Pome

4.1.1 Kernel energies and equilibrium measuresFF9D3CA4D463

Recall the fundamental solution $E_ d$ of (3.1.14), the kernel $\Gamma _ d=-E_ d$ of $-\Delta $, and the area $s_{d-1}$ of the unit sphere. For energy estimates we need kernels that are nonnegative on the sets under consideration, so we fix a compact set $K\subset \mathbb R^ d$. For $d\geq 3$ we put

\[ k(x,y)=\Gamma _ d(x-y)=\frac{|x-y|^{2-d}}{(d-2)s_{d-1}}. \]

In dimension two we fix a scale $D>\operatorname {diam}K$ and put

\[ k_ D(x,y)=\frac{1}{2\pi }\log \frac{D}{|x-y|}=\Gamma _2(x-y)+\frac{\log D}{2\pi }. \]

Both kernels equal $+\infty $ on the diagonal and are nonnegative on $K\times K$.

By a measure on $K$ we mean a finite positive Borel measure on $\mathbb R^ d$ supported on $K$; it is a Radon measure by proposition 2.2.2. The potential and the energy of such a measure $\mu $ are

\[ U^\mu (x)=\int k(x,y)\, \mathrm d\mu (y),\qquad I(\mu )=\iint k(x,y)\, \mathrm d\mu (x)\, \mathrm d\mu (y), \]

with $k_ D$ in place of $k$ when $d=2$; when the scale must be specified, we write $I_ D$. We call $U^\mu $ and $I(\mu )$ the Newtonian potential and the Newtonian energy of $\mu $ if $d\geq 3$, and its logarithmic potential and logarithmic energy if $d=2$. For two measures $\mu $ and $\nu $ on $K$, their mutual energy is $I(\mu ,\nu )=\iint k(x,y)\, \mathrm d\mu (x)\, \mathrm d\nu (y)$. The same integrals define the energy and the mutual energy of finite signed measures on $K$ whenever the kernel is integrable for the product of the total variations.

The potential $U^\mu $ is lower semicontinuous on $\mathbb R^ d$: the kernel is a lower semicontinuous function of $x$ with values in $(-\infty ,\infty ]$, and it is bounded below for $x$ in a compact set and $y\in K$, so Fatou's lemma applies after adding a constant. Moreover, $U^\mu $ is related to the fundamental potential $E_ d*\mu $ of proposition 3.4.11 by $U^\mu =-E_ d*\mu $ if $d\geq 3$ and $U^\mu =-E_2*\mu +(2\pi )^{-1}\mu (K)\log D$ if $d=2$. Replacing $D$ by another scale $D'>\operatorname {diam}K$ adds $(2\pi )^{-1}\mu (K)^2\log (D'/D)$ to the energy; in particular, whether $\mu $ has finite energy does not depend on the scale.

Fundamental potentials satisfy a reciprocity law. Let $\mu $ and $\nu $ be finite positive measures with compact supports, and let $M$ be an upper bound of $E_ d$ on the compact set $\operatorname{Supp}\mu -\operatorname{Supp}\nu $. Applying Tonelli's theorem to the function $(x,y)\mapsto M-E_ d(x-y)$, which is nonnegative on $\operatorname{Supp}\mu \times \operatorname{Supp}\nu $, using $E_ d(-z)=E_ d(z)$ and subtracting the finite number $M\mu (\mathbb R^ d)\nu (\mathbb R^ d)$, we obtain

718E110735E0 4.1.2
\begin{equation} \int (E_ d*\nu )\, \mathrm d\mu =\int (E_ d*\mu )\, \mathrm d\nu , \end{equation}

where both sides lie in $[-\infty ,\infty )$.

The positivity of the energy rests on the Gaussian kernels $\mathrm e^{-t|x-y|^2}$, $t>0$: each of them is an $L^2$ inner product of two Gaussians, and both $k$ and $k_ D$ are obtained from them by integration in $t$.

