Pome

18.34 The determinant functional3AC0CF30AE00

3AC0CF30AE00

As the continuous weight varies, the partial kernel measures are the derivatives of a single functional, the logarithm of a Gram determinant. Orthogonal projection expresses its second derivative as minus a sum of squared norms, which gives concavity, and the total mass identity gives a Lipschitz bound in terms of the dimension of the selected space.

We return to the norm $\| \cdot \| _{m,v,\nu }$ on the whole manifold from section 18.30, with selecting potential $\varphi \in \mathrm{QPSH}(X)$. Fix $m$ with $N_ m>0$ and a basis of $V_ m$, and let $G_ m(v)$ be the Gram matrix of this basis for $\| \cdot \| _{m,v,\nu }$, a positive definite Hermitian matrix. The determinant functional is

\[ \mathcal F_ m^{(r)}(v) =-\frac{r!}{m^{r+1}} \log \frac{\det G_ m(v)}{\det G_ m(0)}. \]

A change of basis multiplies both determinants by the same positive factor, so $\mathcal F_ m^{(r)}$ does not depend on the basis. If $N_ m=0$, put $\mathcal F_ m^{(r)}=0$.

Proposition 18.34.1.A1D3D26087E7 For $v,f\in C(X,\mathbb R)$, the measure $\beta _ m^{(r)}$ at the weight $v$ satisfies

\[ \left.\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\right|_{t=0}\mathcal F_ m^{(r)}(v+tf) =\int _ X f\, \mathrm{d}\beta _ m^{(r)}. \]

The functional $\mathcal F_ m^{(r)}$ is concave on $C(X,\mathbb R)$, and for $v,w\in C(X,\mathbb R)$ and $c\in \mathbb R$,

\[ \mathcal F_ m^{(r)}(v+c)=\mathcal F_ m^{(r)}(v) +\frac{r!N_ m}{m^ r}c, \qquad |\mathcal F_ m^{(r)}(v)-\mathcal F_ m^{(r)}(w)| \leq \frac{r!N_ m}{m^ r}\| v-w\| _\infty . \]

If $N_ m>0$, the second derivative of $t\mapsto \mathcal F_ m^{(r)}(v+tf)$ is strictly negative unless $f$ is constant.

Proof. Choose a basis $s_1,\ldots ,s_{N_ m}$ that is orthonormal for the weight $v$, so that $G_ m(v)=I$ is the identity matrix of size $N_ m$; the indices $i,j$ below range from $1$ to $N_ m$. Since the weights are bounded, we may differentiate under the integral sign. With pointwise inner products taken in $h^ m$, put

\[ A_{ij}=\int _ X f\langle s_ i,s_ j\rangle _{h^ m}\mathrm{e}^{-mv}\, \mathrm{d}\nu , \qquad C_{ij}=\int _ X f^2\langle s_ i,s_ j\rangle _{h^ m}\mathrm{e}^{-mv}\, \mathrm{d}\nu . \]

The first and second derivatives of $t\mapsto G_ m(v+tf)$ at $t=0$ are $-mA$ and $m^2C$. The identity $(\log \det G)'=\operatorname {tr}(G^{-1}G')$ gives the first derivative of $\mathcal F_ m^{(r)}$, and differentiating it once more yields

\[ \left.\frac{\mathrm{d}^2}{\mathrm{d}t^2}\right|_{t=0}\mathcal F_ m^{(r)}(v+tf) =-\frac{r!}{m^{r-1}} \left(\int _ X f^2B_{m,v,\varphi ,\nu }\, \mathrm{d}\nu -\sum _{i,j}|A_{ij}|^2\right). \]

Let $P_ v$ be the orthogonal projection of the weighted $L^2$ space of measurable sections of $L^ m$ onto $V_ m$. Since $\int _ Xf^2B_{m,v,\varphi ,\nu }\, \mathrm{d}\nu =\sum _ j\| fs_ j\| _{m,v,\nu }^2$ and $P_ v(fs_ j)=\sum _ iA_{ji}s_ i$, Pythagoras' theorem shows that the quantity in parentheses equals

\[ \sum _ j\| (I-P_ v)(fs_ j)\| _{m,v,\nu }^2\geq 0. \]

This proves concavity. Multiplying every Gram entry by $\mathrm{e}^{-mc}$ shows that $\det G_ m(v+c)=\mathrm{e}^{-mcN_ m}\det G_ m(v)$, which is the translation rule. By the first-variation formula and the total mass identity, the derivative of $\mathcal F_ m^{(r)}$ along the segment from $w$ to $v$ is bounded by $(r!N_ m/m^ r)\| v-w\| _\infty $, which gives the Lipschitz estimate.

