Pome

10.27 Nonrigid classes on a quotient resolution96EA3D3C069F

96EA3D3C069F

In contrast with example 10.26.2, an irrational nef boundary ray can admit many smooth semipositive representatives. On a suitable two-dimensional torus, such representatives come from semipositive forms depending on a single real coordinate, with an irrational lattice direction making the ray irrational. If these forms vanish near the fixed points of the involution $z\mapsto -z$, they pass smoothly to the resolution of the quotient, a Kummer surface.

Let $A=\mathbb C^2/\Lambda $ be a complex two-torus, let $Y=A/\{ \pm 1\} $, and let $r:X\to Y$ be the minimal resolution. The fixed points of the involution are the sixteen points of $A[2]=(\frac12\Lambda )/\Lambda $, and their images are the sixteen singular points of $Y$.

Lemma 10.27.1.22EA1C593ACD The surface $X$ is compact Kähler. Its exceptional set consists of sixteen disjoint projective lines with self-intersection $-2$.

Proof. Blow up the sixteen fixed points on $A$ and take the quotient by the lifted involution. Near one exceptional line, a blowup chart has coordinates $(u,v)$ with $z_1=u$ and $z_2=uv$, and the involution is $(u,v)\mapsto (-u,v)$. The quotient chart has smooth coordinates $(s,v)=(u^2,v)$. On the other chart, $v'=1/v$ and $s'=v^2s$. These charts describe the total space of $\mathcal O_{\mathbb P^1}(-2)$ near its zero section. The quotient is therefore smooth and resolves the double point, with the stated exceptional curve. Doing this at all fixed points gives the compact surface $X$.

Choose a flat Kähler form on $A$ that equals $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\rho $, where $\rho =|z_1|^2+|z_2|^2$, on disjoint balls centered at the fixed points. Away from those points it descends to $Y$. On the resolution chart,

\[ \rho =|s|(1+|v|^2),\qquad \rho ^2=|s|^2(1+|v|^2)^2. \]

Choose a smooth function $F$ on $[0,+\infty )$ with $F(\rho )=c\rho ^2$ near zero, where $c>0$, with $F'>0$ on $(0,+\infty )$ and $F''\geq 0$, and with $F(\rho )=\rho -C$ for $\rho \geq \delta $, for a sufficiently small $\delta >0$. Such a function is obtained by choosing $F'$ nondecreasing, linear near zero and equal to one beyond $\delta $. Replace the flat form in each ball by $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}F(\rho )$. This agrees with the flat form near the boundary of the ball and extends smoothly across the exceptional line. The resulting closed form $\eta $ is positive off the exceptional set, while along it $\eta $ is positive in the normal direction and zero in the tangent direction.

To restore positivity in the tangent direction, choose a smooth cutoff $\chi $ equal to one for $\rho \leq \delta $ and zero for $\rho \geq 2\delta $. For $s\ne 0$, set

\[ q_ v=\chi (\rho )\log \rho -\log |s|. \]

Near $s=0$ this equals $\log (1+|v|^2)$, so it extends smoothly. On the overlap of the two charts, $q_{v'}-q_ v=-2\log |v|$ is pluriharmonic, so their $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$ forms agree. They define a smooth closed form $R$ supported in the resolved ball, positive in the tangent direction along the exceptional line and semipositive where $\chi =1$. Hence $\eta +\varepsilon R$ is positive where $\chi =1$, including along the line. On the compact transition annulus $\eta $ is already positive, so $\eta +\varepsilon R$ remains positive there for sufficiently small $\varepsilon >0$, and outside the ball $R=0$. Adding these corrections in all the disjoint balls produces a Kähler form on $X$. $\square$

Fix now $a\in \mathbb R\setminus \mathbb Q$ and take for $\Lambda $ the lattice generated by

\[ \lambda _1=(1,0),\quad \lambda _2=(a,1),\quad \lambda _3=(\mathrm i,0),\quad \lambda _4=(0,\mathrm i). \]

