Pome

9.10.11 Plurisubharmonic functions04B4AD1F512D

Let $X$ be a complex space.

Definition 9.10.12.FCF157D7001A A function $\varphi \colon X\rightarrow [-\infty ,\infty )$ is plurisubharmonic if

  1. 96254565568F

    $\varphi $ is not identically $-\infty $ on any irreducible component of $X$, and

  2. E2E28DC114D3

    for any $x\in X$, there is an open neighborhood $V$ of $x$ in $X$, a domain $\Omega \subseteq \mathbb {C}^ N$, a closed immersion $V\hookrightarrow \Omega $ and a plurisubharmonic function $\tilde{\varphi }\in \mathrm{PSH}(\Omega )$ such that $\varphi |_ V=\tilde{\varphi }|_ V$ under this immersion.

The set of plurisubharmonic functions on $X$ is denoted by $\mathrm{PSH}(X)$.

Similarly, if $\theta $ is a smooth closed2 real $(1,1)$-form on $X$, then a function $\varphi \colon X\rightarrow [-\infty ,\infty )$ is $\theta $-plurisubharmonic if for any $x\in X$, there is an open neighborhood $V$ of $x$ in $X$, a domain $\Omega \subseteq \mathbb {C}^ N$, a closed immersion $V\hookrightarrow \Omega $ and a smooth function $g$ on $\Omega $ such that $\theta =(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g)|_ V$ and $g|_ V+\varphi |_ V\in \mathrm{PSH}(V)$.

Theorem 9.10.13 (Fornaess–Narasimhan).48473380B913 Let $\varphi \colon X\rightarrow [-\infty ,\infty )$ be a function. Assume that $\varphi $ is not identically $-\infty $ on any irreducible component of $X$. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. C2704BBBABCF

    $\varphi $ is psh;

  2. 917F8CC8F375

    $\varphi $ is usc and for any morphism $f\colon \Delta \rightarrow X$ from the open unit disk $\Delta $ in $\mathbb {C}$ to $X$ such that $f^*\varphi $ is not identically $-\infty $, the pull-back $f^*\varphi $ is subharmonic.

See [FN80].

Theorem 9.10.14 (Grauert–Remmert).C69D2F0ABA4F Let $X$ be a unibranch3 complex space, let $Z$ be an analytic subset in $X$, and let $\varphi \in \mathrm{PSH}(X\setminus Z)$. Then the function $\varphi $ admits an extension to $\mathrm{PSH}(X)$ in the following two cases:

  1. C2D00AE1EE6E

    The set $Z$ has codimension at least $2$ everywhere.

  2. EC2A3ADCF9E6

    The set $Z$ has codimension at least $1$ everywhere and $\varphi $ is locally bounded from above on an open neighborhood of $Z$.

In both cases, the extension is unique and is given by

B66F47F11DC8 9.10.15
\begin{equation} \varphi (x)=\varlimsup _{X\setminus Z\ni y\to x}\varphi (y),\quad x\in X. \end{equation}
The proof given below combines [Théorème 1.7, Dem85] and [GR56].1

Proof. We first prove the uniqueness, which is a local problem on $X$. Let $\psi $ denote the function defined by the right-hand side of (9.10.15). If $\eta \in \mathrm{PSH}(X)$ is an extension of $\varphi $, then upper semicontinuity gives $\eta \geq \psi $. Conversely, take $z\in Z$ and a holomorphic map $f\colon \Delta \rightarrow X$ such that $f(0)=z$ and $f(\Delta )\not\subset Z$. From the subharmonicity of $f^*\eta $ and (9.10.15), we find that

\[ \eta (z)=f^*\eta (0)=\varlimsup _{\Delta ^* \ni w\to 0}f^*\eta (w)\leq \varlimsup _{X\setminus Z\ni y\to z}\varphi (y)=\psi (z), \]

where the second equality follows from theorem 5.14.10. Thus $\eta =\psi $, and uniqueness follows.

Having established the uniqueness of the extension, the existence also becomes a local problem. So we can freely shrink $X$ around any point in $Z$ in the proof.

2 Let $\pi \colon Y\rightarrow X$ be a resolution of singularities. By the smooth version of the extension theorem theorem 5.14.10, we know that $\pi ^*\varphi $ admits a unique extension to a psh function on $Y$, which we denote by $\eta $. Note that all fibers of $\pi $ are connected since $X$ is unibranch, thanks to theorem 9.10.5. Furthermore, the fibers are compact, since $\pi $ is proper. The restriction of $\eta $ to each fiber is psh or identically $-\infty $, hence is constant by the maximum principle applied to a resolution. It therefore descends to an upper semicontinuous function $\psi $ on $X$, and $\psi |_{X\setminus Z}=\varphi $.

