Pome

15.4 A quantitative stability estimateB4FB50E0C9DE

B4FB50E0C9DE

If a $\theta $-plurisubharmonic function exceeds a bounded solution only by a small amount in $L^1$, the excess is also uniformly small. To prove this, we restrict the density of the solution to a strict superlevel set of the difference and construct a subsolution for the restricted density. Domination bounds the height of the superlevel set in terms of the norm of the restricted density, and Hölder's inequality converts its volume into a power of the $L^1$ error.

Throughout this section $\theta $ is semipositive and big, and $p>1$ is fixed.

Theorem 15.4.1.72397EB33655 Fix $L,C_0>0$. Let $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ satisfy

\[ -C_0\leq u\leq 0,\qquad \mathrm{MA}_\theta (u)=f\, \mathrm{d}V,\qquad 0\leq f\in L^ p(\mathrm{d}V),\quad \| f\| _ p\leq L. \]

For every

\[ 0<\eta <\frac{p-1}{np+p-1} \]

there is a constant $C$, depending only on the fixed data and $\eta $, such that every $v\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ with $v\leq 0$ satisfies

\[ \sup _ X(v-u)_+ \leq C\left(\int _ X(v-u)_+\, \mathrm{d}V\right)^\eta . \]

The comparison potential $v$ need not be bounded.

Proof. Replacing $v$ by $\max (v,u)$ leaves both sides unchanged, so we may assume $-C_0\leq u\leq v\leq 0$. Put $I=\int _ X(v-u)\, \mathrm{d}V$. If $I=0$, the two canonical potentials agree everywhere and there is nothing to prove, so we assume $I>0$.

Choose $q\in (1,p)$, to be specified at the end. For $\delta >0$ put

\[ E_\delta =\{ u<v-\delta \} ,\qquad g_\delta =\mathbf1_{E_\delta }f,\qquad m_\delta =\| g_\delta \| _ q. \]

If $m_\delta >0$, apply lemma 15.3.1 to $g_\delta /m_\delta $. It gives $h\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ and $b>0$ such that

\[ -1\leq h\leq 0,\qquad \mathrm{MA}_\theta (h)\geq b\, g_\delta /m_\delta \, \mathrm{d}V. \]

The constant $b$ does not depend on $\delta ,f,u,v$, since the auxiliary density has $L^ q$ norm one.

First suppose $0<m_\delta <b/2$, and take

\[ t=(2m_\delta /b)^{1/n}\in (0,1),\qquad w=(1-t)v+th-\delta -C_0t. \]

Because $h-v\leq C_0$, we have $w\leq v-\delta $, and hence $\{ u<w\} \subset E_\delta $. Positivity of bounded mixed products gives

\[ \mathrm{MA}_\theta (w)\geq t^ n\mathrm{MA}_\theta (h) \geq 2g_\delta \, \mathrm{d}V. \]

On $\{ u<w\} $ the last measure equals $2\mathrm{MA}_\theta (u)$. Bounded strict domination in the semipositive big background (theorem 16.28.56) therefore implies $u\geq w$. Consequently

\[ v-u\leq v-w =\delta +C_0t+t(v-h)\leq \delta +(C_0+1)t. \]

If $m_\delta =0$, the measure of $u$ vanishes on $E_\delta $, and the same domination theorem with coefficient zero, applied to $u$ and $v-\delta $, gives $v-u\leq \delta $. If $m_\delta \geq b/2$, the bound $v-u\leq C_0$ gives the following inequality after an increase of its constant. Thus in every case

E617EAC91766 15.4.2
\begin{equation} \sup _ X(v-u)\leq \delta +C_1m_\delta ^{1/n}. \end{equation}

Hölder's inequality and Chebyshev's inequality give

\[ m_\delta \leq \| f\| _ p\, \mathrm{d}V(E_\delta )^{1/q-1/p} \leq L(I/\delta )^{(p-q)/(pq)}. \]

Set $a=(p-q)/(npq)>0$. For $0<I\leq 1$, choose $\delta =I^{a/(1+a)}$. Substituting in (15.4.2) yields

\[ \sup _ X(v-u)\leq C_2 I^{\eta _ q}, \qquad \eta _ q=\frac{p-q}{npq+p-q}. \]

As $q\downarrow 1$, the exponent $\eta _ q$ tends to $(p-1)/(np+p-1)$. For the prescribed $\eta $ we choose $q>1$ so close to $1$ that $\eta _ q>\eta $; then $I^{\eta _ q}\leq I^\eta $ on $(0,1]$. When $I>1$, the bound $v-u\leq C_0$ gives the same conclusion after increasing $C$. This proves the theorem. $\square$

Corollary 15.4.3.E429FB866D08 Fix $C_0>0$. Let $u_ j,u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ satisfy $-C_0\leq u_ j,u\leq 0$ and

\[ \mathrm{MA}_\theta (u_ j)=f_ j\, \mathrm{d}V,\qquad \mathrm{MA}_\theta (u)=f\, \mathrm{d}V, \qquad \sup _ j\| f_ j\| _ p+\| f\| _ p<+\infty . \]

If $u_ j\to u$ in $L^1$, then $u_ j\to u$ uniformly. More precisely, for every exponent $\eta $ as in the theorem,

\[ \| u_ j-u\| _\infty \leq C\| u_ j-u\| _{L^1(\mathrm{d}V)}^\eta . \]

Proof. Apply the theorem first with solution $u$ and comparison potential $u_ j$, and then with solution $u_ j$ and comparison potential $u$. The constants are uniform because of the common range and the common density bound. The larger of the two suprema is the uniform norm, and each integral of a positive part is at most the full $L^1$ difference. $\square$

The corollary assumes that the limit $u$ already solves an equation with an $L^ p$ density. In an existence proof, this must be established before the corollary can be applied.

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.