Corollary 20.1.35.DF4E1BF96D34 Let $\mathbb {D}$ be a Cartier b-divisor over $X$. Then $\mathbb {D}$ is nef in the sense of definition 20.1.11 if and only if it is nef in the sense of definition 20.1.12.
Corollary 20.1.35DF4E1BF96D34
Proof. We only handle the nontrivial implication. Assume that $\mathbb {D}$ is nef in the sense of definition 20.1.12. We want to show that $\mathbb {D}$ is nef in the sense of definition 20.1.11. After replacing $X$ by a realization of $\mathbb {D}$, we may assume that $\mathbb {D}$ is realized by $(X,\alpha )$ for some cohomology class $\alpha \in \mathrm{H}^{1,1}(X,\mathbb {R})$.
We first assume that $\mathbb {D}$ is big. Choose a non-divisorial closed positive $(1,1)$-current $T$ on $X$ such that $\mathbb {D}=\mathbb {D}(T)$. Now $\mathbb {D}=\mathbb {D}(T)$ means that for each modification $\pi \colon Y\rightarrow X$, the current $\pi ^*T$ is non-divisorial. In particular, $T$ has vanishing generic Lelong number along each prime divisor over $X$, see (20.1.30). Equivalently, $T$ has vanishing Lelong number everywhere. By Demailly's regularization theorem, a pseudo-effective class carrying a positive current with vanishing Lelong number at every point is nef. Hence $\alpha =\{ T\} $ is nef.
In the general case, fix a Kähler form $\omega $ on the realization of $\mathbb {D}$. For every $\epsilon >0$, the Cartier b-divisor $\mathbb {D}+\epsilon \mathbb {D}(\omega )$ is big and nef in the sense of definition 20.1.12, hence is nef in the sense of definition 20.1.11 by the big case. Thus $\alpha +\epsilon \{ \omega \} $ is nef for all $\epsilon >0$, and the closedness of the nef cone shows that $\alpha $ is nef. $\square$
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.