Pome

Theorem 16.3.355B751E9DFBC1

Theorem 16.3.35.5B751E9DFBC1 Assume that $\varphi ,\psi \in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ and $\varphi \land \psi \in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$. Then

020126C445C3 16.3.36
\begin{equation} \int _ X \theta _{\varphi }^ n+\int _ X \theta _{\psi }^ n\leq \int _ X \theta _{\varphi \lor \psi }^ n+\int _ X \theta _{\varphi \land \psi }^ n. \end{equation}

Proof. We may assume that $\varphi ,\psi \in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )_{>0}$, as otherwise (16.3.36) follows immediately from the monotonicity theorem theorem 13.13.11.

Step 1. We claim that it suffices to prove (16.3.36) with $P_{\theta }[\varphi ]$ and $P_{\theta }[\psi ]$ in place of $\varphi $ and $\psi $.

In fact, as $\varphi \land \psi \not\equiv -\infty $, we also have $P_{\theta }[\varphi ]\land P_{\theta }[\psi ]\not\equiv -\infty $. Moreover,

\[ \int _ X \theta _{P_{\theta }[\varphi ]}^ n=\int _ X \theta _{\varphi }^ n,\quad \int _ X \theta _{P_{\theta }[\psi ]}^ n=\int _ X \theta _{\psi }^ n \]

by proposition 16.3.10. On the other hand, as $C\to \infty $, the potentials

\[ \Bigl ( (\varphi +C)\land V_{\theta } \Bigr ) \lor \Bigl ( (\psi +C)\land V_{\theta } \Bigr ) \]

converge to $P_{\theta }[\varphi ]\lor P_{\theta }[\psi ]$ almost everywhere. Therefore, thanks to corollary 13.13.12 and theorem 13.13.11,

\[ \int _ X \theta _{P_{\theta }[\varphi ]\lor P_{\theta }[\psi ]}^ n=\int _ X \theta _{\varphi \lor \psi }^ n. \]

Finally, we have

\[ \int _ X \theta _{P_{\theta }[\varphi ]\land P_{\theta }[\psi ]}^ n= \int _ X \theta _{\varphi \land \psi }^ n \]

as well. When the left-hand side vanishes, this follows from theorem 13.13.11. Otherwise, it follows from 16.3.32.

In particular, (16.3.36) is equivalent to the corresponding result with $P_{\theta }[\varphi ]$ and $P_{\theta }[\psi ]$ in place of $\varphi $ and $\psi $.

Step 2. We shall assume that $\varphi $ and $\psi $ are model potentials in the sequel.

We write $\gamma =\varphi \lor \psi $ for simplicity. Note that $\gamma \leq 0$.

For each $C>0$, we introduce

\[ \varphi _ C=\varphi \lor (\gamma -C),\quad \psi _ C=\psi \lor (\gamma -C). \]

Note that $\varphi _ C\sim \psi _ C\sim \gamma $. Observe that

\[ \inf _{C>0} \varphi _ C\land \psi _ C=\varphi \land \psi . \]

The $\geq $ direction is trivial, and the $\leq $ direction follows from the observation that the left-hand side is dominated by both $\varphi _ C$ and $\psi _ C$ for any $C>0$, and therefore by both $\varphi $ and $\psi $.

For $C>0$, we compute

35F5A4FBAC68 16.3.37
\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \theta _{\varphi _ C}^ n=& \mathds {1}_{\{ \varphi >\gamma -C\} } \, \theta _{\varphi _ C}^ n+ \mathds {1}_{\{ \varphi \leq \gamma -C\} } \, \theta _{\varphi _ C}^ n & \\ =& \mathds {1}_{\{ \varphi >\gamma -C\} } \, \theta _{\varphi }^ n+ \mathds {1}_{\{ \varphi \leq \gamma -C\} } \, \theta _{\varphi _ C}^ n & \textup{by proposition \href{../../tag/9E81D36B1290/}{13.11.4} \href{../../tag/9E81D36B1290/#sgpt-1C036AD6}{1}}\\ =& \theta _{\varphi }^ n+ \mathds {1}_{\{ \varphi \leq \gamma -C\} } \, \theta _{\varphi _ C}^ n & \textup{by theorem \href{../../tag/553335F185CE/}{16.3.12}}. \end{aligned} \end{equation}

In the last line we use that $\varphi $ is model, so $\theta _\varphi ^ n$ is carried by $\{ \varphi =0\} \subseteq \{ \varphi >\gamma -C\} $. We also get a similar formula for $\theta _{\psi _ C}^ n$.

Therefore, taking the monotonicity theorem theorem 13.13.11 into consideration, we find

BCB4335E3D6E 16.3.38
\begin{equation} \int _ X \theta _{\gamma }^ n-\int _ X \theta _{\varphi }^ n=\int _{\{ \varphi \leq \gamma -C\} } \theta _{\varphi _ C}^ n,\quad \int _ X \theta _{\gamma }^ n-\int _ X \theta _{\psi }^ n=\int _{\{ \psi \leq \gamma -C\} } \theta _{\psi _ C}^ n. \end{equation}

On the other hand, using 16.3.3 and (16.3.37), we find

\[ \begin{aligned} \theta _{\varphi _ C\land \psi _ C}^ n \leq & \mathds {1}_{\{ \varphi _ C\land \psi _ C=\varphi _ C\} } \, \theta _{\varphi _ C}^ n+\mathds {1}_{\{ \varphi _ C\land \psi _ C=\psi _ C\} } \, \theta _{\psi _ C}^ n \\ \leq & \mathds {1}_{\{ \varphi _ C\land \psi _ C=\varphi _ C=0\} }\, \theta _{\varphi }^ n+\mathds {1}_{\{ \varphi _ C\land \psi _ C=\psi _ C=0\} }\, \theta _{\psi }^ n+\mathds {1}_{\{ \varphi \leq \gamma -C\} }\, \theta _{\varphi _ C}^ n\\ & +\mathds {1}_{\{ \psi \leq \gamma -C\} }\, \theta _{\psi _ C}^ n. \end{aligned} \]

In particular,

\[ \mathds {1}_{\{ \varphi _ C\land \psi _ C<0 \} }\, \theta _{\varphi _ C\land \psi _ C}^ n \leq \mathds {1}_{\{ \varphi \leq \gamma -C\} }\, \theta _{\varphi _ C}^ n+\mathds {1}_{\{ \psi \leq \gamma -C\} }\, \theta _{\psi _ C}^ n. \]

Integrating, we find

\[ \begin{aligned} \int _{\{ \varphi _ C\land \psi _ C=0 \} } \theta _{\varphi _ C\land \psi _ C}^ n \geq & \int _ X \theta _{\gamma }^ n-\int _{\{ \varphi \leq \gamma -C\} } \theta _{\varphi _ C}^ n-\int _{\{ \psi \leq \gamma -C\} } \theta _{\psi _ C}^ n\\ =& \int _ X \theta _{\varphi }^ n+\int _ X \theta _{\psi }^ n-\int _ X \theta _{\gamma }^ n, \end{aligned} \]

where on the first line we used the fact that $\varphi _ C\land \psi _ C\sim \gamma $, while on the second line, we used (16.3.38).

Letting $C\to \infty $, and using corollary 13.13.16, we conclude (16.3.36). $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.