Theorem 12.9.1.BF52D98B114F For every $T\in \mathscr G_\omega $, the measure $\Gamma _0(T)$ is absolutely continuous with respect to $\mathrm{d}V$; we write $\Gamma _0(T)=k_ T\, \mathrm{d}V$ and call $k_ T\geq 0$ the determinant density of $T$. For every $1<q<n/(n-1)$ there is $C_ q>0$ such that
12.9 Integrability of Gauduchon determinant measuresD02094988A03
D02094988A03
A lower bound for the constants of smooth equations in terms of an $L^ p$ norm of the density gives, by duality, a uniform $L^ q$ bound for the determinant measures of all normalized Gauduchon currents, for every exponent $q<n/(n-1)$. At the endpoint $q=n/(n-1)$, the optimal constant is exactly $v_-(\omega )^{-1/n}$, where $v_-(\omega )$ is the lower Monge–Ampère mass of definition 13.14.14. Thus integrability of the dual tests at the critical exponent is equivalent to positive lower mass of the background.
Write $\Gamma _0(T)$ for the determinant measure $\Gamma _ F(T)$ of (12.7.1) with $F=0$.
Proof. Fix $p>1$ and a smooth strictly positive function $h$. By theorem 14.2.1 there are a smooth form $\Omega _ h=\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ h>0$ and a constant $c_ h>0$ such that
The lower-density estimate of theorem 14.19.19 gives a constant $c_ p>0$, independent of $h$, such that
The pointwise matrix arithmetic–geometric mean inequality, applied to $\Omega _ h$ and the coefficient density of $T$, gives the inequality of measures
Integrating and using $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}T=0$ yields
Approximation by smooth strictly positive functions extends this bound to every continuous nonnegative $h$, and applied to $|h|$ it bounds the integral of every continuous function against $\Gamma _0(T)$ by its $L^{np}$ norm. Since continuous functions are dense in $L^{np}$, the duality between $L^{np}$ and $L^{np/(np-1)}$ shows that $\Gamma _0(T)$ has a density in $L^{np/(np-1)}$, with norm at most $c_ p^{-1/n}$. As $p$ ranges over $(1,+\infty )$, the exponent $np/(np-1)$ ranges over $(1,n/(n-1))$. This proves the theorem. $\square$
In particular, the determinant of the matrix density vanishes on the singular part of the trace measure: if $\sigma _ T=\sigma _{T,\mathrm{ac}}+\sigma _{T,\mathrm{s}}$ is its Lebesgue decomposition with respect to $\mathrm{d}V$, then
Indeed, $f_0=(\mathrm{d}V/\omega ^ n)^{1/n}$ is everywhere positive and $\Gamma _0(T)=f_0(\det P_ T)^{1/n}\sigma _ T$ is absolutely continuous. This says nothing about a possible singular part of the current $T$ itself.
Theorem 12.9.2.E7F890105D42 With the extended value $+\infty $ allowed, one has
where the right side is interpreted as $+\infty $ when $v_-(\omega )=0$. The supremum does not change if $T$ is restricted to the smooth strictly positive members of $\mathscr G_\omega $. Thus a uniform estimate at the endpoint exponent holds if and only if $v_-(\omega )>0$.
Proof. Suppose first that $v_-(\omega )>0$. For the smooth equation in the preceding proof, the definition of $v_-$ gives
The same pointwise inequality and Stokes' theorem therefore give
By duality, $\| k_ T\| _{L^{n/(n-1)}}\leq v_-(\omega )^{-1/n}$ for every $T\in \mathscr G_\omega $.
For the reverse bound, let $g$ be any smooth positive probability density relative to $\mathrm{d}V$, and solve
Let $T_ g$ be the trace-normalized $(n-1)$st power of the Gauduchon metric conformal to $\Omega _ g$. Equality in the pointwise matrix inequality gives
Since $\| g^{1/n}\| _{L^ n}=1$, Hölder's inequality gives $\| k_{T_ g}\| _{L^{n/(n-1)}}\geq c(g)^{-1/n}$. By theorem 12.15.4, theorem 12.2.3,
Taking the supremum over these smooth currents $T_ g$ proves the matching lower bound; if $v_-(\omega )=0$, the same argument makes this supremum infinite. Since the currents $T_ g$ are smooth, this also proves that allowing nonsmooth currents does not change the supremum. $\square$
The formula shows that the optimal endpoint constant does not depend on the choice of $\mathrm{d}V$, whereas the subcritical constants $C_ q$ may depend on it.