Suppose finally that the second derivative vanishes. Then $fs_ j\in V_ m$ in $L^2$ for every $j$, so there are $0\ne s\in V_ m$ and $\widetilde s\in V_ m$ with $fs=\widetilde s$ almost everywhere. Both sides are continuous and $\nu $ has a positive density, so $fs=\widetilde s$ everywhere. On a ball where $s\ne 0$, the quotient $\widetilde s/s=f$ is a real-valued holomorphic function, hence a constant $c$. The identity theorem gives $\widetilde s=cs$ on the connected manifold $X$, so $f=c$ wherever $s\neq 0$, and by continuity everywhere. Conversely, for constant $f$ the translation rule shows that the second derivative vanishes. $\square$

Thus $\mathcal F_ m^{(r)}$ is a primitive of the partial kernel measures on every compact complex manifold. This does not affect the obstruction proved in section 11.2 to a primitive of the Hermitian Monge–Ampère operator, since the derivative here is a partial kernel measure and not a Monge–Ampère measure.

Corollary 18.34.2.E8DF257514D4 If $N_ m=o(m^ n)$, then $\beta _ m^{(n)}\to 0$ in total variation, and $\mathcal F_ m^{(n)}(v)\to 0$ uniformly for $v$ in any bounded subset of $C(X)$.

Proof. The measures $\beta _ m^{(n)}$ are positive with total masses $n!N_ m/m^ n\to 0$. The second assertion follows from the Lipschitz estimate, since $\mathcal F_ m^{(n)}(0)=0$. $\square$

For example, suppose that $X$ is not Moishezon. By corollary 19.9.17, either every positive-degree section space of $L$ is zero, or $h^0(X,L^ m)=O(m^ d)$ for some $d<n$. Since $V_ m\subseteq H^0(X,L^ m)$, every sequence of selected spaces satisfies the hypothesis of corollary 18.34.2. By the last assertion of corollary 19.9.17, this applies in particular whenever $X$ fails the bounded mass property of definition 13.14.14.

18.34.3 Dependence on the continuous weight6D1351EF2D7C

When only the continuous weight changes, the selected space stays the same, and the two norms are related by a multiplication operator compressed to that space. Inverting this operator expresses the new reproducing vectors through the old ones. As a consequence the kernel itself, and not only the determinant functional, depends analytically on the weight.

Keep $m\geq 1$, the selecting potential $\varphi $, the metric $h$ and the probability measure $\nu $ fixed as in section 18.30, and write $B_ v=B_{m,v,\varphi ,\nu }$ and $\beta _ v=\beta _ m^{(r)}$ for the kernel and the kernel measure at the weight $v$. Let $P_ v$ be the orthogonal projection of the weighted $L^2$ space of measurable sections of $L^ m$, with the norm $\| \cdot \| _{m,v,\nu }$, onto $V_ m$, and let

\[ Z_ m=\{ x\in X:s(x)=0\text{ for every }s\in V_ m\} \]

be the common zero set of the selected sections. At each $x\in X$ choose a covector of unit length on the fiber $(L^ m)_ x$; it defines a complex-linear evaluation $\ell _ x:V_ m\to \mathbb C$. Let $k_{v,x}\in V_ m$ be its Riesz vector, so that $\ell _ x(s)=\langle s,k_{v,x}\rangle _{m,v,\nu }$ for all $s\in V_ m$. Then

389325A12314 18.34.4
\begin{equation} B_ v(x)=\mathrm{e}^{-mv(x)}\ell _ x(k_{v,x}) =\mathrm{e}^{-mv(x)}\| k_{v,x}\| _{m,v,\nu }^2. \end{equation}

These values do not depend on the phase of the chosen covector.

Proposition 18.34.5.81FC6A666EC9 The map $v\mapsto B_ v$ from $C(X,\mathbb R)$ to $C(X,\mathbb R)$ is real analytic. The map $v\mapsto \beta _ v$ is real analytic with values in the finite signed measures on $X$, equipped with the total variation norm $\| \cdot \| _{\mathrm{TV}}$. If $V_ m=\{ 0\} $, both maps vanish identically.

Proof. If $V_ m=\{ 0\} $ there is nothing to prove. Fix a real weight $v_0$. For $f\in C(X,\mathbb C)$ define an operator on $V_ m$ by

\[ T(f)s=P_{v_0}(\mathrm{e}^{-mf}s). \]

Since the exponential series converges in the uniform norm, $T$ is an entire function of $f$ with values in the endomorphisms of $V_ m$. Since $P_{v_0}$ is a contraction,

\[ \| T(f)-I\| \leq \mathrm{e}^{m\| f\| _\infty }-1. \]

Hence, for $m\| f\| _\infty <\log (3/2)$, we have $\| T(f)-I\| <1/2$, so the Neumann series for $T(f)^{-1}$ converges in operator norm and $\| T(f)^{-1}\| \leq 2$. For real $f$, the operator $T(f)$ is selfadjoint and represents the new inner product:

\[ \langle s,u\rangle _{m,v_0+f,\nu } =\langle T(f)s,u\rangle _{m,v_0,\nu }. \]

