Pome

Lemma 16.8.4A3C93A5CDBF4

Lemma 16.8.4.A3C93A5CDBF4 Let $\varphi ,\psi \in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )_{>0}$. For any Kähler form $\omega $ on $X$, the following are equivalent:

  1. ED4E919B13E0

    $P_{\theta }[\varphi ]\leq P_{\theta }[\psi ]$;

  2. E3965942668C

    $P_{\theta +\omega }[\varphi ]\leq P_{\theta +\omega }[\psi ]$.

Proof. 1 $\implies $ 2. Assume 1. Observe that

\[ \varphi \preceq P_{\theta }[\varphi ]\leq P_{\theta +\omega }[\varphi ]. \]

Taking the $P_{\theta +\omega }$-envelope, we find

\[ P_{\theta +\omega }[\varphi ] \leq P_{\theta +\omega }\Bigl [P_{\theta }[\varphi ]\Bigr ] \leq P_{\theta +\omega }\Bigl [P_{\theta +\omega }[\varphi ]\Bigr ]=P_{\theta +\omega }[\varphi ], \]

where the equality follows from theorem 16.3.15. In particular,

7E95C2DD4B7D 16.8.5
\begin{equation} P_{\theta +\omega }[\varphi ]=P_{\theta +\omega }\Bigl [P_{\theta }[\varphi ]\Bigr ]. \end{equation}

A similar formula holds for $\psi $. So we see that 2 holds.

2 $\implies $ 1. Assume 2. By (16.8.5), we may assume that $\varphi $ and $\psi $ are both model potentials in $\mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )_{>0}$.

Observe that $\varphi \lor \psi \preceq P_{\theta +\omega }[\psi ]$. It follows that $P_{\theta +\omega }[\varphi \lor \psi ]\leq P_{\theta +\omega }[\psi ]$. The reverse inequality is trivial, so

\[ P_{\theta +\omega }[\varphi \lor \psi ]= P_{\theta +\omega }[\psi ]. \]

From the direction we have proved, for any $C\geq 1$,

\[ P_{\theta +C\omega }[\varphi \lor \psi ]= P_{\theta +C\omega }[\psi ]. \]

So by proposition 16.3.10,

\[ \int _ X \Bigl (\theta +C\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(\varphi \lor \psi )\Bigr )^ n=\int _ X\left(\theta +C\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\psi \right)^ n. \]

Since both sides are polynomials in $C$, the equality extends to $C=0$, namely,

\[ \int _ X \theta _{\varphi \lor \psi }^ n=\int _ X \theta _{\psi }^ n. \]

In particular, $\varphi \lor \psi \leq P_{\theta }[\psi ]=\psi $ by (16.3.16). So 1 follows. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.