Pome

14.20 Uniqueness for degenerate equations6B1310DDF7B5

6B1310DDF7B5

Let $X$ be a connected compact complex manifold of dimension $n\geq 1$, let $\omega $ be a Hermitian form, and let $\mathrm dV$ be a smooth positive volume form. For a nonzero nonnegative density $f\in L^ p(X,\mathrm dV)$, $p>1$, the preceding chapter determines the constant $c$ in $(\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)^ n=cf\, \mathrm dV$. We now ask whether the potential is determined up to a constant.

For real potentials $u,v$, with the regularity stated in each result, set

\[ A=\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u,\qquad B=\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v,\qquad w=u-v, \qquad T=\sum _{j=0}^{n-1}A^ j\wedge B^{n-1-j}. \]

Then

2EA7CA32AE91 14.20.1
\begin{equation} \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w\wedge T=A^ n-B^ n. \end{equation}

For $A,B\geq 0$ with equal Monge–Ampère measures, $w$ solves $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w\wedge T=0$, whose cofactor may be degenerate or nonclosed. Coefficient products for Sobolev potentials are interpreted almost everywhere. For $C^{1,1}$ solutions with a common continuous density, perturbing $w$ locates its extrema in elliptic regions; the maximum principle propagates their values along the corresponding components.

For $C^2$ potentials, a continuous weight $h>0$ with $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(hT)=0$ in distributions gives a global energy identity forcing $\mathrm dw$ to vanish in the positive directions of the cofactor.

For bounded solutions, an energy measure replaces the pointwise gradient calculation. A continuous density whose positive set is connected and dense then gives uniqueness. When the background has invariant mass, ordinary comparison proves uniqueness for nonzero nonnegative $L^ p$ densities, $p>1$, even if the density vanishes on an open set.

The examples on $\mathbb P^3$ have bounded mass and a smooth nonclosed Hermitian background, yet distinct smooth normalized solutions share one density. Its zero set separates the elliptic regions: it can be an open band or two hypersurfaces with quadratic vanishing, even for a real analytic density. Finite upper mass therefore does not ensure uniqueness.

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.