Pome

18.42 Localization on curvesB3DCF0B463CE

B3DCF0B463CE

We now transfer the transition of proposition 18.41.13 to a compact curve. The selected sections concentrate on a shrinking disk around the distinguished point. When the remainder of the metric weight is negligible on that disk, the norm there can be compared directly with the model norm, and restriction to the disk gives an upper bound for the kernel. For the lower bound, positivity of the curvature away from the distinguished point permits a global $L^2$ correction of localized model sections that preserves the growing vanishing order.

Let $C$ be a connected compact Riemann surface, let $x\in C$, and let $(L,h)$ be a holomorphic line bundle on $C$ with a smooth Hermitian metric. Fix an integer $r\geq 1$. Suppose that in a holomorphic coordinate $z$ centered at $x$ and a holomorphic frame $e$,

\[ |e|_ h^2=\mathrm{e}^{-\phi },\qquad \phi (z)=|z|^{2r}+O(|z|^{2r+1}). \]

Let $\nu $ be a smooth positive volume form on $C$, written as $a(z)\, \mathrm{d}A$ in this coordinate, where $\mathrm{d}A$ is Euclidean area and $a(0)=1$. For positive integers $m$, choose nonnegative integers $q_ m$ such that

\[ q_ m\longrightarrow \infty ,\qquad q_ m=o(m^{1/(2r+1)}). \]

Write $\mathfrak m_ x$ for the ideal sheaf of $x$, and equip

\[ V_ m=H^0(C,L^ m\otimes \mathfrak m_ x^{q_ m}) \]

with the norm $\| s\| _ m^2=\int _ C|s|_{h^ m}^2\, \mathrm{d}\nu $. Its density is $B_ m=\sum _ j|s_{m,j}|_{h^ m}^2$ for any orthonormal basis $(s_{m,j})$, and $B_ m=0$ if $V_ m=0$. As in section 18.41, $\Phi $ denotes the standard Gaussian distribution function.

Theorem 18.42.1.F3F808FEE505 For a fixed real $\tau $, let $x_ m$ lie in the coordinate neighborhood and satisfy

\[ T_ m:=m|z(x_ m)|^{2r}=q_ m/r+\tau \sqrt{q_ m/r}. \]

Then

C94B49B08D68 18.42.2
\begin{equation} \limsup _{m\to \infty } \frac{\pi B_ m(x_ m)}{mr^2|z(x_ m)|^{2r-2}}\leq \Phi (\tau ). \end{equation}

If the curvature of $(L,h)$ is semipositive on $C$ and strictly positive on $C\setminus \{ x\} $, this ratio converges to $\Phi (\tau )$.

Proof. We compare $B_ m$ with the model kernels of section 18.41 on a shrinking disk, which gives the upper bound. For the lower bound, we cut off model polynomials concentrated near $x$ and correct them to global sections by an $L^2$ estimate. Put $z_ m=z(x_ m)$, $\rho _ m=|z_ m|$, $R_ m=(q_ m/(rm))^{1/(2r)}$ and

\[ S_ m=\frac{mr^2\rho _ m^{2r-2}}\pi . \]

Then $R_ m\to 0$ and $\rho _ m/R_ m\to 1$, and $T_ m>0$ for all sufficiently large $m$. Positive constants denoted by $M$, with subscripts when needed, may change between estimates. They are independent of $m$ and of the argument of $z_ m$; they may depend on the fixed geometric data, $r$, $\tau $, and fixed auxiliary cutoffs or radii. We write $q=q_ m$ when no confusion is possible. The model densities $B_{m,r}^{(q)}$ are those of section 18.41.

Step 1: the kernel on a shrinking disk. Fix a real $A>1$ and set $D_ m=\{ |z|<A R_ m\} $. On $D_ m$,

\[ m|\phi (z)-|z|^{2r}|\leq M_ A mR_ m^{2r+1} =M_ A\frac{q_ mR_ m}{r}=o(1),\qquad \sup _{D_ m}|a-1|=o(1). \]

The first limit follows from $q_ mR_ m=r^{-1/(2r)}(q_ m^{2r+1}/m)^{1/(2r)}\to 0$. Hence, on $D_ m$, the norm defined by $h^ m$ and $\nu $ and the radial norm with weight $\mathrm{e}^{-m|z|^{2r}}\, \mathrm{d}A$ differ by a factor $1+o(1)$, uniformly over all holomorphic functions on $D_ m$. The same comparison holds for the corresponding pointwise weights at $z_ m$.

For integers $k\geq 0$, let $I_{m,k}$ and $J_{m,k}$ be the squared norms of $z^ k$ on $D_ m$ and on the whole plane, respectively, with this radial weight. Polar integration gives

\[ \begin{aligned} I_{m,k}& =\frac\pi r m^{-(k+1)/r}\gamma ((k+1)/r,U_ m), & U_ m& =m(A R_ m)^{2r},\\ J_{m,k}& =\frac\pi r m^{-(k+1)/r}\Gamma ((k+1)/r), & \gamma (b,U)& =\int _0^ U t^{b-1}\mathrm{e}^{-t}\, \mathrm{d}t. \end{aligned} \]

Here $b,U>0$. By Parseval's identity on circles and Tonelli's theorem, the normalized monomials form a complete orthonormal system in the space of holomorphic functions on $D_ m$ with finite radial norm: the squared norm of a Taylor series is the sum of the squared norms of its monomials, so its partial sums converge in that norm. Therefore the density of the subspace of functions vanishing to order at least $q$ is

\[ B_ m^{D}(z_ m)=\mathrm{e}^{-T_ m}\sum _{k\geq q}\frac{\rho _ m^{2k}}{I_{m,k}}. \]

Point evaluation is continuous by the local submean inequality, so this sum is also the supremum of $\mathrm{e}^{-T_ m}|f(z_ m)|^2$ over the unit ball of that subspace.

Choose fixed real numbers $1<c<d<A^{2r}$ and put $k_ m=\lfloor rcT_ m\rfloor $. For large $m$, $k_ m\geq q$ and $U_ m\geq dT_ m$. Uniformly for $0\leq k\leq k_ m+1$,

FAC71C0D28AA 18.42.3
\begin{equation} \frac{I_{m,k}}{J_{m,k}}=1+O(\mathrm{e}^{-\eta T_ m}) \end{equation}

for some fixed $\eta >0$. Indeed, let $G_ b$ be a random variable with Gamma density $t^{b-1}\mathrm{e}^{-t}/\Gamma (b)$ on $(0,\infty )$. A change of variable gives $\mathbb E\mathrm{e}^{sG_ b}=(1-s)^{-b}$ for $0<s<1$. With $b=(k+1)/r\leq cT_ m+O_ r(1)$, Markov's inequality yields

\[ 1-\frac{\gamma (b,U_ m)}{\Gamma (b)} \leq \mathrm{e}^{-sU_ m}(1-s)^{-b}. \]

Since $d>c$, choose $s>0$ small enough that $sd+c\log (1-s)>0$. The right side is at most $M\mathrm{e}^{-\eta T_ m}$, as required.

The Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for the positive radial measure gives $I_{m,k+1}^2\leq I_{m,k}I_{m,k+2}$, so $I_{m,k+1}/I_{m,k}$ increases with $k$. By (18.42.3) and the asymptotics of Gamma ratios,

\[ \rho _ m^2\frac{I_{m,k_ m}}{I_{m,k_ m+1}} =(1+o(1))T_ m^{1/r} \frac{\Gamma ((k_ m+1)/r)}{\Gamma ((k_ m+2)/r)} \longrightarrow c^{-1/r}<1. \]

Choose $\kappa \in (c^{-1/r},1)$. For all large $m$, the ratio of consecutive terms $\rho _ m^{2k}/I_{m,k}$ is at most $\kappa $ for every $k\geq k_ m$. Consequently,

\[ \mathrm{e}^{-T_ m}\sum _{k>k_ m}\frac{\rho _ m^{2k}}{I_{m,k}} \leq \frac{\kappa }{1-\kappa } \mathrm{e}^{-T_ m}\frac{\rho _ m^{2k_ m}}{I_{m,k_ m}} =o(S_ m). \]

For the last equality, replace $I_{m,k_ m}$ by $J_{m,k_ m}$ using (18.42.3). The resulting term is one of the terms of the series for $B_{m,r}^{(k_ m)}(z_ m)$. In (18.41.7) for this kernel, each residue threshold divided by $T_ m$ tends to $c>1$, so Chebyshev's inequality makes all the Poisson tails tend to zero, and the comparison error is $O(T_ m^{-1/2})$. Hence $B_{m,r}^{(k_ m)}(z_ m)=o(S_ m)$.

For the terms with $q\leq k\leq k_ m$, we use (18.42.3). Since $I_{m,k}\leq J_{m,k}$ for every $k$, we obtain

\[ B_{m,r}^{(q)}(z_ m)\leq B_ m^{D}(z_ m) \leq (1+o(1))B_{m,r}^{(q)}(z_ m)+o(S_ m). \]

By proposition 18.41.13,

7549BC9C0F5C 18.42.4
\begin{equation} B_ m^{D}(z_ m)/S_ m\longrightarrow \Phi (\tau ). \end{equation}

The global norm of a selected section dominates its norm on $D_ m$. Restriction to $D_ m$ and the preceding comparisons of norms therefore give $B_ m(x_ m)\leq (1+o(1))B_ m^ D(z_ m)$, also when $V_ m=0$. This proves (18.42.2).

Step 2: polynomials with almost all their norm near the point. From now on we assume the curvature hypotheses of the last assertion. Fix a real $c>1$ and put $K_ m=\lfloor cq_ m\rfloor $. Define

\[ C_ m=\sum _{k=q_ m}^{K_ m}\frac{\rho _ m^{2k}}{J_{m,k}},\qquad p_ m(z)=C_ m^{-1/2}\sum _{k=q_ m}^{K_ m} \frac{\bar z_ m^{\, k}z^ k}{J_{m,k}}. \]

For large $m$ these are well defined, $\| p_ m\| _{m,r}=1$, and

E98FEA6D6D19 18.42.5
\begin{equation} \mathrm{e}^{-T_ m}|p_ m(z_ m)|^2 =B_{m,r}^{(q_ m)}(z_ m)-B_{m,r}^{(K_ m+1)}(z_ m) =(\Phi (\tau )+o(1))S_ m. \end{equation}

Here the first equality holds because $p_ m$ is the normalized evaluation vector at $z_ m$ of the span of $z^{q_ m},\ldots ,z^{K_ m}$. The omitted kernel $B_{m,r}^{(K_ m+1)}(z_ m)$ is $o(S_ m)$ by (18.41.7), since its Poisson thresholds divided by $T_ m$ tend to $c>1$; the second equality then follows from proposition 18.41.13.

Choose $\delta \in (0,1/2)$ so that the coordinate disk $|z|<\delta $ satisfies $\phi (z)\geq \beta |z|^{2r}$ for a fixed $\beta \in (1/2,1)$, and such that $a$ is bounded above there. For a sufficiently large fixed $A>1$,

1C00E2972164 18.42.6
\begin{equation} \int _{A R_ m<|z|<\delta }|p_ m|^2\mathrm{e}^{-m\phi }a\, \mathrm{d}A=o(1). \end{equation}

To see this, write $p_ m(z)=\sum _{k=q_ m}^{K_ m}b_{m,k}z^ k$, so that $\sum _ k|b_{m,k}|^2J_{m,k}=1$. The lower bound for $\phi $, the orthogonality of monomials on circles and polar integration bound the left side by a fixed constant times

\[ \sum _{k=q_ m}^{K_ m}|b_{m,k}|^2J_{m,k}\, \beta ^{-(k+1)/r} \mathbb P\{ G_{(k+1)/r}\geq \beta A^{2r}q_ m/r\} . \]

The exponential moment of $G_ b$ at $s=1/2$ gives, for $b,U>0$,

\[ \beta ^{-b}\mathbb P\{ G_ b\geq U\} \leq \exp \bigl (-U/2+b\log (2/\beta )\bigr ). \]

Choose $A$ so large that $\beta A^{2r}/2>c\log (2/\beta )+1$. Since $(k+1)/r\leq (cq_ m+1)/r$, the last factor in the sum is $O(\mathrm{e}^{-q_ m/r})$, uniformly in $k$. This proves (18.42.6). On $|z|<A R_ m$, the norm defined by $h^ m$ and $\nu $ and the radial model norm differ by a factor $1+o(1)$, as shown in Step 1, and the model norm of $p_ m$ on this disk is at most $1$.

Fix a smooth cutoff function $\chi $ with $0\leq \chi \leq 1$, compactly supported in $|z|<\delta $ and equal to one near zero, and extend $\chi p_ m e^{\otimes m}$ by zero to $C$. The preceding estimates give

69F27719E20A 18.42.7
\begin{equation} \| \chi p_ m e^{\otimes m}\| _ m^2\leq 1+o(1). \end{equation}

The numbers $\delta ,\beta ,A$ and the cutoff $\chi $ are fixed before $m$ tends to infinity.

Step 3: a global correction with the same vanishing condition. Let $f_ m=\bar\partial (\chi p_ m e^{\otimes m})$. Its support is contained in a fixed annulus on which $\phi $ has a positive lower bound. The Cauchy–Schwarz inequality and the identity $\sum _ k|b_{m,k}|^2J_{m,k}=1$ give, for $|z|<\delta <1$,

\[ |p_ m(z)|^2\leq \sum _{k=q_ m}^{K_ m}\frac{|z|^{2k}}{J_{m,k}} \leq M(K_ m+1)m^{(K_ m+1)/r}. \]

Here we used that $\Gamma (b)$ has a positive lower bound for $b\geq 1/r$. Since $q_ m\log m=o(m)$, the factor $\mathrm{e}^{-m\phi }$ on the annulus dominates this growth of the coefficients.

Regard $\nu $ as a Kähler form on the curve; it defines pointwise norms of forms and the induced metric $h_{K_ C^{-1}}$ on the anticanonical bundle $K_ C^{-1}$. Choose a smooth cutoff function $\eta $ with $0\leq \eta \leq 1$, supported in the coordinate chart and equal to one near $x$; shrink its support if necessary. For a sufficiently small fixed $t_0>0$, the global smooth functions

\[ \ell _ t=\eta \log (|z|^2+t^2),\qquad 0<t\leq t_0, \]

extended by zero outside the chart, are nonpositive. Their complex Hessians are nonnegative where $\eta =1$, and elsewhere they are bounded below independently of $t$, because $\eta =1$ near $x$.

