Pome

9.11 Potentials and equations on unibranch spaces77EFAFB55325

77EFAFB55325

To solve an equation on a singular complex space, we pass to a resolution and then descend the solution. The pullback background can degenerate along exceptional fibers, and removing a logarithmic pole can leave a residual that does not descend. The examples in this appendix address these two difficulties directly.

Except in the local toric calculations of 9.11.10, 9.11.16, $X$ denotes a reduced irreducible compact complex space of pure dimension $n\geq 1$ that is unibranch: its germ at every point is irreducible, or equivalently, its normalization is a homeomorphism. We write $X_{\mathrm{reg}}$ and $X_{\mathrm{sing}}$ for the regular and singular loci. Every point of $X$ has a neighborhood that embeds as a closed analytic subset of an open set in some $\mathbb C^ N$. Smooth functions and forms on $X$ are defined through such local embeddings: they are locally restrictions of smooth functions and forms on the ambient open sets. A Hermitian form on $X$ is a smooth real $(1,1)$-form that is locally the restriction of a smooth strictly positive ambient $(1,1)$-form. Fix a smooth real $(1,1)$-form $\theta $ on $X$.

A resolution of $X$ is a proper bimeromorphic holomorphic map $\pi :Y\to X$ from a compact complex manifold $Y$; on $Y$ the pullback $\pi ^*\theta $ is an ordinary smooth form, to which the theory of the main text applies. In the last three sections, $X$ is a specific space of this kind.

The basic tool is descent through a resolution. The pullback $\pi ^*\theta $ has no component along the fibers of $\pi $, so the maximum principle on the connected compact fibers shows that every $\pi ^*\theta $-plurisubharmonic function on $Y$ is constant on fibers and descends to $X$. This correspondence preserves envelopes and convergence. Exceptional sets carry no non-pluripolar mass, so the extended Monge–Ampère measure defined through a resolution does not depend on the resolution.

On a projective cone, a logarithmic pole at the vertex becomes a divisor on the incidence resolution, and removing it leaves a strictly positive residual background. This gives uniqueness in the prescribed ordinary class, including for certain nonclosed backgrounds. The bounded equation on the cone uses closedness and an energy identity. The full logarithmic potential descends even when its smooth residual varies along the contracted divisor.

On a curve whose normalization is a torus, a periodic Green function gives a separate construction. It allows the pulled-back background to vanish at singular points, and it treats every potential in a fixed ordinary type with finitely many logarithmic poles. A projective cusp shows that the residual can be continuous even though the density on the curve is unbounded.

On products of a cuspidal curve with elliptic curves, a smooth potential repairs the degenerate background of the normalization, and two torsion identities fix the masses of all bounded potentials. For data close to the reference density, a positive solution gives uniqueness in the whole bounded class by a $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$ energy comparison, even though the background is nonclosed.

We use three facts about unibranch spaces. Resolutions and common smooth refinements of two resolutions exist, and a proper bimeromorphic map to a unibranch space has connected fibers Theorem 9.10.9, Theorem 9.10.8 (Hironaka's Chow lemma), Theorem 9.10.5 (Zariski's main theorem). The Fornaess–Narasimhan criterion identifies plurisubharmonic functions on $X$ as the upper semicontinuous functions that are subharmonic on holomorphic disks Theorem 9.10.13 (Fornaess–Narasimhan). The ramified disk lift used below is the argument in the proof of Theorem 9.10.14 (Grauert–Remmert).

9.11.1 Potentials and disk tests0753019C64C3

Since $X$ may be singular, $\theta $-plurisubharmonicity is defined by testing along holomorphic disks. Let $\Delta \subset \mathbb C$ be the unit disk. For a holomorphic map $f:\Delta \to X$, the pullback $f^*\theta $ is a smooth real $(1,1)$-form on $\Delta $ and therefore has smooth local potentials. Disk tests thus express the background inequality even when $\theta $ has no local potential on $X$.

Definition 9.11.2.76A75EB639CB An upper semicontinuous function $u:X\to [-\infty ,+\infty )$, not identically $-\infty $ on any nonempty open subset, is $\theta $-plurisubharmonic if it satisfies the following disk condition. For every holomorphic $f:\Delta \to X$, the function $u\circ f+a$ is subharmonic or identically $-\infty $ wherever $a$ is a smooth local potential for $f^*\theta $. The set of these functions is denoted by $\mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$.

Two choices of $a$ differ by a harmonic function, so the condition is independent of that choice. On every disk where $u\circ f\not\equiv -\infty $, it gives $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(u\circ f)+f^*\theta \geq 0$ in the sense of distributions.

Lemma 9.11.3.E7163CA56764 Every member of $\mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ is locally the sum of a plurisubharmonic function on $X$ and a smooth function. If $X$ is smooth, this definition agrees with definition 5.22.1.

Proof. In a local embedding, choose an ambient smooth strictly plurisubharmonic function $r$ with $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}r\geq \theta $ on a smaller neighborhood. For a disk $f$ and a local potential $a$ of $f^*\theta $, the function $r\circ f-a$ is subharmonic. Hence $(u+r)\circ f$ is subharmonic or identically $-\infty $. The Fornaess–Narasimhan criterion, together with the assumption that $u$ is not identically $-\infty $ on any open set, shows that $u+r$ is plurisubharmonic. The smooth case now follows from lemma 5.43.2. $\square$

9.11.4 Descent through a resolution65930026730A

Let $\pi :Y\to X$ be a resolution. Near a fiber of $\pi $, the background $\pi ^*\theta $ is dominated by the pullback of a local $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$-exact form, so a local correction makes a $\pi ^*\theta $-plurisubharmonic function plurisubharmonic near the fiber. It is then constant on each compact irreducible component of the fiber, and connectedness of the fiber identifies these constants.

Theorem 9.11.5.F4C06D21AA94 Let $\pi :Y\to X$ be a resolution. Pullback $u\mapsto u\circ \pi $ is an order-preserving bijection

\[ \pi ^*:\mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )\longrightarrow \mathrm{PSH}(Y,\pi ^*\theta ). \]

It preserves suprema of individual functions, boundedness, and ordinary singularity comparisons.

Proof. Pullback preserves the disk inequalities. Every nonempty open subset of $Y$ meets the locus where $\pi $ is biholomorphic, so a pullback is not identically $-\infty $ on any nonempty open set. Injectivity follows from surjectivity of $\pi $.

For the converse, take $v\in \mathrm{PSH}(Y,\pi ^*\theta )$. Near a fiber, choose the local correction $r$ on $X$ used above. The function $v+r\circ \pi $ is plurisubharmonic on the inverse image of that neighborhood, since

\[ \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(v+r\circ \pi )\geq \pi ^*(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}r-\theta )\geq 0. \]

Its restriction to each compact irreducible component of the fiber is constant, possibly $-\infty $, by the maximum principle on a resolution of that component. Connectedness of the fiber makes these constants equal: intersecting components have the same value, and the finite intersection graph of the components is connected. Since $r\circ \pi $ is constant on the fiber, so is $v$.

Thus $v=u\circ \pi $ for a unique function $u$ on $X$. This function is upper semicontinuous: for each real $c$, the closed set $\{ v\geq c\} $ has closed image under the proper map $\pi $, and that image is $\{ u\geq c\} $. If $u$ were identically $-\infty $ on a nonempty open set, the same would hold for $v$ on its inverse image. Hence $u$ is not identically $-\infty $ on any nonempty open set.

It remains to verify the disk condition for $u$ with the background $\theta $ itself. Let $f:\Delta \to X$ be a holomorphic disk with $u\circ f\not\equiv -\infty $. Near a given point of $\Delta $, take a curve in the fiber product $\Delta \times _ XY$ dominating the disk. Its normalization gives, after shrinking, a finite cover $\rho (t)=t^ k$ and a holomorphic lift $f':\Delta \to Y$ with $\pi \circ f'=f\circ \rho $. Choose a smooth local function $a$ on the original disk with $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}a=f^*\theta $. The function

\[ (u\circ f+a)\circ \rho =v\circ f'+a\circ \rho \]

is subharmonic by lemma 5.43.2. Subharmonicity descends through $\rho $ by the finite-disk argument following that lemma. Thus $u\circ f+a$ is subharmonic near every point, which proves that pullback is a bijection.

Since $\pi $ is surjective, pullback preserves suprema, uniform bounds and inequalities up to additive constants; this proves the remaining assertions. $\square$

9.11.6 Envelopes and normalized compactness29C5C6037D7D

Fix a resolution $\pi :Y\to X$. The envelopes of section 5.40 and definition 5.40.4 are defined on $X$ by the same formulas: for an obstacle $f:X\to [-\infty ,+\infty ]$, $P_\theta (f)$ is the upper semicontinuous regularization of the supremum of all $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ with $u\leq f$ pointwise, and $P_\theta [u]$ is defined as in definition 5.40.4. In the next proposition we assume that the family of these competitors is nonempty and locally uniformly bounded above. The descent bijection identifies the competitors on $X$ and on $Y$; the remaining issue is whether upper semicontinuous regularization commutes with pullback.

Proposition 9.11.7.622B386B559D For such an obstacle $f:X\to [-\infty ,+\infty ]$, the envelope $P_\theta (f)$ belongs to $\mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ and

\[ P_{\pi ^*\theta }(f\circ \pi )=P_\theta (f)\circ \pi . \]

The same identity holds for the ordinary envelope $P_\theta [u]$, for every $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$.

Proof. The preceding theorem identifies the competitor families. Let $s$ be their pointwise supremum on $X$; its pullback is the pointwise supremum upstairs. The regularization of $s\circ \pi $ on $Y$ is $\pi ^*\theta $-plurisubharmonic and not identically $-\infty $, since there is a competitor below it. By the theorem, it descends to a $\theta $-plurisubharmonic function $q$. Since $q\geq s$ and $q$ is upper semicontinuous, $q\geq s^*$.

For the reverse inequality, fix $x\in X$ and $y\in \pi ^{-1}(x)$. For each neighborhood $U$ of $x$, the unregularized supremum upstairs is bounded by $\sup _ U s$ on the open neighborhood $\pi ^{-1}(U)$ of $y$. Therefore $q(x)\leq \sup _ U s$, and taking the infimum over $U$ gives $q(x)\leq s^*(x)$. This proves the identity and shows that $P_\theta (f)=s^*$ is $\theta $-plurisubharmonic. The proof for $P_\theta [u]$ is identical, because pullback preserves the ordinary singularity order together with its constants. $\square$

We give the normalized space $\{ u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta ):\sup _ Xu=0\} $ the $L^1$ topology of the pullbacks to $Y$. By theorem 5.25.2 and descent, it is compact. On a fixed resolution, different smooth positive volume forms give equivalent norms. Under a further modification, pullback is continuous by lemma 5.43.19 and bijective by descent, hence a homeomorphism between the normalized compact spaces. Since any two resolutions are dominated by a common one, the topology does not depend on the resolution; the norms on different models are not compared.

9.11.8 Ideal envelopes defined on resolutions491CF8180F3F

Multiplier ideals on smooth models give a singularity relation on $X$. Call two potentials $u,v\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ resolution-ideal equivalent if $u\circ \pi \sim _{\mathcal I}v\circ \pi $ on one resolution $\pi :Y\to X$ (the ideal type of section 5.33), that is, if $\mathcal I(k\, u\circ \pi )=\mathcal I(k\, v\circ \pi )$ for every real $k>0$. By lemma 5.43.24, applied on a common refinement, this does not depend on the resolution. The ideal projection of theorem 18.4.2 then defines an envelope in this class.

Proposition 9.11.9.C43A6C429C4D For $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$, there is a unique potential $P_\theta [u]_{\mathcal I}^{\mathrm{res}}$ on $X$ satisfying

\[ P_\theta [u]_{\mathcal I}^{\mathrm{res}}\circ \pi =P_{\pi ^*\theta }[u\circ \pi ]_{\mathcal I} \]

on every resolution $\pi :Y\to X$, where the right-hand side is the multiplier-ideal envelope of definition 18.4.1 on $Y$. It preserves the resolution-ideal class, is idempotent, has supremum zero, and is independent of the resolution.

Proof. For a fixed resolution, the right-hand side exists by theorem 18.4.2 and descends by theorem 9.11.5. Under a further smooth modification, the competitor families of the ideal envelopes correspond by the descent theorem and lemma 5.43.24, and the regularized suprema commute by the argument of proposition 9.11.7. Thus two resolutions give the same pullback on a common refinement, and hence the same function on $X$. Idempotence, preservation of the class and the normalization follow from the corresponding assertions on $Y$ and surjectivity of $\pi $. $\square$

An intrinsic restricted ideal trace on a subspace contained in the singular locus would require a regularization compatible with restriction to that subspace; the resolution-ideal envelope provides neither the regularization nor the trace.

9.11.10 Boundary weights on a quotient surface6B078FD09EA1

The resolution-ideal relation above uses smooth volume forms on smooth models. An integrability ideal on a singular space can instead use a volume form determined by its canonical bundle and a boundary divisor. The following local example shows how this additional weight changes the ideal. In this subsection, replace the compact space fixed above by the affine surface

\[ X=\{ z_1z_2=z_3^2\} \subset \mathbb C^3, \qquad E=\{ z_1=z_3=0\} ,\qquad D=\tfrac 12 E. \]

The finite map

\[ \pi :\mathbb C^2\longrightarrow X, \qquad \pi (s,t)=(s^2,t^2,st), \]

identifies $X$ with the quotient by $(s,t)\mapsto (-s,-t)$. It has degree two and is unramified away from the origin. Holomorphic germs at the origin of $X$ correspond to convergent series in $s,t$ containing only monomials $s^ at^ b$ with $a+b$ even. Indeed, every such series has the form $F_0(s^2,t^2)+stF_1(s^2,t^2)$ with $F_0,F_1$ convergent.

