=s_{2n-3}\int _0^\infty r^{2n-3}\int f(r\theta )\, \mathrm d\tau _ H(\theta )\, \mathrm d r. \]

Measurability. Let $h$ be a nonnegative Borel function on $(0,\infty )\times S^{2n-1}$. By the definition of $\tau _ H$,

115E6AD9CC4F 2.9.25
\begin{equation} \int h(r,\theta )\, \mathrm d\tau _ H(\theta )=\frac1{s_{2n-3}}\int _{S^{2n-3}}h(r,T_ H\omega )\, \mathrm dS(\omega ). \end{equation}

The map $(H,r,\omega )\mapsto (r,T_ H\omega )$ is Borel by the frame construction of subsection 2.9.17, since its two components are Borel. Hence $(H,r,\omega )\mapsto h(r,T_ H\omega )$ is a nonnegative Borel function on the product of the separable metric spaces $\mathcal H\times (0,\infty )$ and $S^{2n-3}$, and by lemma 2.2.8 and Tonelli's theorem the right side of (2.9.25) is a Borel function of $(H,r)$. In particular, taking $h(r,\theta )=g(\theta )$, we see that $H\mapsto \int g\, \mathrm d\tau _ H$ is Borel for every nonnegative Borel function $g$ on $S^{2n-1}$; for instance, $H\mapsto \tau _ H(B)$ is Borel for every Borel set $B\subset S^{2n-1}$.

Averaging. For a Borel set $B\subset S^{2n-1}$ put $\tau (B)=\int \tau _ H(B)\, \mathrm d\nu (H)$. By monotone convergence, $\tau $ is countably additive, so it is a Borel probability measure on $S^{2n-1}$. For a unitary matrix $U$, the map $UT_ H$ is a complex linear isometry from $\mathbb C^{n-1}$ onto $UH$, so $U$ maps $\tau _ H$ to $\tau _{UH}$, that is, $\tau _ H(U^{-1}B)=\tau _{UH}(B)$. Since $\nu $ is invariant, it follows that $\tau (U^{-1}B)=\int \tau _{UH}(B)\, \mathrm d\nu (H)=\tau (B)$, so $\tau $ is unitarily invariant. The normalized surface measure $\mathrm dS/s_{2n-1}$ of $S^{2n-1}$ is also unitarily invariant, because unitary matrices are orthogonal transformations of $\mathbb R^{2n}$. By the uniqueness in proposition 2.9.18, $\tau =\mathrm dS/s_{2n-1}$. By the definition of $\tau $ for indicator functions, by linearity for simple functions, and by monotone convergence in general, $\int _{\mathcal H}\int g\, \mathrm d\tau _ H\, \mathrm d\nu (H)=\int g\, \mathrm d\tau $ for every nonnegative Borel function $g$ on $S^{2n-1}$.

Conclusion. Integrate the polar-coordinate identity over $H$ with respect to $\nu $. The function $(r,\theta )\mapsto f(r\theta )$ is Borel on $(0,\infty )\times S^{2n-1}$, so by the measurability step $(H,r)\mapsto r^{2n-3}\int f(r\theta )\, \mathrm d\tau _ H(\theta )$ is a nonnegative Borel function on $\mathcal H\times (0,\infty )$, which is product-measurable by lemma 2.2.8. Tonelli's theorem therefore allows us to integrate first over $H$, and the averaging identity with $g(\theta )=f(r\theta )$ shows that the left side of the lemma equals

\[ s_{2n-3}\int _0^\infty r^{2n-3}\int _{S^{2n-1}}f(r\theta )\, \frac{\mathrm d S(\theta )}{s_{2n-1}}\, \mathrm d r. \]

In polar coordinates $\xi =r\theta $ on all of $\mathbb C^ n=\mathbb R^{2n}$, (3.1.2) gives $|\xi |^{-2}\, \mathrm d\xi =r^{2n-3}\, \mathrm d r\, \mathrm dS(\theta )$, so this is the right side. All integrals may be infinite. $\square$

Theorem 2.9.26.03F670D5FB5A Let $n\geq 2$, and let $\mu $ be a finite positive Borel measure on $\mathbb C^ n$ with $I_{2n-2}(\mu )<\infty $. Then for $\nu $-almost every $H\in \mathcal H$, the projected measure $(P_ H)_*\mu $ has a density $g_ H\in L^2(H,m_ H)$ with respect to $m_ H$, and

\[ \int _{\mathcal H}\| g_ H\| _2^2\, \mathrm d\nu (H)=\beta _ n I_{2n-2}(\mu ), \qquad \beta _ n=\frac{a_ n}{b_{2n,2n-2}}=\frac{\Gamma (n)}{\pi ^{n-1}}>0. \]

