Pome

18.41 Degenerate curvature and growing vanishing orders99460DD0DBB7

99460DD0DBB7

In the compact models above, the vanishing orders are proportional to the tensor degree. To see the transition when the order grows more slowly, we pass to a model space of entire functions. There the local metric fixes the scale of the full kernel, while the selecting ideal creates a second, larger radius. Grouping the monomials according to the residues of their degrees expresses the transition at that radius through Poisson tails.

In this section $r$ and $q$ denote new integers. Fix an integer $r\geq 1$. On $\mathbb C$, with coordinate $z=x+\mathrm{i}y$ and area measure $\mathrm{d}A=\mathrm{d}x\, \mathrm{d}y$, put $\phi (z)=|z|^{2r}$. For a real $m>0$, let $H_{m,r}$ be the Hilbert space of entire functions with norm

\[ \| f\| _{m,r}^2=\int _{\mathbb C}|f|^2\mathrm{e}^{-m\phi }\, \mathrm{d}A. \]

For an integer $q\geq 0$, let $H_{m,r}^{(q)}$ consist of the functions vanishing to order at least $q$ at zero. Since the weight is bounded below on each fixed disk, the local submean and Cauchy inequalities bound point and jet evaluations, so this subspace is closed. Write $K_{m,r}^{(q)}(z,w)$ for its reproducing kernel, holomorphic in $z$ and antiholomorphic in $w$, and put

\[ B_{m,r}^{(q)}(z)=\mathrm{e}^{-m\phi (z)}K_{m,r}^{(q)}(z,z). \]

Thus the ideal $(z^ q)$ selects the functions, while the smooth weight determines the norm. We use $\Gamma (a)=\int _0^\infty t^{a-1}\mathrm{e}^{-t}\, \mathrm{d}t$ for $a>0$.

Proposition 18.41.1.85EDCA2D872C For every $m>0$ and integer $q\geq 0$,

33E9A1B502F8 18.41.2
\begin{equation} K_{m,r}^{(q)}(z,w)=\frac r\pi \sum _{k=q}^\infty \frac{m^{(k+1)/r}(z\bar w)^ k}{\Gamma ((k+1)/r)}. \end{equation}

The series and all its derivatives converge uniformly on compact sets. For $\zeta \in \mathbb C$,

EF4D2AABC4A8 18.41.3
\begin{equation} m^{-1/r}B_{m,r}^{(q)}(m^{-1/(2r)}\zeta ) =\frac r\pi \mathrm{e}^{-|\zeta |^{2r}} \sum _{k=q}^\infty \frac{|\zeta |^{2k}}{\Gamma ((k+1)/r)}. \end{equation}

Consequently, if $m$ tends to infinity through positive integers and $q=q_ m\to \infty $, the left side tends to zero uniformly on compact $\zeta $-sets.

Proof. The monomials are orthogonal by rotational invariance. For every integer $k\geq 0$, polar integration with radial variable $\rho $ and the substitution $t=m\rho ^{2r}$ give

\[ \| z^ k\| _{m,r}^2=2\pi \int _0^\infty \rho ^{2k+1}\mathrm{e}^{-m\rho ^{2r}}\, \mathrm{d}\rho =\frac\pi r m^{-(k+1)/r}\Gamma ((k+1)/r). \]

For an entire function $f(z)=\sum _{k\geq 0}a_ kz^ k$, Parseval's identity on circles and Tonelli's theorem yield $\| f\| _{m,r}^2=\sum _{k\geq 0}|a_ k|^2\| z^ k\| _{m,r}^2$. Thus the normalized monomials form an orthonormal basis, and those with $k\geq q$ form an orthonormal basis of the selected subspace. This proves (18.41.2). By Stirling's formula, the reciprocal Gamma coefficients decay faster than every fixed geometric progression, even after multiplication by any fixed power of $k$; this gives uniform convergence on compact sets together with all derivatives. Substituting $z=w=m^{-1/(2r)}\zeta $ gives (18.41.3). On a disk $|\zeta |\leq R$ of fixed radius, the series in (18.41.3) is bounded by the tail, from the index $q$ on, of the convergent series with $|\zeta |$ replaced by $R$. This tail tends to zero as $q\to \infty $, proving the last assertion. $\square$

For $r=1$ and $q=0$ the density is the constant $m/\pi $. For general $r$ and $q=0$ its value at zero is $rm^{1/r}/(\pi \Gamma (1/r))$, whereas it vanishes at zero when $q>0$. The scale $m^{-1/(2r)}$ therefore describes fixed vanishing orders, but a growing order requires a further rescaling.

