is meaningful. We call it envelope goodness in the fixed background. Its relation to mass differs from the Kähler characterization: it can hold when the potential has infinite mass while its envelope has finite mass.
Proposition 18.5.5.A2602BC06784 If a Hermitian metric $\omega $ fails the bounded mass property of definition 13.14.14, there exists $U\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\omega )$ such that
where $\mathcal E_{\mathrm{env}}(X,\omega ,0)$ is the relative envelope class of definition 16.28.61.
Proof.
Take the potential $U$ of proposition 16.28.72, which has the stated ordinary envelope, class membership and infinite mass. Since $P_\omega [U]=V_\omega =0$, proposition 18.4.4 gives $P_\omega [U]_{\mathcal I}=0$.
$\square$
Cite this page
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.