Corollary 12.9.3.893A41D78AF5 For every $R>0$ and $1<q<n/(n-1)$ there is a constant $C_{R,q}$ with the following property. If $F\in C(X)$ and $\| F\| _\infty \leq R$, every supporting probability $\nu \in \mathcal A_0(F)$ of theorem 12.8.2 has a density $a$ satisfying
If $v_-(\omega )>0$, this holds also for $q=n/(n-1)$.
Proof. Recall that $M(F)=\exp (-B_0(F)/n)$, and represent $\nu $ by a maximizing current $T\in \mathscr M(F)$, using theorem 12.8.2. Since $\Gamma _ F(T)=\mathrm{e}^{F/n}\Gamma _0(T)$ and $B_0$ is $1$-Lipschitz,
Theorem 12.9.1 therefore gives the subcritical bound with constant $\mathrm{e}^{2R/n}M(0)^{-1}C_ q$. When $v_-(\omega )>0$, the same argument with the endpoint constant $v_-(\omega )^{-1/n}$ of theorem 12.9.2 gives the case $q=n/(n-1)$. $\square$
On the threefold of theorem 12.19.1, every Hermitian form has zero lower mass, so the endpoint estimate fails for the whole family $\mathscr G_\omega $, while all the subcritical estimates above remain valid. For a fixed smooth density, theorem 12.7.3 gives a unique smooth maximizing current, and its determinant density is bounded. Sequences of currents whose values approach the maximum need not, however, have uniformly bounded higher moments, as proposition 12.18.2 shows.
On the other hand, the endpoint estimate can hold on a manifold with infinite upper mass. On the Hopf threefold of section 23.1, take the Gauduchon metric $\omega $ of that chapter, for which $v_-(\omega )=6$ and $v_+(\omega )=+\infty $, and set $\mathrm{d}V=\omega ^3/6$. The normalized Gauduchon form $T_0=\omega ^2/6$ has $\sigma _{T_0}=\mathrm{d}V$ and $P_{T_0}=I$. Hence $k_{T_0}=6^{-1/3}$, and
Thus an endpoint determinant estimate, with its optimal constant attained, can coexist with infinite upper Monge–Ampère mass.
12.9.4 Uniform bounds near a smooth densityA0340E674DC4
The endpoint estimate can fail for the family of all tests while the maximizing tests for a family of densities remain uniformly controlled. For smooth densities close in $C^{2,\alpha }$ to the normalized volume form $\omega ^ n/\int _ X\omega ^ n$ of the background, a fixed-point argument keeps the solution forms close to $\omega $ and their Gauduchon factors close to that of $\omega $. This gives uniform bounds for both the determinant density of the maximizing current and the density of the supporting probability.
In this subsection we assume $n\geq 3$ and fix $0<\alpha <1$. All Hölder norms are defined using a fixed finite atlas and fixed smooth connections. Put
Thus $\mathrm{e}^{F_*}\mathrm{d}V=\omega ^ n/V$ is a probability measure. By theorem 11.4.2, there is a unique smooth positive function $\chi _0$, the normalized Gauduchon factor of $\omega $, such that
Write $m=\min _ X\chi _0$, $a=\max _ X\chi _0$ and $C_0=\| \chi _0\| _{C^{2,\alpha }}$.
We first specify the constants that determine the size of the neighborhood. For a smooth positive $(1,1)$-form $\Omega $, set
The compatibility argument of proposition 11.23.2, proposition 14.4.1 shows that
is an isomorphism from the space of pairs $(v,c)\in C^{4,\alpha }\times \mathbb R$ with this normalization onto $C^{2,\alpha }$. Let $K\geq 1$ bound its inverse for the norm $\| v\| _{C^{4,\alpha }}+|c|$. The formal adjoint of $A_\omega $ with respect to $\mathrm{d}V$ is $(H/n)L_\omega $, whose kernel consists of the constants and whose index is zero. Consequently $A_\omega $ has kernel $\mathbb R\chi _0$ and range
Its restriction to
has a bounded inverse $\mathcal R:Z_0\to E_\chi $. Fix $G\geq 1$ bounding this inverse.