18.41.4 A uniform tail estimateEB75AE06118D

Grouping the monomial degrees by their residues modulo $r$ expresses the kernel through weighted Poisson tails. The estimate of Gamma ratios below removes those weights, with an error independent of the vanishing threshold.

Write $\mathbb P$ and $\mathbb E$ for probability and expectation. For $T>0$, let $N_ T$ be a Poisson random variable with parameter $T$, so that $\mathbb P(N_ T=\ell )=\mathrm{e}^{-T}T^\ell /\ell !$ for integers $\ell \geq 0$. For a real $0<\alpha \leq 1$, define

\[ w_{\alpha ,T}(\ell )=T^{\alpha -1}\frac{\Gamma (\ell +1)}{\Gamma (\ell +\alpha )}. \]

All constants in the next lemma may depend on $\alpha $, but not on $T$.

Lemma 18.41.5.44E50E6CAEB1 There is a constant $C_\alpha >0$ such that, for $T\geq 1$,

\[ \mathbb E\bigl |w_{\alpha ,T}(N_ T)-1\bigr |\leq C_\alpha T^{-1/2}. \]

Proof. Recall that $\mathbb E N_ T=T$ and $\operatorname {Var}(N_ T)=T$. Stirling's formula, applied to the ratio of Gamma functions, gives

\[ \begin{aligned} \frac{\Gamma (\ell +1)}{\Gamma (\ell +\alpha )} & =\ell ^{1-\alpha }(1+O_\alpha (\ell ^{-1}))& & \quad (\ell \to \infty ),\\ \frac{\Gamma (\ell +1)}{\Gamma (\ell +\alpha )} & \leq C_\alpha (\ell +1)^{1-\alpha }& & \quad (\ell \geq 0). \end{aligned} \]

The second bound follows from the first after the constant is increased to account for finitely many small integers. Since $0\leq 1-\alpha <1$, it implies

\[ w_{\alpha ,T}(\ell )\leq C_\alpha \left(1+\frac{\ell +1}{T}\right), \qquad \mathbb E(w_{\alpha ,T}(N_ T)+1)^2\leq C_\alpha \quad (T\geq 1). \]

For $T\geq 2$, consider the event $E_ T=\{ |N_ T-T|\leq T/2\} $. On this event, the expansion of the Gamma ratio and the bounded derivative of $s\mapsto s^{1-\alpha }$ on $[1/2,3/2]$ give

\[ |w_{\alpha ,T}(N_ T)-1| \leq C_\alpha \left(\frac{|N_ T-T|}{T}+\frac1T\right). \]

By the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, its expectation is at most $C_\alpha T^{-1/2}$. On the complement, Chebyshev's inequality gives $\mathbb P(E_ T^ c)\leq 4/T$, and the preceding second-moment bound together with the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality gives the same estimate for the contribution of $E_ T^ c$. Enlarging the constant handles $1\leq T\leq 2$. $\square$

For integers $q\geq 0$ and $0\leq s<r$, put

\[ L_ s(q)=\left\lceil \frac{q-s}{r}\right\rceil \geq 0. \]

If a monomial degree is written as $k=r\ell +s$, the condition $k\geq q$ becomes $\ell \geq L_ s(q)$.

Proposition 18.41.6.79BA8CB51C0E There is a constant $C_ r>0$, depending only on $r$, such that for $m>0$, $z\ne 0$ and $T=m|z|^{2r}\geq 1$,

69B0FF116418 18.41.7
\begin{equation} \left|\frac{\pi B_{m,r}^{(q)}(z)}{mr^2|z|^{2r-2}} -\frac1r\sum _{s=0}^{r-1}\mathbb P\{ N_ T\geq L_ s(q)\} \right| \leq C_ r T^{-1/2} \quad (q\geq 0). \end{equation}

In particular, the error is uniform in the vanishing order $q$.