We verify that $\psi $ is plurisubharmonic using theorem 9.10.13. Let $f\colon \Delta \rightarrow X$ be a holomorphic map. We assume that $f^*\psi \not\equiv -\infty $. It suffices to show that $f^*\psi $ is subharmonic at $0\in \Delta $. After replacing $\Delta $ by a finite ramified cover if necessary, the germ of $f$ lifts to $Y$. Indeed, consider the proper projection

\[ \Delta \times _ X Y\longrightarrow \Delta . \]

Choose an irreducible analytic curve in $\Delta \times _ X Y$ passing through a point over $0$ and dominating $\Delta $; after shrinking $\Delta $ and normalizing this curve, we obtain a finite ramified cover of the disk. After replacing $\Delta $ by a smaller disk, there are an integer $k>0$ and a holomorphic map $f'\colon \Delta \to Y$ such that

\[ f(t^ k)=\pi (f'(t)). \]

Therefore, $\psi (f(t^ k))=\eta (f'(t))$ near $0$. Since subharmonicity descends under the finite map $t\mapsto t^ k$, it follows that $f^*\psi $ is subharmonic near $0$.

1 By the local description of complex spaces [Section 3.4, CAS], we may assume that there is a domain $\Omega \subseteq \mathbb {C}^ n$, a finite $s$-sheet branched covering $\Phi \colon X\rightarrow \Omega $ with branched locus contained in a proper analytic subset $V\subseteq \Omega $. We may assume that $X$ is connected, $n\geq 1$.

It suffices to show that $\varphi $ is locally bounded from above near $Z$, since then 2 applies. Suppose that this fails. Then we can find $z\in Z$ and $x_ i\in X\setminus Z$ ($i\geq 1$) converging to $z$ such that

\[ \lim _{i\to \infty } \varphi (x_ i)=\infty . \]

Using (9.10.15) around each $x_ i$, we may further assume that $x_ i\in X\setminus (\Phi ^{-1}(\Phi (Z)\cup V))$.

Let $L$ be a complex line passing through $\Phi (z)$ intersecting $(\Phi (Z)\cup V)\cap \overline{B}$ only at $\Phi (z)$, where $B\Subset B'\Subset \Omega $ are two small open balls centered at $\Phi (z)$. Since $\Phi $ is finite, $\Phi (Z)$ still has codimension at least $2$ in $\Omega $. Hence, for each $i$, the set of directions of lines through $\Phi (x_ i)$ meeting $B'\cap \Phi (Z)$ is contained in a proper analytic subset of the projective space of directions. We can therefore choose lines $L_ i$ through $\Phi (x_ i)$ converging to $L$ such that $L_ i\cap (B'\cap \Phi (Z))=\varnothing $. Moreover, since $\Phi (x_ i)\notin V$, no such $L_ i$ is contained in $V$, and hence $L_ i\cap (B'\cap V)$ is discrete. Then $\Phi $ restricts to a branched covering over $B'\cap L_ i$ for all $i\geq 1$. Adding a constant to $\varphi $, we may assume that $\varphi |_{\Phi ^{-1}(L\cap \partial B)}<0$. We can then find an open neighborhood $U$ of $\Phi ^{-1}(L\cap \partial B)$ so that $\varphi |_ U<0$. For large $i$, we have $\Phi ^{-1}(L_ i\cap \partial B)\subseteq U$ and $\Phi (x_ i)\in B$. Put

\[ C_ i\coloneqq \Phi ^{-1}(L_ i\cap B'). \]

Thus $C_ i$ is a one-dimensional complex space contained in $X\setminus Z$. Since $\Phi |_{C_ i}$ is finite over $L_ i\cap B'$, the inverse image $C_ i\cap \Phi ^{-1}(\overline B)$ is compact, and its boundary is contained in $\Phi ^{-1}(L_ i\cap \partial B)$.

Passing to the normalization of each irreducible component of $C_ i$, the pull-back of $\varphi $ is subharmonic. The one-dimensional maximum principle therefore gives

\[ \varphi (x_ i)\leq \sup _{\Phi ^{-1}(L_ i\cap \partial B)}\varphi <0, \]

which is a contradiction. $\square$

Corollary 9.10.16.2DA8FD7B7A99 Let $\pi \colon Y\rightarrow X$ be a proper bimeromorphic morphism between compact Kähler spaces. Let $\theta $ be a smooth closed real $(1,1)$-form on $X$. Assume that $X$ is unibranch. Then the pull-back induces a bijection

\[ \pi ^*\colon \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )\xlongrightarrow {\sim }\mathrm{PSH}(Y,\pi ^*\theta ). \]

Proof. Injectivity follows from the surjectivity of $\pi $. For surjectivity, let $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(Y,\pi ^*\theta )$. The assertion is local on $X$, so after subtracting a local potential of $\theta $ we may assume that $\theta =0$.

By theorem 9.10.5, the fibers of $\pi $ are connected. The restriction of $u$ to any compact fiber is psh, hence is constant by the maximum principle. Thus $u$ descends to a function $v$ on $X$. Since $\pi $ is proper, $v$ is upper semicontinuous.

It remains to check that $v$ is psh. By theorem 9.10.13, it suffices to test on holomorphic disks. Let $f\colon \Delta \rightarrow X$ be a holomorphic disk such that $f^*v\not\equiv -\infty $. As in the proof of theorem 9.10.14, after a finite ramified cover $\rho \colon \Delta \rightarrow \Delta $, the germ of $f\circ \rho $ lifts to $Y$. The pull-back $(f^*v)\circ \rho $ is therefore subharmonic, so $f^*v$ is subharmonic. Hence $v\in \mathrm{PSH}(X)$, and the general $\theta $-psh case follows by adding back the local potentials. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.