In particular it is positive definite, bounded below by $\mathrm{e}^{-m\| f\| _\infty }I$. The Riesz identity therefore gives

\[ k_{v_0+f,x}=T(f)^{-1}k_{v_0,x}. \]

For complex $f$ the right-hand side is still a holomorphic function of $f$. Consequently

\[ f\longmapsto \mathrm{e}^{-m(v_0(x)+f(x))} \ell _ x\bigl (T(f)^{-1}k_{v_0,x}\bigr ) \]

is a holomorphic extension of $f\mapsto B_{v_0+f}(x)$. Evaluations on the finite-dimensional space $V_ m$ are uniformly bounded over the compact manifold $X$, so the linear map $A\mapsto [x\mapsto \ell _ x(Ak_{v_0,x})]$ from the endomorphisms of $V_ m$ to $C(X)$ is bounded; it is well defined because the phases of $\ell _ x$ and $k_{v_0,x}$ cancel. Hence the extension is holomorphic as a map with values in $C(X)$. Finally, $B\mapsto (r!/m^ r)B\nu $ is a bounded linear map into finite measures with the total variation norm, which proves the assertion about $\beta _ v$. At points of $Z_ m$ the Riesz vector is zero, so the argument includes the common zero set. $\square$

Now let $I\subset \mathbb R$ be an open interval and let $t\mapsto v_ t$ be a smooth curve in $C(X,\mathbb R)$. The complete exponential Bell polynomials are

\[ \mathcal B_ j(x_1,\ldots ,x_ j) =\sum _{\sum _{\ell =1}^ j\ell n_\ell =j} j!\prod _{\ell =1}^ j \frac{(x_\ell /\ell !)^{n_\ell }}{n_\ell !}, \qquad j\geq 1, \]

where the sum runs over nonnegative integers $n_1,\ldots ,n_ j$. Write $\mathcal B_ j(-mv_ t)$ for $\mathcal B_ j$ evaluated at the first $j$ derivatives of $-mv_ t$ with respect to $t$, so that $\partial _ t^ j\mathrm{e}^{-mv_ t}=\mathrm{e}^{-mv_ t}\mathcal B_ j(-mv_ t)$ by Faà di Bruno's formula. Define operators on $V_ m$ by

\[ \mathcal T_{t,j}u=-P_{v_ t}\bigl (\mathcal B_ j(-mv_ t)u\bigr ), \qquad u\in V_ m. \]

For $k\geq 1$, let $\Lambda _ k$ be the set of compositions of $k$, that is, of ordered tuples $\alpha =(\alpha _1,\ldots ,\alpha _ p)$ of positive integers with sum $k$, and set $\alpha !=\prod _{j=1}^ p\alpha _ j!$.

Theorem 18.34.6.F82E8E685FEA For every $k\geq 1$,

59C2D7B608B5 18.34.7
\begin{equation} \partial _ t^ k k_{v_ t,x} =\sum _{\alpha \in \Lambda _ k}\frac{k!}{\alpha !} \mathcal T_{t,\alpha _ p}\cdots \mathcal T_{t,\alpha _1}k_{v_ t,x}. \end{equation}

Suppose moreover that $s\geq 1$, that $J\Subset I$ is a compact interval, and that constants $A,R>0$ satisfy

\[ \sup _{t\in J}\| \partial _ t^ jv_ t\| _\infty \leq AR^ j(j!)^ s\qquad (j\geq 1). \]

Then there are constants $C,L>0$, depending only on the fixed data and on $m,r,J,A,R,s$, such that

1BF37D25A2C8 18.34.8
\begin{equation} \sup _{t\in J} \left(\| \partial _ t^ kB_{v_ t}\| _\infty +\| \partial _ t^ k\beta _{v_ t}\| _{\mathrm{TV}}\right) \leq CL^ k(k!)^ s\qquad (k\geq 0). \end{equation}

Thus the kernel and the kernel measure are of Gevrey class $s$ in the parameter.

Proof. The derivative formula. By proposition 18.34.5, $k_{v_ t,x}$ depends smoothly on $t$, for any fixed norm on $V_ m$. Fix a real parameter $t$ and set

\[ H(a)=P_{v_ t}\bigl (\mathrm{e}^{-m(v_{t+a}-v_ t)}\, \cdot \, \bigr )|_{V_ m}. \]

Then $H(0)=I$, $H^{(j)}(0)=-\mathcal T_{t,j}$ by Faà di Bruno's formula, and $k_{v_{t+a},x}=H(a)^{-1}k_{v_ t,x}$ as in the proof of proposition 18.34.5. Since $H(a)-I=O(|a|)$, truncating the Neumann series of $H(a)^{-1}$ after $k$ powers leaves a remainder $O(|a|^{k+1})$. Expanding the truncated series to order $k$ in $a$ gives (18.34.7), with its ordered products and coefficients $k!/\alpha !$. Only a finite Taylor jet of the smooth curve is used.

