Proposition 16.8.27.C42706880DED Let $\varphi ,\psi ,\varphi ',\psi '\in \mathrm{QPSH}(X)$. Assume that
Then
The same holds with $\preceq _{\mathcal{I}}$ in place of $\preceq _ P$.
C42706880DEDProposition 16.8.27.C42706880DED Let $\varphi ,\psi ,\varphi ',\psi '\in \mathrm{QPSH}(X)$. Assume that
Then
The same holds with $\preceq _{\mathcal{I}}$ in place of $\preceq _ P$.
Proof. Take a Kähler form $\omega $ on $X$ such that $\varphi ,\psi ,\varphi ',\psi '\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\omega )_{>0}$. The statement for $\preceq _{\mathcal{I}}$ is a simple consequence of proposition 5.16.8. We only need to handle the case of $\preceq _{P}$.
Step 1. We first show that
In fact, we clearly have
So by proposition 16.8.7, it suffices to show that they have the same mass. We compute
where we applied proposition 16.3.10 to the mixed products on the third line.
Step 2. By Step 1, we may assume that $\varphi ,\psi ,\varphi ',\psi '$ are all model potentials, after replacing them by their $P_{\omega }$-envelopes. So $\varphi \leq \psi $ and $\varphi '\leq \psi '$. Our assertion follows. $\square$
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.