Choose a fixed smooth real function $\psi $ that equals a sufficiently large positive multiple of $|z|^2$ near $x$ and is cut off inside the chart, so that

\[ \mathrm{i}\Theta (K_ C^{-1})+\mathrm{i}\partial \bar\partial \psi \geq 2\nu \]

on a neighborhood of $x$ where $\eta =1$. Here $\mathrm{i}\Theta $ denotes the Chern curvature form, without the factor $1/(2\pi )$, so that the weight $\mathrm{e}^{-\psi }$ contributes $\mathrm{i}\partial \bar\partial \psi $. For all large $m$ and all $0<t\leq t_0$, equip $E_ m=L^ m\otimes K_ C^{-1}$ with the smooth metric

\[ H_{m,t}=(h^ m\otimes h_{K_ C^{-1}})\, \mathrm{e}^{-\psi -q_ m\ell _ t}. \]

This metric satisfies

D74927004F98 18.42.8
\begin{equation} \mathrm{i}\Theta (E_ m,H_{m,t})\geq \nu . \end{equation}

Indeed, near $x$ the two terms involving $h$ and $\ell _ t$ are nonnegative, and the other two together are at least $2\nu $. On the complement of a fixed such neighborhood, compactness and strict positivity give a lower bound $c_0m\nu $ for $m\mathrm{i}\Theta (L,h)$, with $c_0>0$. Since $q_ m=o(m)$, this term absorbs all remaining negative terms, which are bounded by $M(q_ m+1)\nu $.

On the support of $f_ m$, the functions $\ell _ t$ are bounded below uniformly in $t$. The polynomial estimate, the bounded derivatives of $\chi $, and $q_ m\log m=o(m)$ therefore give a constant $a_0>0$ such that, for all large $m$,

\[ \int _ C|f_ m|_{h^ m,\nu }^2 \mathrm{e}^{-\psi -q_ m\ell _ t}\, \mathrm{d}\nu \leq \mathrm{e}^{-a_0m}\qquad (0<t\leq t_0). \]

On a curve, $K_ C=\Lambda ^{1,0}$, so an $L^ m$-valued $(0,1)$-form is the same as an $E_ m$-valued $(1,1)$-form, and the induced metrics give it the same pointwise norm; the anticanonical factor in $E_ m$, whose curvature enters (18.42.8), accounts for this change of bidegree. In bidegree $(1,1)$ on a curve, (18.42.8) makes the curvature operator at least the identity. Since the curve is compact and every $(1,1)$-form on it is $\bar\partial $-closed, the $L^2$ existence theorem for complete Kähler manifolds [Theorem 5.1, DemAM11] applies. It gives an $L^ m$-valued weak solution $u_{m,t}$ with

\[ \bar\partial u_{m,t}=f_ m,\qquad \int _ C|u_{m,t}|_{h^ m}^2 \mathrm{e}^{-\psi -q_ m\ell _ t}\, \mathrm{d}\nu \leq \mathrm{e}^{-a_0m}. \]

Now fix $m$ and let $t\downarrow 0$. Since $\ell _ t\leq 0$ and $\psi $ is bounded, the solutions $u_{m,t}$ are bounded in the original $L^2$ norm, and a subsequence converges weakly to some $u_ m$. Continuity of $\bar\partial $ in the sense of distributions gives $\bar\partial u_ m=f_ m$. For fixed $t'>0$ and $t<t'$, we have $\ell _ t\leq \ell _{t'}$, so the same bound holds in the smooth weighted space with weight $\mathrm{e}^{-\psi -q_ m\ell _{t'}}$, whose norm is equivalent to the original one for this fixed $m$ and $t'$. Weak lower semicontinuity, followed by monotone convergence as $t'\downarrow 0$, gives

\[ \int _ C|u_ m|_{h^ m}^2\mathrm{e}^{-\psi -q_ m\ell }\, \mathrm{d}\nu \leq \mathrm{e}^{-a_0m},\qquad \ell =\eta \log |z|^2. \]

In particular, $\| u_ m\| _ m^2\leq M\mathrm{e}^{-a_0m}$. Near $x$ the right side $f_ m$ vanishes, so the Cauchy–Riemann equation, in the sense of distributions, makes $u_ m$ holomorphic in the frame $e^{\otimes m}$. The smooth factors in the weight are bounded above and below near $x$ for each fixed $m$, so the coefficient of $u_ m$ is square integrable against $|z|^{-2q_ m}$. By lemma 5.37.1 in dimension one, this forces vanishing order at least $q_ m$ at $x$.

Since $p_ m$ also vanishes to order at least $q_ m$ at zero, it follows that $s_ m=\chi p_ m e^{\otimes m}-u_ m$ is a global holomorphic section in $V_ m$. By (18.42.7), $\| s_ m\| _ m\leq 1+o(1)$.

Step 4: evaluation at the moving point. For large $m$, the disk $D_ m$ lies in the region where $\chi =1$ and $f_ m=0$. Apply the local comparison of norms and the extremal property of $B_ m^ D$ to the holomorphic function representing $u_ m$ on $D_ m$, which vanishes to order at least $q_ m$. By (18.42.4),

\[ |u_ m(x_ m)|_{h^ m}^2 \leq (1+o(1))B_ m^ D(z_ m)\| u_ m\| _ m^2 \leq M S_ m\mathrm{e}^{-a_0m}. \]

The pointwise factor $\mathrm{e}^{-m\phi (z_ m)}$ differs from $\mathrm{e}^{-T_ m}$ by a factor $1+o(1)$. Since $\Phi (\tau )>0$, (18.42.5) and the triangle inequality give

\[ |s_ m(x_ m)|_{h^ m}^2\geq (\Phi (\tau )+o(1))S_ m. \]

In particular, these sections are nonzero for large $m$. The extremal characterization of $B_ m$ and $\| s_ m\| _ m\leq 1+o(1)$ yield the matching lower bound, which proves the limit. $\square$

The hypothesis $q_ m=o(m^{1/(2r+1)})$ enters only through $mR_ m^{2r+1}=o(1)$, which makes the first remainder term of the metric weight negligible throughout the disk carrying the norm. For larger orders, the curvature quadrature domains of subsection 18.42.9 absorb the harmonic part of this error and determine where the transition occurs. Theorem 18.42.15 gives the corrected transition for all sublinear orders, and theorem 18.42.27 determines the optimal range in which the uncorrected law holds for every metric. On a fibration over a curve, the kernel identities of section 18.36 transfer these transitions whenever the descended spaces carry the same vanishing conditions and the induced norm.

18.42.9 Curvature quadrature domains3CBD30511EFA

The disk comparison above requires the error of the metric weight to be small throughout the disk carrying the norm. A larger range of orders is obtained by absorbing the harmonic part of this error into the holomorphic sections. The transition then takes place on the boundary of the region where the remaining obstacle potential detaches from the weight with first-order contact, and a quadrature identity for the curvature determines that boundary.

Keep $C,x,(L,h),r,z,e$ and $\nu =a(z)\, \mathrm{d}A$ from section 18.42, and assume that the curvature of $(L,h)$ is semipositive on $C$ and strictly positive on $C\setminus \{ x\} $. We now allow integers $q=q_ m\to \infty $ with $q=o(m)$. Write $V_{m,q}=H^0(C,L^ m\otimes \mathfrak m_ x^ q)$, and let $B_{m,q}$ be its density for the norm of section 18.42. Put

\[ \rho =\phi _{z\bar z},\qquad t=q/m,\qquad R=(t/r)^{1/(2r)}. \]

Write $\mathbb D$ for the unit disk.

