Pome

7.11.16 Capacity convergence and truncated measures7449912C4F37

In theorem 7.10.2, a common bound for the densities forced the solutions to converge in capacity, and theorem 7.5.8 then identified the limiting equation. The canonical approximants $U_ j$ of proposition 7.11.5 have no such bound unless $\mu $ itself has a bounded density, since a bound $\mu _ j\leq M\, \mathrm dV$ for all $j$ would pass to the weak limit $\mu $; nor are the functions $U_ j$ uniformly bounded. We show that the convergence of the energy integrals in theorem 7.11.11 takes the place of the density bound once we pass to the uniformly bounded truncations $\max \{ U_ j,-T\} $, whose Monge–Ampère measures differ from $\mu _ j$ by an error controlled by the energy (lemma 7.11.19). Thus a subsequence of canonical approximants that converges in $L^1(B)$ also converges locally in capacity, and the Monge–Ampère measures of the truncations of its limit approximate $\mu $ in total variation (theorem 7.11.24).

As throughout this section, $B$ is a ball in $\mathbb C^ n$, $n\geq 1$. For finite positive Borel measures $\nu _1,\nu _2$ on $B$ we use the total variation distance

\[ \| \nu _1-\nu _2\| _{\mathrm{TV}} =\sup \left\{ \left|\int _ Bf\, \mathrm d(\nu _1-\nu _2)\right|: f\text{ real Borel},\ |f|\leq 1\right\} . \]

The supremum does not change if $f$ ranges only over the real functions in $C_ c(B)$ with $|f|\leq 1$. Indeed, given a real Borel function $f$ with $|f|\leq 1$, proposition 2.3.5 provides functions in $C_ c(B)$ converging to $f$ in $L^1(\nu _1+\nu _2)$, which we may take real by passing to real parts; clamping them to $[-1,1]$ keeps them in $C_ c(B)$ and does not increase their distance from $f$.

Let $T>0$ and $\delta >0$, and let $f,g$ be functions on $B$ with values in $[-\infty ,\infty )$. Then

8748F8035D18 7.11.17
\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \bigl \{ \max \{ f,-T\} >\max \{ g,-T\} +\delta \bigr \} & \subset \{ f>g+\delta \} ,\\ \bigl \{ \max \{ f,-T\} <\max \{ g,-T\} -\delta \bigr \} & \subset \{ f<g-\delta \} . \end{aligned} \end{equation}

Indeed, at a point of the first set we have $\max \{ f,-T\} >-T$, so $f=\max \{ f,-T\} >\max \{ g,-T\} +\delta \geq g+\delta $; the second inclusion is the first with $f$ and $g$ interchanged. Consequently, truncation at a fixed level preserves convergence locally in capacity (definition 7.5.5): if $f_ j\to f$, then $\max \{ f_ j,-T\} \to \max \{ f,-T\} $.

Modifying a locally bounded plurisubharmonic function on a compact set does not change its total Monge–Ampère mass.

Lemma 7.11.18.E1A777307E3D Let $\Omega \subset \mathbb C^ n$ be open, and let $\varphi ,\psi $ be locally bounded plurisubharmonic functions on $\Omega $ which coincide outside a compact set $K\subset \Omega $. Then $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi )^ n$ and $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\psi )^ n$ agree on $\Omega \setminus K$ and assign the same finite mass to $K$. In particular $\int _\Omega (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi )^ n=\int _\Omega (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\psi )^ n$, where both sides may be infinite.

Proof. The two measures agree on the open set $\Omega \setminus K$, because the products are local (proposition 7.2.2). For $0\leq k\leq n-1$ put $S_ k=(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi )^ k\wedge (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\psi )^{n-1-k}$. By the symmetry of the products (theorem 7.3.7) and definition 7.2.1,

\[ \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(\varphi S_ k)=(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi )^{k+1}\wedge (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\psi )^{n-1-k}, \qquad \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(\psi S_ k)=(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi )^ k\wedge (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\psi )^{n-k}, \]

so the sum over $k$ telescopes and

\[ (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi )^ n-(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\psi )^ n=\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}R,\qquad R=(\varphi -\psi )\sum _{k=0}^{n-1}S_ k. \]