On $X_{\mathrm{reg}}$, the canonical two-form

\[ \Omega =\frac{\mathrm{d}z_1\wedge \mathrm{d}z_3}{z_1} =\frac{\mathrm{d}z_3\wedge \mathrm{d}z_2}{z_2} \]

is defined on the respective charts $z_1\neq 0$ and $z_2\neq 0$. These charts cover $X_{\mathrm{reg}}$, the formulas agree, and $\pi ^*\Omega =2\, \mathrm{d}s\wedge \mathrm{d}t$. The residue form $\Omega $ generates the dualizing sheaf of this hypersurface. Since $\operatorname {div}(z_1)=2E$, the meromorphic fourth tensor power

\[ \beta =\frac{\Omega ^{\otimes 4}}{z_1} \]

generates $\omega _ X^{[4]}(4D)$, the reflexive fourth power of the dualizing sheaf twisted by $4D$. Take the fourth root of its squared absolute value to define the adapted volume $\mathrm{d}V_ D$ on $X_{\mathrm{reg}}$; for zero boundary use the squared absolute value of $\Omega $ and write $\mathrm{d}V_0$. Their pullbacks are

0C6FD486D0E4 9.11.11
\begin{equation} \pi ^*\mathrm{d}V_ D=C_ D|s|^{-1}\, \mathrm{d}A_ s\, \mathrm{d}A_ t, \qquad \pi ^*\mathrm{d}V_0=C_0\, \mathrm{d}A_ s\, \mathrm{d}A_ t, \end{equation}

where $\mathrm{d}A$ denotes Euclidean area and $C_ D,C_0>0$ depend only on the convention for absolute values of forms. Replacing a generator by a holomorphic unit multiplies the volume by a positive factor bounded above and below on smaller neighborhoods.

For $B\in \{ 0,D\} $ and a plurisubharmonic function $u$ on this $X$, define the adapted-volume integrability ideal by

727AAF0F7AFF 9.11.12
\begin{equation} \mathcal I_ B^{\mathrm{ad}}(u)_ x =\left\{ f\in \mathcal O_{X,x}: \int _{U\cap X_{\mathrm{reg}}}|f|^2\mathrm{e}^{-u}\, \mathrm{d}V_ B<\infty \right\} , \end{equation}

where the neighborhood $U$ of $x$ may be chosen for each germ $f$. This uses the weight convention of definition 6.8.5. It defines a different object from the resolution-ideal class: the volume in (9.11.12), including its boundary weight, is part of the definition.

The polar-coordinate calculation needed here also keeps track of the strict integrability boundary.

Lemma 9.11.13.A56815B99E6B Let $A,B,\alpha ,\beta ,T>0$. Then

\[ \int _ T^\infty \int _ T^\infty \exp \bigl (-\alpha p-\beta q+\min (Ap,Bq)\bigr ) \, \mathrm{d}q\, \mathrm{d}p<\infty \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad \frac\alpha A+\frac\beta B>1. \]

At equality the integral diverges.

Proof. Split the quadrant along $q=Ap/B$. On the part $q\geq Ap/B$, set $p_0=\max \{ T,BT/A\} $. After discarding the strip $T<p<p_0$, integration in $q$ gives

\[ \frac1\beta \int _{p_0}^\infty \exp \left(-\left[\alpha -A+\frac{\beta A}{B}\right]p\right) \, \mathrm{d}p. \]

The discarded strip has finite integral because $\beta >0$. On the other part, integration in $p$ gives the corresponding tail with coefficient $\beta -B+\alpha B/A$; its discarded strip is finite because $\alpha >0$. Both coefficients are positive exactly when $\alpha /A+\beta /B>1$. If that sum equals one, either tail is an integral of a positive constant over a half-line. $\square$

Proposition 9.11.14.DA5FE7ECD89D The plurisubharmonic function

\[ u=\max \{ \sqrt2\log |z_1|^2,\, 2\log |z_2|^2\} \]

on $X$ does not have analytic singularities at the origin. Its adapted-volume ideals are

\[ \mathcal I_ D^{\mathrm{ad}}(u)=(z_1,z_3,z_2^2)\mathcal O_ X, \qquad \mathcal I_0^{\mathrm{ad}}(u)=(z_1,z_2,z_3)\mathcal O_ X. \]

In particular, the same potential requires the generator $z_2^2$ in place of $z_2$ when the boundary $D$ is included.

Proof. The function is the restriction of a maximum of two plurisubharmonic functions on $\mathbb C^3$. On the axes parametrized by $(z_1,z_2,z_3)=(\zeta ,0,0)$ and $(0,\zeta ,0)$, its logarithmic coefficients are $\sqrt2$ and $2$. An analytic singularity $c\log \sum _ j|f_ j|^2+O(1)$ restricts to a logarithmic coefficient equal to $c$ times an integer on either axis, provided that it is finite off the origin there. The ratio of the two coefficients would therefore be rational, which it is not.

Pullback by the finite degree-two map reduces local integrability to the cover. Neighborhoods of the origin contain and are contained in images of sufficiently small bidisks, so it suffices to integrate over a bidisk in $s,t$. The pullback weight is

\[ u\circ \pi =\max \{ 2\sqrt2\log |s|^2,\, 4\log |t|^2\} . \]

For $s^ at^ b$, $a,b\geq 0$, set $p=-\log |s|^2$ and $q=-\log |t|^2$. By (9.11.11), angular integration gives, up to a positive constant,

\[ \int _ T^\infty \int _ T^\infty \exp \left(-\left[a+\tfrac 12\right]p-(b+1)q +\min (2\sqrt2\, p,4q)\right) \, \mathrm{d}q\, \mathrm{d}p \]

for the boundary $D$. For zero boundary, replace $a+\tfrac 12$ by $a+1$. Thus lemma 9.11.13 gives the respective conditions

1099F6DF9D77 9.11.15
\begin{equation} \frac{a+\tfrac 12}{2\sqrt2}+\frac{b+1}{4}>1, \qquad \frac{a+1}{2\sqrt2}+\frac{b+1}{4}>1. \end{equation}

These monomial tests determine the entire ideal. Indeed, the measure and the weight on the cover are invariant under separate rotations of $s,t$. Parseval's identity and Tonelli's theorem show that every nonzero coefficient of a weighted-integrable holomorphic series must satisfy its monomial test. Only exponents with $a+b$ even occur.

In the first test, the minimal allowed exponents, under addition of nonnegative even-total exponents, are

\[ (2,0),\quad (1,1),\quad (0,4). \]

To see this, every term with $a\geq 2$ is divisible by $s^2$, every term with $a=1$ has odd $b\geq 1$ and is divisible by $st$, and a term with $a=0$ has even $b$ and passes the test exactly when $b\geq 4$. Each of the three displayed exponents passes the test. Splitting a convergent invariant series into these three groups and dividing gives convergent invariant coefficient series on a smaller bidisk. They descend to holomorphic germs on $X$, bounded on a smaller neighborhood. Since the three generators are weighted-integrable, every such combination is weighted-integrable. This proves the first ideal at the origin. For the second test, every nonconstant even-total monomial is allowed, with minimal exponents $(2,0),(1,1),(0,2)$, and the same argument gives the second ideal.

Away from the origin, $u$ is locally bounded and $X$ is smooth. The only additional volume singularity lies along $E$: with $z_2\neq 0$, $z_3$ is a normal coordinate and $z_1=z_3^2/z_2$, so $\mathrm{d}V_ D$ is a smooth positive factor times $|z_3|^{-1}$ times smooth volume. This is locally integrable. Both ideals therefore equal $\mathcal O_ X$ there, as do the ideals generated by the displayed coordinates, which proves the sheaf identities. $\square$

The calculation depends on the prescribed volume as well as on $u$. It does not change the resolution-ideal equivalence used in proposition 9.11.9. The next calculation expresses the exponent test for a general full-dimensional affine toric cone.

9.11.16 Adapted monomial tests on affine toric spaces73BE0E663644

The quotient calculation expresses integrability as a strict inequality on exponents. On an affine toric space the same inequality comes from the recession of a convex function, while the canonical bundle and boundary supply the translation of the exponent. This also applies to cones with more rays than their dimension.

In this subsection let $N$ be a lattice of rank $n\geq 1$, let $M=\operatorname {Hom}(N,\mathbb Z)$, and let $\sigma \subset N_{\mathbb R}$ be a full-dimensional strongly convex rational polyhedral cone. Its dual cone is $\sigma ^\vee =\{ m:\langle m,v\rangle \geq 0\text{ for all }v\in \sigma \} $. The normal affine toric space

\[ X_\sigma =\operatorname {Spec}\mathbb C[\sigma ^\vee \cap M] \]

is understood with its analytic structure. Its dense torus $T=\operatorname {Hom}(M,\mathbb C^*)$ has characters $\chi ^ m$, and its unique closed orbit is a vertex $o$. Choose nonzero generators $b_1,\ldots ,b_ s$ of the semigroup $\sigma ^\vee \cap M$; their characters embed $X_\sigma $ as a closed affine subset of $\mathbb C^ s$ and all vanish at $o$.

For each ray $\rho $ of $\sigma $, write $v_\rho $ for its primitive lattice generator and $D_\rho $ for the corresponding prime divisor. Fix an effective rational boundary $D=\sum _\rho a_\rho D_\rho $ such that $K_{X_\sigma }+D$ is $\mathbb Q$-Cartier. With $K_{X_\sigma }=-\sum _\rho D_\rho $, this means that there is $w_ D\in M_{\mathbb Q}$ with

A72FB1B5D26F 9.11.17
\begin{equation} \langle w_ D,v_\rho \rangle =1-a_\rho \quad \text{for every }\rho . \end{equation}

Take an integer $q>0$ with $qw_ D\in M$. For torus coordinates $t_1,\ldots ,t_ n$ determined by a basis of $M$, the meromorphic tensor

\[ B_ D=\chi ^{qw_ D} \left(\frac{\mathrm dt_1}{t_1}\wedge \cdots \wedge \frac{\mathrm dt_ n}{t_ n}\right)^{\! \otimes q} \]

generates $\omega _{X_\sigma }^{[q]}(qD)$. Indeed, its order along $D_\rho $ is $-qa_\rho $. The adapted volume $\mathrm dV_ D=|B_ D|^{2/q}$ is independent of this choice for local integrability, as in (9.11.11). We use the ideal $\mathcal I_ D^{\mathrm{ad}}(u)$ defined by the holomorphic-germ integral in (9.11.12) on this $X_\sigma $.

Let $u$ be a plurisubharmonic function invariant under the compact torus of coordinate rotations. The logarithmic map $\operatorname {Log}:T\to N_{\mathbb R}$ satisfies $\langle m,\operatorname {Log}t\rangle =\log |\chi ^ m(t)|$. There is a finite convex function $g$ on $N_{\mathbb R}$ with

\[ u(t)=2g(\operatorname {Log}t). \]

To see convexity, pull $u/2$ back by the exponential covering of $T$. It is independent of the imaginary coordinates, so its distributional complex Hessian is the real Hessian of $g$ up to a positive constant. A nontrivial plurisubharmonic function of this form gives a finite convex function. The factor two matches the weight $\mathrm e^{-u}$.

For a finite convex function $g$ write

\[ (\operatorname {rec}g)(v)= \lim _{t\to \infty }\frac{g(x+tv)-g(x)}t. \]

The convex difference quotients increase to this limit in $\mathbb R\cup \{ +\infty \} $; the limit does not depend on the base point $x$. The latter fact follows by comparing $g(x+tv)$ with convex combinations of $g(t v/(1-\delta ))$ and $g(x/\delta )$, for $0<\delta <1$, and then reversing the translation. Define the Newton set

4B4F6518339A 9.11.18
\begin{equation} P(u)=\left\{ \ell \in M_{\mathbb R}: \sup _{x\in -\sigma }\bigl (\langle \ell ,x\rangle -g(x)\bigr )<\infty \right\} . \end{equation}

Only its interior will enter the integrability test; the set itself need not be closed.

Lemma 9.11.19.5D5A847F99AC Let $C$ be a closed full-dimensional convex cone in a Euclidean space, let $g$ be finite and convex, and let $\ell $ be a linear form. Then

\[ \int _ C\exp \bigl (2\langle \ell ,x\rangle -2g(x)\bigr )\, \mathrm dx<\infty \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad \langle \ell ,v\rangle <(\operatorname {rec}g)(v) \quad (v\in C\setminus \{ 0\} ). \]

This condition is also equivalent to $\ell $ being an interior point of $\{ a:\sup _ C(\langle a,x\rangle -g(x))<\infty \} $. The integral has the same finiteness on every translate of $C$.

Proof. Set $F=g-\ell $. Suppose its recession is positive on $C\setminus \{ 0\} $. Then $F(x)\geq \gamma |x|-A$ on $C$ for some $\gamma >0$ and $A$. Otherwise there are $x_ j\in C$ with $|x_ j|\to \infty $ and $F(x_ j)/|x_ j|\leq 1/j$. After taking a subsequence, $x_ j/|x_ j|\to v\in C$ with $|v|=1$. For fixed $t>0$, convexity gives

\[ F\left(t\frac{x_ j}{|x_ j|}\right) \leq \left(1-\frac t{|x_ j|}\right)F(0) +\frac t{|x_ j|}F(x_ j). \]

Continuity gives $F(tv)\leq F(0)$ for every $t$, contradicting positive recession. A bound on the remaining compact set gives the asserted $A$. Exponential decay proves integrability. The same bound persists when $\ell $ is changed by a sufficiently small linear form, so $\ell $ lies in the stated interior.