Gevrey bounds. For nonnegative integers $n_\ell $ with $\sum \ell n_\ell =j$,

\[ \prod _{\ell =1}^ j(\ell !)^{(s-1)n_\ell } \leq (j!)^{s-1}. \]

The sum $\sum \prod _\ell (n_\ell !)^{-1}$ over these tuples is the coefficient of $z^ j$ in $\exp (z/(1-z))$, and evaluation at $z=1/2$ shows that it is at most $\mathrm{e}\, 2^ j$. Together with the assumed bounds this gives

\[ \sup _{t\in J}\| \mathcal B_ j(-mv_ t)\| _\infty \leq L_0^ j(j!)^ s \]

for some $L_0>0$. Since $P_{v_ t}$ is a contraction, each ordered product in (18.34.7) has operator norm at most $L_0^ k(\alpha !)^ s$. There are $2^{k-1}$ compositions of $k$, and $\alpha !\leq k!$. Since $v_ t$ is uniformly bounded for $t\in J$, the norms $\| \cdot \| _{m,v_ t,\nu }$ are uniformly equivalent, and the evaluations and Riesz vectors are bounded uniformly on $J\times X$. Hence the $t$-derivatives of the unweighted diagonal $x\mapsto \ell _ x(k_{v_ t,x})$ are bounded in $C(X)$ by $C(2L_0)^ k(k!)^ s$. The factor $\mathrm{e}^{-mv_ t}$ satisfies bounds of the same Gevrey order, by the estimate for $\mathcal B_ j(-mv_ t)$. Leibniz's formula and $j!(k-j)!\leq k!$ then give (18.34.8) for $B_{v_ t}$, and the bounded linear map $B\mapsto (r!/m^ r)B\nu $ gives the bound in total variation. $\square$

Corollary 18.34.9.7733E1B20E7B Let $v_ t=v+tq$ with $v,q\in C(X,\mathbb R)$. For $x\notin Z_ m$, the probability measure

F73FC2DA9CA6 18.34.10
\begin{equation} \mathrm{d}\sigma _{t,x}(y) =\frac{|k_{v_ t,x}(y)|_{h^ m}^2\mathrm{e}^{-mv_ t(y)}}{\| k_{v_ t,x}\| _{m,v_ t,\nu }^2}\, \mathrm{d}\nu (y) \end{equation}

satisfies

CDF008B0B2C7 18.34.11
\begin{equation} \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\log B_{v_ t}(x) =m\left(\int _ Xq\, \mathrm{d}\sigma _{t,x}-q(x)\right). \end{equation}

On $Z_ m$ the kernel and all its $t$-derivatives vanish. Moreover, $\int _ X\partial _ tB_{v_ t}\, \mathrm{d}\nu =0$.

Proof. Since $\mathcal T_{t,1}u=mP_{v_ t}(qu)$, the case $k=1$ of (18.34.7) gives $\partial _ tk_{v_ t,x}=mP_{v_ t}(qk_{v_ t,x})$. Applying the fixed evaluation $\ell _ x$ and the Riesz identity gives

\[ \partial _ t\ell _ x(k_{v_ t,x}) =m\int _ Xq|k_{v_ t,x}|_{h^ m}^2 \mathrm{e}^{-mv_ t}\, \mathrm{d}\nu . \]

Dividing by the positive number $\ell _ x(k_{v_ t,x})=\| k_{v_ t,x}\| _{m,v_ t,\nu }^2$ and differentiating the factor $\mathrm{e}^{-mv_ t(x)}$ in (18.34.4) proves (18.34.11); the density in (18.34.10) has integral one by the definition of the norm. At points of $Z_ m$ the evaluations and Riesz vectors vanish for every weight. Finally, differentiating the identity $\int _ XB_{v_ t}\, \mathrm{d}\nu =N_ m$ in $C(X)$ proves the last assertion. For constant $q$ the right-hand side of (18.34.11) vanishes, in accordance with the invariance of the kernel under adding a constant to the weight. $\square$

The uniform norm on the weights is essential in these results, because it controls the weight on the whole region of integration. The next example shows that real-analytic dependence of the weight on a parameter at each interior point of a domain does not suffice.

Example 18.34.12.5DA140DF64C6 On the unit disk $D\subset \mathbb C$ with Euclidean area $\mathrm{d}A$, let $K_ t$ be the Bergman kernel of the Hilbert space of holomorphic functions $f$ on $D$ with the norm $(\int _ D|f|^2\rho _ t\, \mathrm{d}A)^{1/2}$, where

\[ \rho _ t(z)=1+\frac{t^2}{(1-|z|^2)^2+t^2},\qquad t\in \mathbb R. \]

The weights $-\log \rho _ t$ are bounded and depend real analytically on $(z,t)\in D\times \mathbb R$, but

8F78E08AD393 18.34.13
\begin{equation} K_ t(0,0)= \begin{cases} [\pi (1+|t|\arctan (1/|t|))]^{-1},& t\ne 0,\\ \pi ^{-1},& t=0. \end{cases} \end{equation}

In particular, $K_ t(0,0)=\pi ^{-1}-|t|/2+O(t^2)$, so $K_ t(0,0)$ is not differentiable at $t=0$.

