A4E01A8B6F30
The compatibility condition of proposition 11.23.2 decides which right-hand sides a scalar trace equation can have, and it can be used to improve the curvature of a Hermitian metric on a vector bundle. A conformal change $h\mapsto \mathrm e^{-tf}h$ adds the same form $t\, \mathrm i\partial \bar\partial f$ to the curvature in every fiber direction. Solving a Poisson equation for a Gauduchon form, we can make the trace of this form positive outside any prescribed ball. If the original curvature already has a positive direction for every fiber vector over that ball, a small conformal change produces such a direction everywhere.
Throughout this section, $E\to X$ is a holomorphic vector bundle of positive rank, and $n\geq 2$. For a smooth Hermitian metric $h$ on $E$, we use the Chern curvature $F_ h$, the Hermitian endomorphisms $R_ h(u,\bar u)$, the directional forms $\alpha _{h,v}$ and the mean curvature $K_{\omega ,h}$ of 11.18; recall that $h$ is linear in its first argument.
Definition 11.26.1.2C6FED9B1909 The metric $h$ is RC-positive at $x$ if, for every $0\ne v\in E_ x$, there is a tangent vector $u\in T_ x^{1,0}X$ such that
\[ h(R_ h(u,\bar u)v,v)>0. \]
It is uniformly RC-positive at $x$ if one tangent vector $u$ works for every nonzero $v\in E_ x$. A metric has either property on a set if it has that property at every point of the set.
Lemma 11.26.2.23EB10AE428C Suppose that $K_{\omega ,h}(x)\geq 0$. Then $h$ is RC-positive at $x$ if and only if $\alpha _{h,v}\ne 0$ for every $0\ne v\in E_ x$.
Proof.
The trace of $\alpha _{h,v}$ with respect to $\omega $ is $h(K_{\omega ,h}v,v)\geq 0$. A nonzero Hermitian form with nonnegative trace has a positive eigenvalue, since if all its eigenvalues were nonpositive, their nonnegative sum would force all of them to vanish. This gives the required tangent direction. Conversely, a tangent vector with positive evaluation shows that $\alpha _{h,v}\ne 0$.
$\square$
Theorem 11.26.3.AFF6DB5A7BE1 Suppose that $K_{\omega ,h}\geq 0$ on $X$ and that $h$ is RC-positive on a nonempty open set $U$. Then there is a smooth real function $f$ such that $h_ t=\mathrm e^{-tf}h$ is RC-positive on all of $X$ for every sufficiently small $t>0$.
Proof.
By theorem 11.4.2, choose a conformal Gauduchon form $\gamma =\mathrm e^ a\omega $. Then $K_{\gamma ,h}=\mathrm e^{-a}K_{\omega ,h}\geq 0$. Choose a closed coordinate ball $Q\subset U$ and a smooth function $\chi \geq 0$ supported in its interior, with $\int _ X\chi \gamma ^ n>0$, and set
\[ \rho =1-\frac{\int _ X\gamma ^ n}{\int _ X\chi \gamma ^ n}\chi . \]
Thus $\rho =1$ on $X\setminus Q$ and $\int _ X\rho \gamma ^ n=0$. Since $\gamma $ is Gauduchon, proposition 11.23.2, applied with $\gamma $ in place of $\omega $ and $u=0$, gives a smooth real solution $f$ of
78D702B6F891
11.26.4
\begin{equation} P_\gamma f:=\operatorname {tr}_\gamma (\mathrm i\partial \bar\partial f)=\rho . \end{equation}
Indeed, with $L_\gamma f=n\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}f\wedge \gamma ^{n-1}/\gamma ^ n$ as in (11.23.1), we have $P_\gamma =2\pi L_\gamma $, and the adjoint probability of $L_\gamma $ is $\gamma ^ n/\int _ X\gamma ^ n$.
