Pome

12.9.11 Uniformly controlled complex Hessians5603574CC3A6

The preceding construction bounds the solution form and its Gauduchon factor by controlling derivatives of the logarithmic density. A bound on the solution form itself leads to a different estimate. If $\Omega =\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v$, then $d\Omega =d\omega $, so the divergence of its cofactor depends only on the fixed torsion and the size of $\Omega $. This permits uniform bounds for the factor even when derivatives of the varying complex Hessian are unbounded.

We continue to assume $n\geq 3$ and that $\mathrm{d}V$ is a probability volume form. We first give the real elliptic estimate used below. A cube denoted by $tQ$ has the same center as $Q$ and $t$ times its side length, and $\fint _ Q$ denotes its Euclidean average.

Lemma 12.9.12.F7130F1BDC30 Let $Q\subset \mathbb R^ m$, $m>2$, be a cube. Suppose that $u$ is a smooth strictly positive solution on a neighborhood of $3Q$ of

\[ \operatorname {div}(A\nabla u+Bu)=0, \qquad \lambda I\leq A\leq \Lambda I,\qquad |B|\leq K, \]

where $A$ is a smooth symmetric matrix field and $B$ is a smooth vector field. Then

\[ \sup _{Q/2}u\leq C\inf _{Q/2}u, \]

where $C$ depends only on $m,\lambda ,\Lambda ,K$ and the side length of $Q$. Derivatives of $A$ and $B$ do not enter $C$.

Proof. We first estimate positive and negative powers, then compare their small moments by an estimate for $\log u$.

For $p\ne 0,1$, test the weak equation by $\eta ^2u^{p-1}$, where $\eta $ is a smooth cutoff. The principal term is

\[ (p-1)\int \eta ^2u^{p-2}\langle A\nabla u,\nabla u\rangle . \]

The other terms contain respectively $2\eta u^{p-1}A\nabla u\cdot \nabla \eta $, $(p-1)\eta ^2u^{p-1}B\cdot \nabla u$, and $2\eta u^ pB\cdot \nabla \eta $. Taking absolute values after moving the principal term to one side and applying Young's inequality absorbs half of its energy. Thus, for either sign of $p$,

011F0AF31DBF 12.9.13
\begin{equation} \int \eta ^2|\nabla u^{p/2}|^2 \leq C_1p^2(1+|p-1|^{-2}) \int (|\nabla \eta |^2+K^2\eta ^2)u^ p, \end{equation}

with $C_1$ depending only on the ellipticity bounds. Each test is legitimate since this individual smooth positive solution is bounded above and away from zero on the cutoff support.

Put $\beta =m/(m-2)>1$ and choose $p_0=\beta ^{-k-1/2}$, with $k$ to be fixed later. Apply the Euclidean Sobolev inequality to $\eta u^{p/2}$ on nested cubes shrinking from $Q$ to $Q/2$. Choose the cutoff gaps proportional to $2^{-j}$ and the powers $p_ j=p_0\beta ^ j$. The positive powers never equal one: the closest two are $\beta ^{-1/2}$ and $\beta ^{1/2}$. Consequently the constants in (12.9.13), together with the cutoff terms from $\nabla (\eta u^{p/2})$, grow at most polynomially in $p_ j$ and exponentially in $j$. Since $\sum _ j(j+1)\beta ^{-j}<\infty $, their iteration product converges. Negative powers give the same calculation for $u^{-1}$. We obtain

DA143DCFAFAB 12.9.14
\begin{equation} \sup _{Q/2}u\leq C_2\left(\fint _ Q u^{p_0}\right)^{1/p_0}, \qquad \inf _{Q/2}u\geq C_2^{-1} \left(\fint _ Q u^{-p_0}\right)^{-1/p_0}. \end{equation}

Here $C_2$ also depends on $p_0$ and the fixed cube size.

Testing instead by $\eta ^2/u$ gives

\[ \int \eta ^2|\nabla \log u|^2 \leq C_3\int (|\nabla \eta |^2+K^2\eta ^2). \]

For every subcube $S\subset Q$ of side length $\ell $, a cutoff supported in $2S\subset 3Q$, equal to one on $S$, has derivative bounded by $C/\ell $. Poincaré's inequality and Cauchy–Schwarz therefore give

\[ \fint _ S|\log u-(\log u)_ S| \leq C_4(1+K\ell )\leq K_0, \]

where $K_0\geq 1$ is uniform and $(\log u)_ S$ denotes the mean. We spell out the exponential consequence of this mean oscillation bound.

