Pome

12.17 Curvature pairs and positive lower massC18EABD7D630

C18EABD7D630

On a threefold, the lower mass can be bounded below by a curvature condition. Consider a principal elliptic bundle over a Kähler surface, with a connection form $\eta $ whose curvature has real and imaginary parts $\alpha $ and $\beta $. If $\alpha ^2+\beta ^2$ is semipositive, the split metric $g$ built from the base metric and $\eta $ satisfies $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(g^2)=0$ and $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g\leq 0$. A cubic energy identity for bounded potentials then shows that no bounded potential has mass below $\int _ Xg^3$, and the determinant estimate of theorem 12.9.2 transfers this lower bound to every Hermitian form on the manifold. The same curvature sign excludes pluriclosed metrics on these manifolds.

In this section $X$ is a connected compact complex threefold and $\mathrm dV$ is a smooth positive probability volume form. Products of bounded potentials are those of proposition 5.28.2. For a Hermitian form $h$, $\mathscr G_ h$ denotes the compact convex set of normalized Gauduchon currents of section 11.7, and $k_ T$ is the determinant density of $T\in \mathscr G_ h$ relative to $\mathrm dV$, as in theorem 12.9.1.

12.17.1 The bounded cubic identityEDD3B0732B25

When the square of a Hermitian metric $g$ is $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$-closed, the mass of a bounded $g$-plurisubharmonic function differs from $\int _ Xg^3$ by a term that is linear in $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g$. Its coefficient is a positive current playing the role of $\mathrm du\wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}u$.

Lemma 12.17.2.3BBBC535BFA2 Let $g$ be a Hermitian form with $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(g^2)=0$, and let $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,g)$ be bounded. The current

\[ E_ u=\tfrac 12\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(u^2)-u\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u \]

is positive, and

649C88380858 12.17.3
\begin{equation} \int _ X(g+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)^3 =\int _ Xg^3-3\int _ XE_ u\wedge \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g. \end{equation}

If $-\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g\geq 0$, then $v_-(g)=\int _ Xg^3$.

Proof. Locally write $u=p-a$, with $p$ bounded plurisubharmonic and $a$ smooth. Expanding in $p$ and $a$ and using multilinearity, we obtain closed currents $C_ r=(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)^ r$, not necessarily positive, with $C_0=1$. The recursive definition of bounded products, expanded in the same way, gives

\[ \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(uC_ r)=C_{r+1},\qquad r=0,1,2. \]

By lemma 5.27.2 and invariance under smooth corrections, the weighted product $u\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u$ does not depend on the local decomposition. On a smaller ball choose smooth bounded plurisubharmonic $p_ j$ decreasing to $p$, and put $u_ j=p_ j-a$. The same lemma gives $u_ j\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ j\to u\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u$, while boundedness gives $u_ j^2\to u^2$ in $L^1$. Hence

\[ \mathrm du_ j\wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}u_ j =\tfrac 12\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(u_ j^2)-u_ j\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ j\longrightarrow E_ u. \]

The smooth currents on the left are positive, so their weak limit $E_ u$ is positive and has order zero.

Now expand the cube. Repeated use of distributional Stokes gives

\[ \int _ XC_3=0,\qquad \int _ Xg^2\wedge C_1=\int _ Xu\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(g^2)=0, \qquad \int _ Xg\wedge C_2=\int _ XuC_1\wedge \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g. \]

Since $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g$ is closed, $\int _ X\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(u^2)\wedge \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g=0$, so the last integral equals $-\int _ XE_ u\wedge \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g$. This proves (12.17.3). If $-\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g\geq 0$, the correction term is nonnegative, and $u=0$ attains the lower bound $\int _ Xg^3$. $\square$

Lemma 12.17.4.73E13B1F9B7A Let $g,h$ be Hermitian forms with $v_-(g)=V>0$ and $h\geq c g$ for some $c>0$. Then