Lemma 18.42.10.58D1933573E2 Let $b>1$, and let $Q(R,\zeta )$ be a real function, jointly smooth for small real $R$ and $|\zeta |<b$, with $Q(0,\zeta )=|\zeta |^{2r}$. Write $Q_ R=Q(R,\cdot )$, and suppose that every $Q_ R$ is subharmonic and that $Q_{R,\zeta \bar\zeta }>0$ on a fixed neighborhood of the unit circle. For small $R$, let $U_ R$ be the largest subharmonic function on $\{ |\zeta |<b\} $ such that $U_ R\leq Q_ R$ and $U_ R\leq 2r\log |\zeta |+O(1)$ near zero. Then the noncontact set $\Omega _ R=\{ U_ R<Q_ R\} $ is connected, and its boundary is a radial graph near the unit circle. Let $F_ R:\mathbb D\to \Omega _ R$ be the conformal map with $F_ R(0)=0$ and $F_ R'(0)>0$. For every fixed $k$ and all sufficiently small $R$, depending on $k$, the map $F_ R$ and the harmonic function $(U_ R-2r\log |\zeta |)\circ F_ R$ depend smoothly on $R$ in the Hölder spaces $C^{k,\alpha }(\overline{\mathbb D})$, and they differ from their values at $R=0$ by $O(R)$.

The arguments below use only finitely many of these norms, so the dependence of the range of $R$ on $k$ is harmless.

Proof. Fix $k\geq 3$ and $0<\alpha <1$. Let $A^{k,\alpha }$ be the real Banach space of functions that are holomorphic on $\mathbb D$, of class $C^{k,\alpha }$ on its closure, and real at zero. For $h\in A^{k,\alpha }$ near zero set $f(u)=u(1+h(u))$. For small $h$, the map $f$ is univalent, with $f(0)=0$ and $f'(0)>0$. On $|u|=1$ define

\[ K(R,h)=f(u)(Q_ R)_\zeta (f(u))-r, \qquad T(R,h)=(P_-K,\operatorname {Re}[K]_0), \]

where $P_-$ is the projection onto the strictly negative Fourier modes and $[\cdot ]_0$ is the constant Fourier coefficient.

The Cauchy projections are bounded on these Hölder spaces. This follows from the Hilbert kernel on the circle: subtract the value at the evaluation point, split the integral at twice the length of the increment, and use the Hölder bound for differences on the inner part and the bound for the differentiated kernel on the outer part. This gives the $C^{0,\alpha }$ bound, and commuting angular derivatives with the projections gives the $C^{k,\alpha }$ bound. The superposition operator $h\mapsto (Q_ R)_\zeta \circ f$ involves no derivatives of $h$ and is smooth. Thus $T$ is a smooth map into the product of the space of negative-mode functions with $\mathbb R$. At $(R,h)=(0,0)$ we have $T=0$ and

\[ D_ hK(0,0)v=r^2(v+\bar v),\qquad D_ hT(0,0)v=(r^2\overline{v-v(0)},\, 2r^2v(0)). \]

This is a bounded real-linear isomorphism, so the implicit function theorem in Banach spaces gives a unique normalized branch $f_ R$ of solutions of $T(R,h)=0$, depending smoothly on $R$ in the fixed space, with $\| f_ R-\mathrm{id}\| =O(R)$. The branches obtained for larger $k$ agree with this one by uniqueness in the smaller space. For each fixed order, this gives the spatial estimates and the expansions in $R$ needed below, on a parameter interval that depends on the order.

The equation $T=0$ prescribes only the real part of $[K]_0$; we show that the imaginary part vanishes as well. Since $P_-K=0$, the function $K$ extends holomorphically to $\mathbb D$, and $K(0)=[K]_0$ is purely imaginary. On the other hand, Stokes' formula gives

\[ \frac1{2\pi \mathrm{i}}\int _{|u|=1}(Q_ R)_\zeta (f_ R(u))f_ R'(u)\, \mathrm{d}u =\frac1\pi \int _{f_ R(\mathbb D)}(Q_ R)_{\zeta \bar\zeta }\, \mathrm{d}A\in \mathbb R. \]

On the circle the integrand equals $(r+K)f_ R'/f_ R$, whose residue at zero is $r+K(0)$. Hence $K(0)$ is real as well, and therefore zero. Consequently

\[ S_ R(\zeta )=\frac{r+K(f_ R^{-1}(\zeta ))}{\zeta } =r/\zeta +H_ R(\zeta ) \]

with $H_ R$ holomorphic on $\Omega _ R=f_ R(\mathbb D)$, and $S_ R=(Q_ R)_\zeta $ on the boundary of $\Omega _ R$. Let

\[ U_ R=2r\log |\zeta |+2\operatorname {Re}\int _0^\zeta H_ R(w)\, \mathrm{d}w+C_ R. \]

Its complex gradient agrees with that of $Q_ R$ on the boundary, so the difference $Q_ R-U_ R$ is constant there; choose the constant $C_ R$ to make it zero. Then the difference and its gradient vanish on the boundary. Since the tangential second derivative of the difference also vanishes there, its inward normal second derivative equals $\Delta Q_ R>0$. Hence $Q_ R-U_ R>0$ in an inner collar of uniform width. At $R=0$,

\[ U_0=1+2r\log |\zeta |,\qquad |\zeta |^{2r}-1-2r\log |\zeta |>0\quad (0<|\zeta |<1). \]

By uniform convergence, this gap keeps a positive minimum on the remaining compact subsets of the interior for small $R$, and the logarithmic term controls a neighborhood of zero.

Set $U_ R=Q_ R$ outside $\Omega _ R$. Since values and gradients match across the boundary, the Laplacian of the patched function carries no measure on the boundary. Its curvature is $r\delta _0$ inside $\Omega _ R$ and $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}Q_ R\geq 0$ outside, so it is an admissible minorant. If $v$ is any competitor, then $v-U_ R$ is subharmonic on $\Omega _ R\setminus \{ 0\} $, bounded above near zero and nonpositive on the boundary. Removability of the singularity at zero and the maximum principle give $v\leq U_ R$ in $\Omega _ R$, and outside $\Omega _ R$ this follows from $v\leq Q_ R$. This identifies the envelope and shows that there are no further noncontact components. The radial graph property and the estimates for the harmonic part follow from the normalized map and its dependence on the parameter. We henceforth write $F_ R=f_ R$. $\square$

We apply the lemma to the given weight. By Taylor's formula with integral remainder, for small real $R$,

\[ Q_ R(\zeta )=R^{-2r}\phi (R\zeta ) =|\zeta |^{2r}+R E(R,\zeta ) \]

with a jointly smooth function $E$. Choose the holomorphic primitive with $G_ R(0)$ real, and write the envelope in $\Omega _ R$ as

\[ U_ R=2r\log |\zeta |+2\operatorname {Re} G_ R(\zeta ),\qquad G_ R=1/2+O(R). \]

Set $D_ t=R\Omega _ R$. In the original coordinate $z$, the obstacle potential is $\phi _ t(z)=R^{2r}U_ R(z/R)$ inside $D_ t$ and $\phi $ outside. Replacing $\phi $ by $\phi _ t$ in this chart and keeping $h$ elsewhere defines a global singular metric on $L$. Its local potential is $C^1$ across the boundary, bounded above by $\phi $, and has the pole $2t\log |z|+O(1)$. On the boundary, $\phi _ z=t/z+g_ t'$ for a holomorphic function $g_ t$. Green's formula therefore gives the quadrature identity

8F00DDA42676 18.42.11
\begin{equation} \int _{D_ t}\rho (z)f(z)\, \mathrm dA=\pi t f(0) \end{equation}

for every function $f$ holomorphic near $\overline{D_ t}$. The curvature of the singular metric is $t\delta _ x$ inside $D_ t$ and the original curvature outside. Finally, we write the boundary as $\Gamma _ t=\{ R c_ R(\theta )\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\theta }\} $ with a positive periodic function $c_ R$, where $c_ R-1=O(R)$ in each fixed norm used below.