Lemma 4.1.3.21858171114B Let $\sigma $ and $\tau $ be finite real signed measures on $\mathbb R^ d$, and for $t>0$ put

\[ Q_ t(\sigma ,\tau )=\iint \mathrm e^{-t|x-y|^2}\, \mathrm d\sigma (x)\, \mathrm d\tau (y),\qquad h_ t^\sigma (z)=\int \mathrm e^{-2t|z-x|^2}\, \mathrm d\sigma (x), \]

and $Q_ t(\sigma )=Q_ t(\sigma ,\sigma )$. Then $h_ t^\sigma $ is a bounded continuous function, and

FD55A94B512F 4.1.4
\begin{equation} Q_ t(\sigma ,\tau )=\left(\frac{4t}{\pi }\right)^{d/2}\int _{\mathbb R^ d}h_ t^\sigma (z)\, h_ t^\tau (z)\, \mathrm d z. \end{equation}

In particular $Q_ t(\sigma )\geq 0$. If $Q_ t(\sigma )=0$ for arbitrarily large $t$, then $\sigma =0$.

Proof. The function $h_ t^\sigma $ is bounded by $|\sigma |(\mathbb R^ d)$, and it is continuous by dominated convergence. Completing the square gives $|z-x|^2+|z-y|^2=2|z-\tfrac 12(x+y)|^2+\tfrac 12|x-y|^2$. Since $\int _{\mathbb R^ d}\mathrm e^{-4t|w|^2}\, \mathrm dw=(\pi /4t)^{d/2}$, it follows that

\[ \mathrm e^{-t|x-y|^2}=\left(\frac{4t}{\pi }\right)^{d/2}\int _{\mathbb R^ d}\mathrm e^{-2t|z-x|^2}\, \mathrm e^{-2t|z-y|^2}\, \mathrm d z. \]

We integrate this identity against $\sigma \otimes \tau $. Fubini's theorem applies, because the integral of the absolute value of the integrand with respect to $\mathrm dz\otimes |\sigma |\otimes |\tau |$ is at most $(\pi /4t)^{d/2}|\sigma |(\mathbb R^ d)|\tau |(\mathbb R^ d)$, and integrating first in $x$ and in $y$ gives (4.1.4). For $\tau =\sigma $ it shows that $Q_ t(\sigma )$ is a positive multiple of $\int (h_ t^\sigma )^2\, \mathrm dz$. Hence $Q_ t(\sigma )\geq 0$, and if $Q_ t(\sigma )=0$, then $h_ t^\sigma =0$ almost everywhere, hence everywhere, because $h_ t^\sigma $ is continuous.

Now suppose that $Q_{t_ j}(\sigma )=0$ for a sequence $t_ j\to \infty $. The functions $g_ t(z)=(2t/\pi )^{d/2}\mathrm e^{-2t|z|^2}$ are nonnegative and have integral one, and $\int _{|z|\geq \delta }g_ t\, \mathrm d z\to 0$ as $t\to \infty $ for every $\delta >0$. Hence $g_ t*f\to f$ uniformly on $\mathbb R^ d$ for every $f\in C_ c(\mathbb R^ d)$: in the integral defining $g_ t*f-f$ we use the uniform continuity of $f$ on the region $|z|<\delta $ and the smallness of the Gaussian tail on the region $|z|\geq \delta $. Since $g_{t_ j}*\sigma =(2t_ j/\pi )^{d/2}h_{t_ j}^\sigma =0$, Fubini's theorem and the symmetry of $g_ t$ give

\[ \int (g_{t_ j}*f)\, \mathrm d\sigma =\int f\, (g_{t_ j}*\sigma )\, \mathrm d z=0. \]

Letting $j\to \infty $, we get $\int f\, \mathrm d\sigma =0$ for every $f\in C_ c(\mathbb R^ d)$. Thus the positive and negative parts of $\sigma $ define the same positive linear functional on $C_ c(\mathbb R^ d)$, and the uniqueness assertion of theorem 2.3.3 shows that they are equal, that is, $\sigma =0$. $\square$

Proposition 4.1.5.09A0D05A868F Let $\mu $ and $\nu $ be measures on $K$ with finite energy.

