Pome

Lemma 17.13.7BC74B8EA334F

Lemma 17.13.7.BC74B8EA334F Let $\Gamma \in \mathrm{TC}(X,\theta ;\phi )$. Then $\Gamma ^*_ t\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ for all $t>0$. In fact, $\Gamma ^*$ is upper semicontinuous as a function of $X\times (0,\infty )$.

Proof. We first observe that for each $x\in X$, we have

\[ \Gamma _ t^*(x)\leq t\Gamma _{\max }<\infty . \]

Let $R=\{ a+\mathrm{i}b\in \mathbb {C}:a>0,b\in \mathbb {R}\} $. We consider

\[ F\colon X\times R\rightarrow [-\infty ,\infty ),\quad (x,a+\mathrm{i}b)\mapsto \Gamma _ a^*(x). \]

Let $\pi \colon X\times R\rightarrow X$ be the natural projection. Observe that the upper semicontinuous regularization $G$ of $F$ is $\pi ^*\theta $-psh by proposition 5.14.2. It suffices to show that $F=G$. We let

\[ E\coloneqq \left\{ (x,z)\in X\times R: F(x,z)<G(x,z) \right\} . \]

We want to argue that $E=\varnothing $. Since $F$ is invariant under translations in the imaginary direction of $R$, the same is true for its upper semicontinuous regularization $G$. So $E$ can be written as $B\times \mathrm{i}\mathbb {R}$ for some set $B\subseteq X\times (0,\infty )$. Since $E$ is a pluripolar set by proposition 5.14.5, it has zero Lebesgue measure. Hence, $B$ has zero Lebesgue measure. For each $x\in X$, write

\[ B_ x=\left\{ t\in (0,\infty ): (x,t)\in B \right\} . \]

By Fubini's theorem, $B_ x$ has vanishing $1$-dimensional Lebesgue measure for all $x\in X\setminus Z$, where $Z\subseteq X$ is a subset of measure $0$. We may assume that $Z\supseteq \{ \Gamma _{\Gamma _{\max }}=-\infty \} $ so that for $x\in X\setminus Z$, $\Gamma ^*_ t(x)\neq -\infty $ for all $t>0$.

For any $x\in X\setminus Z$, both $t\mapsto F(x,t)$ and $G(x,t)$ are convex functions with values in $\mathbb {R}$ on $(0,\infty )$. They agree almost everywhere, hence everywhere by their continuity. It follows that for $x\in X\setminus Z$, we have $B_ x=\varnothing $.

By proposition 17.13.5, for any $x\in X$, we have

\[ \Gamma _{\tau }(x)=\inf _{t>0} (F(x,t)-t\tau ),\quad \tau <\Gamma _{\max }. \]

On the other hand, let

DBF41B839C63 17.13.8
\begin{equation} \chi _{\tau }(x)=\inf _{t>0} (G(x,t)-t\tau ),\quad \tau < \Gamma _{\max },\quad x\in X. \end{equation}

By Kiselman's principle proposition 5.14.15, $\chi _{\tau }\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$. But on $X\setminus Z$, we already know that $\Gamma _{\tau }=\chi _{\tau }$ for all $\tau <\Gamma _{\max }$. By proposition 5.14.6,

\[ \Gamma _{\tau }=\chi _{\tau },\quad \tau <\Gamma _{\max }. \]

Now we conclude that $F(x,t)=G(x,t)$ by corollary 21.11.26. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.