18.42.12 Gaussian transitions at curvature boundaries77CA2588A10E

To prove the transition at the boundary $\Gamma _ t$, we again correct localized sections by an $L^2$ estimate. The singular metric of subsection 18.42.9, whose curvature at $x$ is the point mass $t\delta _ x$, enforces the growing vanishing order of the correction. Its curvature vanishes on the rest of $D_ t$, so a bounded function varying on the scale $R$ must first restore strict positivity there.

Lemma 18.42.13.FBB9C424D045 There are constants $c,C>0$ with the following properties, for all sufficiently large $m$. There is a smooth function $b_ R$, bounded independently of $m$, such that the metric on $L^ m\otimes K_ C^{-1}$ induced by the singular local potential $\psi _ m=m\phi _ t+b_ R$ on $L^ m$ and by the anticanonical metric of $\nu $ has curvature at least $(c/R^2)\nu $ on $C$. On annuli outside $D_ t$ whose radii are comparable to $R$, the lower bound improves to $(cq/R^2)\nu $. If an $L^ m$-valued $(0,1)$-form $\alpha $ is supported on such an annulus, the equation $\bar\partial v=\alpha $ has a solution $v$, depending linearly on $\alpha $, with

8673DB454C7F 18.42.14
\begin{equation} \| v\| _{h^ m}^2\leq C\frac{R^2}{q}\| \alpha \| _{h^ m,\nu }^2, \end{equation}

where both sides are the $L^2$ norms defined by $h^ m$ and $\nu $. If $\alpha $ vanishes near $x$, then $v$ is holomorphic near $x$ and vanishes to order at least $q$ there.

Proof. Take $b_ R=|z|^2/R^2$ on a disk containing $D_ t$, and cut it off before the radius $3R$, so that its negative curvature is supported outside $D_ t$. This function is uniformly bounded and its Hessian is $O(R^{-2})$. On the support of its negative curvature, the curvature $m\rho $ is comparable to $q/R^2$; since $q\to \infty $, it absorbs the negative part. Inside $D_ t$, the function $b_ R$ contributes the curvature $c/R^2$. Elsewhere in a fixed coordinate disk, the original curvature is bounded below by a fixed multiple of $m|z|^{2r-2}$, and off that disk it is at least $cm$. Since $mR^2\to \infty $, all these bounds dominate $c/R^2$ and the bounded Ricci term of $\nu $.

We use the $L^2$ estimate for $\bar\partial $ with a pointwise lower bound for the curvature of a singular metric, in the form described in section 25.16. As in the proof of theorem 18.42.1, we regard $L^ m$-valued $(0,1)$-forms as $(1,1)$-forms with values in $L^ m\otimes K_ C^{-1}$ and sections of $L^ m$ as $(1,0)$-forms with values in the same bundle; this identification preserves the pointwise norms and brings in the Ricci term of $\nu $. The estimate then reads as follows: if $H$ is a singular metric on $L^ m$ and the curvature of $L^ m\otimes K_ C^{-1}$ is at least $\lambda \nu $ for a continuous function $\lambda >0$, then

\[ \int _ C|v|_ H^2\, \mathrm{d}\nu \leq \int _ C\lambda ^{-1}|\alpha |_{H,\nu }^2\, \mathrm{d}\nu . \]

On the support of $\alpha $ we have $\lambda ^{-1}=O(R^2/q)$, $\phi _ t=\phi $, and $b_ R$ is bounded. Elsewhere $\phi _ t\leq \phi $ gives $\mathrm{e}^{-m\phi }\leq C\mathrm{e}^{-\psi _ m}$. These comparisons yield (18.42.14). Choosing the solution of minimal norm in the singular weighted Hilbert space makes the correction linear in its source.

The estimate requires a continuous lower bound $\lambda $. We take $\lambda $ equal to $c/R^2$ inside $D_ t$ and to $cq/R^2$ on the exterior annulus, interpolating across a thin exterior collar of $\Gamma _ t$. For the cutoff sources used below, whose supports are separated from $\Gamma _ t$, the collar can be chosen to miss the source. For an exterior source whose support accumulates on $\Gamma _ t$, we let the collar shrink to $\Gamma _ t$; since $\Gamma _ t$ has zero area, dominated convergence in the integrals of $\lambda ^{-1}|\alpha |^2$ and weak compactness in the fixed weighted Hilbert space give the same estimate. The singular metric is handled by approximation, which gives the same estimate for a weak solution. Where the source vanishes, the Cauchy–Riemann equation in the sense of distributions makes the solution holomorphic. Near $x$, the weight is $|z|^{-2q}$ times a smooth positive factor. A holomorphic term $z^ j$ is square integrable against it precisely when $j\geq q$, so the solution has the required vanishing order. $\square$

Theorem 18.42.15.B396160A7145 Let $D_ t$ and $\Gamma _ t$ be as in subsection 18.42.9. Let $d_ t(z)$ be the signed Euclidean distance from $z$ to $\Gamma _ t$, positive outside $D_ t$, and let $p_ t(z)$ be the nearest point of $\Gamma _ t$. For every fixed $M>0$, uniformly over points $z$ with $|d_ t(z)|\leq MR/\sqrt q$,

CACEDF5E5E52 18.42.16
\begin{equation} \frac{\pi a(z)B_{m,q}(z)}{m\rho (z)} -\Phi \bigl (2\sqrt{m\rho (p_ t(z))}\, d_ t(z)\bigr )\longrightarrow 0. \end{equation}

If $d_ t(z)=o(R)$ and $\sqrt q\, d_ t(z)/R$ tends to $-\infty $ or $+\infty $, the same normalized kernel tends to $0$ or $1$, respectively. Thus, for every sublinear order, the transition is centered on $\Gamma _ t$ and has length $1/(2\sqrt{m\rho })$.

Proof. We pass to logarithmic coordinates adapted to $\Gamma _ t$, in which the norm of a section of order $q$ becomes Gaussian in the distance to the boundary. Restriction to a thin ring gives the upper bound, and localized trial sections corrected by lemma 18.42.13 give the lower bound. Finally we compare with the full kernel to obtain saturation. Throughout the proof, $c$ and $C$ denote positive constants independent of $m$, which may change from line to line.

Step 1: the effective potential. Define on the unit disk

\[ \begin{aligned} A_ R(w)& =G_ R(F_ R(w))+r\log (F_ R(w)/w),\\ \Psi _ R& =Q_ R(F_ R(w))-2\operatorname {Re} A_ R(w)-2r\log |w|, \end{aligned} \]

where the logarithm uses the branch near one. Then $A_ R=1/2+O(R)$ and $F_ R=w+O(R)$ in every fixed norm used below. The effective potential $\Psi _ R=(Q_ R-U_ R)\circ F_ R$ is positive inside the disk, and its value and gradient vanish on the boundary. For $w=\mathrm{e}^{v+\mathrm{i}\theta }$ it has the expansion

989892B2688B 18.42.17
\begin{equation} \Psi _ R=(2r^2+O(R))v^2+O(v^3), \end{equation}

and the exact quadratic coefficient is $2(Q_ R)_{\zeta \bar\zeta }(F_ R(\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\theta }))|F_ R'(\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\theta })|^2$.