Conversely, if $(\operatorname {rec}F)(v)\leq 0$ for some nonzero $v\in C$, then $F(tv)\leq F(0)$ for $t\geq 0$. Choose a compact ball $K$ in the interior of $C$. On the half-tube $\{ tv+x/2:t\geq 1,\ x\in K\} $, convexity gives

\[ F(tv+x/2)\leq \tfrac 12F(2tv)+\tfrac 12F(x). \]

Thus $\mathrm e^{-2F}$ has a positive lower bound on a set of infinite volume. If instead $\ell $ is in the stated interior, for each nonzero $v\in C$ one may perturb $\ell $ within that interior by a linear form positive on $v$. Dividing its defining upper bound along $tv$ by $t$ gives the strict recession inequality for $\ell $. Finally, translating $C$ replaces $g(x)$ by $g(x+b)$ and multiplies the exponential by a constant; recession is unchanged. $\square$

Theorem 9.11.20.CD69C52538E4 For $m\in \sigma ^\vee \cap M$, the following are equivalent:

\[ \chi ^ m\in \mathcal I_ D^{\mathrm{ad}}(u)_ o, \qquad \chi ^ m\in \Gamma (X_\sigma ,\mathcal I_ D^{\mathrm{ad}}(u)), \qquad m+w_ D\in \operatorname {int}P(u). \]

Equivalently, $\langle m+w_ D,v\rangle <(\operatorname {rec}g)(v)$ for every nonzero $v\in -\sigma $.

Proof. On the torus, polar coordinates turn the weighted monomial integral into a positive constant times

\[ \int _ Q\exp \bigl (2\langle m+w_ D,x\rangle -2g(x)\bigr )\, \mathrm dx, \]

where $Q$ is the logarithmic image of the domain. The omitted toric divisors have measure zero on the regular locus. A basis of neighborhoods of $o$ is given by $|\chi ^{b_ j}|<\epsilon $ for every $j$, with $0<\epsilon <1$. Their logarithmic domains satisfy

4CC45280AE88 9.11.21
\begin{equation} -\sigma -b\ \subset Q_\epsilon =\{ x:\langle b_ j,x\rangle <\log \epsilon \text{ for all }j\} \ \subset \ -\sigma , \end{equation}

for $b\in \operatorname {int}\sigma $ sufficiently far along an interior ray. Indeed, every $\langle b_ j,b\rangle $ is strictly positive, and the $b_ j$ generate the dual cone. The convex-cone lemma gives necessity and sufficiency at $o$, including divergence when a recession inequality is an equality.

For a compact subset of $X_\sigma $, the embedding coordinates have absolute value at most some $R>1$. Its logarithmic image is contained in $\{ x:\langle b_ j,x\rangle \leq \log R\} $, which is contained in $b_ R-\sigma $ for a sufficiently large $b_ R\in \operatorname {int}\sigma $. Under the same strict condition the integral over this translated cone is finite. This proves local integrability everywhere. The converse follows by testing at $o$, and the interior formulation follows from the lemma. $\square$

Corollary 9.11.22.E77092231FA9 Let $\mathfrak a=(\chi ^{a_1},\ldots ,\chi ^{a_ r})$ be a nonzero monomial ideal on $X_\sigma $, with $a_ j\in \sigma ^\vee \cap M$, and let $c>0$ be real. For the measurable weight

\[ v=u-c\log \left(\sum _ j|\chi ^{a_ j}|^2\right), \]

a holomorphic character $\chi ^ m$ is locally integrable with weight $\mathrm e^{-v}\mathrm dV_ D$ at $o$, or everywhere on $X_\sigma $, exactly when

\[ m+w_ D+ca_ j\in \operatorname {int}P(u) \quad \text{for every }j. \]

Values on the common zero set do not affect these integrals.

Proof. For a finite sum and $c>0$, its $c$-th power is comparable to the sum of the $c$-th powers of its terms. Thus the integrand is comparable to

\[ \sum _ j |\chi ^ m|^2|\chi ^{a_ j}|^{2c}\mathrm e^{-u}\, \mathrm dV_ D. \]

Each term gives the preceding logarithmic integral with exponent $m+w_ D+ca_ j$. The cone criterion applies to real exponents, so no rationality of $c$ is needed for this integrability assertion. $\square$

Proposition 9.11.23.511E6797B7CD Let $X=\{ xw=yz\} \subset \mathbb C^4$, with vertex $o$, let $\mathfrak m_ o=(x,y,z,w)$, and take zero boundary. For $\lambda >0$ put

\[ u_\lambda =\lambda \log (|x|^2+|y|^2+|z|^2+|w|^2). \]

The adapted-volume ideal at the vertex is

\[ \mathcal I_0^{\mathrm{ad}}(u_\lambda )_ o =\mathfrak m_ o^{\, \max \{ 0,\lfloor \lambda \rfloor -1\} } \mathcal O_{X,o}. \]

In particular, the constant germ is integrable exactly when $\lambda <2$.

Proof. On the torus use $x,y,z$ as characters, so $w=yz/x$. The character lattice is $\mathbb Z^3$, with semigroup generators

\[ (1,0,0),\quad (0,1,0),\quad (0,0,1),\quad (-1,1,1). \]

The dual cone has primitive rays $(0,1,0)$, $(0,0,1)$, $(1,1,0)$ and $(1,0,1)$. It is full-dimensional with four rays. The residue form $\Omega =\mathrm dx\wedge \mathrm dy\wedge \mathrm dz/x$ generates the canonical sheaf of this hypersurface; it equals $yz$ times the logarithmic torus form. Hence $w_0=(0,1,1)$, which pairs to one with each primitive ray.

Write $d(m)=m_1+m_2+m_3$. Each semigroup generator has degree one. The logarithmic function $g$ differs by a bounded term from $\lambda $ times the maximum of the four linear forms given by those generators. Their convex hull is the section of $\sigma ^\vee $ by $d=1$, so

\[ P(u_\lambda )=\{ \ell \in \sigma ^\vee :d(\ell )\geq \lambda \} . \]

Since $w_0\in \operatorname {int}\sigma ^\vee $ and $d(w_0)=2$, the character condition is $d(m)+2>\lambda $. The smallest allowed integer degree is $k=\max \{ 0,\lfloor \lambda \rfloor -1\} $.

This also gives the ideal for whole holomorphic germs. Lift a germ to a convergent power series in $x,y,z,w$. On a smaller invariant neighborhood, angular Parseval and Tonelli force every nonzero character coefficient to satisfy the same test. All homogeneous terms of degree less than $k$ therefore vanish in the coordinate ring. They are multiples of the homogeneous relation $xw-yz$, and subtracting those finitely many terms leaves a lift of order at least $k$. Thus the germ belongs to $\mathfrak m_ o^ k$. Conversely, every degree-$k$ monomial is integrable by the character test, and bounded holomorphic coefficient germs preserve integrability. This proves the identity and its strict endpoint. $\square$

These ideals use the adapted canonical volume, whereas the resolution-ideal equivalence above uses smooth volumes on the models. Return now to the compact unibranch space and background fixed at the beginning of the appendix.

9.11.24 Extended measures and finite damping449B961AB405

Choose a resolution $\pi :Y\to X$. Two resolutions are isomorphic over the complement of a proper analytic subset of $X$, and their extended measures agree there. Since these measures do not charge pluripolar sets, the omitted analytic sets do not affect the comparison, even when the total mass is infinite.

For $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ define

96D4B9F40B0A 9.11.25
\begin{equation} \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,\theta }(u) =\pi _*\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{Y,\pi ^*\theta }(u\circ \pi ), \end{equation}

where $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{Y,\pi ^*\theta }$ is the extended measure of theorem 13.14.3 on $Y$.

Theorem 9.11.26.D12D6E199E87 The right-hand side of (9.11.25) is the same for every resolution, including resolutions that modify regular points. It is a positive $\sigma $-finite Borel measure, gives zero mass to $X_{\mathrm{sing}}$ and to locally pluripolar sets, and may have infinite total mass; for bounded $u$ it is finite. Put $r_ n=\max (n-2,0)$. There are finite constants $C$ and, for each $q>r_ n$, $C_ q$, depending only on the fixed background data and, for $C_ q$, on $q$, such that for every nonpositive $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ and every $p>0$,

\[ \int _ X\mathrm{e}^{pu}\, \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,\theta }(u) \leq C(1+p^{-1})^{r_ n},\qquad \int _ X(1-u)^{-q}\, \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,\theta }(u) \leq C_ q. \]

The constants may be obtained on any one fixed resolution.

Proof. Given two resolutions, choose a proper analytic subset $S\subset X$ containing $X_{\mathrm{sing}}$ and the images of both exceptional sets. Each map is an isomorphism over $X\setminus S$, and there the two measures are given by the same bounded local products, followed by truncation and exhaustion. On each resolution, the inverse image of $S$ is a proper analytic subset and has zero extended mass by theorem 13.14.3. Hence both pushforwards give $S$ zero mass. This proves independence, including for resolutions whose exceptional sets lie over regular points.

Positivity follows from positivity on $Y$. On $X\setminus S$ either resolution is a Borel isomorphism, so a countable exhaustion of $Y$ by sets of finite measure pushes forward to one on $X$; adjoining the null set $S$ proves $\sigma $-finiteness. A locally pluripolar subset of $X$ pulls back to a pluripolar set off the exceptional locus, and the exceptional locus itself has zero mass. This gives the asserted vanishing.

If $u$ is bounded, its pullback is bounded on the compact manifold $Y$, and local bounded-product estimates give finite total mass. For general nonpositive $u$, apply theorem 13.15.23 on $Y$ to the smooth background $\pi ^*\theta $. Pushforward and the identity $u\circ \pi $ identify the weighted integrals exactly, and the constants come from $\pi ^*\theta $ and a Hermitian metric on $Y$. $\square$

We define convergence in capacity on $X$ as convergence in capacity of the pullbacks to a resolution, using a smooth Hermitian metric there. The local capacity comparison of section 5.29 makes the metric immaterial, and lemma 5.43.20, applied on a common resolution, makes the choice of resolution immaterial.

By theorem 13.15.23 and proper pushforward, both damped measures in the theorem depend weakly continuously on nonpositive potentials for this convergence in capacity. For nonpositive potentials $u_ j\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ converging in capacity, the undamped measures $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,\theta }(u_ j)$ converge weakly if, in addition, their total masses are uniformly bounded and their masses on $\{ u_ j<-T\} $ tend to zero uniformly in $j$ as $T\to \infty $. Pullback preserves these mass and sublevel conditions.

General equations on singular spaces require estimates for the degeneracy of the pulled-back background and of the density; see 24.11.1. For the cone geometry below, a radial construction gives solutions in a prescribed logarithmic class and in the bounded class of a closed background.

9.11.27 Equations on projective cones821709E49BC3

The residual construction of section 15.22 has a counterpart on a projective cone, which is a singular space. A logarithmic pole at the vertex becomes a divisor on the incidence resolution, and removing it leaves a positive residual background. The radial equation below determines both the solution and its normalization scalar. Uniqueness among bounded residuals holds because the lifted density is smooth and its positive locus is connected and dense, even though the density vanishes on the exceptional section.

Let $B\subset \mathbb P^ N$ be a smooth connected, linearly nondegenerate, projectively normal variety of dimension $n-1$, where $N\geq n\geq 2$. Let $X\subset \mathbb P^{N+1}$ be its projective cone, with vertex $p=[0:\cdots :0:1]$, and let $\theta _0=\omega _{\mathrm{FS}}|_ X$ be the restriction of the Fubini–Study form of $\mathbb P^{N+1}$. Write the ambient homogeneous coordinates as $[Z:W]$, with $Z=(Z_0,\ldots ,Z_ N)$. The incidence resolution $\pi :Y\to X$ is a smooth $\mathbb P^1$-bundle $f:Y\to B$; its section $E=\pi ^{-1}(p)$ is contracted, and $\pi $ is an isomorphism off $E$. These cones are reduced, irreducible, compact and normal, hence unibranch, and their vertices are singular.

Indeed, the homogeneous coordinate ring of $B$ is normal by projective normality. Adjoining $W$ preserves normality, and so do the degree-zero projective charts. Algebraic normality passes to the associated analytic space by the algebraic–analytic normality theorem. Smoothness and connectedness of $B$ give irreducibility. In the chart $W=1$, the ideal of the affine cone has no linear terms, by linear nondegeneracy. Its tangent space at the origin therefore has dimension $N+1>n$, so $p$ is singular. The incidence construction is the bundle of lines in $\mathcal O_ B\oplus \mathcal O_ B(-1)$ and has the stated contraction and isomorphism properties.

Write

\[ \begin{gathered} \omega _ B=\omega _{\mathrm{FS}}|_ B,\qquad \beta =\pi ^*\theta _0,\qquad \sigma =f^*\omega _ B,\\ d=\int _ B\omega _ B^{n-1},\qquad x=\frac{\| Z\| ^2}{\| Z\| ^2+|W|^2}. \end{gathered} \]

The same symbol $x$ denotes its pullback to $Y$. Choose $\Psi \in C^\infty (\mathbb P^ N,\mathbb R)$ with $\omega _{\mathrm{FS}}+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\Psi >0$ and $k\in C^\infty ([0,1])$ with $k>0$. Put $\psi =\Psi |_ B$ and define on $Y$

DF6E62BA10C0 9.11.28
\begin{equation} \begin{gathered} s=\frac{\mathrm{e}^\psi x}{1-x+\mathrm{e}^\psi x},\qquad \ell =\log (1-x+\mathrm{e}^\psi x),\qquad \sigma _\psi =f^*(\omega _ B+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\psi ),\\ B_\psi =\beta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\ell ,\qquad \nu =k(s)B_\psi ^ n,\qquad \mu =\pi _*\nu ,\\ I=\int _0^1 k(r)r^{n-1}\, \mathrm{d} r,\qquad M=ndI. \end{gathered} \end{equation}

These data prescribe the measure $\mu $ before the equation is solved. The local form and the fiber integral below describe its degeneracy along $E$ and show that its total mass is $M$.