Proof. Let $\rho =|z|>0$ and put $\alpha _ s=(s+1)/r$ for integers $0\leq s<r$. Grouping the positive series (18.41.2) by the residues $s$ and using $T=m\rho ^{2r}$, we obtain the exact identity

\[ \begin{split} B_{m,r}^{(q)}(z) & =\frac r{\pi \rho ^2}\sum _{s=0}^{r-1} \mathrm{e}^{-T}\sum _{\ell \geq L_ s(q)} \frac{T^{\ell +\alpha _ s}}{\Gamma (\ell +\alpha _ s)}\\ & =\frac{rT}{\pi \rho ^2}\sum _{s=0}^{r-1} \mathbb E\bigl [w_{\alpha _ s,T}(N_ T) \mathbf1_{\{ N_ T\geq L_ s(q)\} }\bigr ]. \end{split} \]

Divide by $mr^2\rho ^{2r-2}/\pi =r^2T/(\pi \rho ^2)$ and apply lemma 18.41.5 to each of the finitely many residues. Since the indicators are bounded by one independently of their thresholds, the resulting error is uniform in $q$. $\square$

18.41.8 The limiting envelope and the transition scale3F7E1C843ABB

A vanishing order proportional to $m$ removes the kernel density inside a fixed circle. Inside that circle the limit of the potentials is logarithmic, and outside it agrees with the smooth weight. Throughout this subsection, $m$ tends to infinity through positive integers. For $\lambda >0$, set $q_ m=\lfloor m\lambda \rfloor $ and $R_\lambda =(\lambda /r)^{1/(2r)}$. Define

\[ V_\lambda (z)= \begin{cases} |z|^{2r},& |z|\geq R_\lambda ,\\ \lambda \log (|z|^2/R_\lambda ^2)+\lambda /r,& 0<|z|<R_\lambda ,\\ -\infty ,& z=0. \end{cases} \]

In the following theorem, $\delta _0$ denotes the unit point mass at zero. Recall that in dimension one the non-pluripolar measure of a subharmonic function discards the mass carried by its polar set.

Theorem 18.41.9.313505FAE88E One has

\[ \frac1m\log K_{m,r}^{(q_ m)}(z,z)\longrightarrow V_\lambda (z) \]

pointwise with extended values and in $L^1_{\mathrm{loc}}(\mathbb C)$. The kernel measures converge locally in total variation:

F26D2556A21E 18.41.10
\begin{equation} \frac1m B_{m,r}^{(q_ m)}\, \mathrm{d}A \longrightarrow \mathbf1_{\{ |z|>R_\lambda \} }\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\phi . \end{equation}

The function $V_\lambda $ is the largest subharmonic function $v$ on $\mathbb C$ such that $v\leq \phi $ and $v(z)\leq \lambda \log |z|^2+C$ near zero for some constant $C$. Its curvature current is

80FF36412E91 18.41.11
\begin{equation} \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}V_\lambda =\lambda \delta _0+ \mathbf1_{\{ |z|>R_\lambda \} }\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\phi . \end{equation}

Thus the limit in (18.41.10) is the non-pluripolar measure of this envelope, rather than its full distributional Laplacian.

Proof. For fixed $z\ne 0$, put $\rho =|z|$ and $T=m\rho ^{2r}$. Then $L_ s(q_ m)/T\to \lambda /(r\rho ^{2r})$, and this limit differs from one when $\rho \neq R_\lambda $. Chebyshev's inequality and (18.41.7) therefore give

2C986E64C32E 18.41.12
\begin{equation} \frac1m B_{m,r}^{(q_ m)}(z)\longrightarrow \begin{cases} 0,& 0<\rho <R_\lambda ,\\ r^2\rho ^{2r-2}/\pi ,& \rho >R_\lambda . \end{cases} \end{equation}

The selected density is at most the full density, that is, the density with $q=0$. When $T\geq 1$, the same comparison with $q=0$ bounds it by $C_ r m\rho ^{2r-2}$; when $T\leq 1$, (18.41.3) with $q=0$ bounds it by $C_ r m^{1/r}\leq C_ r m$. Thus $m^{-1}B_{m,r}^{(q_ m)}$ is uniformly bounded on each compact set. Since the circle $\rho =R_\lambda $ and the origin have zero area, dominated convergence and $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\phi =(r^2/\pi )|z|^{2r-2}\mathrm{d}A$ prove (18.41.10).