The maps need not extend holomorphically across the circle. To obtain charts that also cover a neighborhood outside the circle, we truncate their Taylor series at the degree $K=\lfloor q^{1/16}\rfloor $ and denote the truncations by $F_ K,A_ K$. The Taylor coefficients of a function bounded in a sufficiently high fixed Hölder norm decay faster than a large fixed power of their index, so the truncation error is $O(q^{-10})$, together with the fixed number of derivatives needed here. Fix a small $c_0>0$. On $|w|\leq 1+c_0/K$ the derivatives of the truncations remain bounded and $F_ K-w,A_ K-1/2=O(R)$, because the factor $(1+c_0/K)^ K\leq \mathrm{e}^{c_0}$ controls the sums. In particular, $F_ K$ is univalent there for small $R$. Put $\delta =c_0/K$ and

\[ \Psi _ K=Q_ R(F_ K)-2\operatorname {Re} A_ K-2r\log |w|. \]

The errors in the value and the first derivative of $\Psi _ K$ on the circle are $O(q^{-10})$, and uniformly for $|v|\leq \delta $,

0C736EBAAED9 18.42.18
\begin{equation} \Psi _ K=(2r^2+O(R)+O(|v|))v^2+O(q^{-10})(1+|v|). \end{equation}

Inside the disk, the effective potential has uniform positive quadratic growth near the circle, a positive lower bound on compact annuli farther inside, and logarithmic growth at zero.

In the coordinate $z=RF_ K(w)$, a local holomorphic section of order at least $q$ at $x$ is uniquely represented, in the original frame, as

719C724FC716 18.42.19
\begin{equation} s=w^ q\exp ((q/r)A_ K(w))f(w),\qquad |s|_{h^ m}^2=|f(w)|^2\mathrm{e}^{-(q/r)\Psi _ K(w)}, \end{equation}

with $f$ holomorphic near zero. The volume in this chart is $R^2(1+O(R))\, \mathrm{d}A_ w$. Put $\eta =\sqrt{rq}\, v$. On each band $|\eta |\leq N$ with $N$ fixed,

\[ (q/r)\Psi _ K=2\eta ^2+o(1). \]

Step 2: the upper bound. Let the observation point have coordinate $\eta _0$ in a fixed bounded interval. Restricting the norm to the band $|\eta |\leq N$ bounds the kernel from above by the kernel of the restricted space. For $f(w)=\sum _{j\geq 0}b_ jw^ j$, the limiting diagonal norms of the monomials on this band are

\[ n_{j,N}=\frac{2\pi R^2}{\sqrt{rq}}I_ N(j/\sqrt{rq}),\qquad I_ N(s)=\int _{-N}^ N \mathrm{e}^{2s\eta -2\eta ^2}\, \mathrm{d}\eta . \]

After normalization by $rq/(\pi R^2)$, the limiting upper kernel is

9C31FC6AD112 18.42.20
\begin{equation} \frac12\mathrm{e}^{-2\eta _0^2}\int _0^\infty \frac{\mathrm{e}^{2s\eta _0}}{I_ N(s)}\, \mathrm{d}s. \end{equation}

The passage from sums to integrals uses Riemann sums with mesh $1/\sqrt{rq}$. To control their tails, bound $I_ N(s)$ from below by its integral over a fixed subinterval of $[-N,N]$ lying beyond every observation point $\eta _0$; this gives an exponential bound uniform in the mesh. Thus we may first pass to the Riemann integral and then let $N\to \infty $. Since $I_\infty (s)=\sqrt{\pi /2}\, \mathrm{e}^{s^2/2}$, the expression (18.42.20) tends to

891748D548F0 18.42.21
\begin{equation} \frac1{\sqrt{2\pi }}\int _0^\infty \mathrm{e}^{-(s-2\eta _0)^2/2}\, \mathrm{d}s =\Phi (2\eta _0). \end{equation}

Step 3: the lower bound. Fix $T>0$, and use (18.42.19) with $f$ in the span of the monomials $w^ j$, $0\leq j\leq T\sqrt{rq}$. For $f=\sum _ jb_ jw^ j$, put $\| s\| _{\mathrm{trial}}^2=\sum _ j|b_ j|^2n_ j$, with $n_ j$ given by (18.42.23) below. Let $\chi $ be a radial cutoff function in the $w$-plane, supported in $|w|\leq 1+\delta $ and equal to one on $|w|\leq 1+\delta /2$. The annulus on which $\chi $ is not constant lies outside $D_ t$. Equations (18.42.18) and (18.42.19) bound the squared norm of the source, as a quadratic form on the entire span, by

\[ \| \bar\partial (\chi s)\| _{h^ m,\nu }^2\leq C(R\delta )^{-2}\mathrm{e}^{-cq\delta ^2}\| s\| _{\mathrm{trial}}^2; \]

the linear term $2jv$ in the exponent is absorbed because $\sqrt q\, \delta \to \infty $. Lemma 18.42.13 gives a correction $g_ s$, depending linearly on $s$, with $\bar\partial g_ s=\bar\partial (\chi s)$ and

48CB44544A07 18.42.22
\begin{equation} \| g_ s\| _{h^ m}^2\leq C(q\delta ^2)^{-1}\mathrm{e}^{-cq\delta ^2}\| s\| _{\mathrm{trial}}^2. \end{equation}

The constants here depend on $m$ only through $R$ and $q$. The factor $R^2$ in (18.42.14) cancels the factor $R^{-2}$ coming from the derivative of the cutoff; this cancellation is needed even when $q$ grows more slowly than every power of $m$.

On this span, the Gram form of the global norm of $\chi s$ converges, in the sense of relative operator norm, to the diagonal form

5A8714984B04 18.42.23
\begin{equation} n_ j=\frac{2\pi R^2}{\sqrt{rq}}\sqrt{\frac\pi 2} \exp (j^2/(2rq)). \end{equation}

Indeed, the ratio of the weights is uniformly close to one on each fixed band in $\eta $. Outside such a band, the radial bound for the weight and Parseval's identity on circles bound arbitrary combinations by diagonal tails $\mathrm{e}^{-c\eta ^2+2T|\eta |}$. We first pass to the limit on a fixed band and then enlarge it. The positive lower bound of the effective potential on compact annuli and its logarithmic singularity at zero control the remaining part of the disk. This argument controls the whole quadratic form, without a factor depending on the dimension of the span.

To evaluate the corrections we need a pointwise bound. Let $u$ be a section holomorphic on a disk of radius $R/\sqrt q$ centered at a point $z$ with $|z|$ comparable to $R$. Then a local submean estimate gives

2801C6E5C2B2 18.42.24
\begin{equation} |u(z)|_{h^ m}^2\leq C(q/R^2)\| u\| _{h^ m}^2. \end{equation}

To prove it, multiply $u$ by the exponential of a holomorphic polynomial that removes the harmonic part of the linear and quadratic Taylor terms of $m\phi $ at $z$. After rescaling the disk to unit size, the remaining quadratic coefficient is bounded and the third-order error is $O(q^{-1/2})$, which proves the estimate. It applies to the corrections, because their sources lie on the cutoff annulus, away from the observation points. Together with (18.42.22), it shows that the kernel of the corrected global trial sections differs by $o(q/R^2)$ from the local trial kernel. After normalization, the lower limit is the integral in (18.42.21) with upper limit $T$ instead of infinity, and letting $T\to \infty $ gives the matching lower bound.