The curvature transforms by
0F0F9E5CC398
11.26.5
\begin{equation} F_{h_ t}=F_ h+t\partial \bar\partial f\, \operatorname {Id}_ E, \qquad \alpha _{h_ t,v}=\mathrm e^{-tf} \bigl (\alpha _{h,v}+t|v|_ h^2\mathrm i\partial \bar\partial f\bigr ). \end{equation}
On $X\setminus Q$, the $\gamma $-trace of the expression in parentheses is at least $t|v|_ h^2\rho =t|v|_ h^2>0$ for $v\ne 0$, so it has a positive eigenvalue there.
Over $Q$, the unit sphere bundle $\{ |v|_ h=1\} $ is compact. The largest $\gamma $-eigenvalue of $\alpha _{h,v}$ is continuous and strictly positive on it, so it has a positive minimum $\delta $. Let $C$ be the maximum on $X$ of the operator norm of $\mathrm i\partial \bar\partial f$ relative to $\gamma $. For every unit vector over $Q$, the largest eigenvalue of the expression in parentheses in (11.26.5) is at least $\delta -tC$, which is positive for small $t>0$. Homogeneity in $v$ and the positive factor $\mathrm e^{-tf}$ prove the assertion on $Q$ as well.
$\square$
In this conclusion, the positive direction may depend on the fiber vector $v$. The distinction from uniform RC-positivity already occurs for a local metric with zero mean curvature.
Example 11.26.6.8C86B880454A On a sufficiently small ball in $\mathbb C^2$, equip the trivial bundle of rank two with the metric
\[ H(z)=\operatorname {Id}-zz^*+\tfrac 12|z|^2\operatorname {Id}. \]
At the origin this metric has zero mean curvature for the Euclidean Hermitian form and is RC-positive, but it is not uniformly RC-positive.
Proof.
The two eigenvalues of $H(z)$ are $1-\tfrac 12|z|^2$ and $1+\tfrac 12|z|^2$, so the metric is positive on a small ball. Its first derivatives vanish at the origin, where
\[ F_{i\bar j}=e_ ie_ j^*-\tfrac 12\delta _{ij}\operatorname {Id},\qquad h(R_ h(u,\bar u)v,v)=|v^*u|^2-\tfrac 12|u|^2|v|^2. \]
The sum $F_{1\bar1}+F_{2\bar2}$ is zero. For each nonzero $v$, taking $u=v$ gives a positive evaluation. For each nonzero $u$, taking $v\perp u$ gives a negative evaluation, so no single $u$ works for every $v$.
$\square$
Proposition 11.26.7.9EFFDFAE03AF If $\det E$ admits a flat Hermitian metric, then no smooth Hermitian metric on $E$ is uniformly RC-positive on $X$ or has positive definite mean curvature relative to a Hermitian form. This applies in particular when $\det E$ is holomorphically trivial.
Proof.
If $h$ were uniformly RC-positive, then at each point some $u$ would make the $h$-Hermitian endomorphism $R_ h(u,\bar u)$ positive definite, and its trace would be strictly positive. Since the curvature of the induced metric on $\det E$ is $\operatorname {tr}F_ h$, the determinant metric would be RC-positive as a metric on a line bundle. If instead $K_{\omega ,h}>0$, the $\omega $-trace of the determinant curvature would be $\operatorname {tr}K_{\omega ,h}>0$, which again gives a positive tangent evaluation.
Fix a flat Hermitian metric $h_0$ on $\det E$ and write $\det h=\mathrm e^ b h_0$ for a smooth real function $b$. The determinant curvature is then $-\partial \bar\partial b$. At a global minimum of $b$, this curvature has no positive tangent evaluation, contradicting the RC-positivity of the determinant metric. Finally, a holomorphic trivialization of $\det E$ gives a flat metric, by assigning constant norm to the trivializing frame.
$\square$
Consequently, if $\det E$ admits a flat Hermitian metric and the hypotheses of theorem 11.26.3 hold, the conformally changed metric is RC-positive, whereas $E$ admits neither a uniformly RC-positive metric nor a metric with positive definite mean curvature. The next section shows that the tangent bundle of a nonflat Ricci-flat Kähler surface has these properties, and the local example above shows the pointwise distinction.
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.