Proposition 19.4.7.632B1323B741 There is a convex body $\Delta \in \mathcal{K}_ n$ such that $\Gamma (L)\in \mathcal{S}'(\Delta )$.
19.4.6 Algebraic Okounkov bodiesA81BAAF5B45F
Proof. Step 1. We first show that there is $\Delta \in \mathcal{K}_ n$ such that $\Delta _ k(L)\subseteq \Delta $. For this purpose, using 19.3.3, we may assume that $\nu $ is induced by an admissible flag $Y_{\bullet }$ on $X$. We may further assume that each $Y_ i$ is smooth.
Fix $s\in \mathrm{H}^0(X,L^ k)^{\times }$ for some $k\in \mathbb {Z}_{>0}$. Assume that $s\neq 0$. We need to show that for each $i=1,\ldots ,n$, $\nu (s)_ i\leq Ck$ for some constant $C>0$, independent of the choices of $k$ and $s$.
Fix an ample divisor $H$ on $X$. Take a large enough integer $b_1>0$ such that
Then $\nu (s)_1\leq b_1 k$. Next take a large enough integer $b_2$ such that, for every $a\in [0,b_1]$,
After removing the first vanishing order of $s$ along $Y_1$, the resulting section on $Y_1$ is a section of $k((L-aY_1)|_{Y_1})$ for some $a\in [0,b_1]$. Hence $\nu (s)_2\leq b_2k$. Continuing in this manner and choosing the constants uniformly over the compact ranges of the preceding normalized vanishing orders, we conclude that $\nu (s)_ i/k$ is bounded for each $i$.
Here the expressions involving $L-aY_1$ are understood numerically. At the $i$-th step the previous normalized vanishing orders lie in a compact polytope, and the intersection number is continuous in these parameters; hence the constants $b_ i$ can be chosen uniformly.
Step 2. Observe that $\Gamma (L)$ is clearly a semigroup. It remains to show that $\Gamma (L)$ generates $\mathbb {Z}^{n+1}$ as an Abelian group.
For this purpose, take two very ample divisors $A$ and $B$ so that $L=\mathcal{O}_ X(A-B)$. After choosing $A$ and $B$ ample enough, we may guarantee that there exist sections $s_0\in \mathrm{H}^0(X,A)$, $t_ i\in \mathrm{H}^0(X,B)$ for $i=0,\dots ,n$ such that
and $\nu (t_ i)$ is the $i$-th unit vector $e_ i\in \mathbb {R}^ n$ for $i=1,\ldots ,n$.
Since $L$ is big, we can find $m_0>0$ such that for any $m\geq m_0$, we can find an effective divisor $F_ m$ on $X$ linearly equivalent to $mL-B$. Let $f_ m=\nu ([F_ m])$. Then
Since $(m+1)L$ is linearly equivalent to $A+F_ m$, we have
It follows that $\Gamma (L)$ generates $\mathbb {Z}^{n+1}$. $\square$
Definition 19.4.8.0114DCC2E021 We define the Okounkov body of $L$ with respect to the valuation $\nu $ as
Proposition 19.4.9.572B003B2680 The Okounkov body $\Delta _{\nu }(L)$ depends only on the numerical class of $L$.
Corollary 19.4.10.8494DFD8DF4D We have
Proof. This follows immediately from proposition 19.4.7 and theorem 19.2.5. $\square$
Proposition 19.4.11.AE88967EEE84 Assume that $\varphi $ has analytic singularities and $\theta _{\varphi }$ is a Kähler current. Then we have
and
Proof. By theorem 5.18.8, we can choose a modification $\pi \colon Y\to X$ such that $\pi ^*\varphi $ has log singularities along an effective simple normal crossing $\mathbb Q$-divisor $D$. We regard $\nu $ as a valuation of $\mathbb C(Y)=\mathbb C(X)$. By the definition of $\mathcal I_\infty $, the section spaces defining $\Gamma ^\infty (\theta ,\varphi )$ are naturally identified with
Thus we may compute $\Gamma ^\infty (\theta ,\varphi )$ on $Y$.
In this case,
Since $\pi ^*L-D$ is nef and big by 5.18.5, our assertion follows from the same argument as proposition 19.4.7. $\square$
Proposition 19.4.12.1ED4AF0D9A23 For any holomorphic line bundle $T$ on $X$, as $k\to \infty $
Proof. As $L$ is big, we can take $k_0\in \mathbb {Z}_{>0}$ so that
6BF24D61A02C$T^{-1}\otimes L^{k_0}$ admits a non-zero global holomorphic section $s_0$, and
0D44384F7F7B$T\otimes L^{k_0}$ admits a non-zero global holomorphic section $s_1$.
Then for $k\in \mathbb {Z}_{>k_0}$, we have injective linear maps
It follows that
Using theorem 19.2.5, we conclude. $\square$
Proposition 19.4.13.AE9EBC9C5252 Let $L'$ be another big line bundle on $X$. Then
Proof. Observe that for each $k\in \mathbb {N}$, we have
So our assertion follows immediately from theorem 19.2.5. $\square$
Proposition 19.4.14.2B94C07754DD For any $a\in \mathbb {Z}_{>0}$, we have
Proof. This is an immediate consequence of theorem 19.2.5. $\square$
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.