Pome

13.15 Weighted Monge–Ampère measuresA6A92DB9F7DA

A6A92DB9F7DA

Let $X$ be a connected compact complex manifold of dimension $n$, and let $\omega $ be a Hermitian form. Capacity refers to the capacity $\operatorname {Cap}_\omega $ of section 5.29. For nonpositive $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\omega )$ we write

\[ \mu _ u=\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_\omega (u) \]

for the extended non-pluripolar Monge–Ampère measure of theorem 13.14.3, and we put

\[ r_ n=\max (n-2,0). \]

By section 13.14, the measure $\mu _ u$ can have infinite mass when the bounded mass property fails. Its mass above depth $t$, on the superlevel set $\{ u\geq -t\} $, is nevertheless bounded by a polynomial of degree $r_ n$ in $t$, because the masses of bounded potentials grow at most polynomially in their range. A weight that decreases sufficiently fast in the depth $-u$ compensates for this growth. If $w:[0,+\infty )\to [0,+\infty )$ is a nonincreasing function with $w(t)\to 0$ as $t\to +\infty $, we call

\[ w(-u)\, \mu _ u \]

the damped Monge–Ampère measure of $u$ with weight $w$; the weight is set to zero on the pole set $\{ u=-\infty \} $, which $\mu _ u$ does not charge. The main examples are the exponential weights $\mathrm{e}^{-pt}$ and the polynomial weights $(1+t)^{-q}$. For suitable weights the damped measures are finite, uniformly absolutely continuous with respect to capacity, and continuous under convergence in capacity, a property that the extended measures themselves lack. Removing the weight requires uniform control of the mass on deep sublevel sets; we characterize this control and show by examples that such mass can persist although the potentials converge in capacity.

13.15.1 Range and restricted massBD96324E19C7

We first bound the Monge–Ampère mass of a bounded potential polynomially in its range. The first mixed mass $\int _ X(\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v)\wedge \omega ^{n-1}$ is bounded independently of $v$ by the Gauduchon trace. Local Chern–Levine–Nirenberg estimates turn this into a bound of degree $j-1$ in the range for the $j$th mixed mass, and Stokes' theorem expresses the top mass in terms of the lower ones.

Proposition 13.15.2.57A94BD59310 There is a constant $C_\omega $ such that, for every $A\geq 0$,

\[ \int _ X(\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v)^ n\leq C_\omega (1+A)^{r_ n} \quad \text{if }v\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\omega ),\ 0\leq v\leq A. \]

Proof. Choose finitely many coordinate balls whose concentric smaller balls, with compact closure in the larger ones, cover $X$. On each larger ball choose a fixed quadratic function $q$ with $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}q\geq \omega $, shifted so that $p=v+q$ is plurisubharmonic with $0\leq p\leq A+C$. Let $\kappa $ be the Euclidean form. In the identity

\[ \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}p=(\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v)+(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}q-\omega ), \]

the integral of the first term against $\kappa ^{n-1}$ is bounded by a fixed multiple of the global trace mass, which is bounded by corollary 11.5.3, and the second term is smooth and fixed. Thus $\int \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}p\wedge \kappa ^{n-1}$ is bounded uniformly in $v$ and $A$; in dimension one, Stokes' theorem replaces the trace bound. By (5.27.3), on each smaller ball,

\[ \int (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}p)^ j\wedge \kappa ^{n-j}\leq C_ j(1+A)^{j-1} \quad (1\leq j\leq n). \]

Expand $(\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v)^ j=(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}p+\omega -\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}q)^ j$ and sum over the finite cover. Since the smooth factors have bounded coefficients, the positive mixed masses satisfy

\[ 0\leq M_ j(v):=\int _ X(\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v)^ j\wedge \omega ^{n-j} \leq C_ j(1+A)^{\max (j-1,0)} \quad (0\leq j\leq n). \]

For smooth $v$, the exact form $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v)^ n$ integrates to zero, as in the proof of theorem 11.1.5; the regularization of theorem 5.32.1 and the continuity of bounded products give the same identity for bounded $v$. Thus

\[ 0=\int _ X(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v)^ n =\sum _{j=0}^ n(-1)^{n-j}\binom nj M_ j(v). \]

Since the mixed masses are nonnegative, it follows that

\[ M_ n(v)\leq \sum _{j=0}^{n-1}\binom nj M_ j(v) \leq C_\omega (1+A)^{r_ n}. \]

The largest power is $n-2$ when $n\geq 2$; for $n=1$, only the constant term remains. $\square$

For $n\leq 2$ the bound is uniform, so every compact complex curve or surface has the bounded mass property. In higher dimensions the bound grows with the range, and truncation turns it into a bound for the mass of an unbounded potential above a finite depth.