The coefficient measures of the current $R$ of order zero vanish on $\Omega \setminus K$, so $\operatorname{Supp}R\subset K$. By lemma 2.5.1 there is $\chi \in C^\infty _ c(\Omega )$ with $0\leq \chi \leq 1$ which equals one on a neighborhood of $K$. Then $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\chi $ vanishes on a neighborhood of $\operatorname{Supp}R$, and therefore

\[ \int \chi \, (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi )^ n-\int \chi \, (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\psi )^ n=R(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\chi )=0, \]

where both integrals are finite. Since $\chi =1$ on $K$ and the two measures agree on $\Omega \setminus K$, it follows that $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi )^ n(K)=(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\psi )^ n(K)<\infty $, and adding the equal masses of $\Omega \setminus K$ gives the last assertion. $\square$

Lemma 7.11.19.546063653198 Let $\varphi \in \mathcal E_0(B)$ and $T>0$, and put $\varphi _ T=\max \{ \varphi ,-T\} $. Then $\varphi _ T\in \mathcal E_0(B)$, and for every $p\geq 1$,

\[ \int _ B(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi _ T)^ n=\int _ B(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi )^ n, \qquad e_ p(\varphi _ T)\leq e_ p(\varphi ), \]
B1ADA2B95634 7.11.20
\begin{equation} \| (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi _ T)^ n-(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi )^ n\| _{\mathrm{TV}} \leq 2e_ p(\varphi )T^{-p}. \end{equation}

Moreover, for every Borel set $E\subset B$,

92D8C50415C8 7.11.21
\begin{equation} \int _ E(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi )^ n \leq T^ n\operatorname {Cap}_ B(E)+e_ p(\varphi )T^{-p}. \end{equation}

Proof. Since $\varphi $ tends to zero uniformly at $\partial B$, there is an open neighborhood $V$ of $\partial B$ such that $\varphi >-T$ on $V\cap B$; there $\varphi _ T=\varphi $. Thus $\varphi _ T$ is bounded, nonpositive and plurisubharmonic, it has zero boundary values, and it coincides with $\varphi $ outside the compact set $\overline B\setminus V\subset B$. By lemma 7.11.18, the measures $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi _ T)^ n$ and $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi )^ n$ have the same total mass, which is finite; in particular $\varphi _ T\in \mathcal E_0(B)$.

Put $F_ T=\{ \varphi \leq -T\} $. By maximum locality (proposition 7.3.10), the two measures agree on the complement $\{ \varphi >-T\} $. Since their total masses are equal and finite, they also assign the same mass $m_ T$ to $F_ T$, and Chebyshev's inequality gives

\[ m_ T\leq T^{-p}\int _{F_ T}(-\varphi )^ p(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi )^ n\leq e_ p(\varphi )T^{-p}. \]

As $\varphi _ T=-T$ on $F_ T$, we get

\[ e_ p(\varphi _ T)=\int _{\{ \varphi >-T\} }(-\varphi )^ p(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi )^ n+T^ pm_ T \leq e_ p(\varphi ). \]

The two measures differ only on $F_ T$, where each has mass $m_ T$; this proves (7.11.20). Finally, $(\varphi _ T+T)/T$ is plurisubharmonic with values in $[0,1]$, so it is a competitor for $\operatorname {Cap}_ B$ (definition 7.4.2), and therefore $\int _ E(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi _ T)^ n\leq T^ n\operatorname {Cap}_ B(E)$. Since the two measures agree on $E\setminus F_ T$, we conclude

\[ \int _ E(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi )^ n \leq \int _{E\setminus F_ T}(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\varphi _ T)^ n+m_ T \leq T^ n\operatorname {Cap}_ B(E)+e_ p(\varphi )T^{-p}. \]
$\square$

Proposition 7.11.22.1036F9F7DDDA Let $p\geq 1$.

  1. For every $\varphi \in \mathcal E_0(B)$ and every $T>0$,

    \[ \operatorname {Cap}_ B(\{ \varphi <-T\} ) \leq 2^{n+p}(n+1)!\, e_ p(\varphi )T^{-(n+p)}. \]
  2. Let $\varphi _ j\in \mathcal E_0(B)$ converge in $L^1_{\mathrm{loc}}(B)$, let $u$ be the plurisubharmonic representative of the limit (theorem 5.10.4), and suppose that $E_ p=\sup _ je_ p(\varphi _ j)<\infty $. For every compact set $K\subset B$ there is a constant $C_{K,p}$, depending only on $K$, $p$ and the ball $B$, such that

    52F9E68B74CF 7.11.23
    \begin{equation} \operatorname {Cap}_ B^*(K\cap \{ u<-T\} ) \leq C_{K,p}E_ p^{p/(n+p)}T^{-p}\qquad (T>0). \end{equation}

    In particular, $\operatorname {Cap}^*_ B(K\cap \{ u=-\infty \} )=0$ for every compact set $K\subset B$.

