Pome

19.4.6 Algebraic Okounkov bodiesA81BAAF5B45F

Proposition 19.4.7.632B1323B741 There is a convex body $\Delta \in \mathcal{K}_ n$ such that $\Gamma (L)\in \mathcal{S}'(\Delta )$.

Here and in the sequel, the notation $\mathcal{S}'(\Delta )$ means $\mathcal{S}'(C(\Delta ))$, where $C(\Delta )$ is the cone over $\Delta $. Recall that the notations $\mathcal{K}_ n$ and $\mathcal{S}'(\Delta )$ are introduced in section 19.7.

Proof. Step 1. We first show that there is $\Delta \in \mathcal{K}_ n$ such that $\Delta _ k(L)\subseteq \Delta $. For this purpose, using 19.3.3, we may assume that $\nu $ is induced by an admissible flag $Y_{\bullet }$ on $X$. We may further assume that each $Y_ i$ is smooth.

Fix $s\in \mathrm{H}^0(X,L^ k)^{\times }$ for some $k\in \mathbb {Z}_{>0}$. Assume that $s\neq 0$. We need to show that for each $i=1,\ldots ,n$, $\nu (s)_ i\leq Ck$ for some constant $C>0$, independent of the choices of $k$ and $s$.

Fix an ample divisor $H$ on $X$. Take a large enough integer $b_1>0$ such that

\[ (L-b_1 Y_1)\cdot H^{n-1}<0. \]

Then $\nu (s)_1\leq b_1 k$. Next take a large enough integer $b_2$ such that, for every $a\in [0,b_1]$,

\[ \left((L-aY_1)|_{Y_1}-b_2Y_2\right) \cdot H^{n-2}<0. \]

After removing the first vanishing order of $s$ along $Y_1$, the resulting section on $Y_1$ is a section of $k((L-aY_1)|_{Y_1})$ for some $a\in [0,b_1]$. Hence $\nu (s)_2\leq b_2k$. Continuing in this manner and choosing the constants uniformly over the compact ranges of the preceding normalized vanishing orders, we conclude that $\nu (s)_ i/k$ is bounded for each $i$.

Here the expressions involving $L-aY_1$ are understood numerically. At the $i$-th step the previous normalized vanishing orders lie in a compact polytope, and the intersection number is continuous in these parameters; hence the constants $b_ i$ can be chosen uniformly.

Step 2. Observe that $\Gamma (L)$ is clearly a semigroup. It remains to show that $\Gamma (L)$ generates $\mathbb {Z}^{n+1}$ as an Abelian group.

For this purpose, take two very ample divisors $A$ and $B$ so that $L=\mathcal{O}_ X(A-B)$. After choosing $A$ and $B$ ample enough, we may guarantee that there exist sections $s_0\in \mathrm{H}^0(X,A)$, $t_ i\in \mathrm{H}^0(X,B)$ for $i=0,\dots ,n$ such that

\[ \nu (s_0)=\nu (t_0)=0 \]

and $\nu (t_ i)$ is the $i$-th unit vector $e_ i\in \mathbb {R}^ n$ for $i=1,\ldots ,n$.

Since $L$ is big, we can find $m_0>0$ such that for any $m\geq m_0$, we can find an effective divisor $F_ m$ on $X$ linearly equivalent to $mL-B$. Let $f_ m=\nu ([F_ m])$. Then

\[ (f_ m,m),(f_ m+e_1,m),\dots ,(f_ m+e_ n,m)\in \Gamma (L). \]

Since $(m+1)L$ is linearly equivalent to $A+F_ m$, we have

\[ (f_ m,m+1)\in \Gamma (L). \]

It follows that $\Gamma (L)$ generates $\mathbb {Z}^{n+1}$. $\square$

Thanks to proposition 19.4.7, we can introduce the next definition.

Definition 19.4.8.0114DCC2E021 We define the Okounkov body of $L$ with respect to the valuation $\nu $ as

\[ \Delta _{\nu }(L)\coloneqq \Delta (\Gamma (L)). \]
When $\nu $ is induced by a smooth flag $Y_{\bullet }$ on $X$, we also write $\Delta _{Y_{\bullet }}(L)$ instead. The same convention applies to the partial Okounkov bodies studied below as well.

