Pome

12.33 Cotangent extensions with zero ruling componentC9CE007F34A7

C9CE007F34A7

Every Kähler class has a nonzero ruling component, but the extensions with $\rho =0$, that is, with class $Kf^*\eta $, can be treated in the same way. Their section algebras are the same as for $\rho \neq 0$, but their torsors behave differently: they contain compact rational curves, and their universal covers are not Stein.

Keep the notation of the preceding subsections, with the class $\eta $ and the form $\vartheta _ E$ of lemma 12.30.1. Let $W$ be an extension of $\mathcal O_ M$ by $\Omega _ M^1$ with class $Kf^*\eta $, and put $V=W^*$. The homogeneous charts used above, now with zero ruling component, have transitions

\[ v=1/t,\qquad u_\infty =u,\qquad y_\infty =-t^2y,\qquad w_\infty =w. \]

For $\lambda =m\tau +n$, the lattice acts by

\[ (z,t,u,y,w)\longmapsto (z+\lambda ,b_\lambda t,u+m(q_0ty+Kw),y/b_\lambda ,w), \qquad q_0=2\pi \mathrm{i}d. \]

For the differences $z_ i-z_ j=m_{ij}\tau +n_{ij}$ of local lifts, the zero sections of these charts differ by $Km_{ij}f^*\vartheta _ E$ on overlaps over the base and agree on the two ruling charts, so they give the class $Kf^*\eta $. The linear parts are the cotangent transitions, and in the infinite ruling chart the lattice acts holomorphically by $u_\infty \mapsto u_\infty +m(Kw-q_0v y_\infty )$. Thus the same cocycle computation constructs $W$ also when its ruling component is zero. The fiberwise change of coordinates used for $\rho \ne 0$ is not available, but the polynomial functions on the cotangent bundle give the homogeneous algebra directly.

Lemma 12.33.1.C3F367EB396E Over $\mathbb C\times \mathbb P^1$, the graded algebra of fiber-homogeneous polynomial functions on the pullback of $W$ is

\[ \mathcal O(\mathbb C)[c_-,c_+,h,u,w]/(c_-c_+-h^2), \qquad c_-=y,\quad c_+=t^2y,\quad h=ty, \]

where all five variables have degree one. The lattice fixes $h$ and $w$, sends $c_-$ to $b_\lambda ^{-1}c_-$ and $c_+$ to $b_\lambda c_+$, and translates $u$ by $m(q_0h+Kw)$.

Proof. As in the proof of lemma 12.31.1, holomorphy in the infinite ruling chart bounds the degree in $t$ of the coefficient of $y^ j$ by $2j$; the variable $w$ does not change between the charts. Distributing the exponent $a$ among $j$ integers in $\{ 0,1,2\} $, every monomial $t^ ay^ j$ with $0\leq a\leq 2j$ is a product of $y$, $ty$ and $t^2y$. These generators satisfy $y(t^2y)=(ty)^2$.

In degree $j$, the space of functions of $y$ and $t$ has dimension $2j+1$. The polynomial algebra in three variables modulo the nonzero quadratic relation has the same dimension

\[ \binom {j+2}{2}-\binom {j}{2}=2j+1, \]

where the second term is zero for $j<2$, so the natural surjective graded map is an isomorphism. Adjoining the two trivial fiber coordinates $u,w$ gives the stated algebra, with entire coefficients in $z$. In the other chart,

\[ c_-=-v^2y_\infty ,\qquad c_+=-y_\infty , \qquad h=-v y_\infty , \]

so all generators are holomorphic there. Substitution gives their lattice transformations. $\square$

Proposition 12.33.2.A78CB65BF75E There is a degree-preserving isomorphism of algebras

\[ \bigoplus _{r\geq 0}H^0(M,\operatorname {Sym}^ rV) \simeq \left(\bigoplus _{r\geq 0}H^0(M,\operatorname {Sym}^ rT_ M)\right)[w], \qquad \deg w=1. \]

Consequently the dimension formula, the bigness and volume of the tautological line bundle, and the failure of finite generation in corollary 12.32.3 hold also for this extension.