Lemma 13.15.3.357B2DE7779E Let $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\omega )$ be nonpositive. For $t\geq 0$ and every Borel set $E\subset X$,

F3E7262939D2 13.15.4
\begin{equation} \mu _ u(\{ u\geq -t\} )\leq C_\omega (1+t)^{r_ n}, \qquad \mu _ u(E\cap \{ u\geq -t\} )\leq (1+t)^ n\operatorname {Cap}_\omega (E). \end{equation}

Proof. Put $v_ t=\max (u,-t-1)+t+1$. It is $\omega $-plurisubharmonic and takes values in $[0,t+1]$, and by plurifine locality its Monge–Ampère measure equals $\mu _ u$ on $\{ u\geq -t\} \subset \{ u>-t-1\} $. The first estimate therefore follows from proposition 13.15.2, after enlarging the constant. For the second, $v_ t/(1+t)$ is a test function for the capacity, and positivity gives

\[ (\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_ t)^ n \leq (1+t)^ n\bigl (\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(v_ t/(1+t))\bigr )^ n. \]

Restricting this inequality to $E\cap \{ u\geq -t\} $ proves the capacity bound. $\square$

13.15.5 Exponential damping569E9BAF1CA2

The exponential weight can be handled directly. A convex increasing function with bounded range transforms $u$ into a bounded $\omega $-plurisubharmonic function, and the chain rule shows that the transformed current dominates an exponential multiple of $\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u$. The Monge–Ampère measure of the bounded transform therefore controls the damped measure.

For $a>0$ put $F_ a(t)=a^{-1}\mathrm{e}^{at}$ for $t\leq 0$, with $F_ a(-\infty )=0$. Then $0\leq F_ a\leq a^{-1}$, while $0<F_ a'\leq 1$ and $F_ a''\geq 0$ at finite arguments.

Proposition 13.15.6.8B51BF8706B7 If $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\omega )$ and $u\leq 0$, then $F_ a(u)$ is a bounded $\omega $-plurisubharmonic function, and

\[ \mathrm{e}^{na u}\mu _ u\leq \mathrm{MA}_\omega (F_ a(u)). \]

Proof. First suppose that $u$ is bounded. The chain rule (5.27.9) gives

\[ \omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}F_ a(u) =\mathrm{e}^{au}(\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)+(1-\mathrm{e}^{au})\omega +a\mathrm{e}^{au}\, \mathrm{d}u\wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}u. \]

All three summands are positive, and positivity of their bounded mixed products yields the claimed inequality.

For general $u$, use the truncations $u_ t=\max (u,-t)$. The bounded functions $F_ a(u_ t)$ decrease and take values between zero and $a^{-1}$, so their limit $F_ a(u)$ is a bounded $\omega $-plurisubharmonic function. On the plurifinely open set $D_ t=\{ u>-t\} $, it agrees with $F_ a(u_ t)$. Locality and the bounded case therefore give

\[ \mathrm{e}^{na u}\mathbf1_{D_ t}\mu _ u \leq \mathbf1_{D_ t}\mathrm{MA}_\omega (F_ a(u)). \]

Let $t\to +\infty $. The pole set is not charged by $\mu _ u$, and it has zero mass for the bounded product on the right. $\square$

Theorem 13.15.7.4394319FDE01 For $p>0$, the damped measures $\nu _{p,u}=\mathrm{e}^{pu}\mu _ u$ satisfy

\[ \nu _{p,u}(X)\leq C_\omega (1+p^{-1})^{r_ n}, \qquad \nu _{p,u}(E)\leq \max (1,n/p)^ n\operatorname {Cap}_\omega (E) \]

for every Borel set $E\subset X$, uniformly over all nonpositive $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\omega )$.

Proof. Take $a=p/n$ in proposition 13.15.6. Since $F_{p/n}(u)$ takes values in $[0,n/p]$, proposition 13.15.2 with $A=n/p$ gives the total mass bound, after enlarging $C_\omega $. For the capacity bound put $B=\max (1,n/p)$ and $v=F_{p/n}(u)$. Then $v/B$ is a test function for the capacity, and

\[ B\bigl (\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(v/B)\bigr ) =(\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v)+(B-1)\omega \geq \omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v. \]

Consequently $\nu _{p,u}\leq \mathrm{MA}_\omega (v)\leq B^ n\mathrm{MA}_\omega (v/B)$, which gives the second bound. The measures $\nu _{p,u}$ do not charge pluripolar sets, because $\mu _ u$ does not. $\square$

Since $\mu _ u$ does not charge the pole set, multiplication by $\mathrm{e}^{-pu}$ recovers $\mu _ u$ from $\nu _{p,u}$, including when its mass is infinite. An additive shift $u\mapsto u+c$ multiplies the damped measure by $\mathrm{e}^{pc}$.