6344C84663CF 12.17.5
\begin{equation} \sup _{T\in \mathscr G_ h}\| k_ T\| _{L^{3/2}(\mathrm dV)} \leq c^{-1}V^{-1/3},\qquad v_-(h)\geq c^3V. \end{equation}

Proof. We first check that the determinant measure in (12.7.1) does not depend on the Hermitian form used to express it. Let $T$ be a positive $(2,2)$-current, and let $\sigma _ h=h\wedge T$ and $P=P_ h$ be its trace measure and coefficient matrix relative to $h$, as in section 12.7. In an $h$-unitary frame let $G$ be the matrix of $g$, and set

\[ a=\tfrac 13\operatorname {tr}(GP),\qquad \sigma _ g=a\sigma _ h,\qquad P_ g=a^{-1}G^{1/2}PG^{1/2}. \]

Comparing the defining trace pairings shows that $\sigma _ g=g\wedge T$ and $P_ g$ are the trace measure and coefficient matrix of $T$ relative to $g$, with $\operatorname {tr}P_ g=3$. Since $G>0$ and $\operatorname {tr}P=3$, one has $a>0$ even where $P$ is singular. Moreover $\det P_ g=a^{-3}\det G\det P$ and $g^3=\det G\, h^3$, so the factors $a$ and $\det G$ cancel in $\Gamma _0(T)$. The calculation applies to the matrix density on the whole trace measure, including its singular part.

For $T\in \mathscr G_ h$ put $m=\int _ Xg\wedge T$. Then $0<m\leq c^{-1}$ and $U=T/m\in \mathscr G_ g$. By homogeneity, $k_ T=m k_ U$. Applying theorem 12.9.2 to $g$ gives the norm bound, and applying it again to $h$ gives the lower-mass bound. The supremum here is taken over all of $\mathscr G_ h$, including singular and degenerate currents. $\square$

12.17.6 The curvature criterionC72702069454

We now describe threefolds on which the hypotheses of lemma 12.17.2 hold. Let $\pi :X\to B$ be a holomorphic principal elliptic bundle over a compact connected Kähler surface $(B,\omega )$, with fiber the elliptic curve $E=\mathbb C/\Lambda $ and fiber coordinate $z$. Assume that there is a smooth $(1,0)$-form $\eta $ on $X$, invariant under the action of $E$ and restricting to $\mathrm dz$ on every fiber, such that

\[ \mathrm d\eta =\pi ^*F,\qquad F=\alpha +\mathrm i\beta , \]

where $\alpha ,\beta $ are smooth closed real $(1,1)$-forms on $B$. Put

\[ Q=\alpha ^2+\beta ^2,\qquad e=\mathrm i\eta \wedge \bar\eta , \qquad g=\pi ^*\omega +s e,\quad s>0, \qquad A_ E=\int _ E\mathrm i\, \mathrm dz\wedge \mathrm d\bar z. \]

We call $g$ the split metric.

Theorem 12.17.7.7EC7E0C62DF9 Suppose $Q\geq 0$ and $Q\not\equiv 0$. The split form $g$ is Hermitian, and its lower mass is

D97FFD43BE5D 12.17.8
\begin{equation} v_-(g)=V=3sA_ E\int _ B\omega ^2. \end{equation}

Every bounded $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,g)$ satisfies

\[ \int _ X(g+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)^3 =V+\frac{3s}{2\pi }\int _ XE_ u\wedge \pi ^*Q\geq V. \]

Every Hermitian form $h\geq c g$, with $c>0$, satisfies (12.17.5). Thus the endpoint estimate of theorem 12.9.2 holds for every Hermitian form on $X$, with a constant depending on the form. The manifold $X$ admits no pluriclosed Hermitian metric.