Step 4: return to the original coordinate. Let $p$ be the nearest boundary point and $\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\theta }$ its preimage under $F_ R$. Then

\[ \begin{aligned} v& =\frac{d_ t(z)}{R|F_ R'(\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\theta })|} +O(d_ t(z)^2/R^2)+o(q^{-1/2}),\\ m\rho (p)R^2|F_ R'(\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\theta })|^2& =rq(1+O(R)). \end{aligned} \]

Moreover, $m\rho (z)/a(z)=(rq/R^2)(1+o(1))$ in the band $|d_ t(z)|\leq MR/\sqrt q$. These identities convert $2\eta _0$ into the argument in (18.42.16) and give the normalization of the density there. This proves (18.42.16).

Step 5: the full density and saturation. Let $B_ m^{\rm full}$ be the density of the full space $H^0(C,L^ m)$. At points with $|z|\asymp R$, it satisfies

5803A22CF101 18.42.25
\begin{equation} B_ m^{\rm full}(z)=\frac{m\rho (z)}{\pi a(z)}(1+o(1)), \end{equation}

uniformly in an $o(R)$-neighborhood of $\Gamma _ t$. We give a direct localization argument, which also yields the saturation statements of the theorem. Remove the harmonic Taylor terms of $m\phi $ at the observation point and rescale by $(m\rho (z))^{-1/2}$. On every fixed rescaled disk, the remaining weight tends to $|u|^2$, where $u$ is the rescaled coordinate, and the volume density tends to the constant $a(z)$. The Taylor estimate is uniform, because the third derivatives of $\phi $ at radius $R$ are $O(R^{2r-3})$, so the normalized third-order error is $O(q^{-1/2})$. Restriction to such disks bounds the evaluation norm from above, and the Gaussian norm of the constant function on them tends to $\pi $ as their radius grows. This proves the upper bound in (18.42.25).

For the lower bound, take the holomorphic exponential canceling the harmonic Taylor terms, and cut it off on a disk of radius $\varepsilon R$ centered at the observation point, where $\varepsilon \to 0$ and $\sqrt q\, \varepsilon \to \infty $. Its local squared norm is $(\pi a(z)/(m\rho (z)))(1+o(1))$ times its squared weighted value at the center, which is one. The quadratic lower bound for the weight bounds the source on the cutoff annulus by an exponential factor $\mathrm{e}^{-cq\varepsilon ^2}$. Add the same bounded function of scale $R$ to the original metric and use the pointwise $\bar\partial $ estimate. The relative squared norm of the correction is bounded by $C(q\varepsilon ^2)^{-1}\mathrm{e}^{-cq\varepsilon ^2}=o(1)$, after decreasing $c$ if necessary, and its value at the center is $o(1)$ by (18.42.24). This proves the matching lower bound.

For saturation inside $D_ t$, use the polynomial chart above and put $u=1-|w|>0$. Restrict the norm in (18.42.19) to the exterior half-band $0\leq v\leq c/\sqrt q$. On this half-band every monomial $w^ j$, $j\geq 0$, has norm at least $cR^2/\sqrt q$. Parseval's identity on circles and the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality give

\[ B_{m,q}(z)\leq C\frac{\sqrt q}{R^2}\frac{\mathrm{e}^{-cqu^2}}{1-|w|^2}. \]

If $u\sqrt q\to \infty $, this bound divided by $q/R^2$ tends to zero. The error $O(q^{-10})$ of the chart changes neither the hypothesis nor the conclusion.

For saturation outside $D_ t$, cut off the localized Gaussian section at $z$ on a disk of radius

\[ \varepsilon R,\qquad \varepsilon =\min \{ d_ t(z)/(3R),q^{-1/4}\} . \]

This disk lies entirely outside $D_ t$, and again $\varepsilon \to 0$ and $\sqrt q\, \varepsilon \to \infty $. Apply lemma 18.42.13 with the singular obstacle metric, which equals the original metric on the support of the source. The correction has negligible norm and value, and it vanishes to order $q$ at $x$. Thus a member of $V_{m,q}$ asymptotically attains the full Gaussian density, and (18.42.25) gives the reverse inequality. This proves saturation to one. $\square$

18.42.26 Growth ranges and compact examplesE7C597B62D6D

In the coordinate $z$, the quadrature boundary $\Gamma _ t$ differs from the model circle $|z|=R$ by $O(R^2)$. Comparing this displacement with the transition width $R/\sqrt q$ gives the range of orders in which the uncorrected law holds for every metric. A holomorphic change of coordinate produces a compact example in which the displacement has exactly this size.

Theorem 18.42.27.5C5A28D66191 Keep the setting of subsection 18.42.9, fix the integer $r\geq 1$ and a real $\tau $, and consider observation points with coordinates $z_ m$ and the law

4AA63CACA524 18.42.28
\begin{equation} \frac{\pi B_{m,q}(z_ m)}{mr^2|z_ m|^{2r-2}} \longrightarrow \Phi (\tau ),\qquad m|z_ m|^{2r}=q/r+\tau \sqrt{q/r}, \end{equation}

where the second relation prescribes the radii of the observation points. If $q=o(m^{1/(r+1)})$, this law holds for every choice of the geometric data and every sequence of arguments of $z_ m$. This range is optimal: for every sequence $q\to \infty $ with $q=o(m)$ that is not $o(m^{1/(r+1)})$, there is a compact example satisfying the same hypotheses in which the law fails along a subsequence.

For fixed geometric data, write $\Gamma _ t$ as $\{ |z|=R c_ R(\theta )\} $. Then (18.42.28) holds for every fixed $\tau $ and every sequence of arguments if and only if

168E8A4B3B56 18.42.29
\begin{equation} \sqrt q\, \| c_ R-1\| _\infty \longrightarrow 0. \end{equation}

Proof. By lemma 18.42.10, $c_ R-1=O(R)$ in every fixed norm required here. The observation points in (18.42.28) satisfy

\[ |z_ m|/R=1+\tau /(2\sqrt{rq})+O(q^{-1}). \]

Since the slope of the boundary graph tends to zero, the argument of $\Phi $ in theorem 18.42.15 is $\tau +o(1)$ whenever $\sqrt q R\to 0$, and this condition is equivalent to $q=o(m^{1/(r+1)})$. Moreover, $a(z)=1+o(1)$ and $\rho (z)=r^2|z|^{2r-2}(1+o(1))$ at these points, so the two normalizations agree. Thus theorem 18.42.15 proves the law for all data in this range.

The same reasoning shows that (18.42.29) is sufficient. For necessity, suppose that (18.42.29) fails. On a subsequence, choose an angle realizing the maximal boundary displacement and observe at $|z|=R$ with $\tau =0$. A nonzero finite subsequential limit of the scaled displacement gives a nonzero Gaussian argument, and an infinite one gives saturation to zero or one. Radial and normal distances have relative error tending to zero, because the graph has vanishing slope. In either case the limit differs from $1/2$.