Proof. Give $c_-,c_+$ weights $-1,1$, and $h,u,w$ weight zero. Using $c_-c_+=h^2$, the blocks of negative weight have the form $c_-^ kF(z,h,u,w)$, those of positive weight the form $c_+^ kF(z,h,u,w)$, and the block of weight zero consists of the polynomials $F$. These expressions are unique: the substitution $c_+=h^2/c_-$ embeds the algebra into $\mathcal O(\mathbb C)[h,u,w,c_-,c_-^{-1}]$, and distinct weights correspond to distinct powers of $c_-$ with nonzero polynomial coefficients. In tensor degree $r$, the remaining polynomial degree is $r-k$.

The coefficient bundle $U_3$ now has the inverse translation $u\mapsto u-m(q_0h+Kw)$. Thus the block of weight $-k$ is $H^0(E,A^ k\otimes \operatorname {Sym}^{r-k}U_3)$, the block of weight $k$ has $A^{-k}$ in place of $A^ k$, and the block of weight zero is $H^0(E,\operatorname {Sym}^ rU_3)$. Put $H=h+(K/q_0)w$. Since $q_0\ne 0$, this identifies $U_3$ with the bundle $U$ defined above, with $H$ in place of its Euler variable, plus the trivial line bundle generated by $w$.

By lemma 12.31.2, all positive weights vanish, and the algebra of weight zero is $\mathbb C[H,w]$. Expanding the negative blocks in powers of $w$ identifies them with the blocks for the tangent bundle in lemma 12.31.1, and the substitutions $h\mapsto H$ and $y^ k\mapsto c_-^ k$ give bijections in every degree and surviving weight. Products multiply the coefficient polynomials and add the powers of $c_-$, so these bijections preserve multiplication. This proves the isomorphism. Summing the dimensions for the tangent bundle and taking the quotient by $w$ gives the remaining assertions, exactly as in the proof of corollary 12.32.3. $\square$

Proposition 12.33.3.0414E2D53266 The cotangent torsor $T_ W$ is not Stein. Its universal cover is

\[ \mathbb C^2\times \operatorname {Tot} (\mathcal O_{\mathbb P^1}(-2)), \]

where $\operatorname {Tot}$ denotes the total space of a line bundle; this cover is not Stein either.

Proof. Set $w=1$. The subset $\{ y=0\} $ of the finite ruling chart agrees with $\{ y_\infty =0\} $ in the other chart, and the lattice acts on it by $u\mapsto u+Km$. It therefore descends to a submanifold of $T_ W$ that is a $\mathbb P^1$-bundle over

\[ B_ K=\mathbb C^2_{z,u}/\Lambda ,\qquad (m\tau +n)\cdot (z,u)=(z+m\tau +n,u+Km); \]

this quotient is a complex manifold because translation in $z$ gives a free and properly discontinuous action. Every fiber of this bundle is a compact connected curve in $T_ W$, on which holomorphic functions are constant. Thus $T_ W$ is not holomorphically separable, and hence not Stein.

Before the lattice quotient, the affine charts have no affine term in the ruling direction, and they glue to $\mathbb C^2_{z,u}\times \operatorname {Tot}(\mathcal O_{\mathbb P^1}(-2))$, since $\mathcal O_{\mathbb P^1}(-2)$ is the cotangent bundle of $\mathbb P^1$. This space is simply connected: contracting the fibers of the line bundle retracts the last factor onto $\mathbb P^1$, and $\mathbb C^2$ is contractible. The lattice acts freely and properly discontinuously, so this space is the universal cover. Its zero section contains a compact projective line, which again obstructs holomorphic separability and hence the Stein property. $\square$

Thus the classes with zero and with nonzero ruling component have isomorphic graded section algebras, although theorem 12.30.4 gives a Stein universal cover only when the ruling component is nonzero.

Problem 12.33.4.AD465D07A4C1 Which geometric conditions on a nonclosed nef background force a common degeneration order, or an integral one? When is equality attained in the modification and residual order comparisons?

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.