Pome

4.2.21 Countable covers and quasi-open setsA51B9EF16CF8

The failure of countability in example 4.2.8 takes place on a polar set. We now show that, outside polar sets, Choquet's lemma recovers the countable operations needed for measures and capacity.

Theorem 4.2.22.730413AAC920 Let $(U_ i)_{i\in I}$ be a family of finely open subsets of $\Omega $. Then there is an at most countable subset $J\subset I$ such that

\[ \left(\bigcup _{i\in I}U_ i\right)\setminus \left(\bigcup _{j\in J}U_ j\right) \]

is polar. Moreover, every finely open set $U$ contains a set $V$ such that $U\setminus V$ is polar and $V$ is the union of countably many sets $Q_ k\cap \{ u_ k>a_ k\} $, where $Q_ k$ is an open ball with $\overline{Q_ k}\subset \Omega $, $u_ k$ is subharmonic on an open neighborhood of $\overline{Q_ k}$ in $\Omega $, and $a_ k\in \mathbb R$; in particular, $V$ is a Borel set. Consequently, $U$ is measurable for the completion of Lebesgue measure, and for the completion of every finite positive measure of compact support with finite energy.

Proof. We first reduce to sets of a special form attached to balls with rational centers and radii; for each such ball, Choquet's lemma then selects countably many of these sets. Let $U=\bigcup _{i\in I}U_ i$. Call a set basic if it has the form $Q\cap \{ u>a\} $, where $Q$ is a ball with rational center and rational radius such that $\overline Q\subset \Omega $, $u$ is subharmonic on an open neighborhood of $\overline Q$ in $\Omega $, and $a\in \mathbb R$. Basic sets are finely open. Every point $x\in U$ lies in a basic set contained in some $U_ i$. Indeed, if $x\in U_ i$, then proposition 4.2.4 provides a Euclidean open set $V$, a function $u\in \mathrm{SH}(V)$ and $a<u(x)$ with $\{ y\in V:u(y)>a\} \subset U_ i$, and we choose a rational ball $Q$ with $x\in Q$ and $\overline Q\subset V$. Let $\mathcal B$ be the family of basic sets contained in some $U_ i$; thus $U=\bigcup \mathcal B$.

Fix a rational ball $Q$, and let $\mathcal B_ Q$ consist of the members of $\mathcal B$ of the form $Q\cap \{ u>a\} $; we may assume that $\mathcal B_ Q$ is nonempty. For every pair $(u,a)$ as in the definition of basic sets with $Q\cap \{ u>a\} \in \mathcal B_ Q$, put

\[ v=\frac{u-a}{1+\max \{ 0,\sup _ Q(u-a)\} }\quad \text{on }Q. \]

The supremum is less than $+\infty $, because $u$ is upper semicontinuous on a neighborhood of the compact set $\overline Q$ and hence bounded above on $\overline Q$. Thus $v$ is subharmonic on $Q$, $v\leq 1$, and $\{ v>0\} =Q\cap \{ u>a\} $.

Let $F$ be the supremum of all the functions $v$ so obtained. By Choquet's lemma (lemma 3.4.22), there is a sequence $(v_ k)$ among them such that $F'=\sup _ kv_ k$ satisfies $(F')^*=F^*$. By part (2) of theorem 4.1.26, the sets $\{ F\neq F^*\} $ and $\{ F'\neq (F')^*\} $ are polar; let $P_ Q$ be their union. If $y\in Q\setminus P_ Q$ and $v(y)>0$ for some $v$, then $F'(y)=(F')^*(y)=F^*(y)=F(y)>0$, so $v_ k(y)>0$ for some $k$. Hence the union of $\mathcal B_ Q$ is contained in the union of $P_ Q$ and the countably many basic sets $\{ v_ k>0\} $.

Doing this for each of the countably many rational balls $Q$, we obtain countably many members of $\mathcal B$ whose union covers $U$ outside the set $P=\bigcup _ QP_ Q$, which is polar by proposition 4.1.11. For each selected member choose one index $i$ such that the member is contained in $U_ i$. The set $J$ of chosen indices is at most countable, and $U\setminus \bigcup _{j\in J}U_ j\subset P$. This proves the first assertion.

For the second, let $U$ be finely open, and apply the first assertion to the family of all basic sets contained in $U$, whose union is $U$ by proposition 4.2.4. We obtain countably many basic sets whose union $V\subset U$ is such that $U\setminus V$ is polar. Each basic set is Borel, since subharmonic functions are Borel measurable, so $V$ is Borel.

For the measurability assertions, it suffices to show that the polar set $U\setminus V$ is contained in a Borel set $N$ that is null for Lebesgue measure and for every finite positive measure of compact support with finite energy. Since $\mathbb R^ d$ has a countable base, $U\setminus V$ is covered by countably many connected open sets $V_ k$ carrying nontrivial subharmonic functions $\psi _ k$ with $(U\setminus V)\cap V_ k\subset \{ \psi _ k=-\infty \} $. The Borel set $N=\bigcup _ k\{ \psi _ k=-\infty \} $ is polar by proposition 4.1.11; it is Lebesgue null by proposition 3.4.8, and null for measures of finite energy by theorem 4.1.17. $\square$

Proposition 4.2.23.F3EA8F8D8D8F Let $U\subset \Omega $ be finely open, let $B\subset \mathbb R^ d$ be an open ball, let $L\subset B$ be compact, and let $\eta >0$. Then there is a Euclidean open set $O\Subset B$ with $C_ B(O)<\eta $ such that $(U\cup O)\cap L$ is relatively open in $L$. Equivalently, $U\cap (L\setminus O)$ is relatively open in $L\setminus O$. In this sense, every finely open set is locally quasi-open.

