Theorem 9.11.34.3DAEEE3C82F5 Let $H$ be admissible, and let
\[ \mathcal C_{a,H}=\{ w\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta _ H):\ \varphi -C\leq w\leq \varphi +C\text{ for some }C<\infty \} \]
be the ordinary class of $\varphi $. There is a unique pair $(c,u)$, with $c>0$ and $u\in \mathcal C_{a,H}$ normalized by $\sup _ Xu=0$, such that
\[ \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,\theta _ H}(u)=c\mu . \]
It is given by $c=c_ a$ and
\[ u\circ \pi =\varphi \circ \pi +q_ a-K,\qquad K=\sup _ Y(\varphi \circ \pi +q_ a). \]
Every member of the class has finite extended mass. The solution has mass $V$ and is the same for every admissible $H$. For $H=0$, every member of the class has mass $V$.
The solution is continuous with values in $[-\infty ,+\infty )$, is smooth off $p$, and tends uniformly to $-\infty $ at $p$. Its smooth residual $q_ a-K$ on $Y$ satisfies
\[ (q_ a-K)|_ E=a\psi +Q_ a(0)-K. \]
If $\psi $ is nonconstant, this residual is not the pullback of any function on $X$. There are arbitrarily small admissible $H$ for which $\theta _ H$ is not closed.
For every $w\in \mathcal C_{a,H}$ and every resolution $\tau :Z\to X$, including resolutions that modify regular points,
A8F60A69A51D
9.11.35
\begin{equation} \tau _*\left\langle \bigl (\tau ^*\theta _ H+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(w\circ \tau )\bigr )^ n\right\rangle =\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,\theta _ H}(w), \end{equation}
where $\langle \cdot \rangle $ denotes the non-pluripolar product on $Z$. The measure on $Z$ is finite. Thus the measure, the normalized descended solution and the scalar are independent of the resolution and of every common refinement.
Proof.
We first establish the divisor formula
98BFAEFA11C3
9.11.36
\begin{equation} \beta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(\varphi \circ \pi )=a[E]+\beta _ a. \end{equation}
Indeed, $\log x=\log |t|^2+\log S-\log (1+|t|^2S)$ and $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\log |t|^2=[t=0]$. Along $E$ the kernels of $\beta $ and $\sigma $ are complementary, and $\beta >0$ off $E$. Thus $\beta _ a$ is a smooth Kähler form. Fiber integration also gives
48E4877345BD
9.11.37
\begin{equation} \int _ Y\beta _ a^ n=nd\int _0^1[a+(1-a)x]^{n-1}(1-a)\, \mathrm{d} x=d(1-a^ n)=V. \end{equation}
By (9.11.31), $P_ a(0)=a$, $P_ a(1)=1$ and
\[ P_ a'(s)=\frac{c_ a k(s)s^{n-1}}{P_ a(s)^{n-1}}. \]
The numerator defining $Q_ a'$ vanishes at both ends, so $Q_ a$ is smooth. On $0<x<1$, a local potential for the full positive current is $F_ a(\rho _\psi )$, where
\[ F_ a(r)=ar+(1-a)h(r)+Q_ a(h'(r)). \]
Direct differentiation gives $F_ a'=P_ a(s)$ and $F_ a''=c_ a k(s)s^ n(1-s)/P_ a(s)^{n-1}$. Consequently
E5F90A48E44A
9.11.38
\begin{equation} A_ a=P_ a(s)\sigma _\psi +\frac{c_ a k(s)s^{n-1}}{P_ a(s)^{n-1}}(B_\psi -s\sigma _\psi ),\qquad A_ a^ n=c_ a\nu . \end{equation}
The coefficients are smooth since $P_ a\geq a>0$. On $E$ the restriction is $a\sigma _\psi $; at infinity the horizontal coefficient is one and the transverse coefficient relative to $B_\psi -\sigma _\psi $ is $c_ a k(1)>0$. This proves all the asserted positivity properties, including along both sections.
The functions $\varphi \circ \pi $ and $\varphi \circ \pi +q_ a$ are quasi-plurisubharmonic on $Y$. By (9.11.36), their curvature currents in the background $\beta $ are $a[E]+\beta _ a$ and $a[E]+A_ a$, respectively, so both are positive. The descent theorem theorem 9.11.5 gives $\varphi \in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta _0)$ and a potential $u_0$ with $u_0\circ \pi =\varphi \circ \pi +q_ a$. The bounded residual $q_ a$ puts $u_0$ in the ordinary class of $\varphi $ and gives the uniform logarithmic asymptotics at $p$. Its finite supremum is the constant $K$ of the theorem.