Choose a local holomorphic lift $b(z)$ of the embedding of $B$, and write $S(z)=\sum |b_ j(z)|^2$ and $Z=t b(z)$. In these local coordinates $(z,t)$ on $Y$,

\[ \beta =\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\log (1+|t|^2S),\qquad \sigma =\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\log S. \]

On $0<x<1$ put $\rho =\log (|t|^2S)$, $\rho _\psi =\rho +\psi $, $h(r)=\log (1+\mathrm{e}^ r)$ and $\zeta _\psi =\mathrm{d}\rho _\psi \wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}\rho _\psi $. Then $x=h'(\rho )$, $s=h'(\rho _\psi )$ and $\ell =h(\rho _\psi )-h(\rho )$. Differentiation gives

4720371980C9 9.11.29
\begin{equation} B_\psi =s\sigma _\psi +s(1-s)\zeta _\psi ,\qquad \sigma _\psi ^ n=0,\qquad \zeta _\psi ^2=0. \end{equation}

Near $E$, a local potential of $B_\psi $ is $\log (1+\mathrm{e}^\psi |t|^2S)$; at $t=0$ its Hessian has rank one, in the transverse direction. At the infinity section, with $v=1/t$, a local potential is $\log (\mathrm{e}^\psi S+|v|^2)$; its tangential Hessian is $\sigma _\psi $ and its transverse coefficient is positive. These computations show that $B_\psi $ is smooth and semipositive, and positive off $E$. Since $n\geq 2$, its top power vanishes on $E$.

Along a fiber, $\mathrm d^{\mathrm c}\rho _\psi =\mathrm{d}(\arg t)/(2\pi )$ and $\mathrm{d}\rho _\psi =\mathrm{d} s/[s(1-s)]$. Base components disappear after wedging with $\sigma _\psi ^{n-1}$, so (9.11.29) gives

\[ f_*\nu =nI(\omega _ B+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\psi )^{n-1}. \]

Since $\omega _ B+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\psi $ is closed, Stokes' theorem on $B$ gives $\int _ B(\omega _ B+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\psi )^{n-1}=d$, hence $\nu (Y)=M$. Smooth measures give $E$ zero mass. Therefore $\mu (X)=M$ and $\mu (\{ p\} )=0$. Taking $\psi =0$ and $k=1$ gives $\int _ Y\beta ^ n=d$.

9.11.30 Logarithmic poles at the vertexF23187DC5D42

The logarithmic pole supplies the tangential positivity that $\beta $ lacks along $E$. Fix $0<a<1$ and put $\varphi =a\log x$, with value $-\infty $ at $p$. Set

593FB9025947 9.11.31
\begin{equation} \begin{gathered} \beta _ a=(1-a)\beta +a\sigma ,\qquad V=d(1-a^ n),\qquad c_ a=V/M,\\ P_ a(s)=\left(a^ n+c_ an\int _0^ s k(r)r^{n-1}\, \mathrm{d} r\right)^{1/n},\\ Q_ a'(s)=\frac{P_ a(s)-a-(1-a)s}{s(1-s)},\qquad Q_ a(1)=0,\\ q_ a=a\psi +(1-a)\ell +Q_ a(s),\qquad A_ a=\beta _ a+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}q_ a. \end{gathered} \end{equation}

The singularities of $Q_ a'$ at $s=0$ and $s=1$ are removable. As the proof below shows, the form $\beta _ a$ is strictly positive everywhere, whereas $A_ a$ is semipositive and strictly positive off $E$. Off $E$, we may therefore view $A_ a$ as a positive form on $X\setminus \{ p\} $.

Choose a relatively compact coordinate ball $O\subset X\setminus \{ p\} $ and a smooth compactly supported endomorphism $H$ of $T^{1,0}O$ that is self-adjoint and trace-free with respect to $A_ a$. For tangent vectors $v,w$ of type $(1,0)$ at the same point of $O$, define

1F428FF466CA 9.11.32
\begin{equation} A_ H(v,\bar w)=A_ a(\exp (H)v,\bar w),\qquad \eta _ H=A_ H-A_ a,\qquad \theta _ H=\theta _0+\eta _ H, \end{equation}

where $\eta _ H$ is extended by zero. We call $H$ admissible if

03EEDEF4E91B 9.11.33
\begin{equation} \theta _ H>0,\qquad \beta _{a,H}:=\beta _ a+\pi ^*\eta _ H>0. \end{equation}

These are explicit open conditions on the prescribed data, and every sufficiently small $H$ satisfies them.

Theorem 9.11.34.3DAEEE3C82F5 Let $H$ be admissible, and let

\[ \mathcal C_{a,H}=\{ w\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta _ H):\ \varphi -C\leq w\leq \varphi +C\text{ for some }C<\infty \} \]

be the ordinary class of $\varphi $. There is a unique pair $(c,u)$, with $c>0$ and $u\in \mathcal C_{a,H}$ normalized by $\sup _ Xu=0$, such that

\[ \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,\theta _ H}(u)=c\mu . \]

It is given by $c=c_ a$ and

\[ u\circ \pi =\varphi \circ \pi +q_ a-K,\qquad K=\sup _ Y(\varphi \circ \pi +q_ a). \]

Every member of the class has finite extended mass. The solution has mass $V$ and is the same for every admissible $H$. For $H=0$, every member of the class has mass $V$.

The solution is continuous with values in $[-\infty ,+\infty )$, is smooth off $p$, and tends uniformly to $-\infty $ at $p$. Its smooth residual $q_ a-K$ on $Y$ satisfies

\[ (q_ a-K)|_ E=a\psi +Q_ a(0)-K. \]

If $\psi $ is nonconstant, this residual is not the pullback of any function on $X$. There are arbitrarily small admissible $H$ for which $\theta _ H$ is not closed.

For every $w\in \mathcal C_{a,H}$ and every resolution $\tau :Z\to X$, including resolutions that modify regular points,

A8F60A69A51D 9.11.35
\begin{equation} \tau _*\left\langle \bigl (\tau ^*\theta _ H+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(w\circ \tau )\bigr )^ n\right\rangle =\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,\theta _ H}(w), \end{equation}

where $\langle \cdot \rangle $ denotes the non-pluripolar product on $Z$. The measure on $Z$ is finite. Thus the measure, the normalized descended solution and the scalar are independent of the resolution and of every common refinement.

Proof. We first establish the divisor formula

98BFAEFA11C3 9.11.36
\begin{equation} \beta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(\varphi \circ \pi )=a[E]+\beta _ a. \end{equation}

Indeed, $\log x=\log |t|^2+\log S-\log (1+|t|^2S)$ and $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\log |t|^2=[t=0]$. Along $E$ the kernels of $\beta $ and $\sigma $ are complementary, and $\beta >0$ off $E$. Thus $\beta _ a$ is a smooth Kähler form. Fiber integration also gives

48E4877345BD 9.11.37
\begin{equation} \int _ Y\beta _ a^ n=nd\int _0^1[a+(1-a)x]^{n-1}(1-a)\, \mathrm{d} x=d(1-a^ n)=V. \end{equation}

By (9.11.31), $P_ a(0)=a$, $P_ a(1)=1$ and

\[ P_ a'(s)=\frac{c_ a k(s)s^{n-1}}{P_ a(s)^{n-1}}. \]

The numerator defining $Q_ a'$ vanishes at both ends, so $Q_ a$ is smooth. On $0<x<1$, a local potential for the full positive current is $F_ a(\rho _\psi )$, where

\[ F_ a(r)=ar+(1-a)h(r)+Q_ a(h'(r)). \]

Direct differentiation gives $F_ a'=P_ a(s)$ and $F_ a''=c_ a k(s)s^ n(1-s)/P_ a(s)^{n-1}$. Consequently

E5F90A48E44A 9.11.38
\begin{equation} A_ a=P_ a(s)\sigma _\psi +\frac{c_ a k(s)s^{n-1}}{P_ a(s)^{n-1}}(B_\psi -s\sigma _\psi ),\qquad A_ a^ n=c_ a\nu . \end{equation}

The coefficients are smooth since $P_ a\geq a>0$. On $E$ the restriction is $a\sigma _\psi $; at infinity the horizontal coefficient is one and the transverse coefficient relative to $B_\psi -\sigma _\psi $ is $c_ a k(1)>0$. This proves all the asserted positivity properties, including along both sections.

The functions $\varphi \circ \pi $ and $\varphi \circ \pi +q_ a$ are quasi-plurisubharmonic on $Y$. By (9.11.36), their curvature currents in the background $\beta $ are $a[E]+\beta _ a$ and $a[E]+A_ a$, respectively, so both are positive. The descent theorem theorem 9.11.5 gives $\varphi \in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta _0)$ and a potential $u_0$ with $u_0\circ \pi =\varphi \circ \pi +q_ a$. The bounded residual $q_ a$ puts $u_0$ in the ordinary class of $\varphi $ and gives the uniform logarithmic asymptotics at $p$. Its finite supremum is the constant $K$ of the theorem.

Let $H$ be admissible. Self-adjointness makes $\exp H$ positive, and $\det \exp H=\exp (\operatorname {tr}H)=1$. Hence

FB074E27BCB5 9.11.39
\begin{equation} (A_ a+\pi ^*\eta _ H)^ n=A_ a^ n=c_ a\nu ,\qquad \beta _{a,H}+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(q_ a-K)=A_ a+\pi ^*\eta _ H. \end{equation}

The function $u=u_0-K$ does not depend on $H$. On the regular locus its $\theta _ H$-curvature form is the positive form in (9.11.39); near $p$ the background and the potential are unchanged. Thus $u$ is $\theta _ H$-plurisubharmonic. Formula (9.11.36), together with the deformation, gives $\pi ^*\theta _ H+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(u\circ \pi )=a[E]+A_ a+\pi ^*\eta _ H$; removing the divisor proves the equation. The mass of the solution is $c_ aM=V$. This calculation uses the preservation of the determinant, rather than a mass identity for the class of a nonclosed form.

Bounded residuals and uniqueness. Let $w\in \mathcal C_{a,H}$. On $Y\setminus E$, its residual $g=w\circ \pi -\varphi \circ \pi $ is bounded and $\beta _{a,H}$-plurisubharmonic. By lemma 5.24.7, it extends across $E$ with the same background. Conversely, for any bounded $\beta _{a,H}$-plurisubharmonic $g$, the function $\varphi \circ \pi +g$ has the positive curvature current $a[E]+\beta _{a,H}+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g$ in the pulled-back background. It descends by theorem 9.11.5, and its uniform bounds relative to $\varphi \circ \pi $ put the descended potential in $\mathcal C_{a,H}$. Thus bounded residuals correspond exactly to members of the prescribed ordinary class.

The bounded product is finite on the compact manifold $Y$ and gives $E$ zero mass, by theorem 5.27.1, proposition 5.28.2. Thus

DA8E2A2BBA2B 9.11.40
\begin{equation} \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,\theta _ H}(w)=\pi _*\bigl (\beta _{a,H}+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g\bigr )^ n. \end{equation}

For $H=0$, closedness of $\beta _ a$ makes every term of positive degree in $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g$ in the bounded expansion integrate to zero, so (9.11.37) gives mass $V$ for every member of the class. In the nonclosed case only finiteness is used here.

If $w$ solves the equation with a scalar $c'>0$, its lifted measure is $c'\nu $, since both sides give $E$ zero mass. Both residuals, $g$ and $q_ a-K$, are continuous by corollary 14.19.29, and the uniqueness of the scalar in proposition 14.19.34 gives $c'=c_ a$. The density $\nu /\beta _{a,H}^ n$ is smooth and nonnegative, and its positive locus is exactly $Y\setminus E$. This locus is connected and dense: it is a bundle over the connected base $B$ whose fibers, $\mathbb P^1$ minus a point, are connected. Theorem 14.24.1 shows that $g-(q_ a-K)$ is constant. The normalization fixes this constant, and both full functions equal $-\infty $ at $p$. This proves uniqueness in the ordinary class.

The uniform logarithmic asymptotics give the continuity of the full solution with values in $[-\infty ,+\infty )$. Its residual restricts to $E$ as $a\psi +Q_ a(0)-K$. If $\psi $ is nonconstant, this restriction is nonconstant, so the residual is not a pullback from $X$, since a pullback is constant on $E$. This concerns only the residual; the full potential is $-\infty $ on the whole fiber $E$ and does descend.

Nonclosed deformations. Fix $z_0\in O$ and a smooth $A_ a$-unitary frame on a smaller ball. Let $K_0=\operatorname {diag}(1,-1,0,\ldots ,0)$ in this frame. Choose a real compactly supported function $\chi $ with $\chi (z_0)=0$ such that $\mathrm{d}\chi (z_0)$ is a nonzero covector in the first two complex directions, and, for $\epsilon \in \mathbb R$, put $H=\epsilon \chi K_0$. At $z_0$,

\[ \mathrm{d}\eta _ H=\epsilon \, \mathrm{d}\chi \wedge \gamma ,\qquad \gamma =A_ a(K_0\, \cdot ,\cdot ). \]

Terms containing derivatives of the frame and of $A_ a$ vanish at $z_0$ because $\chi (z_0)=0$. The restriction of $\gamma $ to these four real directions is nondegenerate, so wedge multiplication by $\gamma $ sends a nonzero one-form to a nonzero three-form. Thus $\mathrm{d}\theta _ H(z_0)\ne 0$ for $\epsilon \ne 0$. On the fixed compact support, both strict inequalities (9.11.33) persist for sufficiently small $|\epsilon |$, and $H\to 0$ smoothly as $\epsilon \to 0$. This proves the existence of arbitrarily small nonclosed admissible choices; admissibility itself does not force nonclosedness.