13.15.8 Decreasing weights and capacity continuity1FE9FE4F07DE

For a general decreasing weight $w$, writing $w(s)=\int _ s^\infty (-w'(t))\, \mathrm{d}t$ and integrating the finite-depth estimate (13.15.4) in $t$ bounds both the total mass and the mass on deep sublevel sets. Above any fixed depth, the damped measure is a weighted product of bounded potentials, which is continuous under convergence in capacity; the tail bound then removes the restriction to a fixed depth.

Theorem 13.15.9.EE93EE2035F6 Let $w:[0,+\infty )\to (0,+\infty )$ be continuously differentiable and nonincreasing, with $w(t)\to 0$ as $t\to +\infty $. For $T\geq 0$ define

\[ B_ w(T)=\int _ T^\infty (1+t)^{r_ n}(-w'(t))\, \mathrm{d}t. \]

Assume $B_ w(0)<+\infty $. For nonpositive $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\omega )$, the damped measures $\nu _{w,u}=w(-u)\mu _ u$ satisfy

\[ \nu _{w,u}(X)\leq C_\omega B_ w(0),\qquad \nu _{w,u}(\{ u<-T\} )\leq C_\omega B_ w(T). \]

For every Borel set $E$ and $T\geq 0$,

\[ \nu _{w,u}(E)\leq w(0)(1+T)^ n\operatorname {Cap}_\omega (E)+C_\omega B_ w(T). \]

In particular, these measures are uniformly absolutely continuous with respect to capacity. If nonpositive $u_ j,u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\omega )$ satisfy $u_ j\to u$ in capacity, then $\nu _{w,u_ j}\rightharpoonup \nu _{w,u}$.

Proof. Write $s=-u$. Since $w(s)=\int _ s^\infty (-w'(t))\, \mathrm{d}t$ for finite $s$, and since $\mu _ u$ does not charge the pole set $\{ s=+\infty \} $, Tonelli's theorem and lemma 13.15.3 give

\[ \int _ X w(s)\, \mathrm{d}\mu _ u =\int _0^\infty (-w'(t))\mu _ u(\{ s\leq t\} )\, \mathrm{d}t \leq C_\omega B_ w(0). \]

Restricting the integral to $\{ s>T\} $ gives the same bound with $B_ w(T)$ in place of $B_ w(0)$, since the inner set is then $\{ T<s\leq t\} $, which is empty unless $t>T$.

For the capacity bound, the second estimate in (13.15.4) gives

\[ \int _{E\cap \{ s\leq T\} }w(s)\, \mathrm{d}\mu _ u \leq w(0)(1+T)^ n\operatorname {Cap}_\omega (E). \]

Adding the tail estimate for $\{ s>T\} $ proves the asserted bound. Since $B_ w(T)\to 0$, choosing first $T$ large and then the capacity small gives uniform absolute continuity.

To prove continuity, fix a continuous nonincreasing $\eta :[0,+\infty )\to [0,1]$, equal to one on $[0,1]$ and zero on $[2,+\infty )$, and put $\eta _ T(s)=\eta (s/T)$. For fixed $T>0$, set $v_{j,T}=\max (u_ j,-2T)$ and $g_ T(t)=\eta _ T(-t)w(-t)$ on $[-2T,0]$. Since $g_ T(-2T)=0$, locality gives

D2588BCCC6F7 13.15.10
\begin{equation} \eta _ T(-u_ j)w(-u_ j)\mu _{u_ j} =g_ T(v_{j,T})\, \mathrm{MA}_\omega (v_{j,T}). \end{equation}

Truncation preserves convergence in capacity. The functions $g_ T(v_{j,T})$ are uniformly bounded and quasi-continuous, and they converge in capacity to the corresponding function for $u$. The weighted continuity of bounded products in section 5.27, section 5.29 therefore gives weak convergence of the measures in (13.15.10) for each fixed $T$. The measure $(1-\eta _ T(-u_ j))\nu _{w,u_ j}$ is carried by $\{ u_ j<-T\} $, so by the tail bound its integral against a continuous test function $f$ is at most $C_\omega B_ w(T)\| f\| _\infty $, uniformly in $j$; the same holds for $u$. Letting $T\to \infty $ completes the proof. $\square$

For $w(t)=\mathrm{e}^{-pt}$, $p>0$, the integral $B_ w(0)$ is finite because the exponential dominates the polynomial factor. Thus the exponentially damped measures of theorem 13.15.7 are continuous under convergence in capacity. By that theorem, their tails also satisfy

\[ \nu _{p,u}(\{ u<-T\} ) \leq \mathrm{e}^{-pT/2}\nu _{p/2,u}(X) \leq C_ p\mathrm{e}^{-pT/2}. \]

For polynomial weights, the general estimate takes the following explicit form.

