72CDE5ADD348
When $v_-(h)=0$, some densities admit no positive scaled subsolution. For one fixed density $f$, we now determine the largest coefficient $a$ for which $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(u)\geq af\, \mathrm{d}V$ has a solution. The bounded truncations of $f$ have normalization scalars, and their limit is the answer. Moreover, the largest coefficient is attained: the normalized continuous solutions for the truncations have an $L^1$ cluster limit, and a lower bound for Monge–Ampère densities passes to $L^1$ limits of potentials by means of monotone upper envelopes.
Let $0\leq f\in L^1(\mathrm{d}V)$ have positive integral. Its truncations are bounded and nonzero, and we put
E3AA9E3C0D2D
15.28.1
\begin{equation} f_ k=\min (f,k),\qquad b_ h(f)=\lim _{k\to \infty }c_ h(f_ k). \end{equation}
By lemma 15.27.1, the scalars $c_ h(f_ k)$ decrease as $k$ increases, so the limit exists in $[0,c_ h(f_1)]$. We call $b_ h(f)$ the subsolution threshold of $f$; theorem 15.28.4 below justifies the name. The same lemma gives
4A9175A29709
15.28.2
\begin{equation} b_ h(f)=\inf \{ c_ h(q):0\leq q\leq f,\ q\in L^\infty , \ \textstyle \int _ Xq\, \mathrm{d}V>0\} . \end{equation}
Indeed, every such $q$ satisfies $q\leq f_ k$ for $k\geq \| q\| _{L^\infty }$, hence $c_ h(q)\geq c_ h(f_ k)\geq b_ h(f)$, while the truncations $f_ k$ are themselves admissible.
The Monge–Ampère operator is not continuous under $L^1$ convergence of potentials, but a lower bound for a Monge–Ampère density survives such convergence. The proof replaces the sequence by monotone upper envelopes, which converge in capacity, and uses the continuity of damped measures, theorem 13.15.9, applied with the Hermitian form $h$ and the weight $t\mapsto \mathrm{e}^{-t}$. For nonpositive $v\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,h)$, the corresponding damped measure is $\mathrm{e}^{v}\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(v)$, with weight zero on the pole set; it has finite mass and depends weakly continuously on $v$ under convergence in capacity.
Lemma 15.28.3.8298FD96E154 Let $s_ j,s\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,h)$ be bounded above by a common constant and satisfy $s_ j\to s$ in $L^1(X)$. Suppose $g_ j,g\geq 0$, $g_ j\to g$ in $L^1(\mathrm{d}V)$, and
\[ \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(s_ j)\geq g_ j\, \mathrm{d}V \quad \text{for every }j. \]
Then $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(s)\geq g\, \mathrm{d}V$.
Proof.
Subtracting a common constant, which does not change the extended measures, we may assume that all potentials are nonpositive. Pass to a subsequence along which $s_ j\to s$ and $g_ j\to g$ almost everywhere, and set
\[ a_ j=\inf _{\ell \geq j}g_\ell ,\qquad w_ j=\left(\sup _{\ell \geq j}s_\ell \right)^*. \]
Then $0\leq a_ j\uparrow g$ almost everywhere, and $w_ j\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,h)$ decreases to $s$.
Step 1: $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(w_ j)\geq a_ j\, \mathrm{d}V$. Fix $j$. For $N\geq j$, the finite maximum $m_ N=\max _{j\leq \ell \leq N}s_\ell $ satisfies $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(m_ N)\geq a_ j\, \mathrm{d}V$: on the set $\{ m_ N=s_\ell \} $, proposition 13.14.6 gives $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(m_ N)\geq \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(s_\ell )\geq g_\ell \, \mathrm{d}V\geq a_ j\, \mathrm{d}V$, and these sets cover $X$. As $N\to \infty $, the functions $m_ N$ increase, are bounded above by zero, and have regularized limit $w_ j$. By lemma 5.29.19, $m_ N\to w_ j$ in capacity, so the damped measures $\mathrm{e}^{m_ N}\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(m_ N)$ converge weakly to $\mathrm{e}^{w_ j}\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(w_ j)$. Since $m_ N\to w_ j$ almost everywhere and $a_ j\leq g$, dominated convergence gives $\mathrm{e}^{m_ N}a_ j\to \mathrm{e}^{w_ j}a_ j$ in $L^1(\mathrm{d}V)$. Passing to the limit in $\mathrm{e}^{m_ N}\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(m_ N)\geq \mathrm{e}^{m_ N}a_ j\, \mathrm{d}V$ gives
\[ \mathrm{e}^{w_ j}\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(w_ j) \geq \mathrm{e}^{w_ j}a_ j\, \mathrm{d}V. \]
The pole set of $w_ j$ has zero volume and is not charged by $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(w_ j)$. Dividing by the positive weight off this set gives $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(w_ j)\geq a_ j\, \mathrm{d}V$.