For any resolution $\tau :Z\to X$, theorem 9.11.26 identifies the pushforward of its non-pluripolar product with (9.11.40), which proves (9.11.35). Its total mass equals the finite mass on $X$. Since the ordinary class, the equation and the normalization are intrinsic to $X$, uniqueness gives the same solution and scalar on every resolution and common refinement. $\square$

9.11.41 The bounded equation750E47668A22

Without a logarithmic pole, the residual background is $\beta $, which degenerates along $E$. The radial construction still gives a bounded solution, and closedness of $\beta $ gives an energy argument for its uniqueness. Put

EFA25DCE0A09 9.11.42
\begin{equation} \begin{gathered} c_ b=\frac dM=\frac1{nI},\qquad R(s)=\left(c_ bn\int _0^1 k(sr)r^{n-1}\, \mathrm{d} r\right)^{1/n},\\ Q'(s)=\frac{R(s)-1}{1-s},\qquad Q(1)=0. \end{gathered} \end{equation}

Here $R$ is smooth and positive, $R(1)=1$, and $Q$ is smooth at both endpoints.

Theorem 9.11.43.4CE6B71B5B25 For the same cone and prescribed measure, there is a unique pair $(c,u)$, with $c>0$ and $u$ a bounded $\theta _0$-plurisubharmonic function normalized by $\sup _ Xu=0$, such that $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,\theta _0}(u)=c\mu $. The scalar is $c_ b$. The smooth function $\ell +Q(s)$ on $Y$ is constant on $E$ and descends to a continuous function on $X$; its normalization with supremum zero is $u$.

Every bounded $\theta _0$-plurisubharmonic function has mass $d$. Formula (9.11.35), with $\theta _0$ in place of $\theta _ H$, holds on every resolution and common refinement. If $\Psi =0$ and $k$ is nonconstant, or if $\psi $ is nonconstant, the solution is nonconstant.

Proof. Set $P(s)=sR(s)$ with the data in (9.11.42). Then

BB19755D6BE9 9.11.44
\begin{equation} P(s)^ n=c_ bn\int _0^ s k(r)r^{n-1}\, \mathrm{d} r,\qquad P(0)=0,\qquad P(1)=1. \end{equation}

Smoothness and positivity of $R$ follow from its integral formula. Since $R(1)=1$, $Q$ is smooth at $s=1$, and its derivative is also smooth at zero. Put $U=\ell +Q(s)$. It is smooth on $Y$ and equals $Q(0)$ on $E$. On $0<x<1$, a local potential for $\beta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}U$ is $F(\rho _\psi )$, where $F(r)=h(r)+Q(h'(r))$. Differentiation gives $F'=P(s)$ and $F''=c_ bk(s)s^ n(1-s)/P(s)^{n-1}$.

For $A=\beta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}U$, it follows that

9D62C6B08002 9.11.45
\begin{equation} A=P(s)\sigma _\psi +\frac{c_ b k(s)}{R(s)^{n-1}}(B_\psi -s\sigma _\psi ),\qquad A^ n=c_ b\nu . \end{equation}

This formula shows smoothness at zero directly. At infinity the horizontal coefficient is one and the transverse coefficient is positive. Thus $A$ is semipositive on $Y$ and strictly positive on $Y\setminus E$. By theorem 9.11.5, $U=u_0\circ \pi $ for some $u_0\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta _0)$. The proper surjection $\pi $ is a quotient map, so continuity of $U$ makes $u_0$ continuous. Subtracting $K_ b=\sup _ Xu_0$ gives the required solution.

Let $w$ be a bounded $\theta _0$-plurisubharmonic function. Its pullback $g=w\circ \pi $ is bounded and $\beta $-plurisubharmonic. Its bounded Monge–Ampère measure gives analytic sets zero mass and pushes forward to $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,\theta _0}(w)$. Integrating the bounded expansion and using that $\beta $ is closed gives $\int _ Y(\beta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g)^ n=\int _ Y\beta ^ n=d$; this forces the scalar of any solution to be $c_ b=d/M$. The resolution identity follows from theorem 9.11.26. Now suppose that $w$ solves the equation, and put $q=U-K_ b$, $D=\beta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g$ and $v=g-q$. The bounded integration-by-parts calculus of section 5.27 gives

\[ 0=\int _ Yv(D^ n-A^ n)=-\sum _{j=0}^{n-1}\int _ Y\mathrm{d}v\wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}v\wedge D^ j\wedge A^{n-1-j}. \]

Each integral in the sum is nonnegative, so all of them vanish; in particular, so does the one with the smooth factor $A^{n-1}$. In the weak-gradient interpretation, strict positivity of $A$ on each relatively compact chart of $Y\setminus E$ forces $\mathrm{d} v=0$ there. Since $Y\setminus E$ is connected, $v$ is constant almost everywhere on it. The divisor $E$ has volume zero, so lemma 5.24.3 gives equality everywhere on $Y$. Surjectivity of $\pi $ and the normalization give $w=u$ on $X$.

If $\Psi =0$ and the solution is constant, then $U=Q(x)$ is constant, so $Q'=0$ and $R=1$. Differentiating (9.11.44) then gives $c_ bk=1$, so $k$ is constant. If $\psi $ is nonconstant, the restriction of $U$ to the infinity section is $\psi $, so the solution is nonconstant for every $k$. $\square$

Example 9.11.46.659B6A5D3749 Without the assumption $\Psi =0$, a nonconstant $k$ does not force a nonconstant solution. Take $\Psi =\log 2$ and $k(s)=2/(2-s)^{n+1}$. Then $s=2x/(1+x)$, $\ell =\log (1+x)$ and

\[ \frac{B_\psi ^ n}{\beta ^ n}=\frac{s^ n(1-s)}{x^ n(1-x)}=\frac{(2-s)^{n+1}}2. \]

Thus $\nu =\beta ^ n$. Since $\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} s}(s/(2-s))^ n=nk(s)s^{n-1}$, one has $I=1/n$, $M=d$ and $c_ b=1$. The formulas (9.11.42) give $R=1/(2-s)$ and $Q(s)=\log (2-s)$, hence $U=\log 2$. The normalized solution is zero, although $k$ is nonconstant.

9.11.47 The quadric cone07FD7FBC796C

Let $X=\{ Z_0Z_1=Z_2^2\} \subset \mathbb P^3$. Its base conic is the quadratic Veronese image of $\mathbb P^1$, so $n=d=2$. Its homogeneous coordinate ring $\mathbb C[\xi ^2,\xi \eta ,\eta ^2]$ is the invariant ring of the sign involution acting on the normal polynomial ring $\mathbb C[\xi ,\eta ]$, and is therefore normal; thus the base is projectively normal. In the chart

\[ \pi (z,t)=(t,tz^2,tz),\qquad S=1+|z|^2+|z|^4,\qquad L=1+|t|^2S, \]

one has $\beta =\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\log L$. Differentiation gives

\[ \det ((\log L)_{j\bar k})=\frac{|t|^2(SS_{z\bar z}-|S_ z|^2)}{L^3}=\frac{|t|^2(1+4|z|^2+|z|^4)}{L^3}. \]

Writing $\lambda _4$ for Euclidean volume, we obtain

6E82FAF4001B 9.11.48
\begin{equation} \frac{\beta ^2}{2}=\frac{|t|^2(1+4|z|^2+|z|^4)}{\pi ^2(1+|t|^2(1+|z|^2+|z|^4))^3}\, \mathrm{d}\lambda _4. \end{equation}

The transverse vanishing order on $E=\{ t=0\} $ is exactly two. For $\Psi =0$ and $k=1/2$, one has $I=1/4$ and $M=1$, so $\mu _0=\theta _0^2/2$, extended by zero at $p$, is a probability measure. The logarithmic scalar and the solution mass are $c_ a=2(1-a^2)$ for every admissible deformation, including the nonclosed ones. This exact normalization follows from the preservation of the determinant.

For $\Psi =0$ and $k(s)=1+s$, one has $I=5/6$, $M=10/3$ and $c_ b=3/5$. Put $R(x)=\sqrt{(3+2x)/5}$ and $r_0=\sqrt{3/5}$. The normalized bounded solution is

E97B7922C415 9.11.49
\begin{equation} u(x)=-2(R(x)-r_0)+2\log \frac{1+R(x)}{1+r_0}. \end{equation}

Indeed, $u'=-2/[5(1+R)]=(R-1)/(1-x)$, with a removable singularity at $x=1$. Thus $u=Q(x)-Q(0)$; it is strictly decreasing in $x$, and $u(p)=\sup _ Xu=0$. As a function of $x$ it is smooth on a neighborhood of $[0,1]$, and $x$ is the restriction of a smooth ambient function, so $u$ is the restriction of a smooth ambient function. Its prescribed measure is $\mu _1=(1+x)\theta _0^2$, of mass $10/3$, and $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,\theta _0}(u)=(3/5)\mu _1$, of mass two. Formula (9.11.48) also shows how the lift of this measure vanishes along $E$.

For a real parameter $\epsilon $, the function $\Psi =\epsilon |Z_0|^2/(|Z_0|^2+|Z_1|^2+|Z_2|^2)$ is smooth on $\mathbb P^2$ and preserves $\omega _{\mathrm{FS}}+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\Psi >0$ for sufficiently small $|\epsilon |$. Its restriction to the conic takes the values $\epsilon $ and zero at $[1:0:0]$ and $[0:1:0]$. For small nonzero $\epsilon $, the logarithmic residual is therefore nonconstant on $E$ and does not descend. Deformations supported away from $p$, including nonclosed ones, leave that residual and the full descended solution unchanged.

9.11.50 Logarithmic equations on normalized curves7AADE341B54C

On a curve the pulled-back background can be degenerate, but its total mass still determines the equation. A periodic Green function on the normalization compensates for the degeneracy. The normalization also gives direct control of descent, of the atoms at the poles and of continuity.

Let $X$ be a connected compact reduced unibranch curve whose normalization is a torus:

\[ \pi :E=\mathbb C/\Lambda \longrightarrow X, \]

a finite bijective holomorphic map, where $\Lambda \subset \mathbb C$ is a lattice. It is biholomorphic outside a finite set. Let $h$ be a Hermitian form on $X$ in the sense of the beginning of this appendix. In the flat coordinate $z=x+\mathrm iy$ on $E$, set

\[ dA=dx\, dy,\qquad V=\int _ EdA,\qquad \beta _0=dA/V,\qquad \beta =\pi ^*h=b\beta _0. \]

Here $b$ is smooth and nonnegative, positive over $X_{\rm reg}$, and may vanish at the other points. Put $H=\int _ E\beta >0$. Every two-form on a curve is closed, and this is essential for the following construction.

Lemma 9.11.51.99DF4FD89931 There is a real periodic distribution $G$ with mean zero, smooth off zero, such that

E623581B83B2 9.11.52
\begin{equation} \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}G=\delta _0-\beta _0,\qquad G(z)=\log |z|^2+\text{a smooth function near }0. \end{equation}

For $r\in L^ p(E,\beta _0)$, $p>1$, its convolution satisfies

\[ \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\bigl (G*(r\beta _0)\bigr ) =\left(r-\int _ Er\beta _0\right)\beta _0. \]

The convolution is bounded and continuous, and it is smooth if $r$ is smooth.

Proof. With the normalization of $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$ fixed in the Conventions, $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v=(\Delta v)/(4\pi )\, dA$ and $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\log |z|^2=\delta _0$, as in lemma 5.37.18. Cutting off this logarithm in a coordinate disk, with a cutoff equal to one near zero, gives a function $L$ on $E$ with $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}L=\delta _0+q\beta _0$, where $q$ is smooth and $\int _ Eq\beta _0=-1$ by Stokes' theorem.

Let $e_\xi $ be the characters of the torus, with $-\Delta e_\xi =\lambda _\xi e_\xi $. The nonconstant characters have $\lambda _\xi >0$, growing quadratically on the dual lattice. Define the correction $S$, of mean zero, by its Fourier coefficients

\[ S_\xi =\frac{4\pi }{V}\frac{(q+1)_\xi }{\lambda _\xi } \quad (\xi \ne 0),\qquad S_0=0, \]

where $(q+1)_\xi $ is the Fourier coefficient of $q+1$. Integration by parts shows that these coefficients decay faster than any power of $\lambda _\xi $. Hence the series and all its derivatives converge uniformly, and $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}S=-(q+1)\beta _0$. Conjugate symmetry of the coefficients makes $S$ real. Subtracting the mean of $L+S$ from $L+S$ proves (9.11.52). In particular, $G$ belongs to $L^ r$ for every finite $r$.

The convolution uses the group law and the Haar probability $\beta _0$. Write $K=G*(r\beta _0)$. Testing against smooth functions and using Fubini's theorem proves its distributional equation. Smooth input gives smooth output by the same Fourier argument. For $p'=p/(p-1)$, Hölder's inequality gives

\[ \begin{aligned} \| K\| _\infty & \leq \| G\| _{p'}\| r\| _ p,\\ |K(z+s)-K(z)| & \leq \| r\| _ p\| G(\cdot +s)-G\| _{p'}. \end{aligned} \]

Approximating $G$ by smooth functions shows that translation is continuous in $L^{p'}$, and hence that $K$ is continuous. $\square$

Choose finitely many distinct points $q_1,\ldots ,q_ k\in E$ and weights $a_ j>0$, possibly none, with

\[ \begin{aligned} A& =\sum _ j a_ j<H,& M& =H-A,\\ \Phi & =G*((H-b)\beta _0),& \Psi & =\Phi +\sum _ j a_ jG(\cdot -q_ j). \end{aligned} \]

The function $\Phi $ is smooth, and

0567315FF18B 9.11.53
\begin{equation} \beta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\Psi =M\beta _0+\sum _ j a_ j\delta _{q_ j}. \end{equation}

Thus $\Psi $ is a $\beta $-plurisubharmonic function, not identically $-\infty $, whose logarithmic poles are exactly the points $q_ j$, with coefficients $a_ j$ measured on the normalization. The proper bijection $\pi $ is a homeomorphism, so we may define $\psi =\Psi \circ \pi ^{-1}$; its disk inequalities are proved below. The ordinary type of $\psi $ consists of the potentials $w\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,h)$ with

\[ w\leq \psi +C,\qquad \psi \leq w+C \]

for a finite constant $C$, the inequalities being understood for extended real values.