Proof. The density $\rho _ t$ is radial and lies between one and two. By radial symmetry, the constant functions are orthogonal to the holomorphic functions vanishing at the origin, so the reproducing value at the center is the reciprocal of $\int _ D\rho _ t\, \mathrm{d}A$. Polar coordinates and the substitution $a=1-r^2$ give, for $t\ne 0$,

\[ \int _ D\rho _ t\, \mathrm{d}A =\pi \int _0^1\left(1+\frac{t^2}{a^2+t^2}\right)\mathrm{d}a =\pi \bigl (1+|t|\arctan (1/|t|)\bigr ). \]

For $t=0$ the integral is $\pi $. This proves (18.34.13) and the expansion. For every $t\ne 0$ we have $\| \log \rho _ t\| _{L^\infty (D)}=\log 2$, whereas $\rho _0=1$. Thus the curve $t\mapsto \log \rho _ t$ is not continuous at $t=0$ for the uniform norm, and the example does not contradict proposition 18.34.5. $\square$

Throughout these estimates the degree $m$ and the selected space were fixed, and the constants depend on $m$. A limit envelope need not even be differentiable in the weight, as the corner in example 16.28.40 shows; differentiating limits would require estimates uniform in $m$.

18.34.14 Stability of normalized kernels2BFA87C25210

The total mass of $B_ v\nu $ is the dimension of the selected space, so dividing by this dimension gives probability measures whose dependence on the weight can be controlled independently of the dimension. The squared reproducing kernel defines a symmetric coupling of such a probability measure with itself, and the positivity of the associated Markov operator sharpens the resulting variation bound to an optimal one.

Keep the fixed data of subsection 18.34.3, and assume $N_ m>0$. For each real $v\in C(X)$, the normalized kernel probability is

8B5886BCBD7B 18.34.15
\begin{equation} \mu _ v=\frac{B_ v}{N_ m}\nu . \end{equation}

Choose an orthonormal basis $s_1,\ldots ,s_{N_ m}$ of $V_ m$ for the weight $v$, and use the unit evaluations $\ell _ x$ of subsection 18.34.3 to set

\[ F_ i(x)=\mathrm{e}^{-mv(x)/2}\ell _ x(s_ i),\qquad C_ v(x,y)=\sum _ i F_ i(x)\overline{F_ i(y)}. \]

The function $C_ v$ depends on the phases of the evaluations, but $|C_ v|$ does not. For $x\notin Z_ m$ let $\sigma _{v,x}$ be the probability measure (18.34.10) at the weight $v$, and define

\[ \mathcal Q_ v f(x)=\int _ X f(y)\, \mathrm{d}\sigma _{v,x}(y); \]

on $Z_ m$, which is a $\mu _ v$-null set, put $\mathcal Q_ vf=0$.

Lemma 18.34.16.66CB6C16A6B7 The measure

A9FF4DD46DA7 18.34.17
\begin{equation} \mathrm{d}J_ v(x,y)=\frac{|C_ v(x,y)|^2}{N_ m} \, \mathrm{d}\nu (x)\, \mathrm{d}\nu (y) \end{equation}

on $X\times X$ is a symmetric probability measure whose two marginals are equal to $\mu _ v$. The operator $\mathcal Q_ v$ is a selfadjoint, positive semidefinite contraction of $L^2(\mu _ v)$; it fixes the constant functions $\mu _ v$-almost everywhere and preserves integrals against $\mu _ v$.

Proof. Orthonormality gives $\int _ X|C_ v(x,y)|^2\, \mathrm{d}\nu (y)=B_ v(x)$, so the first marginal of $J_ v$ is $\mu _ v$. By symmetry so is the second, and the total mass identity shows that $J_ v$ has mass one. Off $Z_ m$, dividing $|C_ v(x,\cdot )|^2\, \mathrm{d}\nu $ by $B_ v(x)$ gives the squared Riesz-vector density in (18.34.10). Thus the probabilities $\sigma _{v,x}$ are the conditional probabilities of $J_ v$ given the first coordinate, and $\mathcal Q_ v$ is the associated Markov operator. Since these conditional probabilities have mass one and the marginal of $J_ v$ is $\mu _ v$, the operator $\mathcal Q_ v$ fixes constants and preserves integrals; Jensen's inequality shows that it is a contraction of $L^2(\mu _ v)$, and the symmetry of $J_ v$ shows that it is selfadjoint. For $f\in L^2(\mu _ v)$, expanding the finite sum gives

\[ \langle \mathcal Q_ v f,f\rangle _{L^2(\mu _ v)} =\frac1{N_ m}\sum _{i,j} \left|\int _ X fF_ i\overline{F_ j}\, \mathrm{d}\nu \right|^2\geq 0. \]

Each of these integrals is independent of the phases, and it exists because $|F_ i\overline{F_ j}|\leq B_ v$ and $f\in L^1(\mu _ v)$. This proves positivity. $\square$

For $v,q\in C(X,\mathbb R)$ we write $D\mu _ v[q]$ for the derivative of $t\mapsto \mu _{v+tq}$ at $t=0$ in total variation, which exists by proposition 18.34.5.