Write $f=\log u$ and fix $a>2$. Select the maximal dyadic subcubes $S$ of $Q$ on which $\fint _ S|f-f_ Q|>aK_0$. Their total measure is at most $|Q|/a$. The parent of each selected cube has average at most $aK_0$, hence $|f_ S-f_ Q|\leq 2^ maK_0$. Outside their union, differentiation of dyadic averages gives $|f-f_ Q|\leq aK_0$ almost everywhere. Repeat this selection inside each chosen cube, subtracting its own mean. The union at generation $j$ has measure at most $a^{-j}|Q|$, and outside generation $j+1$ the accumulated mean changes and last oscillation give

\[ |f-f_ Q|\leq (j2^ ma+a)K_0. \]

The intersection of all generations is null. Choosing $c>0$ so that $\exp (c2^ ma)<a$ and summing over the generations yields

\[ \fint _ Q\exp \! \left(\frac{c|f-f_ Q|}{K_0}\right)\leq C_5, \]

with dimensional constants. Now fix $k$ large enough that $p_0<c/K_0$. Multiplying the estimates for the positive and negative exponentials cancels $f_ Q$ and gives

\[ \left(\fint _ Q u^{p_0}\right) \left(\fint _ Q u^{-p_0}\right)\leq C_5^2. \]

Combining this with (12.9.14) proves the result. Every constant comes from the stated coefficient bounds and the fixed cube. $\square$

Proposition 12.9.15.9D81484FC945 Fix $0<\delta \leq \Lambda $. For every smooth real $v$ with

\[ \delta \omega \leq \Omega _ v:=\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v\leq \Lambda \omega , \]

let $\rho _ v$ be its Gauduchon factor normalized by

\[ \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(\rho _ v\Omega _ v^{n-1})=0, \qquad \int _ X\rho _ v\, \mathrm{d}V=1. \]

There is $C_ H\geq 1$, depending only on $X,\omega ,\mathrm{d}V,\delta ,\Lambda $, such that $C_ H^{-1}\leq \rho _ v\leq C_ H$ on $X$ for every such $v$.

Proof. Existence and uniqueness of $\rho _ v$ follow from theorem 11.4.2. Fix a real reference metric on $X$, and put $Q_ v=\Omega _ v^{n-1}$ and $J_ v=\Omega _ v^ n/\mathrm{d}V$. Since $d\Omega _ v=d\omega $,

82DFE47055F1 12.9.16
\begin{equation} dQ_ v=(n-1)d\omega \wedge \Omega _ v^{n-2}. \end{equation}

Both $Q_ v$ and $dQ_ v$ have uniformly bounded coefficients in fixed charts.

Define a real tensor $A_ v$ and vector field $b_ v$ by

\[ \langle A_ vd\phi ,d\psi \rangle \, \mathrm{d}V =n\, d\psi \wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}\phi \wedge Q_ v, \qquad (b_ v\cdot d\phi )\, \mathrm{d}V =-n\, \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}\phi \wedge dQ_ v. \]

Only the $(1,1)$ part of $d\psi \wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}\phi $ contributes to the first identity; it is

\[ \frac{\mathrm i}{4\pi } (\partial \psi \wedge \bar\partial \phi +\partial \phi \wedge \bar\partial \psi ). \]

Thus $A_ v$ is symmetric and uniformly positive definite, with a uniform upper bound. The second identity and (12.9.16) give a uniform bound for $b_ v$.

For $L_{\Omega _ v}\phi =n\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\phi \wedge Q_ v/\Omega _ v^ n$, Stokes' theorem gives

\begin{align*} \int _ X\psi J_ vL_{\Omega _ v}\phi \, \mathrm{d}V & =-n\int _ Xd\psi \wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}\phi \wedge Q_ v +n\int _ X\psi \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}\phi \wedge dQ_ v\\ & =-\int _ X\langle A_ vd\phi ,d\psi \rangle \, \mathrm{d}V -\int _ X\psi b_ v\cdot d\phi \, \mathrm{d}V. \end{align*}

In particular, the adjoint equation for $\rho _ v$ is

\[ \operatorname {div}_{\mathrm{d}V}(A_ vd\rho _ v+b_ v\rho _ v)=0. \]

In each coordinate chart, multiplying the coefficients by the fixed smooth volume density converts this to Euclidean divergence form while preserving uniform ellipticity and a uniform bound for the vector coefficient. Lemma 12.9.12 applies. A fixed finite cover by inner cubes has a connected overlap graph, since $X$ is connected. Chaining its local estimates gives $\sup _ X\rho _ v\leq C_ H\inf _ X\rho _ v$. The normalization and $\mathrm{d}V(X)=1$ imply the claimed two-sided bound. $\square$

For a fixed $0<\varepsilon <1$, consider the full family

BB82503DF712 12.9.17
\begin{equation} \mathcal V_\varepsilon = \{ v\in C^\infty (X,\mathbb R):\sup _ Xv=0, -\varepsilon \omega \leq \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v\leq \varepsilon \omega \} . \end{equation}

Set $c_ v=\int _ X\Omega _ v^ n$ and $F_ v=\log (J_ v/c_ v)$, so that $\int _ X\mathrm e^{F_ v}\mathrm{d}V=1$. The density $F_ v$ is defined by an actual solution form, rather than prescribed before solving an equation.