Theorem 13.15.11.B72AF5B37CB7 For every $q>r_ n$, the damped measures

\[ \sigma _{q,u}:=(1-u)^{-q}\mu _ u \]

have uniformly bounded mass for $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\omega )$, $u\leq 0$. More precisely,

\[ \sigma _{q,u}(\{ u<-T\} ) \leq C\frac{q}{q-r_ n}(1+T)^{r_ n-q}\quad (T\geq 0), \]

where $C$ depends only on $\omega $. There is also a constant $C_ q$ such that, for every Borel set $E\subset X$,

\[ \sigma _{q,u}(E)\leq C_ q\operatorname {Cap}_\omega (E)^{(q-r_ n)/(q+n-r_ n)}. \]

Proof. For $w(t)=(1+t)^{-q}$, direct integration gives

\[ B_ w(T)=q\int _ T^\infty (1+t)^{r_ n-q-1}\, \mathrm{d}t =\frac{q}{q-r_ n}(1+T)^{r_ n-q}. \]

Thus proposition 13.15.9 gives the mass and tail estimates. For the capacity bound put $\delta =\operatorname {Cap}_\omega (E)$. If $0<\delta \leq 1$, choose $T=\delta ^{-1/(q+n-r_ n)}\geq 1$ in that theorem. Both $T^ n\delta $ and $T^{r_ n-q}$ equal $\delta ^{(q-r_ n)/(q+n-r_ n)}$, so its two terms have the required bound. If $\delta =0$, let $T\to \infty $; if $\delta >1$, use the total mass bound. $\square$

For $n\geq 2$, the capacity exponent is $1-n/(q+2)$. The threshold $q>n-2$ comes from the mixed-mass estimate in proposition 13.15.2.

Logarithmic factors give weights at the threshold. For $n\geq 3$ and $a>1$, put $r=n-2>0$ and

\[ w(t)=(1+t)^{-r}[\log (\mathrm{e}+t)]^{-a}. \]

Differentiation gives

\[ (1+t)^ r(-w'(t)) =\frac{r}{(1+t)[\log (\mathrm{e}+t)]^ a} +\frac{a}{(\mathrm{e}+t)[\log (\mathrm{e}+t)]^{a+1}}. \]

The ratios $(\mathrm{e}+t)/(1+t)$ are bounded. The substitution $y=\log (\mathrm{e}+t)$ therefore bounds the integrals of the two terms over $[T,+\infty )$ by fixed multiples of $[\log (\mathrm{e}+T)]^{1-a}$ and $[\log (\mathrm{e}+T)]^{-a}$, respectively. Since $a>1$ and $\log (\mathrm{e}+T)\geq 1$, we obtain $B_ w(T)\leq C_{n,a}[\log (\mathrm{e}+T)]^{1-a}$. Hence, by proposition 13.15.9, the damped measures $(1-u)^{-(n-2)}[\log (\mathrm{e}-u)]^{-a}\mu _ u$ have uniformly bounded mass, their mass on $\{ u<-T\} $ is at most a constant times $[\log (\mathrm{e}+T)]^{1-a}$, and they are continuous under convergence in capacity. In dimensions one and two, $r_ n=0$ and $B_ w(T)=w(T)$, so every weight satisfying the monotonicity, differentiability and vanishing conditions of proposition 13.15.9 can be used.

Damping can restore convergence when every undamped measure has infinite mass. When the bounded mass property fails, take the potential $U$ constructed in the proof of theorem 13.14.18, whose current has integrable coefficients by proposition 13.14.21, and normalize it by $\sup _ XU=0$. For $0<\varepsilon <1$, the potentials $\varepsilon U$ converge to zero in capacity as $\varepsilon \downarrow 0$: by (5.29.4), the capacity of $\{ \varepsilon U<-\delta \} $ is at most $C\varepsilon /\delta $ for each fixed $\delta >0$ and small $\varepsilon $. Consequently, for $p>0$ and $q>r_ n$,

\[ \mathrm{e}^{p\varepsilon U}\mu _{\varepsilon U}\rightharpoonup \omega ^ n, \qquad (1-\varepsilon U)^{-q}\mu _{\varepsilon U}\rightharpoonup \omega ^ n, \]

although $\mu _{\varepsilon U}(X)=+\infty $ for every $0<\varepsilon <1$. The full currents also converge to $\omega $ in the coefficient $L^1$ norm, and their Gauduchon traces converge in total variation.

13.15.12 Uniform tails and undamped convergence0D2E3E7B4DFD

On deep sublevel sets the damping weight tends to zero, so convergence of the weighted measures can leave their undamped mass uncontrolled. Uniformly vanishing deep tails supply the additional control: the following condition gives a finite limit measure and weak convergence of the undamped measures $\mu _{u_ j}$. It can equivalently be expressed by an increasing integrability weight.

