Pome

Theorem 8.13.10A532C77D7D0C

Theorem 8.13.10.A532C77D7D0C Let $u,v$ be bounded admissible. If, for some $0\leq c<1$,

\[ \mathbf1_{\{ u<v\} }H_ m(u) \leq c\mathbf1_{\{ u<v\} }H_ m(v), \]

then $u\geq v$ everywhere, on an arbitrary Hermitian background. In particular, $H_ m(u)(\{ u<v\} )=0$ implies $u\geq v$.

Proof. Add the same constant to $u,v$ so that $v\geq 1$. This preserves the measure hypothesis and the desired conclusion. Choose $0<\alpha <1$ with $\alpha ^ m>c$ and put $V=\alpha v$, $\eta =1-\alpha $. Suppose $S=\inf _ X(u-V)<0$. For $0<s<-S$, the set $E_ s=\{ u<V+S+s\} $ is contained in $\{ u<V\} $ and hence in $\{ u<v\} $. It has positive volume. Indeed, if its volume were zero, then $u\geq V+S+s$ almost everywhere. Both functions are bounded admissible with their canonical representatives, so 8.2.10 would give this order everywhere, contradicting the definition of $S$. The argument does not require $E_ s$ to be open or the infimum to be attained.

Choose also $s<\eta ^3/C$, where $C$ is from 8.13.8. By 8.12.3 and the measure hypothesis,

\[ \begin{aligned} \alpha ^ m H_ m(v)(E_ s)+\eta ^ m\int _{E_ s}\omega ^ n & \leq H_ m(V)(E_ s)\\ & \leq (1+Cs\eta ^{-m})H_ m(u)(E_ s)\\ & \leq c(1+Cs\eta ^{-m})H_ m(v)(E_ s). \end{aligned} \]

If $c>0$, take $s$ still smaller so that $c(1+Cs\eta ^{-m})<\alpha ^ m$. If $c=0$, this strict inequality already holds. All measures are finite and positive, so the display forces the positive-volume term to be zero, a contradiction. Hence $S\geq 0$ and $u\geq \alpha v$. Let $\alpha $ increase to one, with $\alpha ^ m>c$. Since $v$ is bounded, $\alpha v\to v$ uniformly, and therefore $u\geq v$. The final assertion is $c=0$. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.