It remains to construct the compact examples. On $\mathbb P^1$ choose a radial metric on $\mathcal O(d)$ whose local potential $f(u)$, $u=|w|^2$, equals $u^ r$ near zero, such that $g(u)=uf'(u)$ is strictly increasing on $(0,\infty )$ and tends to $d$, and such that $g(u)=d-\epsilon /u$ for large $u$, with a constant $\epsilon >0$. Such a smooth interpolation exists for a sufficiently large integer $d$: prescribe a positive function $g'$, equal to $r^2u^{r-1}$ near zero and to $\epsilon /u^2$ near infinity, with total integral $d$. Then $f=d\log u+\mathrm{constant}+\epsilon /u$ near infinity, so the potential in the frame at infinity is smooth with strictly positive curvature. Choose a smooth radial volume form equal to $\mathrm{d}A_ w$ near zero.

For sufficiently small $t$, the hole $D_ t$ lies in the region where $f(u)=u^ r$ and equals the disk $|w|<R$: rotational invariance and uniqueness make it a disk, and its curvature mass is $rR^{2r}=t$. Hence the transition and saturation statements of theorem 18.42.15 apply to this compact example.

Now use instead the coordinate $z$ defined by $w=z+cz^2$, with a constant $c>0$. In this coordinate the same compact metric satisfies $\phi (z)=|z|^{2r}+O(|z|^{2r+1})$, the volume form still has $a(0)=1$, and vanishing orders are unchanged. At the uncorrected observation point $z=R$ with $\tau =0$,

\[ 2\sqrt{mr^2R^{2r-2}}\, (|w|-R) =2c\sqrt r\, \sqrt q R, \]

and the normalizing factors computed in the two coordinates have ratio tending to one. If $q$ is not $o(m^{1/(r+1)})$, there is a subsequence on which $\sqrt q R$ tends to a positive finite number or to infinity. Theorem 18.42.15, together with its saturation statement when the argument diverges, then gives a limit strictly larger than $1/2$. This proves that the range is sharp. $\square$

18.42.30 Corrections from the smooth weightBDE9EA5F5F58

The boundary $\Gamma _ t$ can be expanded in powers of $R$, and the leading terms of this expansion give explicit corrections to the uncorrected law. Write

\[ \phi (z)=|z|^{2r}+P_{2r+1}(z,\bar z)+O(|z|^{2r+2}),\qquad P(\theta )=P_{2r+1}(\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\theta },\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}\theta }), \]

where $P_{2r+1}$ is a real homogeneous polynomial of degree $2r+1$ in $(z,\bar z)$. Let $\Lambda $ be the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator of the unit circle, $\Lambda \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i} n\theta }=|n|\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i} n\theta }$. The first boundary coefficient is given by

49C316E4C1B2 18.42.31
\begin{equation} c_ R=1+Rb_1+O(R^2),\qquad b_1=-\frac{((2r+1)-\Lambda )P}{4r^2}. \end{equation}

To derive this, write the interior obstacle, to first order in $R$ and in polar coordinates $(s,\theta )$ for $\zeta $, as $1+2r\log s+R H$ with $H$ harmonic. Matching values on the boundary $s=1+Rb_1$ gives $H|_{s=1}=P$; the terms involving $b_1$ cancel there, since the radial model already matches first derivatives. Matching radial derivatives then gives $4r^2b_1+(2r+1)P-\Lambda P=0$. If $P_{2r+1}$ is harmonic, then $\Lambda P=(2r+1)P$ and $b_1=0$, as it must be, since such a term can be removed by a change of frame.

For $q=O(m^{1/(r+1)})$, the argument of $\Phi $ at the uncorrected observation point of (18.42.28) is

FBDC714894A5 18.42.32
\begin{equation} \tau +\frac{\sqrt q R}{2r^{3/2}}((2r+1)-\Lambda )P(\theta )+o(1), \end{equation}

uniformly in $\theta $, and the normalized kernel differs from $\Phi $ of this argument by $o(1)$. The remainder is small because $\sqrt q R^2\to 0$ in this range. For $w=z+cz^2$ we have $P=2r\operatorname {Re}(c\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\theta })$, and the shift is $2\sqrt{rq}R\operatorname {Re}(c\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\theta })$, in agreement with the compact example above.

For every fixed integer $J\geq 1$, the parameter construction of lemma 18.42.10 gives

\[ c_ R=1+\sum _{j=1}^ J R^ j b_ j+O(R^{J+1}) \]

in every fixed norm needed. The coefficients satisfy an explicit recursion, obtained by expanding the interior harmonic obstacle in powers of $R$. At order $j$, matching values determines the boundary data of the new harmonic term from the Taylor term of degree $2r+j$ of $\phi $ and all preceding coefficients, and harmonic extension determines the term itself. Matching derivatives then gives an equation $4r^2b_ j+\text{(known terms)}=0$; the new coefficient $b_ j$ does not enter the value equation of order $j$. For $j\geq 2$, nonlinear contributions of lower-order terms also appear.

Replacing $\Gamma _ t$ by the curve given by the truncated expansion moves the center of the transition by $O(R^{J+2})$. This curve can therefore be used in place of $\Gamma _ t$ whenever

\[ \sqrt q R^{J+1}\to 0, \quad \hbox{equivalently}\quad q=o(m^{(J+1)/(r+J+1)}). \]

If $b_1=\cdots =b_{j-1}=0$ but $b_ j\not\equiv 0$, the criterion (18.42.29) shows that, for this fixed weight, the uncorrected law holds exactly in the range $q=o(m^{j/(r+j)})$, and this range is sharp when all directions of observation are allowed. Indeed, the higher terms are relatively $O(R)$ at an angle where $b_ j\ne 0$.

In the radial case $\phi =f(u)$ with $u=|z|^2$, the hole is a disk by uniqueness and rotational invariance. By (18.42.11), its boundary circle $\{ u=u_*\} $ is determined by

\[ m u_*f'(u_*)=q. \]

With $\rho (u)=f'(u)+uf''(u)$, the asymptotic variance of the dominant monomial degree is $m u\rho (u)$, and the corresponding Gaussian argument is

065262EB036B 18.42.33
\begin{equation} \frac{m u f'(u)-q}{\sqrt{m u\rho (u)}}. \end{equation}

For bounded arguments, Taylor expansion at $u_*$ identifies it with $2\sqrt{m\rho (u_*)}(\sqrt u-\sqrt{u_*})+o(1)$. Hence theorem 18.42.15 proves this radial formula for all sublinear orders. For $f=u^ r+c u^{r+1}+\cdots $, the first shift at the uncorrected observation point is $c(r+1)r^{-3/2}\sqrt q R^2$, so the critical growth is $m^{2/(r+2)}$. This larger radial threshold does not apply in arbitrary coordinates.

No fixed finite Taylor jet of the weight determines the correction for every $q=o(m)$. For example, near zero take

\[ f(u)=u^ r+c u^ r \mathrm{e}^{-1/\sqrt u},\qquad c>0, \]

with the second term extended by zero at $u=0$, and interpolated globally as above. It has the same Taylor jet as $u^ r$ at zero to every finite order, but at $u=R^2$ its relative contribution to $uf'(u)$ is $c \mathrm{e}^{-1/R}(1+1/(2rR))$. For $q=\lfloor m/\log m\rfloor $, we have $\sqrt q \mathrm{e}^{-1/R}/R\to \infty $. Hence the uncorrected observation point with $\tau =0$ lies outside the true boundary circle by many transition widths, and the normalized kernel tends to one. The quadrature-domain correction includes this flat contribution.

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.