Theorem 13.15.13.8B2A9680933C Let $u_ j,u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\omega )$ be nonpositive and suppose $u_ j\to u$ in capacity. Assume

\[ \lim _{T\to \infty }\sup _ j\mu _{u_ j}(\{ u_ j<-T\} )=0. \]

Then $\mu _ u$ is finite and $\mu _{u_ j}\rightharpoonup \mu _ u$.

Proof. Choose $T_0$ such that every tail $\mu _{u_ j}(\{ u_ j<-T\} )$ with $T\geq T_0$ is at most one. By lemma 13.15.3, $\mu _{u_ j}(X)\leq C(1+T_0)^{r_ n}+1$, so the tail condition already gives a uniform bound for the total masses.

With the cutoffs $\eta _ T$ of (13.15.10), the fixed-level argument in the proof of theorem 13.15.9, applied with $w\equiv 1$, gives

\[ \eta _ T(-u_ j)\mu _{u_ j}\rightharpoonup \eta _ T(-u)\mu _ u \quad \text{for every fixed }T>0. \]

The masses of the measures on the left are bounded by the uniform bound for the total masses. Since $\eta _ T(-u)$ increases to one off the pole set as $T\to \infty $, monotone convergence proves $\mu _ u(X)<+\infty $.

For a continuous test function $f:X\to \mathbb R$, the error made by inserting $\eta _ T(-u_ j)$ is at most $\| f\| _\infty \mu _{u_ j}(\{ u_ j<-T\} )$, which is small for large $T$, uniformly in $j$. For the limit potential, the corresponding error tends to zero because $\mu _ u$ is finite and does not charge the pole set. Let first $j\to \infty $ with $T$ fixed, and then $T\to \infty $. $\square$

Let $\chi :[0,+\infty )\to [1,+\infty )$ be continuous, nondecreasing and unbounded. For a nonpositive potential $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\omega )$ define

\[ J_{\chi ,\omega }(u)=\int _ X\chi (-u)\, \mathrm{d}\mu _ u, \]

with the value $+\infty $ allowed. Since $\chi (T)\to +\infty $, a uniform bound for this functional forces the sublevel tails to vanish uniformly.

Corollary 13.15.14.7312F05A4396 Let $u_ j,u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\omega )$ be nonpositive. If $u_ j\to u$ in capacity and $\sup _ jJ_{\chi ,\omega }(u_ j)\leq C$, then

\[ J_{\chi ,\omega }(u)\leq C,\qquad \mu _{u_ j}\rightharpoonup \mu _ u. \]

Proof. Since $\chi \geq 1$, the total masses are at most $C$, and

\[ \mu _{u_ j}(\{ u_ j<-T\} )\leq C/\chi (T). \]

Thus theorem 13.15.13 applies. For the bound on $J_{\chi ,\omega }(u)$, use (13.15.10) with the compactly supported continuous function $s\mapsto \chi (s)\eta _ T(s)$ in place of $w\eta _ T$. The corresponding weighted integrals converge for each fixed $T$, and they are at most $C$. Let $T\to \infty $ and use monotone convergence. $\square$

Proposition 13.15.15.ACA3FA133A3B For a family of nonpositive potentials in $\mathrm{PSH}(X,\omega )$, the uniform tail condition of theorem 13.15.13 is equivalent to a uniform bound on $J_{\chi ,\omega }$ for some continuous nondecreasing unbounded function $\chi \geq 1$.

Proof. One implication was proved in corollary 13.15.14. Conversely, write the family as $(u_ i)_{i\in I}$. As in the proof of theorem 13.15.13, the tail condition and lemma 13.15.3 give a uniform bound for the total masses. Choose numbers $T_ k\to +\infty $, with $T_{k+1}>T_ k+1$, such that $\mu _{u_ i}(\{ -u_ i>T_ k\} )\leq 2^{-k}$ for every $i\in I$. Let $\rho _ k$ be a continuous nondecreasing function, equal to zero on $[0,T_ k]$ and to one on $[T_ k+1,+\infty )$, and define

\[ \chi (s)=1+\sum _{k\geq 1}\rho _ k(s). \]

The sum is locally finite, so $\chi $ is continuous, nondecreasing and unbounded. Tonelli's theorem gives

\[ J_{\chi ,\omega }(u_ i) \leq \mu _{u_ i}(X)+\sum _{k\geq 1}\mu _{u_ i}(\{ -u_ i>T_ k\} ) \leq \sup _{i\in I}\mu _{u_ i}(X)+1, \]

so this weight gives a uniform integrability bound for the whole family. $\square$

13.15.16 Mass concentrationA75B7FC1B6D9

The tail condition excludes mass carried by sublevel sets that disappear in the capacity limit. On a curve this mass can concentrate at a pole of the limit. When the bounded mass property fails, it can also persist along smooth potentials converging to zero.