Proposition 18.34.18.4920A08E02F1 For $q,v,w\in C(X,\mathbb R)$, write $\operatorname {osc}_ Xq=\sup _ Xq-\inf _ Xq$. Then

5CBC01E88DA5 18.34.19
\begin{equation} D\mu _ v[q]=m(\mathcal Q_ vq-q)\mu _ v, \qquad \| D\mu _ v[q]\| _{\mathrm{TV}} \leq \frac m2\operatorname {osc}_ Xq. \end{equation}

Consequently

E8E6AD8629D0 18.34.20
\begin{equation} \| \mu _ w-\mu _ v\| _{\mathrm{TV}} \leq 2\tanh \left(\frac m4\operatorname {osc}_ X(w-v)\right). \end{equation}

These bounds do not depend on $N_ m$. In particular, let $v_ m,w_ m\in C(X,\mathbb R)$ along a sequence of degrees with nonzero selected spaces. If $m\operatorname {osc}_ X(w_ m-v_ m)\to 0$, then the two sequences of normalized kernel probabilities have the same weak, or total variation, limit whenever one of them converges in that topology.

Proof. The formula for $D\mu _ v[q]$ follows from corollary 18.34.9, since $N_ m$ does not depend on the weight. For the bound, put $g=q-\mathcal Q_ vq$, $A=\{ g>0\} $ and $p=\mu _ v(A)$. Since $\mathcal Q_ v$ preserves integrals, $g$ has mean zero, and selfadjointness gives

\[ \int _ Ag\, \mathrm{d}\mu _ v =\langle q,(I-\mathcal Q_ v)\mathbf1_ A\rangle _{L^2(\mu _ v)}. \]

The function $(I-\mathcal Q_ v)\mathbf1_ A$ is nonnegative on $A$ and nonpositive on its complement, almost everywhere, and its integral is zero. Subtracting $\inf _ Xq$ from $q$ does not change the pairing, which is therefore at most

\[ \operatorname {osc}_ Xq \bigl (p-\langle \mathbf1_ A,\mathcal Q_ v\mathbf1_ A\rangle \bigr ). \]

Positivity of $\mathcal Q_ v$, applied to $\mathbf1_ A-p$, gives $\langle \mathbf1_ A,\mathcal Q_ v\mathbf1_ A\rangle \geq p^2$: since $\mathcal Q_ v$ fixes constants and preserves integrals, $\langle \mathbf1_ A-p,\mathcal Q_ v(\mathbf1_ A-p)\rangle =\langle \mathbf1_ A,\mathcal Q_ v\mathbf1_ A\rangle -p^2$. As $g$ has mean zero, it follows that

\[ \| g\| _{L^1(\mu _ v)} =2\int _ Ag\, \mathrm{d}\mu _ v \leq 2\operatorname {osc}_ Xq\, p(1-p) \leq \tfrac 12\operatorname {osc}_ Xq. \]

The total variation norm of a signed measure is the integral of the absolute value of its density, so $\| D\mu _ v[q]\| _{\mathrm{TV}}=m\| g\| _{L^1(\mu _ v)}$, and (18.34.19) follows.

For the global estimate, take $q=w-v$, $v_ t=v+tq$, $\mu _ t=\mu _{v_ t}$ and $\mathcal Q_ t=\mathcal Q_{v_ t}$ for $0\leq t\leq 1$, and put $a=m\operatorname {osc}_ Xq$. For a Borel set $E$, the function $p_ t=\mu _ t(E)$ is differentiable, because integration against $\mathbf1_ E$ is a bounded linear functional for the total variation norm, and selfadjointness gives

\[ p'_ t=-m\langle q,(I-\mathcal Q_ t)\mathbf1_ E\rangle _{L^2(\mu _ t)}. \]

The function $(I-\mathcal Q_ t)\mathbf1_ E$ has positive and negative parts whose integrals both equal $p_ t-\langle \mathbf1_ E,\mathcal Q_ t\mathbf1_ E\rangle $. Bounding $q$ above and below on the supports of these parts, and applying positivity to $\mathbf1_ E-p_ t$ as before, we obtain

\[ |p'_ t|\leq a\bigl (p_ t-\langle \mathbf1_ E,\mathcal Q_ t\mathbf1_ E\rangle \bigr ) \leq ap_ t(1-p_ t). \]