Proof. We construct $O$ as the union of an open set covering the polar part of $U$ near $L$ and of open sets outside which the functions defining the rest of $U$ are continuous on $L$. By the second assertion of theorem 4.2.22, there are at most countably many sets $V_ k=Q_ k\cap \{ u_ k>a_ k\} \subset U$, with $Q_ k$, $u_ k$ and $a_ k$ as there, whose union $V$ is such that $U\setminus V$ is contained in a polar set $P$. Discarding the empty ones, we may assume that every $V_ k$ is nonempty and that $k$ ranges over a set $\mathcal K\subset \{ 1,2,\ldots \} $. Since $V_ k\neq \varnothing $, we may assume that $u_ k$ is defined on an open ball $Q_ k'\supset \overline{Q_ k}$ and is nontrivial there; by proposition 3.4.8, it is then locally integrable, hence not identically $-\infty $ on any ball in $Q_ k'$. Fix an open set $W_0$ with $L\subset W_0\Subset B$.

First we cover the polar part. The set $P\cap W_0$ is polar and its closure is a compact subset of $B$, so $C_ B^*(P\cap W_0)=0$ by corollary 4.1.24. Hence there is an open set $O_0$ with $P\cap W_0\subset O_0\subset W_0$ and $C_ B(O_0)<\eta /2$.

Next we deal with the discontinuities of the functions $u_ k$. For each $k\in \mathcal K$, the compact set $\overline{Q_ k}\cap L$ lies in the open set $Q_ k'\cap B$. Each of its points therefore lies in a ball $D'$ such that $D'\Subset D\Subset Q_ k'\cap B$ for another ball $D$, and finitely many such balls $D'$ cover $\overline{Q_ k}\cap L$. Enumerate all the pairs of balls obtained in this way, for all $k\in \mathcal K$, as $(D'_ j,D_ j)$ with $j$ in a set $\mathcal J$ of positive integers, and let $k(j)$ be the index $k$ for which the pair $(D'_ j,D_ j)$ was chosen. For each $j\in \mathcal J$, the quasi-continuity theorem (theorem 4.1.30), applied to $u_{k(j)}$ on $Q_{k(j)}'$ with the ball $D_ j\Subset Q_{k(j)}'$ and the compact set $\overline{D'_ j}\cap L\subset D_ j$, provides an open set $O_ j\Subset D_ j$ with $C_{D_ j}(O_ j)<\eta 2^{-j-1}$ such that $u_{k(j)}$ is finite and continuous on $(\overline{D'_ j}\cap L)\setminus O_ j$. By proposition 4.2.12, $C_ B(O_ j)=C_ B^*(O_ j)\leq C_{D_ j}^*(O_ j)=C_{D_ j}(O_ j)<\eta 2^{-j-1}$.

Put $O=O_0\cup \bigcup _{j\in \mathcal J}(O_ j\cap W_0)$. This is an open subset of $W_0$, so $O\Subset B$, and countable subadditivity and monotonicity of the outer capacity (theorem 4.1.19) give

\[ C_ B(O)\leq C_ B(O_0)+\sum _{j\in \mathcal J}C_ B(O_ j)<\frac\eta 2+\sum _{j\geq 1}\eta 2^{-j-1}=\eta . \]

It remains to show that $U\cap F$ is relatively open in $F=L\setminus O$. Since $L\subset W_0$, the set $(U\setminus V)\cap F$ is contained in $(P\cap W_0)\setminus O_0=\varnothing $, so $U\cap F=V\cap F$. Let $y\in V\cap F$. Then $y\in V_ k$ for some $k\in \mathcal K$; since $y\in \overline{Q_ k}\cap L$, we have $y\in D'_ j$ for some $j$ with $k(j)=k$. Since $L\subset W_0$, we have $O_ j\cap L\subset O$, so $D'_ j\cap F\subset (\overline{D'_ j}\cap L)\setminus O_ j$, and the function $u_ k$ is finite and continuous on $D'_ j\cap F$. Hence

\[ \{ z\in D'_ j\cap Q_ k\cap F:u_ k(z)>a_ k\} \]

is relatively open in $F$, contains $y$, and is contained in $V_ k\cap F$. Therefore $U\cap F=V\cap F$ is relatively open in $F$.

Write $U\cap F=T\cap F$ with $T$ open in $\mathbb R^ d$. Then $(U\cup O)\cap L=(U\cap F)\cup (O\cap L)=(T\cup O)\cap L$ is relatively open in $L$. Conversely, if $(U\cup O)\cap L$ is relatively open in $L$, then its intersection with $F$, which is $U\cap F$, is relatively open in $F$. This proves the equivalence of the two formulations. $\square$

Fine continuity should not be confused with quasi-continuity: a subharmonic function is continuous on all of $\Omega $ for the fine topology, whereas theorem 4.1.30 gives Euclidean continuity only after an open set of small capacity has been removed.

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.