Proposition 16.6.2.8769D844C274 Given $\varphi ,\psi \in \mathrm{QPSH}(X)$, the following are equivalent:
8350562AE8B9For any $k\in \mathbb {Z}_{>0}$, we have
\[ \mathcal{I}(k\varphi )=\mathcal{I}(k\psi ); \]799708EE5608for any $\lambda \in \mathbb {R}_{>0}$, we have
\[ \mathcal{I}(\lambda \varphi )=\mathcal{I}(\lambda \psi ); \]F9ADC7F591FDfor any modification $\pi \colon Y\rightarrow X$ and any $y\in Y$, we have
\[ \nu (\pi ^*\varphi ,y)=\nu (\pi ^*\psi ,y); \]3689FC205187for any proper bimeromorphic morphism $\pi \colon Y\rightarrow X$ from a Kähler manifold and any $y\in Y$, we have
\[ \nu (\pi ^*\varphi ,y)=\nu (\pi ^*\psi ,y); \]5B2C5A6F25ABfor any prime divisor $E$ over $X$, we have
\[ \nu (\varphi ,E)=\nu (\psi ,E). \]
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.