Let $H$ be admissible. Self-adjointness makes $\exp H$ positive, and $\det \exp H=\exp (\operatorname {tr}H)=1$. Hence
FB074E27BCB5
9.11.39
\begin{equation} (A_ a+\pi ^*\eta _ H)^ n=A_ a^ n=c_ a\nu ,\qquad \beta _{a,H}+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(q_ a-K)=A_ a+\pi ^*\eta _ H. \end{equation}
The function $u=u_0-K$ does not depend on $H$. On the regular locus its $\theta _ H$-curvature form is the positive form in (9.11.39); near $p$ the background and the potential are unchanged. Thus $u$ is $\theta _ H$-plurisubharmonic. Formula (9.11.36), together with the deformation, gives $\pi ^*\theta _ H+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(u\circ \pi )=a[E]+A_ a+\pi ^*\eta _ H$; removing the divisor proves the equation. The mass of the solution is $c_ aM=V$. This calculation uses the preservation of the determinant, rather than a mass identity for the class of a nonclosed form.
Bounded residuals and uniqueness. Let $w\in \mathcal C_{a,H}$. On $Y\setminus E$, its residual $g=w\circ \pi -\varphi \circ \pi $ is bounded and $\beta _{a,H}$-plurisubharmonic. By lemma 5.24.7, it extends across $E$ with the same background. Conversely, for any bounded $\beta _{a,H}$-plurisubharmonic $g$, the function $\varphi \circ \pi +g$ has the positive curvature current $a[E]+\beta _{a,H}+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g$ in the pulled-back background. It descends by theorem 9.11.5, and its uniform bounds relative to $\varphi \circ \pi $ put the descended potential in $\mathcal C_{a,H}$. Thus bounded residuals correspond exactly to members of the prescribed ordinary class.
The bounded product is finite on the compact manifold $Y$ and gives $E$ zero mass, by theorem 5.27.1, proposition 5.28.2. Thus
DA8E2A2BBA2B
9.11.40
\begin{equation} \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_{X,\theta _ H}(w)=\pi _*\bigl (\beta _{a,H}+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g\bigr )^ n. \end{equation}
For $H=0$, closedness of $\beta _ a$ makes every term of positive degree in $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g$ in the bounded expansion integrate to zero, so (9.11.37) gives mass $V$ for every member of the class. In the nonclosed case only finiteness is used here.
If $w$ solves the equation with a scalar $c'>0$, its lifted measure is $c'\nu $, since both sides give $E$ zero mass. Both residuals, $g$ and $q_ a-K$, are continuous by corollary 14.19.29, and the uniqueness of the scalar in proposition 14.19.34 gives $c'=c_ a$. The density $\nu /\beta _{a,H}^ n$ is smooth and nonnegative, and its positive locus is exactly $Y\setminus E$. This locus is connected and dense: it is a bundle over the connected base $B$ whose fibers, $\mathbb P^1$ minus a point, are connected. Theorem 14.24.1 shows that $g-(q_ a-K)$ is constant. The normalization fixes this constant, and both full functions equal $-\infty $ at $p$. This proves uniqueness in the ordinary class.
The uniform logarithmic asymptotics give the continuity of the full solution with values in $[-\infty ,+\infty )$. Its residual restricts to $E$ as $a\psi +Q_ a(0)-K$. If $\psi $ is nonconstant, this restriction is nonconstant, so the residual is not a pullback from $X$, since a pullback is constant on $E$. This concerns only the residual; the full potential is $-\infty $ on the whole fiber $E$ and does descend.
Nonclosed deformations. Fix $z_0\in O$ and a smooth $A_ a$-unitary frame on a smaller ball. Let $K_0=\operatorname {diag}(1,-1,0,\ldots ,0)$ in this frame. Choose a real compactly supported function $\chi $ with $\chi (z_0)=0$ such that $\mathrm{d}\chi (z_0)$ is a nonzero covector in the first two complex directions, and, for $\epsilon \in \mathbb R$, put $H=\epsilon \chi K_0$. At $z_0$,
\[ \mathrm{d}\eta _ H=\epsilon \, \mathrm{d}\chi \wedge \gamma ,\qquad \gamma =A_ a(K_0\, \cdot ,\cdot ). \]
Terms containing derivatives of the frame and of $A_ a$ vanish at $z_0$ because $\chi (z_0)=0$. The restriction of $\gamma $ to these four real directions is nondegenerate, so wedge multiplication by $\gamma $ sends a nonzero one-form to a nonzero three-form. Thus $\mathrm{d}\theta _ H(z_0)\ne 0$ for $\epsilon \ne 0$. On the fixed compact support, both strict inequalities (9.11.33) persist for sufficiently small $|\epsilon |$, and $H\to 0$ smoothly as $\epsilon \to 0$. This proves the existence of arbitrarily small nonclosed admissible choices; admissibility itself does not force nonclosedness.
For any resolution $\tau :Z\to X$, theorem 9.11.26 identifies the pushforward of its non-pluripolar product with (9.11.40), which proves (9.11.35). Its total mass equals the finite mass on $X$. Since the ordinary class, the equation and the normalization are intrinsic to $X$, uniqueness gives the same solution and scalar on every resolution and common refinement.
$\square$
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.