Theorem 9.11.54.2489A49CB212 Let $0\leq f\in L^ p(E,\beta _0)$ for some finite $p>1$, with $F=\int _ Ef\beta _0>0$, and set $\nu =\pi _*(f\beta _0)$. Every potential in the ordinary type of $\psi $ has extended non-pluripolar mass $M$. In this type there is a unique normalized solution of

\[ \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,h}(u)=c\nu , \qquad \sup _ Xu=0, \qquad c=\frac{H-A}{F}>0. \]

Every member of the type that solves $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,h}(w)=c'\nu $ for some constant $c'>0$, with no regularity assumed, has $c'=c$ and differs from the normalized solution by a constant.

The solution is continuous with real values off its finite pole set, and continuous at the poles as a map into $\mathbb R\cup \{ -\infty \} $ with the order topology. Its residual relative to $\psi $ extends to a continuous real function on $X$. If there are no poles, the solution itself is continuous with real values everywhere. The type and the equation do not depend on the choice of a resolution or of a common refinement. The measure $\nu $ is non-pluripolar.

Proof. Set $c=M/F$ and

\[ v=G*((cf-M)\beta _0),\qquad U=\Psi +v. \]

The lemma gives a bounded continuous $v$ and the positive current

5C30CCD83A1D 9.11.55
\begin{equation} \beta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}U=cf\beta _0+\sum _ j a_ j\delta _{q_ j}. \end{equation}

In each disk, adding a smooth local primitive of $\beta $ gives a function with positive distributional Laplacian, and hence a subharmonic representative. Continuity off the poles and the explicit logarithmic values identify this representative with $U$ as defined above. The same argument applies to $\Psi $. The supremum $S=\sup _ EU$ is finite, and we put $u=(U-S)\circ \pi ^{-1}$.

Every holomorphic disk $g:\Delta \to X$ lifts holomorphically to $\widetilde g=\pi ^{-1}\circ g$. Indeed, for a nonconstant disk the inverse image of the finite singular set is discrete, and off this set the lift is holomorphic. Since $\pi ^{-1}$ is a homeomorphism, $\widetilde g$ is continuous on the whole disk. Near an omitted point its image therefore stays in a bounded coordinate neighborhood in $E$, and the removable singularity theorem in one variable extends it holomorphically. A constant disk lifts to a constant map, and a nonconstant disk cannot have image in a finite set.

Choose a smooth local primitive $\eta $ of $\beta $ near the lifted image, that is, $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\eta =\beta $. Then $\eta \circ \widetilde g$ is a primitive of $g^*h$, and

\[ u\circ g+\eta \circ \widetilde g=(U-S+\eta )\circ \widetilde g \]

is subharmonic or identically $-\infty $. That the composition is subharmonic follows from decreasing smooth local regularizations and the holomorphic chain rule for the Laplacian. Any other primitive on the disk differs by a harmonic function. These are exactly the disk tests of definition 9.11.2, and the same argument shows that $\psi \in \mathrm{PSH}(X,h)$. A constant disk at a pole has the permitted restriction $\equiv -\infty $. A nonconstant lift meeting $q_ j$ with order $\ell $ gives the pole coefficient $\ell a_ j$.

The homeomorphism $\pi $ gives continuity off the poles. Near a pole, the smooth logarithmic remainder of $\Psi $ and the bounded continuous function $v$ give continuity with extended values. The residual is the descent of $v-S$, including at the poles, so no difference of two infinite values is involved. The solution belongs to the stated ordinary type.

For the mass and uniqueness assertions, let $w$ be any member of the type and put $W=w\circ \pi $. Pulling back along coordinate disks of the normalization shows that $W$ is $\beta $-plurisubharmonic and not identically $-\infty $. The two type inequalities make $W$ locally bounded away from $Q=\{ q_ j\} $, and at each pole they give

\[ W=a_ j\log |z-q_ j|^2+O(1), \]

with value $-\infty $ at $q_ j$. The positive Radon measure $T_ W=\beta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}W$ has total mass $H$ by Stokes' theorem. Its atom at $q_ j$ has weight exactly $a_ j$. This follows from the planar atom identity of lemma 5.37.18. Explicitly, choose a smooth local primitive $\eta $ of $\beta $ near $q_ j$, and let $m(r)$ be the circular mean of $W+\eta $ around $q_ j$. Since $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(W+\eta )=T_ W$, it satisfies

\[ m'(r)=\frac{2T_ W(B_ r)}r \]

for almost every $r$, by the divergence theorem and regularization. If $\tau =T_ W(\{ q_ j\} )$, integration gives $m(r)/\log r^2\to \tau $, while the bounded logarithmic remainder gives the limit $a_ j$.

Hence the non-pluripolar product of $W$, defined in dimension one by truncation, is

\[ \langle \beta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}W\rangle =\mathbf1_{E\setminus Q}T_ W. \]

Indeed, on each relatively compact set avoiding $Q$, a sufficiently low truncation equals $W$, and the indicator removes the poles. Its mass is $H-A=M$ for every member of the type. For (9.11.55), removing the atoms leaves $cf\beta _0$. The definition (9.11.25) gives the asserted equation on $X$. A locally pluripolar set pulls back to a set on which some quasi-subharmonic function, not identically $-\infty $, equals $-\infty $; such sets have zero flat area. Hence $\nu $ is non-pluripolar.

Suppose that $w$ solves the equation with a constant $c'>0$. Comparing total masses gives $c'F=M$, so $c'=c$. Since $\pi $ is a Borel homeomorphism and the atoms are fixed, $T_ W=T_ U$. Thus $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(W-U)=0$, where $W-U$ is an integrable function. Every nonconstant Fourier coefficient of $W-U$ vanishes, so the difference is constant almost everywhere. Subharmonic functions are determined by their averages over shrinking disks, so the values of $W$ and $U$ differ by the same constant everywhere, and the same holds on $X$. This includes members of the type with no regularity assumed.

Finally, a resolution $\rho :Y\to X$ factors through $E$ by the disk-lifting argument. The resulting proper holomorphic map $Y\to E$ has generic degree one. For smooth compact curves, the multiplicities in a fiber sum to the degree, so every fiber is a single point of multiplicity one, and the map is biholomorphic. The same holds for every common refinement, which proves the independence assertion directly. $\square$

The integrability hypothesis on $f$ refers to flat area on $E$. On $X_{\rm reg}$, the density of $\nu $ with respect to $h$ is $(f/b)\circ \pi ^{-1}$; both measures give the finite singular set zero mass. No positive lower bound for $b$ and no bound for the density on $X$ is required.

9.11.56 A projective cusp with a degenerate pullback90D7DAC242DE

The following example has a normalization of genus one and a singularity that is not normal. Its background and its equation can both be computed explicitly.

Example 9.11.57.77EE41C1372C There is a projective unibranch curve with one ordinary cusp, normalized by $E=\mathbb C/(\mathbb Z+\mathrm i\mathbb Z)$, for which the restricted Fubini–Study background has mass $H=6$. For the reference with one pole of weight one at the preimage of the cusp, every potential of its ordinary type has mass five. With

\[ f(z)=1+\tfrac 12\cos (2\pi \operatorname {Re}z),\qquad \nu =\pi _*(f\beta _0), \]

the normalized equation has $c=5$. Its residual is continuous on the curve, although the density on the regular locus with respect to the background is unbounded at the cusp. That density belongs to $L^ r(X,h)$ exactly for $1\leq r<2$.

Proof. For the square lattice define

\[ x(z)=z^{-2}+\sum _{\substack {\lambda \in \mathbb Z+\mathrm i\mathbb Z\\ \lambda \ne 0}} \bigl ((z-\lambda )^{-2}-\lambda ^{-2}\bigr ), \qquad y=x'. \]

The summands are $O(|\lambda |^{-3})$ on compact sets away from the lattice, so the series converges normally. Pairing opposite lattice points shows that $x$ is even. The differentiated series is absolutely and normally convergent, and reindexing shows that $y$ is periodic. Thus $x(z+\omega )-x(z)$ is constant for $\omega =1,\mathrm i$; evaluating at $-\omega /2$ and using evenness shows that this constant is zero. Both functions are meromorphic on $E$, with their only poles at zero and expansions

\[ x=z^{-2}+a_2z^2+a_4z^4+\cdots , \qquad y=-2z^{-3}+2a_2z+4a_4z^3+\cdots . \]

Cancelling the Laurent expansions leaves an elliptic function with no poles and zero constant term, which vanishes by the maximum principle. This gives

E7FF7E63C71E 9.11.58
\begin{equation} y^2=4x^3-g_2x-g_3, \qquad g_2=20a_2,\quad g_3=28a_4. \end{equation}

The argument principle on a translated fundamental parallelogram shows that $x-c$ has two zeros, counted with multiplicity, for every finite $c$. Its fibers are therefore of the form $\{ z,-z\} $. If $y(z)=0$, the local multiplicity is at least two. Distinct points $z,-z$ would then give at least four zeros, so $z=-z$ on $E$, the multiplicity is exactly two, and $x''(z)\ne 0$. Since $y$ is odd, the map $(x,y)$ is injective and immersive away from zero: use $dx$ where $y\ne 0$, and $dy=x''dz$ otherwise.

Define

\[ \pi (z)=[1:x:y:x^2:x^3],\qquad \pi (0)=[0:0:0:0:1]. \]

In the last affine chart its holomorphic coordinates are

\[ [s^3:s^2:t:s:1],\qquad s=1/x=z^2+O(z^6),\qquad t=y/x^3=-2z^3+O(z^7). \]

Equation (9.11.58) becomes

\[ t^2=s^3(4-g_2s^2-g_3s^3). \]

Dividing $t$ by an analytic square root of the nonvanishing factor gives the ordinary cusp $t'^2=s^3$. Choose the local parameter $\zeta $ so that $s=\zeta ^2$ and $t'=\zeta ^3$. The local ring of the cusp is $\mathbb C\{ \zeta ^2,\zeta ^3\} $, with normalization $\mathbb C\{ \zeta \} $. To see this directly, note that division by $t'^2-s^3$ writes every germ as $A(s)+t'B(s)$, and the even and odd parts identify the image ring. Its fraction field contains $\zeta $, which is integral since $\zeta ^2=s$, and the larger ring is a finite module generated by $1$ and $\zeta $. An integral meromorphic germ cannot have negative order: in a monic equation, its highest power would have strictly smallest order. Hence $\mathbb C\{ \zeta \} $ is the full integral closure.

The image is the reduced projective locus

\[ \begin{aligned} Z_1^2& =Z_0Z_3,& Z_1Z_3& =Z_0Z_4,\\ Z_3^2& =Z_1Z_4,& Z_2^2& =4Z_0Z_4-g_2Z_0Z_1-g_3Z_0^2. \end{aligned} \]

On $Z_0\ne 0$ these equations describe the graph of the affine cubic, and since the fibers of $x$ have degree two, both square-root values of $y$ occur. On $Z_0=0$ they force $Z_1=Z_3=Z_2=0$, leaving only $\pi (0)$. In the last chart they give exactly the cusp displayed above. The finite local module at the cusp and the biholomorphic charts elsewhere show that $\pi $ is finite. Hence $\pi $ is the bijective normalization of a connected curve that is smooth away from this one cusp.

For the restricted Fubini–Study form, $\beta =b\beta _0$ is positive away from zero and

\[ C_1|z|^2\leq b(z)\leq C_2|z|^2 \]

near zero. Indeed, the derivatives of the coordinates in the last chart vanish at zero, and $ds=2z\, dz+O(z^5)dz$ gives the leading term. On the complement of zero, the Fubini–Study potential is

\[ L=\log (1+|x|^2+|y|^2+|x|^4+|x|^6) =-6\log |z|^2+\text{a smooth function near }0. \]

Globally $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}L=\beta -6\delta _0$, so integrating gives $H=6$. Since the normalization has generic degree one, the degree two of $x$ contributes no factor to the measure.

For the pole of weight one, the reference and the continuous correction are

\[ \Psi =G*((6-b)\beta _0)+G, \qquad v=-\frac5{2\pi }\cos (2\pi \operatorname {Re}z). \]

Direct differentiation gives $\beta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\Psi =5\beta _0+\delta _0$ and $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v=(5f-5)\beta _0$. Since $F=1$, theorem 9.11.54 gives $c=5$, the mass, and uniqueness in the whole type. The residual is the descent of $v-\sup _ E(\Psi +v)$. Finally, $f/b$ is comparable to $|z|^{-2}$ near zero, and the integral of its $r$th power against $\beta =b\beta _0$ is comparable to

\[ \int _0^\epsilon \rho ^{3-2r}\, d\rho . \]

This is finite exactly when $r<2$, with logarithmic divergence at $r=2$. $\square$

The cusp is not normal, so the example is not covered by hypotheses requiring normal log-terminal singularities. Nor is the curve a projective cone: an irreducible reduced projective cone of dimension one has a single point as base and is a projective line, whereas the normalization here has genus one. Without poles, the same data give $c=6$ and $v=-(3/\pi )\cos (2\pi \operatorname {Re}z)$, and the solution is continuous with real values even at the cusp. These are sufficient conditions in dimension one; the general problem for singular spaces in 24.11.1 remains open.