Proof. (1) Let $h$ be a competitor for $\operatorname {Cap}_ B$, that is, $h\in \mathrm{PSH}(B)$ and $0\leq h\leq 1$. The set $\{ \varphi <-T\} $ is open, because $\varphi $ is upper semicontinuous, and it is relatively compact in $B$, because $\varphi $ has zero boundary values. Hence $\nu =\mathbf1_{\{ \varphi <-T\} }(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}h)^ n$ is a finite measure, and it is dominated by $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}h)^ n$. The tail estimate (7.11.3) of theorem 7.11.2, applied to $\nu $ and $w=h$, involves the constant $\kappa _{n,p}=2^{n+p}(n+1)!M^ n$, where $M\leq 1$ is the oscillation of $h$ on $B$, but not the mass of $\nu $; it gives

\[ \int _{\{ \varphi <-T\} }(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}h)^ n=\nu (\{ \varphi <-T\} ) \leq 2^{n+p}(n+1)!\, e_ p(\varphi )T^{-(n+p)}. \]

Taking the supremum over $h$ proves (1).

(2) Choose an open set $U$ and compact sets $L,L'\subset B$ with $K\subset U\Subset \operatorname{Int}L$ and $L\subset \operatorname{Int}L'$. By the Chern–Levine–Nirenberg inequality (theorem 7.2.5, with the base current $1$ and the pair $L\subset \operatorname{Int}L'$), there is a constant $C_ L$ with $\int _ L(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}h)^ n\leq C_ L$ for every competitor $h$, since $\| h\| _{L^\infty (L')}\leq 1$. The finite measure $\mathbf1_ L(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}h)^ n$ is dominated by $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}h)^ n$ and has mass at most $C_ L$, so the constant $A_ p$ of theorem 7.11.2 for this measure and $w=h$ is at most

\[ C_{K,p}=\Bigl (1+\frac pn\Bigr )\bigl (2^{n+p}(n+1)!\bigr )^{p/(n+p)}C_ L^{n/(n+p)}. \]

Hence the moment estimate (7.11.4), applied to $\varphi _ j$, gives

\[ \int _ L(-\varphi _ j)^ p(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}h)^ n \leq C_{K,p}E_ p^{p/(n+p)} \]

for all $j$ and all competitors $h$.

We pass this bound to the limit $u$. Since the $\varphi _ j$ are nonpositive, $u\leq 0$ almost everywhere, and hence everywhere by the submean inequality. Fix $S>0$. The truncations $\max \{ \varphi _ j,-S\} $ take values in $[-S,0]$ and converge to the plurisubharmonic function $\max \{ u,-S\} $ in $L^1_{\mathrm{loc}}(B)$, since $t\mapsto \max \{ t,-S\} $ is $1$-Lipschitz. Since $\mathbf1_ L(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}h)^ n\leq (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}h)^ n$, lemma 7.11.9 shows that they also converge in $L^1(\mathbf1_ L(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}h)^ n)$. As $t\mapsto t^ p$ is Lipschitz on $[0,S]$ and $(-\max \{ \varphi _ j,-S\} )^ p\leq (-\varphi _ j)^ p$, it follows that

\[ \begin{aligned} \int _ L(-\max \{ u,-S\} )^ p(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}h)^ n & =\lim _{j\to \infty }\int _ L(-\max \{ \varphi _ j,-S\} )^ p(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}h)^ n\\ & \leq C_{K,p}E_ p^{p/(n+p)}. \end{aligned} \]

