Pome

10.26 Rigid boundary classes on a torus5A68768CC1C3

5A68768CC1C3

We now turn to the boundary of the nef cone. A nef class with zero top intersection number may have a smooth semipositive representative and yet leave little freedom to vary it. On a complex torus, the kernel of a constant semipositive form controls this freedom: when the leaves of the kernel are dense, the form is the only closed positive current in its class. The same condition decides whether adding a small fixed Kähler form produces metrics whose diameters tend to zero. For Kähler forms converging to the boundary in other ways, the diameters can tend to zero even at a class with many semipositive representatives.

Let $X=V/\Lambda $ be a complex torus, where $V\simeq \mathbb C^ n$ and $\Lambda $ is a full lattice. Let $\theta $ be a translation-invariant semipositive real $(1,1)$-form of rank $r$ with $1\leq r<n$, and fix a translation-invariant Kähler form $\kappa $. The class $\alpha =\{ \theta \} _{\mathrm{BC}}$ is nef and has $\int _ X\theta ^ n=0$. It lies on the boundary of the nef cone: a Kähler form in $\alpha $ would have positive top intersection number, whereas Stokes' theorem gives every representative the top intersection number $\int _ X\theta ^ n=0$. We call $\alpha $ rigid if it contains exactly one closed positive current. Let $K=\ker \theta \subset V$, a complex subspace of dimension $n-r$, and let $H\subset X$ be the closure of its image in $X$. This is a connected real subtorus, which need not be complex. Diameters are computed for the Riemannian metric $g_\eta (v,w)=\eta (v,Jw)$ associated with a positive form $\eta $, where $J$ is the complex structure.

Theorem 10.26.1.9A07C571BD3F The following are equivalent:

  1. $\alpha $ is rigid;

  2. $H=X$;

  3. $\operatorname {diam}(X,\theta +t\kappa )\to 0$ as $t\downarrow 0$.

In the first case the unique current is $\theta $. The third condition is independent of the chosen translation-invariant Kähler form $\kappa $.

Proof. Rigidity when $H=X$. Suppose first that $H=X$. By lemma 20.4.10, a positive current in $\alpha $ can be written $T=\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u$ with $u$ quasi-plurisubharmonic, in particular $u\in L^1(X)$. For a constant real vector $v\in K$, the coefficient $T(v,Jv)$ is a positive Radon measure. Its total integral against Haar measure is zero, because $\theta (v,Jv)=0$ and the remaining part of the coefficient is a combination of constant-coefficient derivatives of $u$. Hence this coefficient vanishes. Writing $D_ v$ for differentiation along $v$ and using that $K$ is complex, we obtain

\[ (D_ v^2+D_{Jv}^2)u=0 \quad \text{as a distribution for every }v\in K. \]

For a real linear functional $\ell $ with $\ell (\Lambda )\subset \mathbb Z$, let $\widehat u(\ell )$ be the Fourier coefficient of $u$ at the character $\exp (2\pi \mathrm i\ell )$. The identity above gives

\[ \bigl (\ell (v)^2+\ell (Jv)^2\bigr )\widehat u(\ell )=0. \]

Since the image of $K$ is dense, a nonzero character cannot vanish identically on $K$. Thus every nonconstant Fourier coefficient of $u$ is zero, and convolution with a smooth approximate identity shows that $u$ is constant. Hence $T=\theta $.

Nonrigidity when $H\ne X$. If $H\ne X$, a nontrivial character of the real torus $X/H$ gives a nonzero $\ell $ that vanishes on $K$. Put $\phi =\cos (2\pi \ell )$. Since $K$ is complex, the form $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\phi $ vanishes whenever one of its arguments lies in $K$. On a fixed complement of $K$, $\theta $ is positive definite and $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\phi $ is uniformly bounded. Consequently, the forms $\theta \pm \varepsilon \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\phi $ are semipositive for sufficiently small $\varepsilon >0$. They represent the same class, and they are distinct because a nonconstant smooth function on a compact torus cannot have zero $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$. Hence $\alpha $ is not rigid.

Collapse when $H=X$. Suppose again that $H=X$, and fix $\delta >0$. By density and compactness, there are finitely many vectors $k_1,\ldots ,k_ N\in K$ whose images form a $\delta $-net in the flat metric of $\kappa $. Put $R=\max _ j|k_ j|_\kappa $. Since $\theta (k_ j,Jk_ j)=0$, the straight path from $0$ to the image of $k_ j$ has $(\theta +t\kappa )$-length $\sqrt t\, |k_ j|_\kappa $. For $0<t\leq 1$ these metrics are bounded above by a fixed multiple of $\kappa $. Joining this path to a point within $\delta $ therefore gives

\[ \operatorname {diam}(X,\theta +t\kappa ) \leq \sqrt t\, R+C\delta , \]

since by translation invariance the diameter equals the supremum of the distances from $0$. Letting first $t\downarrow 0$ for this fixed net and then $\delta \downarrow 0$ proves the third condition.