9.11.59 A logarithmic endpoint for integrable dataE2DBF02EA6E5

The hypothesis $p>1$ in theorem 9.11.54 guarantees that the Green correction is bounded and continuous. For merely integrable densities, the solution can leave the ordinary type. The following family of densities locates the boundary exactly, and it also gives continuous residuals for some densities outside every $L^ p$, $p>1$.

We keep the notation $X,E,h,\beta ,\beta _0,H,\Psi ,\psi ,A,M$ of subsection 9.11.50, with $A<H$. Fix $q\in E$ and a flat coordinate $z$ centered at $q$, and put $r=|z|$ and $t=\log (1/r)$, so that $t>1$ on a small punctured disk around $q$. For $C_0>0$ and $\gamma >1$, choose a positive density $f_\gamma $, smooth away from $q$, which equals

\[ f_\gamma =C_0r^{-2}t^{-\gamma } \]

on a sufficiently small punctured disk around $q$, and extend it smoothly and positively to the complement. Set

\[ F_\gamma =\int _ Ef_\gamma \beta _0,\qquad c_\gamma =M/F_\gamma ,\qquad \nu _\gamma =\pi _*(f_\gamma \beta _0). \]

The local integral of $f_\gamma $ is finite exactly for $\gamma >1$. For every such $\gamma $, this density lies outside $L^ p(E,\beta _0)$ for every $p>1$. Since $f_\gamma \beta _0$ is absolutely continuous on $E$, the measure $\nu _\gamma $ is non-pluripolar by the pullback argument in the proof of theorem 9.11.54.

Theorem 9.11.60.E80960D59FB4 For this family, the equation $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,h}(u)=c\nu _\gamma $ with some constant $c>0$ has a solution in the ordinary type of $\psi $ if and only if $\gamma >2$. In that case $c=c_\gamma $, the normalized solution is unique in the whole type, and its residual is continuous but, on the normalization, not Hölder continuous for any positive exponent.

For $1<\gamma \leq 2$, there is a solution $u_\gamma \in \mathrm{PSH}(X,h)$ of

\[ \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,h}(u_\gamma ) =c_\gamma \nu _\gamma \]

with non-pluripolar mass $M$, whose pullback to $E$ has the same multiplier ideals as $\Psi $ at every positive weight. It violates the lower inequality $\psi \leq u_\gamma +C$ of the ordinary type, and no solution with any positive constant exists in the ordinary type of $\psi $.

Proof. The coefficient below differs from that in (10.23.2) because here $\beta _0=dA/V$. Define on the punctured coordinate disk

7B4446B6082E 9.11.61
\begin{equation} P_\gamma (t)= \begin{cases} \displaystyle \frac{4\pi C_0}{V(\gamma -1)(\gamma -2)} t^{2-\gamma },& \gamma \ne 2,\\[4pt] \displaystyle -\frac{4\pi C_0}{V}\log t,& \gamma =2. \end{cases} \end{equation}

Direct differentiation gives

\[ P_\gamma ''(t)=\frac{4\pi C_0}{V}t^{-\gamma },\qquad \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}P_\gamma =f_\gamma \beta _0 \]

off $q$. The flux of $P_\gamma $ through the circle of radius $\mathrm{e}^{-t}$, which computes the mass of $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}P_\gamma $ inside this circle, is

\[ -\tfrac 12P_\gamma '(t) =\frac{2\pi C_0}{V(\gamma -1)}t^{1-\gamma }\longrightarrow 0 \]

as $t\to \infty $. Thus the distributional extension across $q$ adds no atom. Also $P_\gamma $ is locally integrable and $|P_\gamma (t)|/t\to 0$, so its Lelong number at $q$ is zero. These are the same flux and growth mechanisms as in theorem 10.23.1, with the present normalization of area.

Take a smooth cutoff $\chi $ supported in the coordinate disk and equal to one near $q$, and extend $L=c_\gamma \chi P_\gamma $ by zero. The signed measure

\[ \rho \beta _0=(c_\gamma f_\gamma -M)\beta _0-\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}L \]

has a smooth density $\rho $ on all of $E$: near $q$ the singular densities cancel, leaving $-M\beta _0$. Its integral is zero by Stokes' theorem and $c_\gamma F_\gamma =M$. Hence lemma 9.11.51 gives a smooth correction $R=G*(\rho \beta _0)$. Set $v_\gamma =L+R$ and $U_\gamma =\Psi +v_\gamma $. Then

BA74C8891A07 9.11.62
\begin{equation} \beta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}U_\gamma =c_\gamma f_\gamma \beta _0+\sum _ j a_ j\delta _{q_ j}. \end{equation}

As before, the positive local Laplacians give subharmonic representatives. The disk-lifting argument in the proof of theorem 9.11.54 descends $U_\gamma -\sup _ EU_\gamma $. It is smooth away from the original poles and from $q$. Its non-pluripolar product removes the original atoms, and a possible new value $-\infty $ at $q$ carries no atom. The mass is therefore $M$, and (9.11.25) gives the equation on $X$.

For $\gamma >2$, $P_\gamma \to 0$, so $v_\gamma $ extends continuously and boundedly, and the solution belongs to the prescribed ordinary type. The difference of $v_\gamma $ from its value at $q$ has a nonzero leading term proportional to $t^{2-\gamma }$, with a smooth remainder of order $O(r)$. This decays more slowly than every power $r^\alpha $, $\alpha >0$, so the residual is not Hölder continuous for any positive exponent. Uniqueness follows from the mass of the whole type, the restoration of the fixed pole atoms and the harmonic-difference argument used in the proof of theorem 9.11.54; none of these steps requires $p>1$ once the bounded correction exists.

For $1<\gamma \leq 2$, $P_\gamma \to -\infty $. The correction is bounded above but unbounded below near $q$, so the inequality $\Psi \leq U_\gamma +C$ fails off the pole set. Since its Lelong number is zero, the point atoms of $\beta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}U_\gamma $ are those of $\beta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\Psi $. Applying lemma 5.37.18 to each positive multiple, after a smooth local correction, shows that all multiplier ideals of $U_\gamma $ and $\Psi $ on $E$ coincide, also when $q$ is not one of the original poles. On $X$, this is resolution-ideal equivalence in the sense defined before proposition 9.11.9.

If another solution belonged to the ordinary type, its mass would be $M$, which forces the constant $c_\gamma $. Restoring its prescribed atoms in the extended equation would give exactly (9.11.62). Its difference from $U_\gamma $ would then be harmonic on the torus, hence constant, with equality of the values everywhere. This contradicts the unboundedness of the correction near $q$, so no positive constant admits a solution in the ordinary type.

Finally, the integral of the density is a constant times $\int ^\infty t^{-\gamma }dt$, whereas the integral of its $p$th power, $p>1$, is comparable to

\[ \int ^\infty e^{2(p-1)t}t^{-p\gamma }dt=+\infty . \]

This proves both integrability assertions and completes the proof. $\square$

The theorem is an exact criterion for this logarithmic family only; it does not characterize general $L^1$ data, and it gives no mass or uniqueness statement for the whole resolution-ideal class. On the projective cusp, all these constructions apply with the same, possibly degenerate, pulled-back background. The failure at $\gamma =2$ occurs already in the bounded ordinary type, that is, when there are no original poles.

9.11.63 Nonclosed equations on cuspidal products25867983D80D

On a cuspidal curve, the pullback of a Hermitian form to the normalization degenerates at the preimage of the cusp, but adding a smooth potential turns it into a positive form. On the products below we perturb the background by a nonclosed form all of whose powers are $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$-closed. This fixes the mass of every bounded potential and gives an energy comparison, although the background is not closed. A perturbative solution near a constant-coefficient form then provides a positive solution against which every bounded solution can be compared.

Fix $n\geq 2$. For $j=1,\ldots ,n$, let $E_ j=\mathbb C/(\mathbb Z+\mathrm i\mathbb Z)$ with coordinate $z_ j$, and put $\kappa _ j=\frac{\mathrm i}{2\pi }\mathrm dz_ j\wedge \mathrm d\bar z_ j$. Replace a neighborhood of a point $p\in E_1$ by the cusp with normalization $z\mapsto (z^2,z^3)$; equivalently, the holomorphic functions at the marked point are the functions on $E_1$ whose first derivative vanishes there. Denote the resulting compact curve by $C$ and its cusp by $q$. Put

\[ X=C\times E_2\times \cdots \times E_ n,\qquad Y=E_1\times \cdots \times E_ n. \]

The normalization $\pi :Y\to X$ is finite and bijective, hence a homeomorphism, and has generic degree one. The space $X$ is reduced, irreducible and unibranch, and its singular locus is $\{ q\} \times E_2\times \cdots \times E_ n$.

Choose a Hermitian form $h_ C$ on $C$ which near $q$ is the restriction of $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(|x|^2+|y|^2)$, where $(x,y)=(z^2,z^3)$ are the coordinates of the cusp. Its pullback is $\eta =\rho \kappa _1$, where $\rho $ is smooth, positive off $p$, and

B5525E6496F5 9.11.64
\begin{equation} \rho =4|z|^2+9|z|^4\quad \hbox{near }p. \end{equation}

Write $\lambda >0$ for the average of $\rho $ on $E_1$, and set

\[ h_0=h_ C+\sum _{j=2}^ n\kappa _ j,\quad H_0=\pi ^*h_0=\eta +\sum _{j=2}^ n\kappa _ j,\quad K_0=\lambda \kappa _1+\sum _{j=2}^ n\kappa _ j,\quad \Omega =K_0^ n. \]

Forms on the factors are pulled back to the products without change of notation.

Proposition 9.11.65.D0F33FF75830 There are a smooth real $(1,1)$-form $\alpha $ on $X$, mixing the factors $C$ and $E_2$, and a smooth real function $v_0$ on $Y$ such that, for every sufficiently small nonzero real $\varepsilon $, the Hermitian form $h=h_0+\varepsilon \alpha $ is not closed and

\[ \begin{gathered} H=\pi ^*h,\qquad k=H+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_0=K_0+\varepsilon \pi ^*\alpha \geq \tfrac 12K_0,\\ \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(H^ r)=\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(k^ r)=0\quad (r\geq 0). \end{gathered} \]

Moreover $\int _ YH^ n=\int _ Yk^ n=:M>0$.

Proof. Choose real smooth functions $A$ on $C$, supported away from $q$, and $B$ on $E_2$. Let

\[ \alpha =\partial A\wedge \bar\partial B+\bar\partial A\wedge \partial B =\partial (A\bar\partial B)+\bar\partial (A\partial B). \]

The form $\alpha $ is real and satisfies $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\alpha =0$. At a point where $\partial A=0$, $\partial \bar\partial A\ne 0$ and $\partial B\ne 0$,

\[ \partial \alpha =-\partial A\wedge \partial \bar\partial B +\partial \bar\partial A\wedge \partial B\ne 0. \]

Thus $\mathrm d\alpha \ne 0$. The form $\alpha $ vanishes near the singular locus. Its operator norm relative to $H_0$ is bounded on its support, and its norm relative to $K_0$ is bounded everywhere. Choose $|\varepsilon |$ so small that both norms, multiplied by $|\varepsilon |$, are less than $1/2$. This proves positivity of $h$ in the ambient sense, semipositivity of $H$, and the inequality $K_0+\varepsilon \pi ^*\alpha \geq \tfrac 12K_0$.

The equation $\partial _ z\partial _{\bar z}v=\lambda -\rho $ on $E_1$, whose right-hand side has mean zero, has a smooth real periodic solution, obtained by dividing its nonzero Fourier coefficients. Its pullback $v_0$ satisfies $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_0=(\lambda -\rho )\kappa _1$, which proves the formula for $k$. The forms $H_0$ and $K_0$ are closed. Hence $\mathrm dk$ and $\mathrm d^{\mathrm c}k$ come from the complex surface $E_1\times E_2$, so that $\mathrm dk\wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}k=0$ for degree reasons, and $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}k=0$. The same identities hold for $H$. The Leibniz rule now gives $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(k^ r)=\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(H^ r)=0$ for all $r$; this uses both torsion identities, not only pluriclosedness. Expanding $(H+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_0)^ n$ and integrating by parts shows that every term containing $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_0$ integrates to zero. Hence the masses agree, and positivity of $k$ makes them positive. $\square$

Fix an integer $s\geq n+3$ before making a further choice of $\varepsilon $. Use the Fourier Sobolev norm $\| w\| _{H^ t}^2=\sum _{m\in \mathbb Z^{2n}}(1+|m|^2)^ t|\widehat w(m)|^2$ on $Y$, and write $H^ t_0$ for the subspace of real functions in $H^ t$ with zero mean with respect to $\Omega $. In the remaining formulas, $\alpha $ denotes its pullback to $Y$.

Theorem 9.11.66.6EDDAD49D627 For sufficiently small nonzero $\varepsilon $, depending on $n$, $s$ and the fixed forms, there are explicit constants $R,\delta >0$ such that every $g\in H^ s_0$ with $\| g\| _{H^ s}\leq \delta $ admits a unique $w\in H^{s+2}_0$ with $\| w\| _{H^{s+2}}\leq R$ satisfying

\[ (k+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w)^ n=(f_\varepsilon +g)\Omega , \qquad f_\varepsilon =\frac{k^ n}{\Omega },\qquad k+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w\geq \tfrac 14K_0. \]

The constants may be chosen as in (9.11.67). In particular, $w$ is of class $C^2$.