Write $z_ j=x_ j+\mathrm i y_ j$. Since $y_1$ takes integer values on $\Lambda $, the coordinate $y_1\bmod \mathbb Z$ defines a map from $A$ to the circle $\mathbb R/\mathbb Z$. Call a smooth even function $h:\mathbb R/\mathbb Z\to [0,+\infty )$ admissible if it has integral one and vanishes near $\frac12\mathbb Z$; such functions are obtained from even pairs of nonnegative bumps supported away from that set. For an admissible $h$, put

\[ \theta _ h=h(y_1)\, \mathrm dx_1\wedge \mathrm dy_1. \]

Proposition 10.27.2.6055AD1EB4F6 The forms $\theta _ h$ descend and extend by zero to smooth semipositive closed forms $T_ h$ on $X$. They all represent one nonzero nef Bott–Chern class $\alpha $ with $\alpha ^2=0$. This class is not rigid, that is, it contains more than one closed positive current, and its image in real de Rham cohomology spans an irrational ray. Each $T_ h$ vanishes on a neighborhood of the exceptional set.

Proof. The form $\theta _ h$ is closed, because $\mathrm dh(y_1)$ is proportional to $\mathrm dy_1$, and it is semipositive. Since $h$ is even, $\theta _ h$ is invariant under the involution. At every fixed point, $y_1$ belongs to $\frac12\mathbb Z$ modulo $\mathbb Z$, so the form vanishes on a neighborhood of that point. Its descent to the complement of the singular points of $Y$ therefore extends by zero across their resolved neighborhoods. This proves smoothness and the asserted vanishing.

Let $h_1,h_2$ be admissible and put $k=h_1-h_2$. This function is even, has mean zero and vanishes near $\frac12\mathbb Z$. Choose $f$ with

\[ f'(y)=4\pi \int _0^ y k(s)\, \mathrm ds, \qquad f''=4\pi k. \]

The derivative $f'$ is periodic and odd, so its mean is zero, and $f$ can be chosen periodic and even. Evenness and the zero mean of $k$ give $\int _0^{1/2}k=0$, hence $f'=0$ near $\frac12\mathbb Z$. Therefore $f(y_1)$ descends, and it extends by constants near each exceptional curve to a smooth function $G$ on $X$. Since

\[ \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}f(y_1)=\frac{f''(y_1)}{4\pi } \, \mathrm dx_1\wedge \mathrm dy_1 \quad \text{on }A, \qquad \text{we have}\qquad \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}G=T_{h_1}-T_{h_2}. \]

Thus all the forms $T_ h$ have the same Bott–Chern class $\alpha $. Distinct admissible functions give distinct forms, so $\alpha $ is not rigid. The forms are semipositive and have square zero, so $\alpha ^2=0$. By lemma 10.27.1, adding any positive multiple of a Kähler form gives a Kähler representative of a nearby class; therefore $\alpha $ is nef.

By the mean-one condition, the periods of $\theta _ h$ on the real two-tori generated by $(\lambda _1,\lambda _3)$ and by $(\lambda _2,\lambda _3)$ are $1$ and $a$, respectively. Translate both cycles by $(0,\mathrm i/4)$. The translated cycles lie in $\{ y_2=1/4\} $ modulo $\mathbb Z$ and avoid the sixteen fixed points, and their periods are unchanged because the form is closed. Their images in $X$ lie in the complement of the exceptional curves, which is doubly covered without ramification by $A\setminus A[2]$. The first period shows that $\alpha \ne 0$. If a nonzero multiple $b\alpha $ had a rational de Rham class, then evaluating it on these cycles would make both $b$ and $ba$ rational, contradicting $a\notin \mathbb Q$. Finally, since $\alpha ^2=0$, Stokes' theorem shows that $\alpha $ itself has no Kähler representative, so it lies on the boundary of the nef cone. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.