Proof. On $H$ we use the Fourier transform defined by the Euclidean inner product $\operatorname{Re}\langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle $ and the measure $m_ H$; in an orthonormal frame it is the transform of subsection 2.9.1 on $\mathbb R^{2n-2}$. For $y\in \mathbb C^ n$ and $\xi \in H$ we have $\operatorname{Re}\langle P_ Hy,\xi \rangle =\operatorname{Re}\langle y,\xi \rangle $, because $y-P_ Hy$ is orthogonal to $H$. Hence the Fourier transform of $(P_ H)_*\mu $ at $\xi \in H$ is $\int \mathrm e^{-2\pi \mathrm i\operatorname{Re}\langle P_ Hy,\xi \rangle }\, \mathrm d\mu (y)=\widehat\mu (\xi )$; that is, it is the restriction of $\widehat\mu $ to $H$. Apply lemma 2.9.24 to the continuous function $|\widehat\mu |^2$, and then theorem 2.9.6 with $d=2n$ and $s=2n-2$, for which $|\xi |^{s-d}=|\xi |^{-2}$. We obtain

\[ \int _{\mathcal H}\int _ H|\widehat\mu (\xi )|^2\, \mathrm d m_ H(\xi )\, \mathrm d\nu (H) =a_ n\int _{\mathbb C^ n}|\widehat\mu (\xi )|^2|\xi |^{-2}\, \mathrm d\xi =\beta _ n I_{2n-2}(\mu )<\infty . \]

The inner integral is a Borel function of $H$, by the frame construction in subsection 2.9.17; hence it is finite for $\nu $-almost every $H$. For each such $H$, we apply proposition 2.9.5 on $\mathbb C^{n-1}=\mathbb R^{2n-2}$ to the image of $\mu $ under $T_ H^{-1}P_ H$. Since $T_ H$ preserves $\operatorname{Re}\langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle $, the Fourier transform of this image is $w\mapsto \widehat\mu (T_ Hw)$, whose squared $L^2$ norm is $\int _ H|\widehat\mu |^2\, \mathrm d m_ H<\infty $. Hence the image has a density in $L^1\cap L^2$, and composing it with $T_ H^{-1}$ we obtain a density $g_ H$ of $(P_ H)_*\mu $ with respect to $m_ H$, with $\| g_ H\| _2^2=\int _ H|\widehat\mu |^2\, \mathrm d m_ H$. In particular, $H\mapsto \| g_ H\| _2^2$ is Borel, being equal to this Fourier integral, so no measurable choice of the densities themselves is needed. Integrating over $H$ proves the identity.

To compute $\beta _ n$, recall from (2.9.8) that $s_{k-1}=2\pi ^{k/2}/\Gamma (k/2)$ for every $k\geq 1$. Hence $a_ n=\Gamma (n)/(\pi \Gamma (n-1))$, while $b_{2n,2n-2}=\pi ^{n-2}/\Gamma (n-1)$, and therefore $\beta _ n=\Gamma (n)/\pi ^{n-1}$. $\square$

Theorem 2.9.27.AF10D8C2B9D9 Let $n\geq 2$, let $K\subset \mathbb C^ n$ be bounded, and let $E_ j\subset K$, $j\geq 1$, be Borel sets. Suppose that there are Borel probability measures $\mu _ j$ on $\mathbb C^ n$ such that $\mu _ j(E_ j)=1$ and $I_{2n-2}(\mu _ j)\leq C$ for a constant $C<\infty $ independent of $j$. Then some affine complex line meets $E_ j$ for infinitely many $j$.

Proof. We parametrize the affine complex lines that can meet $K$ by a compact set carrying a finite measure $\lambda $, and bound from below, independently of $j$, the $\lambda $-measure of a set of lines meeting $E_ j$. Choose $M>0$ with $K\subset B(0,M)$. Every affine complex line can be written as $c+H^\perp $ with $H\in \mathcal H$ and $c\in H$, and $c=P_ Hy$ for every point $y$ of the line. Indeed, if the line is $a+\mathbb Cb$, let $H$ be the hyperplane orthogonal to $b$, so that $H^\perp =\mathbb Cb$, and put $c=P_ Ha$; then $P_ H(a+\zeta b)=c$ for every $\zeta \in \mathbb C$. If the line meets $K$ at a point $y$, then $|c|=|P_ Hy|\leq |y|<M$. Hence the lines that can meet $K$ are parametrized by the set

\[ \mathcal L_ M=\{ (H,c):H\in \mathcal H,\ c\in H,\ |c|\leq M\} , \]

which is compact, being closed in $\mathcal H\times \overline{B(0,M)}$ because $c\in H$ means $P_ Hc=c$. We equip $\mathcal L_ M$ with the finite measure $\lambda $ defined by

\[ \int h\, \mathrm d\lambda =\int _{\mathcal H}\int _{H\cap \overline{B(0,M)}}h(H,c)\, \mathrm d m_ H(c)\, \mathrm d\nu (H) \]

for nonnegative Borel functions $h$. In the frames of subsection 2.9.17, $\lambda $ is the image of the product of $\nu $ and Lebesgue measure on the closed ball of radius $M$ in $\mathbb C^{n-1}$. Thus it is a Borel measure, and its total mass is the volume of a ball of radius $M$ in $\mathbb R^{2n-2}$.