We normalize the Hölder norms of forms and of endomorphism fields so that they dominate pointwise operator norms and are submultiplicative under composition of endomorphisms; the subscript $\mathrm{alg}$ below refers to this norm on endomorphism fields. Choose $D\geq 1$ so that
Let $C_{\mathrm{tr}}\geq 1$ be a bound for the trace map on endomorphism fields, and put $Q=2C_{\mathrm{tr}}D^2$. Expanding $\Omega ^{n-1}-\omega ^{n-1}$ gives a constant $C_ A\geq 1$ such that
Only two derivatives of $\Omega $ enter this polynomial estimate. Define
A7F3B3DF78D5
12.9.5
These constants depend only on $\omega $, $\mathrm{d}V$, $\alpha $ and the chosen norms.
Lemma 12.9.6.9F57BA26805A Let $F$ be smooth with $\| F-F_*\| _{C^{2,\alpha }}\leq \varepsilon $. The solution form $\Omega _ F=\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ F$ of $\mathrm{MA}_\omega (u_ F)=\mathrm{e}^{B_0(F)+F}\mathrm{d}V$ and its Gauduchon factor $\chi _ F$, normalized as below, satisfy
The potential can be normalized by $\int _ Xu_ F\, \mathrm{d}V=0$ with $\| u_ F\| _{C^{4,\alpha }}+|B_0(F)-\log V|\leq r$.
Proof. For $\| v\| _{C^{4,\alpha }}\leq 1/(2D)$ put
The logarithm series starts at degree two. If the endomorphism norms of $\omega ^{-1}\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v$ and $\omega ^{-1}\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w$ are at most $\rho \leq 1/2$, telescoping their powers bounds the difference series by $C_{\mathrm{tr}}\rho /(1-\rho )$ times the endomorphism difference. Hence
On the closed radius-$r$ ball of normalized pairs $(v,c)$, the map
has image norm at most $K\varepsilon +KQr^2\leq 3r/4$ and Lipschitz constant at most $2KQr\leq 1/2$. Its fixed point $(u,c)$ satisfies
The estimate $Dr\leq 1/2$ gives the form comparison. The scalar is $b=\log V+c$. Differentiating the local equation gives a uniformly elliptic equation for each first derivative of $u$, with coefficients initially in $C^{2,\alpha }$. Interior Schauder estimates improve the regularity one order at a time, so $u$ is smooth. Uniqueness in theorem 14.2.1 identifies it with $u_ F$ and gives $b=B_0(F)$. No uniform higher-derivative bounds on $F$ enter the estimates above.
Put $\Delta A=A_{\Omega _ F}-A_\omega $. Stokes' theorem makes its image lie in $Z_0$. On the complete space $E_\chi $, the affine map
has Lipschitz constant $\kappa =GC_ ADr\leq m/(4C_0)\leq 1/4$. Its fixed point obeys
Since $A_\omega \chi _0=0$ and $A_\omega \mathcal R$ is the identity on $Z_0$, the function $\chi _ F=\chi _0+\eta $ satisfies $A_{\Omega _ F}\chi _ F=0$, and it has the stated normalization and bounds. Elliptic regularity makes it smooth. Every Gauduchon factor of $\Omega _ F$ with the same normalization satisfies the same affine fixed-point equation, so this factor is the one given by theorem 11.4.2. $\square$
Theorem 12.9.7.6A30AAE398CD For every smooth $F$ in the ball of lemma 12.9.6, let $T_ F$ be the maximizing current of theorem 12.7.3 and $\nu _ F$ the supporting probability of $B_0$ at $F$; both are unique. With
their densities satisfy
In particular, for $p=n/(n-1)$,
The constants do not involve $v_-(\omega )$; in particular, these bounds hold also when $v_-(\omega )=0$.