Step 2: passage to $s$. Since $w_ j$ decreases to $s\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,h)$, lemma 5.29.19 gives $w_ j\to s$ in capacity, and the damped measures of $w_ j$ converge weakly to $\mathrm{e}^ s\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(s)$. Moreover $0\leq \mathrm{e}^{w_ j}a_ j\leq g$ and $\mathrm{e}^{w_ j}a_ j\to \mathrm{e}^ sg$ almost everywhere, so dominated convergence and Step 1 give
\[ \mathrm{e}^ s\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(s) \geq \mathrm{e}^ s g\, \mathrm{d}V. \]
Dividing by $\mathrm{e}^ s$ on $\{ s>-N\} $ and letting $N\to \infty $ gives $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(s)\geq g\, \mathrm{d}V$ off the pole set of $s$. Both measures give zero mass to the pole set, which proves the lemma.
$\square$
Theorem 15.28.4.CC13A9B1D927 For every nonnegative $f\in L^1(\mathrm{d}V)$ with positive integral,
\[ b_ h(f)=\max \{ a\geq 0:\text{there exists }u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,h) \text{ with }\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(u) \geq af\, \mathrm{d}V\} . \]
In particular, $f\, \mathrm{d}V$ admits a positive scaled subsolution if and only if $b_ h(f)>0$.
Proof.
If $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(u)\geq af\, \mathrm{d}V$ with $a>0$, then also $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(u)\geq af_ k\, \mathrm{d}V$ for every $k$, and lemma 15.27.1 gives $a\leq c_ h(f_ k)$. Letting $k\to \infty $ gives $a\leq b_ h(f)$. If $b_ h(f)=0$, the coefficient zero is attained by the zero potential.
Suppose now that $b=b_ h(f)>0$, and let $u_ k$ be continuous solutions of
\[ \mathrm{MA}_ h(u_ k)=c_ h(f_ k)f_ k\, \mathrm{d}V, \qquad \sup _ Xu_ k=0. \]
By theorem 5.25.2, a subsequence $u_{k_ j}$ converges in $L^1$ to some $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,h)$ with $\sup _ Xu=0$. The densities $c_ h(f_{k_ j})f_{k_ j}$ are dominated by $c_ h(f_1)f$ and converge to $bf$ almost everywhere, hence in $L^1$. Lemma 15.28.3 now gives $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(u)\geq bf\, \mathrm{d}V$, so the maximum is attained at $a=b$.
$\square$
When $b_ h(f)>0$, a function $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,h)$ with $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(u)\geq b_ h(f)f\, \mathrm{d}V$ is called a threshold subsolution for $f$, and a threshold subsolution with $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_ h(u)=b_ h(f)f\, \mathrm{d}V$ is called a threshold solution; the theorem shows that threshold subsolutions exist. Its proof preserves only a lower bound for the density. It shows neither that the normalized solutions $u_ k$ converge in capacity, nor that their limit has finite mass, nor that equality holds in the limit; these are the additional difficulties of the exact equation for an individual density. The threshold does not depend on the choice of truncations. If $(q_ k)$ is any increasing sequence of nonzero bounded densities converging to $f$ almost everywhere, then $c_ h(q_ k)\geq b_ h(f)$ by (15.28.2); conversely, the second half of the proof, applied to normalized solutions for $q_ k$, gives a subsolution with coefficient $\lim _ kc_ h(q_ k)$, which is therefore at most $b_ h(f)$. Hence $\lim _ kc_ h(q_ k)=b_ h(f)$.
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.