Example 13.15.17.446B53338035 On $X=\mathbb P^1$, let $z$ be the standard affine coordinate and let $\delta _0$ denote the unit Dirac measure at its origin. Take the Fubini–Study form

\[ \omega =\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\log (1+|z|^2),\qquad \int _ X\omega =1, \]

and the global nonpositive potential

\[ u(z)=\log \frac{|z|^2}{1+|z|^2},\qquad u_ j=\max (u,-j). \]

At infinity, in the coordinate $\zeta =1/z$, the function $u$ equals $-\log (1+|\zeta |^2)$, so it is smooth there. The Poincaré–Lelong formula gives

\[ \omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u=\delta _0, \qquad \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_\omega (u)=0. \]

The second identity holds because the extended measure discards the pole set and the current vanishes on its complement.

Each $u_ j$ is bounded and $\omega $-plurisubharmonic. Its measure $\mu _ j=\mu _{u_ j}=\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ j$ has mass one by Stokes' theorem, and $\mu _ j=0$ on the open set $\{ u>-j\} $ by locality. Hence

\[ \operatorname {supp}\mu _ j\subset \{ u\leq -j\} =\left\{ |z|^2\leq \frac{\mathrm{e}^{-j}}{1-\mathrm{e}^{-j}}\right\} . \]

These disks shrink to the origin, so $\mu _ j\rightharpoonup \delta _0$. On their supports, $u_ j=-j$. Consequently, for $j>T$,

\[ \mu _ j(\{ u_ j<-T\} )=1, \qquad \mathrm{e}^{pu_ j}\mu _ j=\mathrm{e}^{-pj}\mu _ j\rightharpoonup 0 \quad (p>0). \]

Nevertheless, $u_ j\to u$ in capacity. Indeed, outside any neighborhood of the origin the functions eventually agree with $u$, and the origin has arbitrarily small neighborhoods of arbitrarily small capacity. Thus bounded mass and capacity convergence do not prevent the undamped measures from acquiring mass at a pole of the limit. The damped limit is the extended measure of $u$, as predicted by theorem 13.15.9.

We return to a general compact Hermitian manifold $(X,\omega )$.

Corollary 13.15.18.5804300415EA Assume $v_+(\omega )=+\infty $ and put $V_\omega =\int _ X\omega ^ n$. Fix a real number $b>V_\omega $ and a sequence $0<\varepsilon _ j<1$ tending to zero. The smooth potentials $w_ j$ of corollary 13.14.23, chosen with mass $b$, converge to zero in capacity. For every $T>0$,

\[ \left\| \mathbf1_{\{ w_ j\geq -T\} }(\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w_ j)^ n-\omega ^ n \right\| _{\mathrm{TV}}\longrightarrow 0, \qquad \int _{\{ w_ j<-T\} }(\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w_ j)^ n\longrightarrow b-V_\omega . \]

After passage to a subsequence, there is a positive measure $\sigma $ of mass $b-V_\omega $ such that

\[ (\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w_ j)^ n\rightharpoonup \omega ^ n+\sigma , \qquad \mathbf1_{\{ w_ j<-T\} }(\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w_ j)^ n\rightharpoonup \sigma \quad \text{for every }T>0. \]

Proof. The construction in corollary 13.14.23 gives $w_ j=s_ j u_ j$, where $u_ j$ is smooth and $\omega $-plurisubharmonic, $\sup _ Xu_ j=0$ and $0<s_ j<\varepsilon _ j$. The sublevel estimate (5.29.4) gives, for every fixed $\delta >0$ and all sufficiently large $j$,

\[ \operatorname {Cap}_\omega (\{ |w_ j|>\delta \} ) =\operatorname {Cap}_\omega (\{ u_ j<-\delta /s_ j\} ) \leq Cs_ j/\delta \longrightarrow 0. \]

Put $\mu _ j=(\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w_ j)^ n$. Fix $T>0$ and write $E_{j,T}=\{ w_ j\geq -T\} $. The lower bound in corollary 13.14.23 gives

\[ \mathbf1_{E_{j,T}}\mu _ j\geq \lambda _{j,T}:=(1-\varepsilon _ j)^ n\mathbf1_{E_{j,T}}\omega ^ n. \]

Since $w_ j\to 0$ in $L^1$, the smooth volume of $X\setminus E_{j,T}$ tends to zero, and hence $\lambda _{j,T}\to \omega ^ n$ in total variation. For every $p>0$, theorem 13.15.9 gives $\int _ X\mathrm{e}^{pw_ j}\, \mathrm{d}\mu _ j\to V_\omega $, and therefore

\[ \limsup _ j\mu _ j(E_{j,T}) \leq \mathrm{e}^{pT}\lim _ j\int _ X\mathrm{e}^{pw_ j}\, \mathrm{d}\mu _ j =\mathrm{e}^{pT}V_\omega . \]

Letting $p\downarrow 0$ and combining with the lower bound, we obtain $\mu _ j(E_{j,T})\to V_\omega $. Positivity now yields

\[ \begin{split} \| \mathbf1_{E_{j,T}}\mu _ j-\omega ^ n\| _{\mathrm{TV}} & \leq \mu _ j(E_{j,T})-\lambda _{j,T}(X) +\| \lambda _{j,T}-\omega ^ n\| _{\mathrm{TV}}\\ & \longrightarrow 0. \end{split} \]

Subtracting this shallow mass from $\mu _ j(X)=b$ proves the assertion about the mass on $\{ w_ j<-T\} $.