  1. If $d\geq 3$, then $I(\mu ,\nu )$ is finite and $I(\mu ,\nu )^2\leq I(\mu )I(\nu )$. The energy is a positive definite quadratic form on the real linear span of the measures on $K$ with finite energy.

  2. If $d=2$, then $I_ D(\mu ,\nu )$ is finite. The energy $I_ D$ is a positive definite quadratic form on the space of finite signed measures on $K$ of total mass zero whose positive and negative parts have finite energy, and it satisfies the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality on this space.

Proof. By (4.1.4), the expression $Q_ t(\sigma ,\tau )$ of lemma 4.1.3 is $(4t/\pi )^{d/2}$ times the $L^2$ inner product of $h_ t^\sigma $ and $h_ t^\tau $. Hence, by the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality in $z$,

F2F2EC96C26E 4.1.6
\begin{equation} Q_ t(\mu ,\nu )\leq Q_ t(\mu )^{1/2}Q_ t(\nu )^{1/2} \end{equation}

for positive measures $\mu $ and $\nu $.

The case $d\geq 3$. Put $a=(d-2)/2>0$ and $c_ a=\int _0^\infty s^{a-1}\mathrm e^{-s}\, \mathrm d s\in (0,\infty )$. The substitution $s=tr^2$ gives

\[ r^{2-d}=\frac{1}{c_ a}\int _0^\infty t^{a-1}\mathrm e^{-t r^2}\, \mathrm d t,\qquad r>0, \]

and both sides are $+\infty $ for $r=0$. By Tonelli's theorem,

\[ I(\mu ,\nu )=\kappa \int _0^\infty t^{a-1}Q_ t(\mu ,\nu )\, \mathrm d t,\qquad \kappa =\frac{1}{(d-2)s_{d-1}c_ a}. \]

Applying (4.1.6) and then the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for the measure $t^{a-1}\, \mathrm dt$, we obtain $I(\mu ,\nu )\leq I(\mu )^{1/2}I(\nu )^{1/2}$. Now let $\sigma $ be a real linear combination of measures on $K$ with finite energy. Its total variation is dominated by a combination of the same measures with nonnegative coefficients, so the inequality just proved shows that $\iint k\, \mathrm d|\sigma |\, \mathrm d|\sigma |<\infty $. Consequently Fubini's theorem applies to the integrand $t^{a-1}\mathrm e^{-t|x-y|^2}$, and

\[ I(\sigma )=\kappa \int _0^\infty t^{a-1}Q_ t(\sigma )\, \mathrm d t\geq 0 \]

by lemma 4.1.3. If $I(\sigma )=0$, then $Q_ t(\sigma )=0$ for almost every $t>0$, in particular for arbitrarily large $t$, and lemma 4.1.3 gives $\sigma =0$.

The case $d=2$. For $0<r\leq D$ we have

\[ \log \frac Dr=\frac12\int _0^\infty \frac{\mathrm e^{-t r^2}-\mathrm e^{-tD^2}}{t}\, \mathrm d t. \]

Indeed, the right side vanishes for $r=D$, and differentiation under the integral sign, which is legitimate for $r$ in a compact subinterval of $(0,\infty )$, shows that its derivative in $r$ is $-r\int _0^\infty \mathrm e^{-tr^2}\, \mathrm dt=-1/r$. The integrand is nonnegative, and since $|\mathrm e^{-t r^2}-\mathrm e^{-tD^2}|\leq tD^2$, its integral over $0<t<1$ is at most $D^2$. Since $|x-y|\leq \operatorname {diam}K<D$ for $x,y\in K$, Tonelli's theorem gives