To compute the limit of the potentials inside the circle, fix $0<\rho <R_\lambda $ and write

\[ d_{m,k}=\frac{m^{(k+1)/r}\rho ^{2k}}{\Gamma ((k+1)/r)} \quad (k\geq q_ m). \]

The estimate of Gamma ratios from Stirling's formula gives

\[ \frac{d_{m,k+1}}{d_{m,k}} \leq \left(\frac{rm\rho ^{2r}}{q_ m+1}\right)^{1/r} \left(1+\frac{C_ r}{q_ m+1}\right) \quad (k\geq q_ m) \]

for all sufficiently large $m$. The right side tends to $(r\rho ^{2r}/\lambda )^{1/r}<1$. Hence the sum of these terms lies between $d_{m,q_ m}$ and a fixed multiple of that term, and Stirling's formula yields

\[ \frac1m\log K_{m,r}^{(q_ m)}(z,z) \longrightarrow \lambda \log \rho ^2+ \frac\lambda r\bigl (1-\log (\lambda /r)\bigr ) =V_\lambda (z). \]

For $\rho >R_\lambda $, the limit of the densities in (18.41.12) is positive. Hence $m^{-1}\log B_{m,r}^{(q_ m)}(z)\to 0$, and therefore $m^{-1}\log K_{m,r}^{(q_ m)}(z,z)$ tends to $\phi (z)$.

At $\rho =R_\lambda $, put $k_ m=\max \{ q_ m,\lfloor rm\rho ^{2r}\rfloor \} $. Then $k_ m/m\to r\rho ^{2r}=\lambda $. The single monomial of degree $k_ m$ and Stirling's formula give $\liminf m^{-1}\log K_{m,r}^{(q_ m)}(z,z)\geq \phi (z)$, and the bound for the full kernel already proved gives the reverse inequality for the upper limit. At zero the selected kernel vanishes for all sufficiently large $m$. This proves pointwise convergence everywhere.

For local $L^1$ convergence, the bounds for the full kernel give a uniform upper bound for $m^{-1}\log K_{m,r}^{(q_ m)}(z,z)$ on each compact set. The single selected monomial of degree $q_ m$ gives the lower bound

\[ \frac1m\log K_{m,r}^{(q_ m)}(z,z) \geq c_ m+\frac{q_ m}{m}\log |z|^2, \]

where $c_ m$ is bounded as $m\to \infty $, again by Stirling's formula. Since $0\leq q_ m/m\leq \lambda $, the negative part on a fixed compact set is bounded by a constant plus $2\lambda |\log |z||$ near zero, which is locally integrable. Dominated convergence proves the $L^1_{\mathrm{loc}}$ assertion.

We turn to the envelope. The two radial expressions for $V_\lambda $ and their first radial derivatives agree at $R_\lambda $, because $rR_\lambda ^{2r}=\lambda $. Away from zero and that circle, direct differentiation proves (18.41.11). Since the first derivatives match, the circle carries no measure, and $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\log |z|^2=\delta _0$ gives the atom at zero. The right side is positive, so $V_\lambda $ is subharmonic. For $t=|z|^{2r}/(\lambda /r)<1$, the inequality $\log t+1\leq t$ proves $V_\lambda \leq \phi $ inside the circle; outside it there is equality.