All the kernels $B_{v_ t}$ are positive exactly off the common zero set $Z_ m$, so the probabilities $\mu _ t$ are mutually absolutely continuous. Hence, if $p_0$ is zero or one, then $p_ t=p_0$ for all $t$. Otherwise $0<p_ t<1$ for all $t$, and integration gives

\[ \left|\log \frac{p_1}{1-p_1}-\log \frac{p_0}{1-p_0}\right|\leq a. \]

Let $\sigma (z)=\mathrm{e}^ z/(1+\mathrm{e}^ z)$ be the logistic function. If $p_1\geq p_0$ and $z=\log (p_0/(1-p_0))$, then

\[ p_1-p_0\leq \sigma (z+a)-\sigma (z) =\frac{\sinh (a/2)}{\cosh (z+a/2)+\cosh (a/2)} \leq \tanh (a/4). \]

The case $p_1\leq p_0$ is symmetric. Since $\mu _ w-\mu _ v$ has total mass zero, its total variation norm is $2\sup _ E|\mu _ w(E)-\mu _ v(E)|$, which proves (18.34.20). Under the hypothesis of the last assertion the right-hand side tends to zero, which gives the final statement. $\square$

Example 18.34.21.A118D36549FE For each $a>0$ and $m\geq 1$, the bound (18.34.20) is optimal as a supremum over smooth weights, already for a selected space of dimension one. Indeed, let $X=\mathbb P^1$ with the trivial line bundle and its trivial metric, take the selecting potential zero, and let $\nu $ be the Fubini–Study area normalized to mass one. Then there are smooth real weights $w_ j$ with $m\operatorname {osc}_ Xw_ j=a$ such that

\[ \| \mu _{w_ j}-\mu _0\| _{\mathrm{TV}}\longrightarrow 2\tanh (a/4). \]

Proof. The selected space consists of the constant functions, so the normalized kernel probability at a weight $u$ is $\mathrm{e}^{-mu}\nu /\int _ X\mathrm{e}^{-mu}\, \mathrm{d}\nu $. Choose a spherical cap $E$ with $\nu (E)=p=(1+\mathrm{e}^{a/2})^{-1}$; its boundary circle has zero area. Choose smooth functions $0\leq \chi _ j\leq 1$, equal to one on an inner cap and zero outside an outer cap, converging almost everywhere to $\mathbf1_ E$; each has oscillation one. Put $w_ j=-a\chi _ j/m$. The densities $\mathrm{e}^{a\chi _ j}$ converge boundedly almost everywhere, and their normalizing constants converge to a positive limit, so $\mu _{w_ j}$ converges in total variation to

\[ \frac{\mathrm{e}^{a\mathbf1_ E}}{Z}\nu , \qquad Z=1-p+\mathrm{e}^ ap=\mathrm{e}^{a/2}. \]

This limit gives $E$ the mass $1-p$, and its density with respect to $\nu $ is greater than one on $E$ and less than one outside $E$. Its total variation distance from $\nu =\mu _0$ is therefore $2(1-2p)=2\tanh (a/4)$. The triangle inequality transfers this limit to the measures $\mu _{w_ j}$. This shows that the bound is optimal as a supremum; we do not claim that it is attained by a smooth weight. $\square$

At the scale of perturbations of size $1/m$, the analytic dependence on the weight is also controlled independently of the dimension of the selected space.

Proposition 18.34.22.4F99D774A693 Put $\rho =\log (3/2)$. The map $f\mapsto \mu _{v+f/m}$ extends holomorphically to the ball $\{ f\in C(X,\mathbb C):\| f\| _\infty <\rho \} $, with values in complex measures of total variation at most three. For real $q\in C(X)$ and $k\geq 1$,

961FF4CC03F6 18.34.23
\begin{equation} \left\| \left.\frac{\mathrm{d}^ k}{\mathrm{d}t^ k}\right|_{t=0} \mu _{v+tq}\right\| _{\mathrm{TV}} \leq 3k!\left(\frac{m\operatorname {osc}_ Xq}{2\rho }\right)^ k. \end{equation}

The radius $\rho $ and the bound three do not depend on $m$, $N_ m$ or the real base weight $v$.