Theorem 12.9.18.AD62F7DA0E68 Let

\[ j_-=(1-\varepsilon )^ n\min _ X\frac{\omega ^ n}{\mathrm{d}V}, \qquad j_+=(1+\varepsilon )^ n\max _ X\frac{\omega ^ n}{\mathrm{d}V}, \]

and take $C_ H$ from proposition 12.9.15 with $\delta =1-\varepsilon $ and $\Lambda =1+\varepsilon $. For every $v\in \mathcal V_\varepsilon $, the exact maximizing current $T_ v\in \mathscr G_\omega $ for $F_ v$ is unique. Its determinant density $k_{T_ v}$ and the probability density $r_ v=\mathrm d\nu _{T_ v,F_ v}/\mathrm{d}V$ satisfy

FEAB45A97679 12.9.19
\begin{equation} \frac{j_-}{C_ Hj_+}\leq r_ v\leq \frac{C_ Hj_+}{j_-}, \qquad j_+^{-1/n}\frac{j_-}{C_ Hj_+} \leq k_{T_ v}\leq j_-^{-1/n}\frac{C_ Hj_+}{j_-}. \end{equation}

In particular both densities are uniformly bounded at the critical exponent $n/(n-1)$, without an assumption on the lower mass. Moreover,

\[ \| F_ v-F_0\| _\infty \leq n\log \frac{1+\varepsilon }{1-\varepsilon }, \]

and this normalized family contains infinitely many distinct nonconstant densities on the fixed manifold $X$.

Proof. Use the normalization of proposition 12.9.15 and put

\[ N_ v=\int _ XJ_ v\rho _ v\, \mathrm{d}V, \qquad T_ v=\frac{\rho _ v}{N_ v}\Omega _ v^{n-1}. \]

The factor equation and $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$-Stokes give

\[ \int _ X\omega \wedge \rho _ v\Omega _ v^{n-1} =\int _ X\Omega _ v\wedge \rho _ v\Omega _ v^{n-1}=N_ v. \]

Hence $T_ v\in \mathscr G_\omega $. It is the $(n-1)$st power of the Gauduchon metric $\gamma _ v=(\rho _ v/N_ v)^{1/(n-1)}\Omega _ v$. The equation $\Omega _ v^ n=c_ v\mathrm e^{F_ v}\mathrm{d}V$ gives $B_0(F_ v)=\log c_ v$. Thus theorem 12.7.3 identifies $T_ v$ as the unique exact maximizer, and $M(F_ v)=c_ v^{-1/n}$. The determinant and probability normalizations are therefore

2B0B40A18948 12.9.20
\begin{equation} k_{T_ v}=\frac{\rho _ v}{N_ v}J_ v^{(n-1)/n}, \qquad \Gamma _{F_ v}(T_ v)=c_ v^{-1/n}\frac{J_ v\rho _ v}{N_ v}\, \mathrm{d}V, \qquad r_ v=\frac{J_ v\rho _ v}{N_ v}. \end{equation}

Here $j_-\leq J_ v\leq j_+$ and, since $\int _ X\rho _ v\, \mathrm{d}V=1$, also $j_-\leq N_ v\leq j_+$. The factor bound gives the first pair of inequalities in (12.9.19); the identity $k_{T_ v}=J_ v^{-1/n}r_ v$ gives the second. The critical norms are bounded by the respective upper constants because $\mathrm{d}V$ is a probability volume.

The inequalities

\[ (1-\varepsilon )^ n\leq \frac{J_ v}{J_0}\leq (1+\varepsilon )^ n, \qquad (1-\varepsilon )^ n\leq \frac{c_ v}{c_0}\leq (1+\varepsilon )^ n \]

give the bound for $F_ v-F_0$ by subtracting logarithms. To prove nontriviality, choose a nonconstant smooth real $\phi $. For small $t$, the potential $t\phi -\sup _ X(t\phi )$ belongs to $\mathcal V_\varepsilon $ and gives the same density as $t\phi $. Differentiation at zero gives

\[ \left.\frac{d}{dt}F_{t\phi }\right|_{t=0} =L_\omega \phi - \frac{\int _ XJ_0L_\omega \phi \, \mathrm{d}V}{\int _ XJ_0\, \mathrm{d}V}. \]

This function is nonconstant: otherwise $L_\omega \phi $ would be constant, its values at a maximum and a minimum would force that constant to be zero, and the strong maximum principle would make $\phi $ constant. Choose two points where the displayed derivative differs. The difference of the densities at these points is strictly monotone for $t$ in a small interval. These give infinitely many distinct densities, with at most one parameter having equal values at the chosen points. Discarding that parameter gives the nonconstant family. $\square$

Uniform bounds for the solution forms need not give derivative bounds, or even equicontinuity, for their normalized logarithmic densities.