\[ 4\pi I_ D(\mu )=\int _0^\infty \bigl (Q_ t(\mu )-\mu (K)^2\mathrm e^{-tD^2}\bigr )\, \frac{\mathrm d t}{t}, \]

with a nonnegative integrand. As $\int _1^\infty \mathrm e^{-tD^2}\, \mathrm dt/t<\infty $, it follows that $\int _1^\infty Q_ t(\mu )\, \mathrm dt/t<\infty $, and likewise for $\nu $. By (4.1.6) and the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for the measure $\mathrm dt/t$ on $(1,\infty )$, also $\int _1^\infty Q_ t(\mu ,\nu )\, \mathrm dt/t<\infty $. Since the part of the integral over $0<t<1$ contributes at most $D^2\mu (K)\nu (K)$ to $4\pi I_ D(\mu ,\nu )$, the mutual energy $I_ D(\mu ,\nu )$ is finite.

Now let $\sigma $ be a signed measure on $K$ of total mass zero whose positive and negative parts $\sigma ^\pm $ have finite energy. Then

\[ \iint k_ D\, \mathrm d|\sigma |\, \mathrm d|\sigma |=I_ D(\sigma ^+)+2I_ D(\sigma ^+,\sigma ^-)+I_ D(\sigma ^-)<\infty , \]

so Fubini's theorem applies to the integrand $(\mathrm e^{-t|x-y|^2}-\mathrm e^{-tD^2})/t$ with respect to $\mathrm dt\otimes \sigma \otimes \sigma $. Since $\sigma (K)=0$, the term $\mathrm e^{-tD^2}$ integrates to zero, and

\[ I_ D(\sigma )=\frac1{4\pi }\int _0^\infty Q_ t(\sigma )\, \frac{\mathrm d t}{t}\geq 0. \]

In particular $I_ D(\sigma )$ does not depend on $D$. As in the case $d\geq 3$, $I_ D(\sigma )=0$ forces $\sigma =0$ by lemma 4.1.3.

It remains to prove the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. Let $\mathcal E$ be the real linear span of the measures on $K$ with finite energy if $d\geq 3$, and the set of signed measures on $K$ of total mass zero whose positive and negative parts have finite energy if $d=2$. In the second case $\mathcal E$ is also a vector space. Indeed, let $\sigma ,\tau \in \mathcal E$ and $c\in \mathbb R$. Since $|\sigma +\tau |\leq |\sigma |+|\tau |$, we have $(\sigma +\tau )^\pm =\frac12\bigl (|\sigma +\tau |\pm (\sigma +\tau )\bigr )\leq \sigma ^\pm +\tau ^\pm $, while $(c\sigma )^\pm =c\sigma ^\pm $ if $c\geq 0$ and $(c\sigma )^\pm =|c|\sigma ^\mp $ if $c<0$. A positive measure on $K$ dominated by the sum of two measures with finite energy has finite energy, because the kernel is nonnegative on $K\times K$ and the mutual energy of two measures with finite energy is finite. Hence $\sigma +\tau $ and $c\sigma $ belong to $\mathcal E$.

In both cases, the total variation of an element of $\mathcal E$ is dominated by a sum of measures on $K$ with finite energy, so for $\sigma ,\tau \in \mathcal E$ the kernel is integrable with respect to $|\sigma |\otimes |\tau |$. Consequently $I(\sigma ,\tau )=\iint k\, \mathrm d\sigma \, \mathrm d\tau $ (with $k_ D$ in place of $k$ when $d=2$) is a symmetric bilinear form on $\mathcal E$, and $I(\sigma )=I(\sigma ,\sigma )\geq 0$ by what we have proved. Hence, for $\sigma ,\tau \in \mathcal E$, the quadratic polynomial $s\mapsto I(\sigma +s\tau )=I(\sigma )+2sI(\sigma ,\tau )+s^2I(\tau )$ is nonnegative on $\mathbb R$. Its discriminant is therefore nonpositive, which is the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality $I(\sigma ,\tau )^2\leq I(\sigma )I(\tau )$. $\square$