The positive measures $\mu _ j$ have fixed mass on the compact manifold $X$, so a subsequence converges weakly to a measure $\nu $ of mass $b$. The inequality $\mu _ j\geq (1-\varepsilon _ j)^ n\omega ^ n$ gives $\nu \geq \omega ^ n$. Set $\sigma =\nu -\omega ^ n$. For each $T>0$, subtracting the total-variation limit of the shallow restrictions from $\mu _ j\rightharpoonup \nu $ gives the last assertion along the same subsequence, for every $T$. $\square$

Thus the defect $\sigma $ in corollary 13.15.18 carries the whole excess mass $b-V_\omega $, although the currents $\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w_ j$ converge to $\omega $ in the coefficient $L^1$ norm and their Gauduchon traces converge in total variation. The location of $\sigma $ is constrained by the limits of the intermediate powers of $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w_ j$, as we now show.

13.15.19 Intermediate currents of a shrinking sequence0117A750C1BE

We formulate the result for a connected compact complex manifold $Y$ of dimension $n\geq 1$ with a Hermitian form $h$, since it will be applied with different metrics in section 23.1. Consider smooth functions

\[ v_ j=s_ ju_ j,\qquad u_ j\in \mathrm{PSH}(Y,h),\qquad \sup _ Yu_ j=0,\qquad 0<s_ j\longrightarrow 0. \]

Suppose that their Monge–Ampère masses $\int _ Y(h+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_ j)^ n$ equal a fixed number $b$ and that

\[ (h+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_ j)^ n\rightharpoonup h^ n+\sigma . \]

The lower bound $h+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_ j\geq (1-s_ j)h$ shows that $\sigma $ is positive. Although $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_ j\to 0$ in the trace norm, its intermediate powers can have nonzero limits, and these limits determine $\sigma $.

Proposition 13.15.20.708664A6CF93 After passage to a common subsequence, the positive forms

\[ H_ j=\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_ j+s_ jh=s_ j(h+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ j) \]

satisfy $H_ j^ k\rightharpoonup K_ k$ for $1\leq k\leq n$. The currents $K_ k$ are positive and closed, and $K_1=K_ n=0$. For every smooth real $(n-k,n-k)$-form $\eta $ with $\mathrm{d}\eta =0$ or $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\eta =0$,

\[ \int _ Y K_ k\wedge \eta =0. \]

Moreover,

13C111AE3D65 13.15.21
\begin{equation} \sigma =\sum _{k=2}^{n-1}\binom nk h^{n-k}\wedge K_ k. \end{equation}

If $\vartheta $ is a smooth closed semipositive $(1,1)$-form on $Y$, then $\sigma $ is supported on $\{ \vartheta ^ n=0\} $. In dimension three the same conclusion holds for every smooth semipositive $(1,1)$-form $\vartheta $ with $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\vartheta =0$.

Proof. For $s_ j<1/2$, positivity in the expansion

\[ (h+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_ j)^ n =\sum _{k=0}^ n\binom nk(1-s_ j)^{n-k}h^{n-k}\wedge H_ j^ k \]

gives a uniform bound for each $\int _ Yh^{n-k}\wedge H_ j^ k$. In local unitary coordinates, the coefficient matrix of the smooth positive form $H_ j^ k$ on exterior powers is positive semidefinite, so its entries are bounded in absolute value by its trace, up to a dimensional constant. The trace bounds therefore bound every coefficient in total variation, and weak compactness of measures gives a common subsequence and positive limits $K_ k$.

For $n\geq 2$, choose a Gauduchon form $\gamma $. By proposition 11.5.1,

\[ \int _ Y H_ j\wedge \gamma ^{n-1} =s_ j\int _ Yh\wedge \gamma ^{n-1}. \]

Since $\gamma $ and $h$ are equivalent smooth metrics, it follows that $H_ j\to 0$ in coefficient total variation. For $n=1$ the same conclusion follows from $\int _ YH_ j=s_ j\int _ Yh$. Thus $K_1=0$ in all dimensions. Since $\mathrm{d}H_ j=s_ j\mathrm{d}h$,

\[ \mathrm{d}(H_ j^ k)=ks_ j\mathrm{d}h\wedge H_ j^{k-1}\longrightarrow 0 \]

as currents, because the preceding trace bounds control multiplication by the fixed smooth form $\mathrm{d}h$. Hence every $K_ k$ is closed.