Letting $S\to \infty $, monotone convergence gives the same bound for $\int _ L(-u)^ p(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}h)^ n$. The set $U\cap \{ u<-T\} $ is open, because $u$ is upper semicontinuous, and it contains $K\cap \{ u<-T\} $. By Chebyshev's inequality its $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}h)^ n$-measure is at most $C_{K,p}E_ p^{p/(n+p)}T^{-p}$. Taking the supremum over $h$ bounds $\operatorname {Cap}_ B(U\cap \{ u<-T\} )$, and hence the outer capacity in (7.11.23). Finally, $K\cap \{ u=-\infty \} $ is contained in $K\cap \{ u<-T\} $ for every $T$, so letting $T\to \infty $ shows that it has zero outer capacity. $\square$

Theorem 7.11.24.D25577E2BC26 Under the hypotheses of theorem 7.11.11, the relabeled subsequence $U_ j$ converges to $u$ locally in capacity. Moreover, let $E_2=\sup _ je_2(U_ j)$, which is finite by proposition 7.11.5. For every $T>0$, the Monge–Ampère measure of the bounded plurisubharmonic function $u_ T=\max \{ u,-T\} $ has total mass at most $m$, and

8C2FAF9DC64B 7.11.25
\begin{equation} \| (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ T)^ n-\mu \| _{\mathrm{TV}}\leq 2E_2T^{-2}. \end{equation}

Proof. We estimate the capacities of the sets where the truncation $\max \{ U_ j,-T\} $ lies far below or far above $u_ T$ (Steps 1 and 2) and deduce convergence in capacity (Step 3). The estimate for $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ T)^ n$ then follows from the convergence of the truncated measures (Step 4). Fix $T>0$ and write $a_ j=\max \{ U_ j,-T\} $ and $b=u_ T$. These plurisubharmonic functions take values in $[-T,0]$, and $a_ j\to b$ in $L^1_{\mathrm{loc}}(B)$ because truncation is $1$-Lipschitz. By theorem 7.11.11, $\varepsilon _ j=\int _ B|U_ j-u|\, \mathrm d\mu _ j\to 0$.

Step 1. The sets where $a_ j<b-\delta $. Let $\delta >0$. The set $\{ a_ j<b-\delta /2\} $ is relatively compact in $B$, because $b\leq 0$ while $a_ j$ tends to zero at $\partial B$. Applying lemma 7.10.1 with $s=t=\delta /2$ and then Chebyshev's inequality, we obtain

\[ \begin{aligned} \operatorname {Cap}_ B(\{ a_ j<b-\delta \} ) & \leq \left(\frac2\delta \right)^ n\int _{\{ a_ j<b-\delta /2\} }(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}a_ j)^ n\\ & \leq 2^{n+1}\delta ^{-(n+1)}\int _ B(b-a_ j)_+(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}a_ j)^ n. \end{aligned} \]

The weight $(b-a_ j)_+$ takes values in $[0,T]$, and it is at most $|U_ j-u|$, since truncation does not increase distances. By (7.11.20) with $p=2$, $\| (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}a_ j)^ n-\mu _ j\| _{\mathrm{TV}}\leq 2E_2T^{-2}$, where $\mu _ j=(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}U_ j)^ n$. Hence

\[ \int _ B(b-a_ j)_+(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}a_ j)^ n \leq \int _ B(b-a_ j)_+\, \mathrm d\mu _ j+T\cdot 2E_2T^{-2} \leq \varepsilon _ j+\frac{2E_2}T, \]

and therefore $\operatorname {Cap}_ B(\{ a_ j<b-\delta \} )\leq 2^{n+1}\delta ^{-(n+1)}(\varepsilon _ j+2E_2/T)$.

Step 2. The sets where $a_ j>b+\delta $. Let $L\subset B$ be compact. By theorem 7.5.2, for every $\sigma >0$ there is an open set $G\subset B$ with $\operatorname {Cap}_ B(G)<\sigma $ such that $b$ is continuous on $B\setminus G$. We claim that $L\cap \{ a_ j>b+\delta \} \subset G$ for all sufficiently large $j$. Let $z\in L\setminus G$. Since $b$ is upper semicontinuous, $b<b(z)+\delta /3$ on a closed ball $\overline{B(z,r)}\subset B$. Hartogs' lemma (theorem 5.10.4), applied to the sequence $a_ j$ with the constant majorant $b(z)+\delta /3$, gives $a_ j<b(z)+\delta /3$ on $\overline{B(z,r)}$ for all large $j$. Since $b$ is continuous on $B\setminus G$, after shrinking $r$ we also have $b>b(z)-\delta /3$ on $(L\setminus G)\cap B(z,r)$. Hence $a_ j-b<2\delta /3$ on $(L\setminus G)\cap B(z,r)$ for all large $j$. As $L\setminus G$ is compact, finitely many such balls cover it, which proves the claim. Consequently $\varlimsup _ j\operatorname {Cap}_ B(L\cap \{ a_ j>b+\delta \} )\leq \sigma $ for every $\sigma >0$, that is, $\operatorname {Cap}_ B(L\cap \{ a_ j>b+\delta \} )\to 0$.