Proof. Set $b_1=\lambda $ and $b_ j=1$ for $j\geq 2$. The operator

\[ L_0w=\frac{nK_0^{n-1}\wedge \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w}{\Omega } =\sum _ j b_ j^{-1}\partial _{z_ j}\partial _{\bar z_ j}w \]

has Fourier eigenvalues $\ell (m)=-\pi ^2\sum _ jb_ j^{-1}(m_{2j-1}^2+m_{2j}^2)$. It has an inverse $H^ s_0\to H^{s+2}_0$ of norm

\[ A_0=\sup _{m\ne 0}\frac{1+|m|^2}{|\ell (m)|} \leq \frac{2\max _ jb_ j}{\pi ^2}. \]

Let $L_\varepsilon w=nk^{n-1}\wedge \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w/\Omega $. It preserves zero mean because $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(k^{n-1})=0$. Fix $\varepsilon _0\leq 1$ within the positivity range. The finite expansion of $k^{n-1}$ gives

\[ L_\varepsilon -L_0=\sum _{j=1}^{n-1}\varepsilon ^ jP_ j, \qquad P_ jw=n\binom {n-1}{j} \frac{K_0^{n-1-j}\wedge \alpha ^ j\wedge \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w}{\Omega }. \]

Choose bounds $e_ j$ for the norms $\| P_ j\| _{H^{s+2}\to H^ s}$, which are finite since multiplication by smooth coefficients is bounded on $H^ s$, and set $B=\sum _ j\varepsilon _0^{j-1}e_ j$. If $|\varepsilon |\leq \varepsilon _0$ and $|\varepsilon |A_0B\leq 1/2$, the Neumann series gives $\| L_\varepsilon ^{-1}\| \leq A:=2A_0$.

The remainder is

\[ Q(w)=\sum _{r=2}^ n\binom nr\frac{k^{n-r}\wedge (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w)^ r}{\Omega }. \]

For $s>n$, Fourier convolution and the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, together with $\sum _ m(1+|m|^2)^{-s}<\infty $, make $H^ s$ an algebra. Multiplication by smooth coefficients and the finite expansion therefore give a constant $C_ Q$ such that, on the unit ball of $H^{s+2}$,

\[ \begin{aligned} \| Q(w)\| _{H^ s}& \leq C_ Q\| w\| _{H^{s+2}}^2,\\ \| Q(w)-Q(z)\| _{H^ s}& \leq C_ Q(\| w\| _{H^{s+2}}+\| z\| _{H^{s+2}})\| w-z\| _{H^{s+2}}. \end{aligned} \]

Each term of $Q(w)$ has zero integral against $\Omega $: for smooth $w$, its integral is $\int w\, \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(k^{n-r})\wedge (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w)^{r-1}=0$, and Sobolev approximation gives the general case. The Sobolev embedding also gives a constant $D$ such that the pointwise operator norm of $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w$ with respect to $K_0$ is at most $D\| w\| _{H^{s+2}}$. Choose

E79D47E722CF 9.11.67
\begin{equation} 0<R\leq \min \{ 1,(4AC_ Q)^{-1},(4D)^{-1}\} ,\qquad \delta =R/(2A). \end{equation}

The equation is equivalent to $L_\varepsilon w+Q(w)=g$. The map $w\mapsto L_\varepsilon ^{-1}(g-Q(w))$ takes the closed ball of radius $R$ in $H^{s+2}_0$ into the ball of radius $3R/4$ and has Lipschitz constant at most $1/2$. Its fixed point gives existence and uniqueness in that ball. Since $k\geq K_0/2$ and the operator norm of $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w$ is at most $1/4$, the form $k+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w$ is at least $K_0/4$. The embedding $H^{s+2}\subset C^2$ follows from $s\geq n+3$. $\square$

The perturbation $g$ may depend on all torus variables. For example, writing $z_ j=x_ j+\mathrm i y_ j$, every sufficiently small nonzero multiple of $\prod _ j\cos (2\pi x_ j)+\prod _ j\cos (2\pi y_ j)$ is an admissible perturbation with zero mean. Thus the construction does not force the solution to have separated variables.

Lemma 9.11.68.7426C6119D9F Every bounded $U\in \mathrm{PSH}(Y,k)$ satisfies $\int _ Y(k+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}U)^ n=M$. The same holds with $H$ in place of $k$.

Proof. The products are the bounded products of proposition 5.28.2. For $r\geq 1$, the bounded local recursion and Stokes' theorem on the compact manifold $Y$ give

\[ \int _ Y k^{n-r}\wedge (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}U)^ r =\int _ YU\, \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(k^{n-r})\wedge (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}U)^{r-1}=0. \]

Alternatively, one may convolve $U$ on the torus, add a fixed local positive quadratic function, and pass to the limit in the decreasing bounded expansion; every smooth integral vanishes by the same identity. Expanding the top power proves the assertion. The proof for $H$ is identical, since its powers are also $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$-closed and its mass is $M$. $\square$

Proposition 9.11.69.FEAE8B85485E Let $V$ be a solution $w$ given by theorem 9.11.66. If a bounded $U\in \mathrm{PSH}(Y,k)$ satisfies $(k+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}U)^ n=(k+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}V)^ n$, then $U-V$ is constant.

Proof. Convolve $U$, $V$ and $k$ with the same nonnegative radial kernel $\varrho _ j$ on the torus, of radius $r_ j\downarrow 0$, and write

\[ U_ j=U*\varrho _ j,\quad V_ j=V*\varrho _ j,\quad k_ j=k*\varrho _ j, \quad A_ j=k_ j+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}U_ j,\quad B_ j=k_ j+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}V_ j. \]

Translations preserve positivity, so $A_ j\geq 0$ and $B_ j\geq \beta K_0$ with $\beta =1/4$. The forms $k_ j$ converge smoothly, and $V_ j$ converges in $C^2$. On lifted coordinate balls, choose a common positive quadratic function $q$ with $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}q\geq k$. Convolution gives $q*\varrho _ j=q+b r_ j^2$ for a fixed $b>0$. The radial averages of the bounded plurisubharmonic functions $U+q$ and $V+q$ decrease as the radii decrease. Hence $U_ j+b r_ j^2+q$ and $V_ j+b r_ j^2+q$ decrease to $U+q$ and $V+q$; the identical constants cancel in the difference.

Put $\phi _ j=U_ j-V_ j$ and $T_ j=\sum _{r=0}^{n-1}A_ j^ r\wedge B_ j^{n-1-r}$. The identities $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}k_ j=0$ and $\mathrm dk_ j\wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}k_ j=0$ persist under convolution, since the torsion is still pulled back from $E_1\times E_2$. Differentiating the monomials therefore gives $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}T_ j=0$. Also $T_ j\geq B_ j^{n-1}\geq \beta ^{n-1}K_0^{n-1}$. Stokes' theorem applied to $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(\phi _ j^2)$ yields

E6758962B60C 9.11.70
\begin{equation} -\int _ Y\phi _ j(A_ j^ n-B_ j^ n) =\int _ Y\mathrm d\phi _ j\wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}\phi _ j\wedge T_ j \geq \beta ^{n-1}\int _ Y\mathrm d\phi _ j\wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}\phi _ j\wedge K_0^{n-1}. \end{equation}

Only the $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$-closedness of $T_ j$ is needed here.

We treat the four terms on the left separately. Expand $A_ j^ n$ with respect to the local plurisubharmonic potential $U_ j+b r_ j^2+q$ and the smoothly converging coefficient $k_ j-\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}q$. The weighted limit lemma 5.27.2 gives $\int U_ jA_ j^ n\to \int U(k+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}U)^ n$. Decreasing convergence and the uniform convergence of $V_ j$ give the corresponding limit for $\int V_ jA_ j^ n$. Since $B_ j^ n$ has uniformly converging continuous densities, bounded pointwise convergence and dominated convergence give the limit of $\int U_ jB_ j^ n$. The term $\int V_ jB_ j^ n$ converges by $C^2$ convergence. A finite partition of unity gives the global statements. Since the two limiting measures are equal, the left-hand side of (9.11.70) tends to zero.

The flat Fourier Poincaré inequality now shows that the $L^2$ norm of $\phi _ j$ minus its average tends to zero. Bounded convergence gives $\phi _ j\to U-V$ in $L^2$, so $U-V$ is constant almost everywhere. Local smooth corrections and the canonical plurisubharmonic representatives extend this equality to every point. $\square$

Theorem 9.11.71.127BF0018B1A Let $f\in H^ s(Y)$ be strictly positive and set

\[ \nu =\pi _*(f\Omega ),\qquad c=\frac{M}{\int _ Y f\Omega }. \]

If $\| cf-f_\varepsilon \| _{H^ s}\leq \delta $, there is a unique bounded $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,h)$ with $\sup _ Xu=0$ and

\[ \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,h}(u)=c\nu . \]

The function $u$ is continuous and locally Hölder continuous of exponent $1/3$ in ambient coordinates. The measure $\nu $ is non-pluripolar and gives the singular locus zero mass. On the regular locus its density with respect to $h^ n$ is $f/J$, where $J=H^ n/\Omega $; near the cusp this density is $\lambda f/\rho $. The equation holds on every resolution and every common smooth refinement. Every bounded solution of an equation $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,h}(u')=c'\nu $ with $c'>0$ has $c'=c$.

Proof. The function $g=cf-f_\varepsilon $ has zero mean. Let $w$ be the solution given by theorem 9.11.66. The potential $v_0+w$ is bounded and $H$-plurisubharmonic. Descent through the resolution $\pi $ (theorem 9.11.5) gives

\[ u=(v_0+w)\circ \pi ^{-1}-\sup _ Y(v_0+w), \]

which satisfies the disk condition with the background $h$ itself. Since the normalization is a homeomorphism, $u$ is continuous. The definition of the extended measure and theorem 9.11.26 give the equation. Any other bounded solution pulls back to a bounded $H$-plurisubharmonic potential. Since $\pi $ is a Borel homeomorphism, equality of the pushforward measures means equality on $Y$. Subtracting $v_0$ and applying proposition 9.11.69 gives uniqueness. The mass identity of lemma 9.11.68 forces the scalar of every bounded solution to be $M/\nu (X)=c$.

The singular locus pulls back to the divisor $\{ p\} \times E_2\times \cdots \times E_ n$, which has zero smooth volume. If a set is locally pluripolar, a local plurisubharmonic function equal to $-\infty $ on it pulls back to a plurisubharmonic function, not identically $-\infty $, away from that divisor; its pole set has zero smooth volume. Thus $\nu $ is non-pluripolar. On the regular locus, the change of variables formula gives the density $f/J$. Near the cusp $\alpha =0$, so

\[ H^ n=n!\rho \, \kappa _1\wedge \cdots \wedge \kappa _ n, \qquad \Omega =n!\lambda \, \kappa _1\wedge \cdots \wedge \kappa _ n. \]

The ratio gives the density $\lambda f/\rho $; the generic degree of $\pi $ and both factorials have been accounted for.

For the Hölder assertion, put $d=z-z'$ and $a=z+z'$. Then

\[ z^2-z'^2=da,\qquad z^3-z'^3=d(3a^2+d^2)/4. \]

If $|a|\geq |d|/4$, the first modulus is at least $|d|^2/4$, which controls $|d|^3$ on a bounded chart. Otherwise the second modulus is at least $13|d|^3/64$. Hence $|z-z'|\leq C(|z^2-z'^2|+|z^3-z'^3|)^{1/3}$. The $C^1$ regularity of $v_0+w$ in $z$ and in the other product coordinates gives the asserted ambient estimate.

Every resolution $\sigma :Z\to X$ factors through $Y$: in the cusp chart, the quotient $y/x$ is bounded off the exceptional set and extends holomorphically to the smooth source, giving the normalization coordinate. Write $\sigma =\pi \circ \mu $. The map $\mu $ is a proper modification. The bounded pullback products agree off its exceptional locus, and they give this analytic set zero mass by proposition 5.28.2. Hence their pushforwards agree on all of $Y$. This proves the equation on every resolution, and the same argument applies to further common refinements. The full potential is exactly $u\circ \sigma $, which is constant on every fiber, and surjectivity preserves all ordinary comparisons. $\square$

Existence alone holds for a larger class of data: on the normalization, the positive form $k$ places the equation in the bounded-mass regime of section 10.31. The smallness condition above is needed for the quantitative regularity and for the positive solution used in the uniqueness comparison.

Corollary 9.11.72.5F7DB1E779E6 For the same $X$ and $h$, every nonzero nonnegative $f\in L^ p(Y,\Omega )$, $p>1$, admits a bounded $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,h)$ with $\sup _ Xu=0$ and

\[ \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,h}(u)=\frac{M}{\int _ Yf\Omega }\, \pi _*(f\Omega ). \]

Proof. The torus $Y$ is Kähler, so it has bounded mass by lemma 19.9.12. Since $k>0$, zero is an ordinary model for $k$: $P_ k[0]=0$. Its lower volume is $M>0$ by lemma 9.11.68, because the potentials of the same ordinary type as zero are exactly the bounded ones. Hence theorem 10.31.3, applied on $Y$ with background $k$ and reference zero, gives a bounded $k$-plurisubharmonic solution for the measure $f\Omega $, and its scalar is $M/\int f\Omega $. Adding $v_0$ and using theorem 9.11.5, theorem 9.11.26 gives the normalized equation on $X$. The datum is non-pluripolar as in theorem 9.11.71. Neither smallness nor strict positivity of $f$ is needed for this existence statement. $\square$

The spaces $X$ contain no rational curves. Indeed, a holomorphic map $\mathbb P^1\to X$ lifts locally to $Y$ through the cusp normalization, and the local lifts glue by uniqueness. Every flat holomorphic one-form on $Y$ pulls back to zero on $\mathbb P^1$, so the lifted map has zero derivative and is constant. The results of this section depend on this explicit geometry, on the bounded ordinary type and on the $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$-closedness of all powers of the background. Ambient Hölder regularity and uniqueness in the whole bounded class are proved only for data in the small Sobolev neighborhood above. The general problem 24.11.1, including arbitrary pole types and backgrounds whose powers are not $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$-closed, remains open.

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.