No collapse when $H\ne X$. If $H\ne X$, choose $\ell $ as above. Its differential vanishes on $K$, so $|\mathrm d\ell (v)|\leq L|v|_\theta $ for some $L>0$, where $|v|_\theta $ is the seminorm defined by $\theta $. Since $\theta +t\kappa \geq \theta $, the surjective map $\ell \bmod \mathbb Z$ onto the circle of length one is $L$-Lipschitz for every $t>0$. Two points mapping to opposite points of the circle therefore have distance at least $1/(2L)$, and the diameters cannot tend to zero. This completes the proof of the equivalences. Since the second condition does not involve $\kappa $, neither does the third. $\square$

On a two-dimensional square torus, the slope of the kernel line decides rigidity.

Example 10.26.2.5B00F62ACA6B On $X=(\mathbb C/(\mathbb Z+\mathrm i\mathbb Z))^2$, for $a\in \mathbb R$ set

\[ \theta _ a=\frac{\mathrm i}{2} (\mathrm dz_2-a\, \mathrm dz_1) \wedge (\mathrm d\bar z_2-a\, \mathrm d\bar z_1). \]

Its class is rigid exactly when $a$ is irrational. In that case its ray is irrational, that is, no nonzero real multiple of its de Rham class is rational, and every family $\theta _ a+t\kappa $ as above collapses to a point in diameter. For rational $a$ the class is not rigid, and these diameters have a positive lower bound.

Proof. The kernel is the complex line $z_2=a z_1$. Write $z_ j=x_ j+\mathrm i y_ j$. An integral character has the form

\[ \ell =m_1x_1+m_2x_2+n_1y_1+n_2y_2, \qquad m_ j,n_ j\in \mathbb Z, \]

and it vanishes on the kernel exactly when $m_1+a m_2=n_1+a n_2=0$. For irrational $a$, only the zero character does so, hence the image of the kernel is dense. For rational $a$, a nonzero such character exists. Now apply theorem 10.26.1. The periods of $\theta _ a$ on the coordinate two-tori in the $(x_2,y_2)$ and $(x_1,y_2)$ directions are $1$ and $-a$, respectively. If a nonzero multiple of its class were rational, the first period would make that multiple rational, and the second would then make $a$ rational. This proves the assertion about the ray. $\square$

The fixed positive direction $\kappa $ in the theorem cannot be replaced by an arbitrary convergent family of Kähler forms, even when all the metrics are flat and Ricci-flat.

Example 10.26.3.87A3AA3B13FD On the same square torus let $\theta _0=\frac{\mathrm i}{2}\mathrm dz_2\wedge \mathrm d\bar z_2$ and, for $t>0$, put

\[ \beta _ t=\frac{\mathrm i}{2}\left[ (t\, \mathrm dz_1+\mathrm dz_2) \wedge (t\, \mathrm d\bar z_1+\mathrm d\bar z_2) +t^2\mathrm dz_2\wedge \mathrm d\bar z_2\right]. \]

These are flat Ricci-flat Kähler forms, $\beta _ t\to \theta _0$ smoothly, and

\[ \operatorname {diam}(X,\beta _ t)\leq t. \]

The limiting class $\{ \theta _0\} _{\mathrm{BC}}$ is not rigid.

Proof. The coefficient matrix of $\beta _ t$ is $\left(\begin{smallmatrix}t^2& t\\ t& 1+t^2\end{smallmatrix}\right)$, with determinant $t^4>0$. Its coefficients are constant, which gives flatness and Ricci-flatness. Represent a point by $(z_1,z_2)$ with real and imaginary parts in $[-1/2,1/2]$, and choose a Gaussian integer $k$ nearest to $-z_1-z_2/t$. The displacement $(z_1+k,z_2)$ represents the same point of the torus and has squared metric norm

\[ |t(z_1+k)+z_2|^2+t^2|z_2|^2 \leq t^2/2+t^2/2=t^2. \]

The straight path along this displacement proves the bound for the distance from zero, and translation invariance gives the diameter bound. For $0<|s|<1/\pi $, the form $\theta _0+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(s\cos (2\pi x_2))=(1-\pi s\cos (2\pi x_2))\theta _0$ is another semipositive representative, so the limiting class is not rigid. Finally, the coefficient matrix of $\beta _ t-\theta _0$ has eigenvalues $t^2\pm t$, so this difference is indefinite for $0<t<1$: the forms $\beta _ t$ do not approach $\theta _0$ from above. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.