Step 3. Convergence in capacity. Let $K\subset B$ be compact, and apply Step 2 to a compact set $L\subset B$ with $K\subset \operatorname{Int}L$. The bounded functions $a_ j-b$ are quasi-continuous by theorem 7.5.2 and the remark following definition 7.5.1. Therefore lemma 7.5.4, together with Steps 1 and 2 applied with $\delta /2$ in place of $\delta $, gives

\[ \begin{aligned} & \varlimsup _{j\to \infty }\operatorname {Cap}_ B^*(K\cap \{ |a_ j-b|>\delta \} )\\ & \qquad \leq \varlimsup _{j\to \infty }\bigl (\operatorname {Cap}_ B(L\cap \{ a_ j>b+\delta /2\} ) +\operatorname {Cap}_ B(\{ a_ j<b-\delta /2\} )\bigr )\\ & \qquad \leq 2^{2n+3}\delta ^{-(n+1)}\frac{E_2}T. \end{aligned} \]

It remains to remove the truncation. Outside $\{ U_ j<-T\} \cup \{ u<-T\} $ we have $a_ j=U_ j$ and $b=u$. Hence both sets $K\cap \{ U_ j>u+\delta \} $ and $K\cap \{ U_ j<u-\delta \} $ in definition 7.5.5 are contained in

\[ \bigl (K\cap \{ |a_ j-b|>\delta \} \bigr )\cup \{ U_ j<-T\} \cup \bigl (K\cap \{ u<-T\} \bigr ). \]

By proposition 7.11.22 with $p=2$, applied in part (1) to $U_ j$, whose energy is at most $E_2$, and in part (2) to the sequence $(U_ j)$,

\[ \operatorname {Cap}_ B(\{ U_ j<-T\} )\leq \frac{2^{n+2}(n+1)!\, E_2}{T^{n+2}},\qquad \operatorname {Cap}_ B^*(K\cap \{ u<-T\} )\leq \frac{C_{K,2}E_2^{2/(n+2)}}{T^2}, \]

and the capacity of the open set $\{ U_ j<-T\} $ equals its outer capacity. By subadditivity of the outer capacity, the upper limits as $j\to \infty $ of the outer capacities of the two sets in definition 7.5.5 are bounded by the sum of three terms, each of which tends to zero as $T\to \infty $. Since these upper limits do not depend on $T$, they vanish. Thus $U_ j\to u$ locally in capacity.

Step 4. The truncated limit measure. Fix $T>0$ again. By Step 3 and (7.11.17), the uniformly bounded functions $a_ j$ converge to $b$ locally in capacity, so $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}a_ j)^ n\to (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ T)^ n$ weakly on $B$ by theorem 7.5.8. By lemma 7.11.19, each $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}a_ j)^ n$ has total mass $\mu _ j(B)=m$. Testing with functions $\chi \in C_ c(B)$, $0\leq \chi \leq 1$, and letting $\chi $ increase to one, we see that $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ T)^ n$ has total mass at most $m$. Moreover, (7.11.20) gives

\[ \left|\int _ B\chi \, (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}a_ j)^ n-\int _ B\chi \, \mathrm d\mu _ j\right|\leq 2E_2T^{-2} \]

for every real $\chi \in C_ c(B)$ with $|\chi |\leq 1$. Since $\mu _ j\to \mu $ weakly by proposition 7.11.5, letting $j\to \infty $ yields the same bound with $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ T)^ n$ and $\mu $ in place of $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}a_ j)^ n$ and $\mu _ j$. Both limit measures are finite, so by the remark following the definition of the total variation distance, the supremum over such $\chi $ equals $\| (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ T)^ n-\mu \| _{\mathrm{TV}}$. This proves (7.11.25). $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.