Finally, let $v$ be subharmonic with $v\leq \phi $ and $v\leq \lambda \log |z|^2+C$ near zero. On the punctured disk $0<|z|<R_\lambda $, the function $v-\lambda \log |z|^2$ is subharmonic and bounded above near zero, so it extends subharmonically across zero. On the boundary circle it is at most $\lambda /r-\lambda \log R_\lambda ^2$, since $v\leq \phi =\lambda /r$ there. The maximum principle gives $v\leq V_\lambda $ inside the disk, and outside the disk this follows from $v\leq \phi $. Since $V_\lambda $ itself satisfies the conditions, it is the largest such function. Removing the atom at the pole gives the last assertion. $\square$

The measures in this theorem have infinite total mass on $\mathbb C$, so their convergence is asserted only on compact sets. The weighted potentials $m^{-1}\log B_{m,r}^{(q_ m)}$ converge to $V_\lambda -\phi $. The radius $R_\lambda $ is created by the selecting ideal even when $r=1$, whereas $r>1$ also reflects the curvature zero at the origin.

For any integer sequence $q_ m\to \infty $, the transition at the boundary circle is governed by the central limit theorem for the same Poisson tails. Let $\Phi $ be the standard Gaussian distribution function,

\[ \Phi (\tau )=\frac1{\sqrt{2\pi }}\int _{-\infty }^{\tau } \mathrm{e}^{-s^2/2}\, \mathrm{d}s \quad (\tau \in \mathbb R). \]

Proposition 18.41.13.2E997A26D38A Fix a real $\tau $. Choose $z_ m\ne 0$ with

\[ m|z_ m|^{2r}=\frac{q_ m}{r}+\tau \sqrt{\frac{q_ m}{r}}, \]

which is positive for all sufficiently large $m$. Then

\[ \frac{\pi B_{m,r}^{(q_ m)}(z_ m)}{mr^2|z_ m|^{2r-2}} \longrightarrow \Phi (\tau ). \]

In particular, this applies both when $q_ m/m\to \lambda >0$ and when $q_ m/m\to 0$.

Proof. We first recall the central limit theorem for Poisson variables in the form used here. For a fixed real $M>0$, Stirling's formula for $\ell !$ gives, uniformly over integers $\ell $ with $|\ell -T|\leq M\sqrt T$,

\[ \mathbb P(N_ T=\ell )=\frac1{\sqrt{2\pi T}} \exp \left(-\frac{(\ell -T)^2}{2T}\right) (1+O_ M(T^{-1/2}))\quad (T\to \infty ). \]

Indeed, insert the expansion of the factorial in $\mathrm{e}^{-T}T^\ell /\ell !$ and expand the logarithm in powers of $(\ell -T)/T$; the cubic remainder is $O_ M(T^{-1/2})$. Riemann sums over bounded intervals therefore converge to Gaussian integrals, and Chebyshev's bound $\mathbb P(|N_ T-T|>M\sqrt T)\leq M^{-2}$ then allows $M\to \infty $. Consequently, if real thresholds $a_ T$ satisfy $(a_ T-T)/\sqrt T\to a\in \mathbb R$, then $\mathbb P(N_ T\geq a_ T)\to 1-\Phi (a)$; rounding changes the normalized threshold by at most $T^{-1/2}$, and $\Phi $ is continuous.

Set $T_ m=m|z_ m|^{2r}$. Then $T_ m\to \infty $ and, for every integer $0\leq s<r$,

\[ \frac{L_ s(q_ m)-T_ m}{\sqrt{T_ m}}\longrightarrow -\tau . \]

Apply the preceding Poisson limit in (18.41.7). The uniform error there tends to zero, and each of the finitely many probabilities tends to $1-\Phi (-\tau )=\Phi (\tau )$. $\square$

For a sequence $q_ m\to \infty $, put $R_ m=(q_ m/(rm))^{1/(2r)}$. At fixed $\tau $, the radii in proposition 18.41.13 satisfy

\[ |z_ m|=R_ m\left(1+\frac{\tau }{2\sqrt{rq_ m}}+O_{r,\tau }(q_ m^{-1})\right). \]

If $q_ m=o(m)$, these radii tend to zero, while their ratio to the scale $m^{-1/(2r)}$ of the full kernel tends to infinity; when $r>1$, they shrink to a curvature zero. To transfer this transition to a compact manifold, both the local comparison of norms and the error of the global extension must be uniform in the growing vanishing order. The next section establishes both estimates on a curve.

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.