In dimension two, the restriction to measures of total mass zero in part (2) is what makes the logarithmic energy independent of the scale. For a positive measure, the sign of $I_ D$ depends on how the scale compares with the support. Identify $\mathbb R^2$ with $\mathbb C$, and let $\sigma _ r$ be the normalized arc length measure on the circle $|x|=r$. For $|x|=r$, the rotation invariance of $\sigma _ r$ gives

\[ \int \log |x-y|\, \mathrm d\sigma _ r(y)=\log r+\frac1{2\pi }\int _{-\pi }^{\pi }\log |1-\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta }|\, \mathrm d\theta , \]

and the last integral vanishes. Indeed, for $0<a<1$ the function $z\mapsto \log |1-az|$ is harmonic on a neighborhood of the closed unit disc, so its mean over the unit circle equals its value $0$ at the origin. We may let $a\uparrow 1$ by dominated convergence, since $|\theta |/\pi \leq |1-a\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta }|\leq 2$ for $1/2\leq a<1$ and $|\theta |\leq \pi $. Hence, for every $D>0$, the function $\int k_ D(\cdot ,y)\, \mathrm d\sigma _ r(y)$ equals $(2\pi )^{-1}\log (D/r)$ on the circle, and $\iint k_ D\, \mathrm d\sigma _ r\, \mathrm d\sigma _ r=(2\pi )^{-1}\log (D/r)$. For a fixed scale $D$, this energy is negative as soon as $r>D$. Thus no single scale makes the logarithmic energy nonnegative on all positive measures with compact support.

Theorem 4.1.7.AA43DD93EFE4 Let $K\subset \mathbb R^ d$ be a compact set that carries a probability measure of finite energy; when $d=2$, the scale $D>\operatorname {diam}K$ is fixed. Then there is a unique probability measure $\mu _ K$ on $K$ of minimal energy, the equilibrium measure of $K$. Put $V(K)=I(\mu _ K)$, and $V_ D(K)=I_ D(\mu _ K)$ when $d=2$. Every probability measure $\nu $ on $K$ with finite energy satisfies

\[ I(\mu _ K,\nu )\geq V(K) \]

(with $I_ D$ and $V_ D(K)$ when $d=2$). If $d\geq 3$, then $V(K)>0$, and the Newtonian capacity of $K$ is defined to be $1/V(K)$. If $d=2$, the logarithmic capacity of $K$ is defined to be $D\mathrm e^{-2\pi V_ D(K)}$; neither $\mu _ K$ nor this number depends on $D$. If $K$ carries no probability measure of finite energy, in particular if $K=\varnothing $, its Newtonian or logarithmic capacity is defined to be zero.

Proof. Existence. Let $\mu _ j$ be probability measures on $K$ whose energies converge to the infimum $m$, which is finite by hypothesis. By theorem 2.6.5, after passing to a subsequence, $\mu _ j$ converges vaguely to a Radon measure $\mu $ on $\mathbb R^ d$. By proposition 2.6.2, applied to the open set $\mathbb R^ d\setminus K$, we have $\mu (\mathbb R^ d\setminus K)\leq \varliminf _ j\mu _ j(\mathbb R^ d\setminus K)=0$, so $\mu $ is carried by $K$; testing against a function in $C_ c(\mathbb R^ d)$ equal to one on $K$ then shows that $\mu (K)=1$. To prove that $I(\mu )\leq m$, we first show that

\[ \iint F\, \mathrm d\mu _ j\, \mathrm d\mu _ j\longrightarrow \iint F\, \mathrm d\mu \, \mathrm d\mu \]

for every continuous function $F$ on $\mathbb R^ d\times \mathbb R^ d$.

