Theorem 15.4.1.72397EB33655 Fix $L,C_0>0$. Let $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ satisfy
For every
there is a constant $C$, depending only on the fixed data and $\eta $, such that every $v\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ with $v\leq 0$ satisfies
B4FB50E0C9DEB4FB50E0C9DE
If a $\theta $-plurisubharmonic function exceeds a bounded solution only by a small amount in $L^1$, the excess is also uniformly small. To prove this, we restrict the density of the solution to a strict superlevel set of the difference and construct a subsolution for the restricted density. Domination bounds the height of the superlevel set in terms of the norm of the restricted density, and Hölder's inequality converts its volume into a power of the $L^1$ error.
Throughout this section $\theta $ is semipositive and big, and $p>1$ is fixed.
Theorem 15.4.1.72397EB33655 Fix $L,C_0>0$. Let $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ satisfy
For every
there is a constant $C$, depending only on the fixed data and $\eta $, such that every $v\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ with $v\leq 0$ satisfies
The comparison potential $v$ need not be bounded.
Proof. Replacing $v$ by $\max (v,u)$ leaves both sides unchanged, so we may assume $-C_0\leq u\leq v\leq 0$. Put $I=\int _ X(v-u)\, \mathrm{d}V$. If $I=0$, the two canonical potentials agree everywhere and there is nothing to prove, so we assume $I>0$.
Choose $q\in (1,p)$, to be specified at the end. For $\delta >0$ put
If $m_\delta >0$, apply lemma 15.3.1 to $g_\delta /m_\delta $. It gives $h\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ and $b>0$ such that
The constant $b$ does not depend on $\delta ,f,u,v$, since the auxiliary density has $L^ q$ norm one.
First suppose $0<m_\delta <b/2$, and take
Because $h-v\leq C_0$, we have $w\leq v-\delta $, and hence $\{ u<w\} \subset E_\delta $. Positivity of bounded mixed products gives
On $\{ u<w\} $ the last measure equals $2\mathrm{MA}_\theta (u)$. Bounded strict domination in the semipositive big background (theorem 16.28.56) therefore implies $u\geq w$. Consequently
If $m_\delta =0$, the measure of $u$ vanishes on $E_\delta $, and the same domination theorem with coefficient zero, applied to $u$ and $v-\delta $, gives $v-u\leq \delta $. If $m_\delta \geq b/2$, the bound $v-u\leq C_0$ gives the following inequality after an increase of its constant. Thus in every case
Hölder's inequality and Chebyshev's inequality give
Set $a=(p-q)/(npq)>0$. For $0<I\leq 1$, choose $\delta =I^{a/(1+a)}$. Substituting in (15.4.2) yields
As $q\downarrow 1$, the exponent $\eta _ q$ tends to $(p-1)/(np+p-1)$. For the prescribed $\eta $ we choose $q>1$ so close to $1$ that $\eta _ q>\eta $; then $I^{\eta _ q}\leq I^\eta $ on $(0,1]$. When $I>1$, the bound $v-u\leq C_0$ gives the same conclusion after increasing $C$. This proves the theorem. $\square$
Corollary 15.4.3.E429FB866D08 Fix $C_0>0$. Let $u_ j,u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ satisfy $-C_0\leq u_ j,u\leq 0$ and
If $u_ j\to u$ in $L^1$, then $u_ j\to u$ uniformly. More precisely, for every exponent $\eta $ as in the theorem,
Proof. Apply the theorem first with solution $u$ and comparison potential $u_ j$, and then with solution $u_ j$ and comparison potential $u$. The constants are uniform because of the common range and the common density bound. The larger of the two suprema is the uniform norm, and each integral of a positive part is at most the full $L^1$ difference. $\square$
The corollary assumes that the limit $u$ already solves an equation with an $L^ p$ density. In an existence proof, this must be established before the corollary can be applied.
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.