Lemma 20.2.54.A172685DB2AD Assume that $n\geq 2$. Let $\theta $ be a closed smooth $(1,1)$-form on $X$ representing a big cohomology class and $(\varphi _ j)_ j$ be a decreasing sequence in $\mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$. Assume that $\varphi \in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ and $\varphi _ j\xrightarrow {d_ S}\varphi $. Furthermore, assume that $\varphi \leq \varphi _ j$ for each $j>0$. Then quasi-every $H\in \Lambda $ is connected and smooth, $\varphi _ j|_ H\not\equiv -\infty $ for all $j\geq 1$, $\varphi |_ H\not\equiv -\infty $, and
Lemma 20.2.54A172685DB2AD
Proof. By corollary 16.9.36, we may assume that $\varphi \in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )_{>0}$.
Using 13.13.30, we can find a decreasing sequence $(\epsilon _ j)_ j$ in $(0,1)$ with limit $0$ and $\eta _ j\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )_{>0}$ such that $\eta _ j\leq \varphi _ j$ and
By corollary 20.2.49, 20.2.51, we can find a co-pluripolar set $\Lambda '\subseteq \Lambda $ such that any $H\in \Lambda '$ satisfies:
BE6DEC237CA9$H$ is smooth and connected;
A069E69D0FE9$\eta _ j|_ H\in \mathrm{PSH}(H,\theta |_ H)_{>0}$ for all $j\geq 1$ and $\varphi |_ H\in \mathrm{PSH}(H,\theta |_ H)_{>0}$.
Therefore, taking proposition 16.4.2 into account, we arrive at
Since the normalized envelopes $P_{\theta |_ H}[\eta _ j|_ H]$ are relatively compact in $L^1$, we have $\epsilon _ jP_{\theta |_ H}[\eta _ j|_ H]\to 0$ in $L^1$. Letting $j\to \infty $, we get
The reverse inequality is trivial, so we get an equality here. By theorem 13.13.11 and proposition 16.4.4, we conclude that
Therefore, using corollary 16.9.14, we conclude that $\varphi _ j|_ H\xrightarrow {d_ S}\varphi |_ H$. $\square$
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.