The smooth form $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_ j)^ k$ is both $\mathrm{d}$-exact and $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$-exact:

\[ (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_ j)^ k =\mathrm{d}\bigl (\mathrm d^{\mathrm c}v_ j\wedge (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_ j)^{k-1}\bigr ) =\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\bigl (v_ j(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_ j)^{k-1}\bigr ). \]

Its integral against either kind of test form $\eta $ in the statement is therefore zero by Stokes' formula. Expanding $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_ j=H_ j-s_ jh$ gives

\[ \int _ Y\eta \wedge H_ j^ k =-\sum _{r=0}^{k-1}\binom kr(-s_ j)^{k-r} \int _ Y\eta \wedge h^{k-r}\wedge H_ j^ r =O(s_ j). \]

Each integral on the right is bounded by the trace bound for $H_ j^ r$. Taking $k=n$ and $\eta =1$ shows that the positive measures $H_ j^ n$ tend to zero in total variation, which proves $K_ n=0$; the other vanishing integrals follow by weak convergence. Finally, letting $j\to \infty $ in the positive expansion above, the terms with $k=0$ tend to $h^ n$ and those with $k=1$ and $k=n$ vanish in the limit, which proves (13.15.21).

For closed semipositive $\vartheta $, apply the vanishing integrals to $\eta =\vartheta ^{n-k}$. The measure $K_ k\wedge \vartheta ^{n-k}$ is positive and has zero mass. On every relatively compact open set where $\vartheta >0$, it dominates a positive multiple of the trace measure of $K_ k$, so $K_ k$ vanishes there. The decomposition gives the asserted support. In dimension three only $K_2$ occurs, and the same argument applies to the $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$-closed test form $\vartheta $ itself. $\square$

In dimensions at most two the decomposition forces $\sigma =0$. A threefold carrying a pluriclosed Hermitian metric, that is, a Hermitian form $\vartheta $ with $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\vartheta =0$, has no nonzero defect $\sigma $ of this form either. In higher dimensions, the vanishing integrals impose necessary conditions on each intermediate current; they do not by themselves produce a smooth sequence with prescribed intermediate limits.

13.15.22 Damping for a smooth backgroundED067EDD9B9F

For a general smooth background $\theta $, truncation at a constant level may fail to preserve $\theta $-plurisubharmonicity. A larger Hermitian form makes the truncations plurisubharmonic and dominates the extended measure, and the local expansion of the $\theta $-product gives continuity at each fixed truncation level.

Theorem 13.15.23.18CDC482A9DD Let $\theta $ be a smooth real $(1,1)$-form, and for nonpositive $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ put $\mu _{\theta ,u}=\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_\theta (u)$. The mass bounds, capacity estimates and capacity-continuity statements for damped measures in this chapter, including proposition 13.15.9, hold for the measures $\mu _{\theta ,u}$ in place of $\mu _ u$, with constants depending on $\theta $ and $\omega $. In particular, for $p>0$ and $q>r_ n$,

\[ \int _ X\mathrm{e}^{pu}\, \mathrm{d}\mu _{\theta ,u} \leq C(1+p^{-1})^{r_ n},\qquad \int _ X(1-u)^{-q}\, \mathrm{d}\mu _{\theta ,u}\leq C_ q. \]

The undamped tail criterion of theorem 13.15.13 and the integrability criterion of corollary 13.15.14 also hold with $\mu _{\theta ,u}$ in place of $\mu _ u$.

Proof. Choose $C_0\geq 1$ such that $\theta \leq \Omega :=C_0\omega $. Then $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\Omega )$, and theorem 13.14.3 gives

\[ 0\leq \mu _{\theta ,u}\leq \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_\Omega (u). \]

All the mass, tail and capacity bounds therefore follow from the estimates already proved for $\Omega $. The metric comparison in section 5.29 gives, for every Borel set $E\subset X$,

\[ \operatorname {Cap}_\omega (E) \leq \operatorname {Cap}_\Omega (E) \leq C_0^ n\operatorname {Cap}_\omega (E). \]

For continuity, let nonpositive $u_ j,u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ converge in capacity, and use (13.15.10) with the $\theta $-product. The truncations are bounded and $\Omega $-plurisubharmonic. The weighted capacity continuity of section 5.27, section 5.29 applies term by term to the local expansion of their signed $\theta $-products, with the same bounded quasi-continuous coefficients. Since the cutoff vanishes at the truncation level, the result is exactly the restricted positive measure. The uniform tails obtained from the domination by $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_\Omega $ remove the cutoff. Domination also gives the sublevel estimate, so the preceding proofs of the undamped tail and integrability criteria apply without change. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.