Proof. On $V_ m$ use $T(f)=P_ v(\mathrm{e}^{-f}\, \cdot \, )$, the operator in the proof of proposition 18.34.5 for the perturbation $f/m$ of the weight $v$. That proof gives $\| T(f)^{-1}\| \leq 2$ on the ball. The extended measure has the density

\[ \frac{\mathrm{e}^{-mv(x)-f(x)}}{N_ m} \ell _ x\bigl (T(f)^{-1}k_{v,x}\bigr ) \]

with respect to $\nu $. By the Riesz identity at the weight $v$, its absolute value is at most $2\mathrm{e}^{\| f\| _\infty }B_ v(x)/N_ m\leq 3B_ v(x)/N_ m$, so its total variation is at most three. Holomorphy follows from the same finite-dimensional construction and the bounded linear passage from densities to measures. For a complex constant $c$ we have $T(f+c)=\mathrm{e}^{-c}T(f)$, and the resulting factor $\mathrm{e}^{c}$ cancels the factor $\mathrm{e}^{-c}$ in the density; thus adding constants to $f$ does not change the extension. For nonconstant real $q$, replace $q$ by $q-c$ with $c=(\sup _ Xq+\inf _ Xq)/2$, so that $\| q-c\| _\infty =\operatorname {osc}_ Xq/2$. Then $t\mapsto \mu _{v+tq}$ extends holomorphically to the disk $|t|<\rho /(m\| q-c\| _\infty )$, with total variation at most three. The Cauchy estimates for Banach-valued holomorphic functions, applied on circles of radius less than $\rho /(m\| q-c\| _\infty )$, followed by letting the radius increase to that value, prove (18.34.23). If $q$ is constant, the measure does not depend on $t$, and all derivatives vanish. $\square$

The hypothesis $m\operatorname {osc}_ X(w_ m-v_ m)\to 0$ in proposition 18.34.18 cannot in general be replaced by uniform convergence $w_ m-v_ m\to 0$: a perturbation of order $1/m$ along the fibers of a product survives in a nonzero measure limit.

Example 18.34.24.00C65C3DCEEB Let $Y$ be a connected compact complex manifold of positive dimension with a smooth positive probability volume $\nu _ Y$. On $X=\mathbb P^1\times Y$, use the pullback of $\mathcal O(1)$ with its Fubini–Study metric, the selecting potential zero, and the volume $\nu =\nu _{\mathrm{FS}}\otimes \nu _ Y$, where $\nu _{\mathrm{FS}}$ is the Fubini–Study area of mass one. Choose a nonconstant $q\in C(Y,\mathbb R)$ and put

\[ v_ m(b,y)=q(y)/m,\qquad Z_ q=\int _ Y\mathrm{e}^{-q}\, \mathrm{d}\nu _ Y,\qquad \nu _ q=Z_ q^{-1}\mathrm{e}^{-q}\nu _ Y. \]

Then $N_ m=m+1$ and, for every $m$, the kernel and the normalized kernel probability at the weight $v_ m$ are

53B83B2F665D 18.34.25
\begin{equation} B_{m,v_ m}(b,y)=(m+1)\frac{\mathrm{e}^{-q(y)}}{Z_ q}, \qquad \mu _{m,v_ m}=\nu _{\mathrm{FS}}\otimes \nu _ q. \end{equation}

Thus $v_ m\to 0$ uniformly, but the kernel measures with $r=1$ converge in total variation to $\nu _{\mathrm{FS}}\otimes \nu _ q$, whereas at the weight zero the limit is $\nu _{\mathrm{FS}}\otimes \nu _ Y$. In both cases the potentials $m^{-1}\log B_{m,v}$ tend uniformly to zero. With the normalization by the dimension of $X$, both sequences of kernel measures tend to zero in total variation.

Proof. Every section descends to $\mathbb P^1$, because the fibers $\{ b\} \times Y$ are compact and connected, as in proposition 18.36.1. Hence the selected space is $H^0(\mathbb P^1,\mathcal O(m))$, of dimension $m+1$. Its unweighted Bergman kernel for $\nu _{\mathrm{FS}}$ is constant, since the unitary group acts transitively on $\mathbb P^1$ and preserves the metric and the volume; its integral $m+1$ determines the constant. For a section pulled back from $\mathbb P^1$, the norm on $X$ at the weight $v_ m$ is $Z_ q$ times the norm on $\mathbb P^1$, which proves (18.34.25). At the weight zero the normalized kernel probability is $\nu _{\mathrm{FS}}\otimes \nu _ Y$. These probabilities differ: equality would force $\mathrm{e}^{-q}/Z_ q=1$ almost everywhere, and then everywhere, because $q$ is continuous and every nonempty open set has positive volume; this contradicts the choice of $q$. The kernel measures with $r=1$ are $(m+1)/m$ times these probabilities, and the normalization in dimension $1+\dim Y\geq 2$ gives measures tending to zero in total variation. Finally, $m^{-1}\log B_{m,v_ m}=m^{-1}\bigl (\log (m+1)-q-\log Z_ q\bigr )$ and $m^{-1}\log B_{m,0}=m^{-1}\log (m+1)$ both tend uniformly to zero. $\square$

The same phenomenon, in which a fiber probability survives in the limit, reappears in section 18.40, where the limit measure on the total space carries the conditional fiber probabilities of the integration volume. So far the norm varied within a fixed selected space. Under a modification the integrability condition changes as well, and the next section compares both the selected spaces and their norms.

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.