By inner regularity (proposition 2.2.2), choose compact sets $F_ j\subset E_ j$ with $\mu _ j(F_ j)\geq 1/2$. The set

\[ J_ j=\{ (H,c):H\in \mathcal H,\ c\in P_ HF_ j\} \subset \mathcal L_ M \]

parametrizes the lines meeting $F_ j$. It is compact, as the image of $\mathcal H\times F_ j$ under the continuous map $(H,y)\mapsto (H,P_ Hy)$. Its section over $H$ is $P_ HF_ j$, so $\lambda (J_ j)=\int m_ H(P_ HF_ j)\, \mathrm d\nu (H)$. Let $g_{j,H}$ be the densities given by theorem 2.9.26 for $\mu _ j$. Since $F_ j\subset P_ H^{-1}(P_ HF_ j)$, the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality gives, for $\nu $-almost every $H$,

\[ \frac12\leq \mu _ j(F_ j)\leq (P_ H)_*\mu _ j(P_ HF_ j)=\int _{P_ HF_ j}g_{j,H}\, \mathrm d m_ H \leq \| g_{j,H}\| _2\, m_ H(P_ HF_ j)^{1/2}. \]

Integrate this inequality over $H$ with respect to the probability measure $\nu $, and apply the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality once more. Squaring the result and using theorem 2.9.26, we obtain

\[ \frac14\leq \lambda (J_ j)\int _{\mathcal H}\| g_{j,H}\| _2^2\, \mathrm d\nu (H) \leq \lambda (J_ j)\beta _ n C. \]

In particular $C>0$, and $\lambda (J_ j)\geq \delta =1/(4\beta _ n C)$ for every $j$. The sets $\bigcup _{j\geq m}J_ j$ decrease in $m$ and have measure at least $\delta $. Since $\lambda $ is finite, continuity from above gives

\[ \lambda \left(\bigcap _ m\bigcup _{j\geq m}J_ j\right)\geq \delta >0, \]

so this set is nonempty. If $(H,c)$ belongs to it, then $c\in P_ HF_ j$ for infinitely many $j$. For each such $j$ there is $y\in F_ j$ with $c=P_ Hy$, so $y\in c+H^\perp $. Hence the line $c+H^\perp $ meets $F_ j$, and therefore $E_ j$, for infinitely many $j$. $\square$

Corollary 2.9.28.644CAD92A580 Let $D\subset \mathbb C^ n$ be open, with $n\geq 1$, and let $u\colon D\to [-\infty ,\infty )$ be a Borel function whose restriction to every connected component of every affine complex-line section of $D$ is subharmonic. Then $u$ is locally bounded above on $D$.

Proof. If $n=1$, the only affine complex line is $\mathbb C$ itself. Thus $u$ is subharmonic on every component of $D$, hence upper semicontinuous and locally bounded above.

Let $n\geq 2$, and suppose that $u$ is not bounded above on any neighborhood of some point $p\in D$. Then there are points $x_ j\to p$ with $A_ j=u(x_ j)\to \infty $. Choose $R>0$ with $\overline{B(p,2R)}\subset D$; discarding finitely many terms, we may assume that $|x_ j-p|<R$ for all $j$. Then $\overline{B(x_ j,R)}\subset B(p,2R)\subset D$, and theorem 2.9.22 gives Borel probability measures $\mu _ j$ carried by the sets

\[ E_ j=\{ y\in \mathbb C^ n:R/2\leq |y-x_ j|\leq R,\ u(y)\geq A_ j\} , \]

with $I_{2n-2}(\mu _ j)\leq C_ nR^{-(2n-2)}$ for every $j$. All the sets $E_ j$ lie in the bounded set $B(p,2R)$. By theorem 2.9.27, some affine complex line $L$ meets $E_ j$ for all $j$ in an infinite set $J$. Choose $y_ j\in L\cap E_ j$ for $j\in J$. Passing to a subsequence, we may assume that $y_ j\to y\in L\cap \overline{B(p,2R)}\subset D$. A small closed disc in $L$ centered at $y$ lies in $D$, so for large $j$ the points $y_ j$ lie in the same connected component of $D\cap L$ as $y$. On this component $u$ is subharmonic, hence upper semicontinuous, and therefore $\varlimsup _ ju(y_ j)\leq u(y)<\infty $. This contradicts $u(y_ j)\geq A_ j\to \infty $. $\square$

Borel measurability enters this argument through the construction of the measures in theorem 2.9.22. In the proof of theorem 5.8.4, measurability is first derived from the line hypothesis, and only then is corollary 2.9.28 applied.

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.