Proposition 19.4.9.572B003B2680 The Okounkov body $\Delta _{\nu }(L)$ depends only on the numerical class of $L$.

See [Proposition 4.1, LM09] for the elegant proof.

Corollary 19.4.10.8494DFD8DF4D We have

10.38
\begin{equation} \operatorname{vol}\Delta _{\nu }(L)=\frac{1}{n!}\operatorname{vol}L. \end{equation}

Proof. This follows immediately from proposition 19.4.7 and theorem 19.2.5. $\square$

Proposition 19.4.11.AE88967EEE84 Assume that $\varphi $ has analytic singularities and $\theta _{\varphi }$ is a Kähler current. Then we have

\[ \Gamma ^{\infty }(\theta ,\varphi )\in \mathcal{S}'(\Delta _\nu (L)) \]

and

\[ \operatorname{vol}\Gamma ^{\infty }(\theta ,\varphi )=\frac{1}{n!}\int _ X \theta _{\varphi }^ n. \]

Proof. By theorem 5.18.8, we can choose a modification $\pi \colon Y\to X$ such that $\pi ^*\varphi $ has log singularities along an effective simple normal crossing $\mathbb Q$-divisor $D$. We regard $\nu $ as a valuation of $\mathbb C(Y)=\mathbb C(X)$. By the definition of $\mathcal I_\infty $, the section spaces defining $\Gamma ^\infty (\theta ,\varphi )$ are naturally identified with

\[ \mathrm{H}^0\left(Y,\pi ^*L^ k\otimes \mathcal O_ Y(-\lceil kD\rceil )\right). \]

Thus we may compute $\Gamma ^\infty (\theta ,\varphi )$ on $Y$.

In this case,

\[ \Gamma ^{\infty }(\theta ,\varphi )= \Biggl \{ (\nu (s),k):k\in \mathbb {N}, s\in \mathrm{H}^0\left(Y,\pi ^*L^ k\otimes \mathcal{O}_ Y(-\lceil k D \rceil )\right)^{\times } \Biggr \} \]

Since $\pi ^*L-D$ is nef and big by 5.18.5, our assertion follows from the same argument as proposition 19.4.7. $\square$

We first extend theorem 19.2.5 to the twisted case.

Proposition 19.4.12.1ED4AF0D9A23 For any holomorphic line bundle $T$ on $X$, as $k\to \infty $

\[ \Delta _{k,T}(L)\xrightarrow {d_{\mathrm{Haus}}} \Delta _{\nu }(L). \]

Proof. As $L$ is big, we can take $k_0\in \mathbb {Z}_{>0}$ so that

  1. 6BF24D61A02C

    $T^{-1}\otimes L^{k_0}$ admits a non-zero global holomorphic section $s_0$, and

  2. 0D44384F7F7B

    $T\otimes L^{k_0}$ admits a non-zero global holomorphic section $s_1$.

Then for $k\in \mathbb {Z}_{>k_0}$, we have injective linear maps

\[ \mathrm{H}^0(X,L^{k-k_0})\xrightarrow {\times s_1}\mathrm{H}^0(X,T\otimes L^{k})\xrightarrow {\times s_0}\mathrm{H}^0(X, L^{k+k_0}). \]

It follows that

\[ (k-k_0)\Delta _{k-k_0}(L)+\nu (s_1)\subseteq k\Delta _{k,T}(L)\subseteq (k+k_0)\Delta _{k+k_0}(L)-\nu (s_0). \]

Using theorem 19.2.5, we conclude. $\square$

Proposition 19.4.13.AE9EBC9C5252 Let $L'$ be another big line bundle on $X$. Then

\[ \Delta _{\nu }(L)+\Delta _{\nu }(L')\subseteq \Delta _{\nu }(L\otimes L'). \]

Proof. Observe that for each $k\in \mathbb {N}$, we have

\[ \Delta _ k(L)+\Delta _ k(L')\subseteq \Delta _ k(L\otimes L'). \]

So our assertion follows immediately from theorem 19.2.5. $\square$

Proposition 19.4.14.2B94C07754DD For any $a\in \mathbb {Z}_{>0}$, we have

\[ \Delta _{\nu }(L^ a)=a\Delta _{\nu }(L). \]

Proof. This is an immediate consequence of theorem 19.2.5. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.