Example 12.9.21.CAEF64468276 For every fixed $0<\varepsilon <1$, there are $v_ j\in \mathcal V_\varepsilon $ with $\| v_ j\| _{C^0}\to 0$ such that their normalized densities $F_{v_ j}$ are pairwise distinct, bounded in $C^0$, and unbounded in $C^1$. This family is not equicontinuous. Nevertheless, both densities of its exact maximizers satisfy the uniform bounds of theorem 12.9.18.

Proof. Choose holomorphic coordinates centered at a point $p$, put $x=\operatorname {Re}z_1$, and take a smooth real cutoff $\zeta $ supported in the chart and equal to one near $p$. We may assume $0\leq \zeta \leq 1$. On the chart set

\[ \beta =dx\wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}x=\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(x^2/2) =\frac{\mathrm i}{8\pi }dz_1\wedge d\bar z_1. \]

This is a nonzero semipositive form of rank one. For a constant $a>0$ to be chosen, extend

\[ w_ j=\frac a{j^2}\zeta \sin (jx) \]

by zero outside the chart, and put $v_ j=w_ j-\sup _ Xw_ j$. The product rule gives

\begin{align*} \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w_ j={}& -a\zeta \sin (jx)\beta +\frac aj\cos (jx) (d\zeta \wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}x+dx\wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}\zeta )\\ & +\frac a{j^2}\sin (jx)\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\zeta . \end{align*}

All fixed forms in this expression have compact support after multiplication by the indicated cutoff or its derivatives. Thus a fixed $C>0$ bounds the operator norm of $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w_ j$ relative to $\omega $ by $aC$ for every $j\geq 1$. Choose $a$ so small that $aC\leq \varepsilon /2$. Then $v_ j\in \mathcal V_\varepsilon $, and $\| v_ j\| _{C^0}\leq 2a/j^2$.

Write $s=\operatorname {tr}_{\omega (p)}\beta >0$. Since $x(p)=0$ and $\zeta =1$ near $p$, we have $\Omega _{v_ j}(p)=\omega (p)$ and

\[ \partial _ x\Omega _{v_ j}(p)=\partial _ x\omega (p)-aj\beta . \]

Differentiating the logarithmic determinant, and observing that its normalizing integral is constant in the spatial variable, gives the exact identity

\[ \partial _ xF_{v_ j}(p) =\partial _ x\log \frac{\omega ^ n}{\mathrm{d}V}(p)-ajs. \]

These derivatives are pairwise different and their absolute values tend to infinity. Hence the densities are pairwise distinct and their $C^1$ norms are unbounded. Their uniform $C^0$ bound is part of theorem 12.9.18.

To check failure of equicontinuity, take points $p_ j^\pm $ with $x=\pm \pi /(2j)$ and all other real coordinates zero. For large $j$ they lie where $\zeta =1$, and $\Omega _{v_ j}(p_ j^\pm )=\omega (p_ j^\pm )\mp a\beta $. The integral normalizing $F_{v_ j}$ cancels from the difference, so

\[ F_{v_ j}(p_ j^-)-F_{v_ j}(p_ j^+) \longrightarrow \log \frac{1+as}{1-as}>0. \]

Indeed, $\beta ^2=0$ gives $(\omega (p)\pm a\beta )^ n=(1\pm as)\omega (p)^ n$, and $as<1$ by the chosen form comparison. Both points tend to $p$, which proves the failure of equicontinuity. The exact-adjoint bounds still apply because the entire sequence lies in $\mathcal V_\varepsilon $. $\square$

The same estimate applies to the family with $\delta \omega \leq \Omega _ v\leq \Lambda \omega $ by replacing $j_-$ and $j_+$ with $\delta ^ n\min _ X(\omega ^ n/\mathrm{d}V)$ and $\Lambda ^ n\max _ X(\omega ^ n/\mathrm{d}V)$. Applying the estimate to a prescribed family of densities requires uniformly comparable solution forms. Thus this construction provides critical estimates when $v_-(\omega )=0$ for a larger smooth family, but leaves the question for arbitrary bounded families of continuous densities open.

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.