Proof. We suppress pullbacks in the curvature calculation. Comparing types in $\mathrm d\eta =F$ gives $\partial \eta =0$, $\bar\partial \eta =F$, $\partial \bar\eta =\bar F$ and $\bar\partial \bar\eta =0$. Hence

\[ \partial e=-\mathrm i\eta \wedge \bar F,\qquad \bar\partial e=\mathrm iF\wedge \bar\eta , \qquad \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}e=-\frac1{2\pi }F\wedge \bar F=-\frac1{2\pi }Q. \]

Since $e^2=0$ and the base has dimension two,

\[ \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g=-\frac{s}{2\pi }\pi ^*Q,\qquad \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(g^2)=-\frac{s}{\pi }\pi ^*(\omega \wedge Q)=0, \qquad g^3=3s\pi ^*(\omega ^2)\wedge e. \]

The form $g$ is positive, because $\pi ^*\omega $ is positive on directions transverse to the fibers and $e$ is positive on the vertical line. Fiber integration of $g^3$ gives $V$, and lemma 12.17.2, lemma 12.17.4 give the mass identity and the endpoint bound. By compactness, every Hermitian form $h$ satisfies $h\geq cg$ for some $c>0$.

Finally, $S=-\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g$ is smooth, semipositive and not identically zero. If a Hermitian form $b$ were pluriclosed, Stokes' theorem would give

\[ 0=\int _ Xg\wedge \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}b =\int _ Xb\wedge \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g=-\int _ Xb\wedge S<0, \]

where the last inequality holds because $b$ is strictly positive and $S$ is semipositive and nonzero on an open set. $\square$

Proposition 12.17.9.A60EEF389BCA The split metric $g$ is balanced if and only if $\omega \wedge \alpha =\omega \wedge \beta =0$. For such a primitive pair one has $Q\leq 0$, with strict inequality wherever the pair is nonzero. In particular, a balanced split metric never satisfies the hypothesis $Q\geq 0$, $Q\not\equiv 0$ of theorem 12.17.7.

Proof. One has $\mathrm d(g^2)=2s\pi ^*\omega \wedge \mathrm de$, and $\mathrm de$ has one component containing $\eta $ and one containing $\bar\eta $. These two vertical types are independent, so $\mathrm d(g^2)=0$ if and only if $\omega \wedge F=0$, which is equivalent to the two stated real identities. A primitive real $(1,1)$-form on a surface has eigenvalues $\lambda ,-\lambda $ in an $\omega $-unitary frame, so its square is $-\lambda ^2\omega ^2$. Applying this to $\alpha $ and to $\beta $ gives the sign of $Q$. In this case $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}g\geq 0$, so (12.17.3) bounds the masses of bounded potentials from above rather than from below, and gives no information on the lower mass. $\square$

12.17.10 Negative-line-bundle quotients49FAED65F993

The simplest examples of the curvature criterion come from negative line bundles. Dividing the complement of the zero section of a negative line bundle over $\mathbb P^1\times \mathbb P^1$ by a dilation produces a principal elliptic bundle, and the logarithm of the fiber norm gives a connection form whose curvature is a multiple of a Kähler form on the base.

Take $B=\mathbb P^1\times \mathbb P^1$, let $\omega _1,\omega _2$ be the pullbacks of the Fubini–Study forms of the two factors, normalized to have integral one, and put

\[ \begin{gathered} \Omega =a\omega _1+b\omega _2,\quad a,b\in \mathbb N_{>0},\qquad L=\mathcal O(-a,-b),\\ X=L^\times /\langle v\mapsto \rho v\rangle ,\quad 0<\rho <1, \end{gathered} \]

where $L^\times $ is the total space of $L$ with the zero section removed. Equip $L$ with the Hermitian norm induced by the standard norms on the tautological bundles of the two factors. Let $r=\log \| v\| ^2$ and set $\eta =\partial r$.