Proof. Set $\Omega =\Omega _ F$, $\chi =\chi _ F$ and
The form comparison and $\int _ X\chi \omega ^ n=1$ give
Since $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(\chi \Omega ^{n-1})=0$, Stokes' theorem also gives $Z=\int _ X\chi \Omega ^ n$. The form $T=(\chi /Z)\Omega ^{n-1}$ is normalized and is a constant multiple of the $(n-1)$st power of the Gauduchon metric conformal to $\Omega $. By theorem 12.7.3, it is the unique maximizing current, so $T=T_ F$. The equality case in the proof of that theorem gives $\nu _ F=\Omega \wedge T_ F$, and hence
CED2026424BD
12.9.9
The last identity uses the positive root $\gamma =(\chi /Z)^{1/(n-1)}\Omega $, for which $T_ F=\gamma ^{n-1}$. Uniqueness of the supporting probability follows from theorem 12.8.2.
Now $\chi /Z\leq (3a/2)2^{n-1}$ and $\Omega ^ n/\mathrm{d}V\leq (3/2)^ nH_{\max }$, and multiplying gives exactly $q_ F\leq C_\nu $ and $k_{T_ F}\leq C_ k$. Since $\int _ Xq_ F\, \mathrm{d}V=1$, we have $\int _ Xq_ F^ p\, \mathrm{d}V\leq C_\nu ^{p-1}$, which gives the sharper $L^ p$ estimate for $q_ F$. The $L^ p$ estimate for $k_{T_ F}$ follows from $\int _ X\mathrm{d}V=1$. $\square$
Corollary 12.9.10.7877D1AB98D3 The ball of lemma 12.9.6 contains smooth injectively parametrized families, of arbitrarily large finite dimension, of data $F$ normalized by $\int _ X\mathrm{e}^ F\mathrm{d}V=1$. It also contains a smooth path of such data whose maximizing currents are pairwise distinct.
Proof. For a small smooth function $f$, put
If $F(f)=F(g)$, then $f-g$ is constant, so the map $f\mapsto F(f)$ is injective on functions of zero $\mathrm{d}V$-mean. By its continuity in $C^{2,\alpha }$, it maps a sufficiently small neighborhood of zero in any fixed finite-dimensional space of such smooth functions into the ball, and these spaces can have arbitrary dimension.
For the path, choose a smooth real $\psi $ of zero $\mathrm{d}V$-mean whose complex Hessian at some point $x_0$ has, in an $\omega $-unitary frame, a matrix $Q_0$ that is not a multiple of the identity. A cutoff of $|z_1|^2-|z_2|^2$ in local coordinates, minus its mean, is such a function. For small real $t$ put
These normalized data tend to $F_*$ in $C^{2,\alpha }$ as $t\to 0$, and by uniqueness in theorem 14.2.1 their solution forms are the forms $\Omega _ t$. If $F_ s=F_ t$, then $\log (\Omega _ s^ n/\Omega _ t^ n)$ is the constant $\log (V_ s/V_ t)$. The signs of the complex Hessian of $(s-t)\psi $ at a maximum and at a minimum force this constant to be zero. Integrating the derivative of $\log \det $ along the segment between $\Omega _ t$ and $\Omega _ s$ then gives a uniformly elliptic equation for $(s-t)\psi $ without zeroth-order term, and the maximum principle forces $(s-t)\psi $ to be constant. Since $\psi $ is not constant, $s=t$.
If the maximizing currents for $F_ s$ and $F_ t$ agree, (12.9.9) makes $\Omega _ s^{n-1}$ and $\Omega _ t^{n-1}$ proportional at $x_0$. Positive cofactor matrices determine positive forms up to scale, so $I+sQ_0$ and $I+tQ_0$ are proportional. Since $I$ and $Q_0$ are linearly independent, comparing coefficients gives $s=t$. $\square$
The small $C^{2,\alpha }$ neighborhood gives a condition directly on the prescribed density. The next estimate instead assumes uniform bounds for the solution forms and covers a larger smooth family without derivative bounds on its densities. The question for arbitrary bounded families of continuous densities remains open when $v_-(\omega )=0$. The concentrating sequences of proposition 12.18.2 consist of near-maximizers, so these estimates do not apply to them.