Given $\delta >0$, cover $K$ by finitely many balls $B(x_ i,\delta )$ with $x_ i\in K$. By lemma 2.5.2, there are functions $0\leq \varphi _ i\in C_ c^\infty (B(x_ i,\delta ))$ with $\sum _ i\varphi _ i=1$ on $K$. For $x,y\in K$, a term $\varphi _ i(x)\varphi _ l(y)$ is nonzero only if $|x-x_ i|<\delta $ and $|y-x_ l|<\delta $, so

\[ \Bigl |F(x,y)-\sum _{i,l}F(x_ i,x_ l)\varphi _ i(x)\varphi _ l(y)\Bigr |\leq \omega (2\delta ), \]

where $\omega $ is the modulus of continuity of $F$ on $K\times K$. The double integrals of the finite sums converge, since $\int \varphi _ i\, \mathrm d\mu _ j\to \int \varphi _ i\, \mathrm d\mu $. As all the measures are probability measures carried by $K$ and $\omega (2\delta )\to 0$ as $\delta \downarrow 0$, this proves the asserted convergence.

For $n>0$, the truncated kernel $\min \{ k,n\} $ is continuous on $\mathbb R^ d\times \mathbb R^ d$, including the diagonal, and it increases to $k$ as $n\to \infty $. Applying the convergence just proved to $F=\min \{ k,n\} $, we get

\[ \iint \min \{ k,n\} \, \mathrm d\mu \, \mathrm d\mu =\lim _ j\iint \min \{ k,n\} \, \mathrm d\mu _ j\, \mathrm d\mu _ j\leq \varliminf _ j I(\mu _ j)=m. \]

Since $k\geq 0$ on $K\times K$, monotone convergence in $n$ gives $I(\mu )\leq m$. Hence $\mu $ is a minimizer.

Uniqueness. Let $\mu $ and $\mu '$ be minimizers. The signed measure $\sigma =\mu -\mu '$ has total mass zero. Since $|\sigma |\leq \mu +\mu '$, its positive and negative parts satisfy $\sigma ^+=\frac12(|\sigma |+\sigma )\leq \mu $ and $\sigma ^-\leq \mu '$, so they have finite energy, the kernel being nonnegative on $K\times K$. All mutual energies are finite by proposition 4.1.5, so we may expand and obtain

\[ I\bigl (\tfrac 12(\mu +\mu ')\bigr )=\tfrac 12I(\mu )+\tfrac 12I(\mu ')-\tfrac 14I(\sigma )=m-\tfrac 14I(\sigma ). \]

Since $\frac12(\mu +\mu ')$ is a probability measure on $K$, this energy is at least $m$, so $I(\sigma )\leq 0$. By proposition 4.1.5, $\sigma =0$.

The inequality. Let $\nu $ be a probability measure on $K$ with finite energy. For $0<t\leq 1$ the probability measure $(1-t)\mu _ K+t\nu $ competes in the minimization, so

\[ V(K)\leq I\bigl ((1-t)\mu _ K+t\nu \bigr )=(1-t)^2V(K)+2t(1-t)I(\mu _ K,\nu )+t^2I(\nu ), \]

all terms being finite. Subtracting $V(K)$, dividing by $t$ and letting $t\downarrow 0$ gives $0\leq -2V(K)+2I(\mu _ K,\nu )$.

The capacities. Let $d\geq 3$. A point mass has infinite energy, so $K$ is not a single point and $\operatorname {diam}K>0$. The kernel is at least $((d-2)s_{d-1})^{-1}(\operatorname {diam}K)^{2-d}>0$ on $K\times K$, hence $V(K)>0$. Let $d=2$. Replacing $D$ by $D'>\operatorname {diam}K$ changes the energy of every probability measure on $K$ by the same constant $(2\pi )^{-1}\log (D'/D)$. Hence $\mu _ K$ does not depend on the scale, $V_{D'}(K)=V_ D(K)+(2\pi )^{-1}\log (D'/D)$, and $D'\mathrm e^{-2\pi V_{D'}(K)}=D\mathrm e^{-2\pi V_ D(K)}$. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.