Proposition 12.17.11.3E19D4A0EA58 The quotient $X$ is a compact complex threefold, and the projection to $B$ is a principal elliptic fibration. For $g=\pi ^*\Omega +s\mathrm i\eta \wedge \bar\eta $, $s>0$,

86B14E8734DC 12.17.12
\begin{equation} v_-(g)=24\pi s ab\log (1/\rho ). \end{equation}

Every Hermitian form on $X$ satisfies the endpoint bound of theorem 12.17.7 over its full set of normalized Gauduchon currents. The manifold has $H^2(X,\mathbb R)\ne 0$ and admits no balanced or pluriclosed metric. In particular, it is not diffeomorphic to a Hopf threefold $(\mathbb C^3\setminus \{ 0\} )/\langle z\mapsto \lambda z\rangle $, $0<|\lambda |<1$.

Proof. In product coordinates, the squared norm of the standard local frame of $L$ is $(1+|z_1|^2)^ a(1+|z_2|^2)^ b$. Therefore

\[ \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}r=\pi ^*\Omega ,\qquad \mathrm d\eta =2\pi \mathrm i\pi ^*\Omega . \]

Dilation changes $r$ by a constant, so $\eta $ descends to $X$. The function $r$ changes by the nonzero constant $\log \rho ^2$ under the generator, so the action is free and properly discontinuous; the unit circle bundle, which is compact, times a fundamental interval for $r$ maps onto $X$, which is therefore compact. Each fiber is $\mathbb C^*/\rho ^{\mathbb Z}$. Its logarithmic coordinate has periods $\log \rho $ and $2\pi \mathrm i$, and the curvature $F=2\pi \mathrm i\Omega $ has real part $0$ and imaginary part $2\pi \Omega $; hence

\[ A_ E=4\pi \log (1/\rho ),\qquad Q=4\pi ^2\Omega ^2>0, \qquad \int _ B\Omega ^2=2ab. \]

Theorem 12.17.7 now gives (12.17.12) and the endpoint bound, and excludes pluriclosed metrics.

To prove $H^2(X,\mathbb R)\ne 0$, put $A=\eta +\bar\eta $ and $B_1=\mathrm i(\eta -\bar\eta )$. Then $\mathrm dA=0$ and $\mathrm dB_1=-4\pi \pi ^*\Omega $. Suppose that $\pi ^*(\omega _1-\omega _2)=\mathrm d\zeta $ for a real one-form $\zeta $. Averaging $\zeta $ over the compact group of elliptic translations, we may assume $\zeta $ invariant, so that

\[ \zeta =\pi ^*\xi +(\pi ^*f)A+(\pi ^*j)B_1 \]

for a one-form $\xi $ and functions $f,j$ on $B$. The components of $\mathrm d\zeta $ with one vertical and one horizontal direction must vanish, which gives $\mathrm df=\mathrm dj=0$. Thus

\[ \omega _1-\omega _2=\mathrm d\xi -4\pi j\Omega . \]

Integrating over the two rulings gives $1=-4\pi ja$ and $-1=-4\pi jb$, which is impossible because $a,b>0$. A Hopf threefold as above is diffeomorphic to $S^5\times S^1$, whose second real cohomology vanishes.

Finally, $\pi ^*\Omega =-\mathrm dB_1/(4\pi )$ is a nonzero semipositive exact form. Its integral against the closed positive square of a balanced metric would vanish by Stokes' theorem and be strictly positive by positivity. Hence no balanced metric exists. $\square$

12.17.13 A Calabi–Eckmann family without LCK metrics51CD5F251745

A Hermitian metric $\Omega $ is locally conformally Kähler, or LCK, if $\mathrm d\Omega =\vartheta \wedge \Omega $ for a closed real one-form $\vartheta $, its Lee form; such metrics are studied in section 23.2. The quotients of the preceding subsection resemble Hopf manifolds. A second family shows that the curvature criterion also applies on manifolds that carry no LCK metric at all.

Let $\tau =A+\mathrm iB_0$, where $A<0$ and $B_0>0$, and let $\mathbb C$ act holomorphically on $(\mathbb C^2\setminus \{ 0\} )^2$ by

\[ t\cdot (z,w)=(\mathrm e^ t z,\mathrm e^{\tau t}w). \]

Write $X_\tau $ for the quotient and put $r_1=\log |z|^2$, $r_2=\log |w|^2$. The map $(z,w)\mapsto ([z],[w])$ descends to a projection $\pi :X_\tau \to \mathbb P^1\times \mathbb P^1$; let $\omega _1,\omega _2$ be the pullbacks to the base of the Fubini–Study forms of the two factors, normalized to have integral one.