12.9.11 Uniformly controlled complex Hessians5603574CC3A6
The preceding construction bounds the solution form and its Gauduchon factor by controlling derivatives of the logarithmic density. A bound on the solution form itself leads to a different estimate. If $\Omega =\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v$, then $d\Omega =d\omega $, so the divergence of its cofactor depends only on the fixed torsion and the size of $\Omega $. This permits uniform bounds for the factor even when derivatives of the varying complex Hessian are unbounded.
We continue to assume $n\geq 3$ and that $\mathrm{d}V$ is a probability volume form. We first give the real elliptic estimate used below. A cube denoted by $tQ$ has the same center as $Q$ and $t$ times its side length, and $\fint _ Q$ denotes its Euclidean average.
Lemma 12.9.12.F7130F1BDC30 Let $Q\subset \mathbb R^ m$, $m>2$, be a cube. Suppose that $u$ is a smooth strictly positive solution on a neighborhood of $3Q$ of
where $A$ is a smooth symmetric matrix field and $B$ is a smooth vector field. Then
where $C$ depends only on $m,\lambda ,\Lambda ,K$ and the side length of $Q$. Derivatives of $A$ and $B$ do not enter $C$.
Proof. We first estimate positive and negative powers, then compare their small moments by an estimate for $\log u$.
For $p\ne 0,1$, test the weak equation by $\eta ^2u^{p-1}$, where $\eta $ is a smooth cutoff. The principal term is
The other terms contain respectively $2\eta u^{p-1}A\nabla u\cdot \nabla \eta $, $(p-1)\eta ^2u^{p-1}B\cdot \nabla u$, and $2\eta u^ pB\cdot \nabla \eta $. Taking absolute values after moving the principal term to one side and applying Young's inequality absorbs half of its energy. Thus, for either sign of $p$,
011F0AF31DBF
12.9.13
with $C_1$ depending only on the ellipticity bounds. Each test is legitimate since this individual smooth positive solution is bounded above and away from zero on the cutoff support.
Put $\beta =m/(m-2)>1$ and choose $p_0=\beta ^{-k-1/2}$, with $k$ to be fixed later. Apply the Euclidean Sobolev inequality to $\eta u^{p/2}$ on nested cubes shrinking from $Q$ to $Q/2$. Choose the cutoff gaps proportional to $2^{-j}$ and the powers $p_ j=p_0\beta ^ j$. The positive powers never equal one: the closest two are $\beta ^{-1/2}$ and $\beta ^{1/2}$. Consequently the constants in (12.9.13), together with the cutoff terms from $\nabla (\eta u^{p/2})$, grow at most polynomially in $p_ j$ and exponentially in $j$. Since $\sum _ j(j+1)\beta ^{-j}<\infty $, their iteration product converges. Negative powers give the same calculation for $u^{-1}$. We obtain
DA143DCFAFAB
12.9.14
Here $C_2$ also depends on $p_0$ and the fixed cube size.
Testing instead by $\eta ^2/u$ gives
For every subcube $S\subset Q$ of side length $\ell $, a cutoff supported in $2S\subset 3Q$, equal to one on $S$, has derivative bounded by $C/\ell $. Poincaré's inequality and Cauchy–Schwarz therefore give
where $K_0\geq 1$ is uniform and $(\log u)_ S$ denotes the mean. We spell out the exponential consequence of this mean oscillation bound.
Write $f=\log u$ and fix $a>2$. Select the maximal dyadic subcubes $S$ of $Q$ on which $\fint _ S|f-f_ Q|>aK_0$. Their total measure is at most $|Q|/a$. The parent of each selected cube has average at most $aK_0$, hence $|f_ S-f_ Q|\leq 2^ maK_0$. Outside their union, differentiation of dyadic averages gives $|f-f_ Q|\leq aK_0$ almost everywhere. Repeat this selection inside each chosen cube, subtracting its own mean. The union at generation $j$ has measure at most $a^{-j}|Q|$, and outside generation $j+1$ the accumulated mean changes and last oscillation give
The intersection of all generations is null. Choosing $c>0$ so that $\exp (c2^ ma)<a$ and summing over the generations yields
with dimensional constants. Now fix $k$ large enough that $p_0<c/K_0$. Multiplying the estimates for the positive and negative exponentials cancels $f_ Q$ and gives
Combining this with (12.9.14) proves the result. Every constant comes from the stated coefficient bounds and the fixed cube. $\square$
Proposition 12.9.15.9D81484FC945 Fix $0<\delta \leq \Lambda $. For every smooth real $v$ with
let $\rho _ v$ be its Gauduchon factor normalized by
There is $C_ H\geq 1$, depending only on $X,\omega ,\mathrm{d}V,\delta ,\Lambda $, such that $C_ H^{-1}\leq \rho _ v\leq C_ H$ on $X$ for every such $v$.
