Pome

Corollary 16.8.1669E7C4B20FAE

Corollary 16.8.16.69E7C4B20FAE Let $\theta $ be a closed smooth real $(1,1)$-form on $X$ representing a pseudo-effective cohomology class. Assume that $\varphi \in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$. Then

\[ P_{\theta }[\varphi ]_{\mathcal{I}}=\sup \left\{ \psi \in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta ): \psi \leq 0, \psi \preceq _{\mathcal{I}} \varphi \right\} . \]

Proof. It suffices to show that for any $\psi \in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ with $\psi \leq 0$ and $\psi \preceq _{\mathcal{I}}\varphi $, we have $\psi \leq P_{\theta }[\varphi ]_{\mathcal{I}}$. By 16.8.13 and proposition 16.6.11, we know that $P_{\theta }[\varphi ]_{\mathcal{I}}\lor \psi \sim _{\mathcal{I}}\varphi $. Therefore, $P_{\theta }[\varphi ]_{\mathcal{I}}\lor \psi $ is a candidate in the definition of $P_{\theta }[\varphi ]_{\mathcal{I}}$ (cf. (16.6.8)), so

\[ \psi \leq P_{\theta }[\varphi ]_{\mathcal{I}}\lor \psi \leq P_{\theta }[\varphi ]_{\mathcal{I}}. \]

We conclude the proof. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.