Proposition 12.17.14.119B81D2AF8F The quotient $X_\tau $ is a compact complex threefold diffeomorphic to $S^3\times S^3$, and $\pi $ is a principal elliptic fibration over $\mathbb P^1\times \mathbb P^1$. The form $\eta =\tau \partial r_1-\partial r_2$ descends to $X_\tau $, and for

\[ g=\pi ^*(\omega _1+\omega _2)+s\mathrm i\eta \wedge \bar\eta , \qquad s>0, \]

one has

D04D662546BA 12.17.15
\begin{equation} v_-(g)=48\pi ^2sB_0. \end{equation}

Every Hermitian form $h\geq c g$, with $c>0$, satisfies

\[ \sup _{T\in \mathscr G_ h}\| k_ T\| _{L^{3/2}(\mathrm dV)} \leq c^{-1}(48\pi ^2sB_0)^{-1/3}. \]

There is no balanced, pluriclosed or LCK metric on $X_\tau $.

Proof. Every orbit contains a unique point with $|z|=|w|=1$: the required parameter is determined by

\[ \operatorname {Re}t=-r_1/2,\qquad \operatorname {Im}t=(r_2-Ar_1)/(2B_0). \]

These smooth formulas identify $(\mathbb C^2\setminus \{ 0\} )^2$ with $\mathbb C\times (S^3\times S^3)$, so the action is free and proper, and $X_\tau $ is diffeomorphic to $S^3\times S^3$. To obtain holomorphic charts, choose a nonzero coordinate $z_ k$ of $z$ and a branch of its logarithm, and use the action to normalize $z_ k=1$; the functions $z_ l/z_ k$, $l\ne k$, and $w_ jz_ k^{-\tau }$ are then local holomorphic coordinates on the quotient. Changing the branch of the logarithm accounts for the periods along the fibers. Thus $X_\tau $ is a compact complex threefold.

The invariant form $\eta $ vanishes on the generator $z\partial _ z+\tau w\partial _ w$ of the action, so it descends. On an elliptic fiber it equals $\mathrm d\chi $, where $\chi =\tau \log v_1-\log v_2$ in terms of fiber coordinates $(v_1z,v_2w)$; its period lattice is generated by $2\pi \mathrm i\tau $ and $-2\pi \mathrm i$. Hence $A_ E=8\pi ^2B_0$. Direct differentiation gives

\[ \begin{aligned} F& =2\pi \mathrm i(\tau \omega _1-\omega _2),& \alpha & =-2\pi B_0\omega _1,\\ \beta & =2\pi (A\omega _1-\omega _2),& Q& =-8\pi ^2A\, \omega _1\wedge \omega _2>0. \end{aligned} \]

Since $\int _ B(\omega _1+\omega _2)^2=2$, theorem 12.17.7 gives the lower mass, the endpoint bound and the absence of pluriclosed metrics.

Moreover $\mathrm d\operatorname {Re}\eta =-2\pi B_0\pi ^*\omega _1$. This nonzero semipositive exact form excludes every balanced metric by the Stokes argument at the end of the preceding proof, and hence also every Kähler metric. The quotient is simply connected, so the Lee form of a hypothetical LCK metric would be exact, equal to $\mathrm df$; multiplying the metric by $\mathrm e^{-f}$ would then give a Kähler metric, a contradiction. In particular $X_\tau $ carries no Vaisman metric, that is, no LCK metric with parallel Lee form. $\square$

The curvature criterion controls bounded potentials and the full set of normalized Gauduchon currents in these threefolds. Curvature pairs of changing sign, primitive curvature pairs and higher-dimensional analogues are not covered by this argument.

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.