Proof. Existence and uniqueness of $\rho _ v$ follow from theorem 11.4.2. Fix a real reference metric on $X$, and put $Q_ v=\Omega _ v^{n-1}$ and $J_ v=\Omega _ v^ n/\mathrm{d}V$. Since $d\Omega _ v=d\omega $,
Both $Q_ v$ and $dQ_ v$ have uniformly bounded coefficients in fixed charts.
Define a real tensor $A_ v$ and vector field $b_ v$ by
Only the $(1,1)$ part of $d\psi \wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}\phi $ contributes to the first identity; it is
Thus $A_ v$ is symmetric and uniformly positive definite, with a uniform upper bound. The second identity and (12.9.16) give a uniform bound for $b_ v$.
For $L_{\Omega _ v}\phi =n\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\phi \wedge Q_ v/\Omega _ v^ n$, Stokes' theorem gives
In particular, the adjoint equation for $\rho _ v$ is
In each coordinate chart, multiplying the coefficients by the fixed smooth volume density converts this to Euclidean divergence form while preserving uniform ellipticity and a uniform bound for the vector coefficient. Lemma 12.9.12 applies. A fixed finite cover by inner cubes has a connected overlap graph, since $X$ is connected. Chaining its local estimates gives $\sup _ X\rho _ v\leq C_ H\inf _ X\rho _ v$. The normalization and $\mathrm{d}V(X)=1$ imply the claimed two-sided bound. $\square$
For a fixed $0<\varepsilon <1$, consider the full family
BB82503DF712
12.9.17
Set $c_ v=\int _ X\Omega _ v^ n$ and $F_ v=\log (J_ v/c_ v)$, so that $\int _ X\mathrm e^{F_ v}\mathrm{d}V=1$. The density $F_ v$ is defined by an actual solution form, rather than prescribed before solving an equation.
Theorem 12.9.18.AD62F7DA0E68 Let
and take $C_ H$ from proposition 12.9.15 with $\delta =1-\varepsilon $ and $\Lambda =1+\varepsilon $. For every $v\in \mathcal V_\varepsilon $, the exact maximizing current $T_ v\in \mathscr G_\omega $ for $F_ v$ is unique. Its determinant density $k_{T_ v}$ and the probability density $r_ v=\mathrm d\nu _{T_ v,F_ v}/\mathrm{d}V$ satisfy
FEAB45A97679
12.9.19
In particular both densities are uniformly bounded at the critical exponent $n/(n-1)$, without an assumption on the lower mass. Moreover,
and this normalized family contains infinitely many distinct nonconstant densities on the fixed manifold $X$.
Proof. Use the normalization of proposition 12.9.15 and put
The factor equation and $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$-Stokes give
Hence $T_ v\in \mathscr G_\omega $. It is the $(n-1)$st power of the Gauduchon metric $\gamma _ v=(\rho _ v/N_ v)^{1/(n-1)}\Omega _ v$. The equation $\Omega _ v^ n=c_ v\mathrm e^{F_ v}\mathrm{d}V$ gives $B_0(F_ v)=\log c_ v$. Thus theorem 12.7.3 identifies $T_ v$ as the unique exact maximizer, and $M(F_ v)=c_ v^{-1/n}$. The determinant and probability normalizations are therefore
2B0B40A18948
12.9.20
Here $j_-\leq J_ v\leq j_+$ and, since $\int _ X\rho _ v\, \mathrm{d}V=1$, also $j_-\leq N_ v\leq j_+$. The factor bound gives the first pair of inequalities in (12.9.19); the identity $k_{T_ v}=J_ v^{-1/n}r_ v$ gives the second. The critical norms are bounded by the respective upper constants because $\mathrm{d}V$ is a probability volume.
The inequalities
give the bound for $F_ v-F_0$ by subtracting logarithms. To prove nontriviality, choose a nonconstant smooth real $\phi $. For small $t$, the potential $t\phi -\sup _ X(t\phi )$ belongs to $\mathcal V_\varepsilon $ and gives the same density as $t\phi $. Differentiation at zero gives
This function is nonconstant: otherwise $L_\omega \phi $ would be constant, its values at a maximum and a minimum would force that constant to be zero, and the strong maximum principle would make $\phi $ constant. Choose two points where the displayed derivative differs. The difference of the densities at these points is strictly monotone for $t$ in a small interval. These give infinitely many distinct densities, with at most one parameter having equal values at the chosen points. Discarding that parameter gives the nonconstant family. $\square$
Uniform bounds for the solution forms need not give derivative bounds, or even equicontinuity, for their normalized logarithmic densities.
Example 12.9.21.CAEF64468276 For every fixed $0<\varepsilon <1$, there are $v_ j\in \mathcal V_\varepsilon $ with $\| v_ j\| _{C^0}\to 0$ such that their normalized densities $F_{v_ j}$ are pairwise distinct, bounded in $C^0$, and unbounded in $C^1$. This family is not equicontinuous. Nevertheless, both densities of its exact maximizers satisfy the uniform bounds of theorem 12.9.18.
Proof. Choose holomorphic coordinates centered at a point $p$, put $x=\operatorname {Re}z_1$, and take a smooth real cutoff $\zeta $ supported in the chart and equal to one near $p$. We may assume $0\leq \zeta \leq 1$. On the chart set
This is a nonzero semipositive form of rank one. For a constant $a>0$ to be chosen, extend
by zero outside the chart, and put $v_ j=w_ j-\sup _ Xw_ j$. The product rule gives
All fixed forms in this expression have compact support after multiplication by the indicated cutoff or its derivatives. Thus a fixed $C>0$ bounds the operator norm of $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w_ j$ relative to $\omega $ by $aC$ for every $j\geq 1$. Choose $a$ so small that $aC\leq \varepsilon /2$. Then $v_ j\in \mathcal V_\varepsilon $, and $\| v_ j\| _{C^0}\leq 2a/j^2$.
Write $s=\operatorname {tr}_{\omega (p)}\beta >0$. Since $x(p)=0$ and $\zeta =1$ near $p$, we have $\Omega _{v_ j}(p)=\omega (p)$ and
Differentiating the logarithmic determinant, and observing that its normalizing integral is constant in the spatial variable, gives the exact identity
These derivatives are pairwise different and their absolute values tend to infinity. Hence the densities are pairwise distinct and their $C^1$ norms are unbounded. Their uniform $C^0$ bound is part of theorem 12.9.18.
To check failure of equicontinuity, take points $p_ j^\pm $ with $x=\pm \pi /(2j)$ and all other real coordinates zero. For large $j$ they lie where $\zeta =1$, and $\Omega _{v_ j}(p_ j^\pm )=\omega (p_ j^\pm )\mp a\beta $. The integral normalizing $F_{v_ j}$ cancels from the difference, so
Indeed, $\beta ^2=0$ gives $(\omega (p)\pm a\beta )^ n=(1\pm as)\omega (p)^ n$, and $as<1$ by the chosen form comparison. Both points tend to $p$, which proves the failure of equicontinuity. The exact-adjoint bounds still apply because the entire sequence lies in $\mathcal V_\varepsilon $. $\square$
The same estimate applies to the family with $\delta \omega \leq \Omega _ v\leq \Lambda \omega $ by replacing $j_-$ and $j_+$ with $\delta ^ n\min _ X(\omega ^ n/\mathrm{d}V)$ and $\Lambda ^ n\max _ X(\omega ^ n/\mathrm{d}V)$. Applying the estimate to a prescribed family of densities requires uniformly comparable solution forms. Thus this construction provides critical estimates when $v_-(\omega )=0$ for a larger smooth family, but leaves the question for arbitrary bounded families of continuous densities open.
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.