Lemma 11.47.2.3CD979065654 The profile $A$ is smooth and strictly convex, with $0<A'<1$, bounded $A''$ and asymptotic slopes $0,1$. Its tangents tend uniformly to $-\infty $ on each compact interval as their point of tangency tends to $-\infty $, and uniformly to the line $y\mapsto y$ as that point tends to $+\infty $. Moreover, $A(x)-x\searrow 0$ at the right end.
11.47 Envelopes for singular radial obstaclesAEE10281DB3D
AEE10281DB3D
The radial inverse of section 11.46 starts with a density. One can instead perturb the singular reference as an obstacle and let the envelope select its measure. The resulting total profile is a convex minorant. Its affine intervals give open regions of zero density, while its contact with the reference at both ends controls the residual across the pole and the hyperplane at infinity.
Keep $k\geq 2$, $0<\alpha <1$, the normalized Fubini–Study form $\kappa $ on $\mathbb P^ k$ and the potential $u_\alpha $ of lemma 11.46.2. Write $r=|z|^2$ on the chart $Z_0\ne 0$, put $x=\log r$, and define
Here $u_\alpha (x)$ denotes its radial profile. Throughout this section primes denote derivatives in $x$. For $F\in C_ c^2(\mathbb R;\mathbb R)$, extend $F(\log r)$ by zero near the pole $o$ and the hyperplane at infinity, and set
AF49CAB59368
11.47.1
The obstacle takes the value $-\infty $ at $o$. Since $F$ is bounded, its pointwise constraint already implies ordinary domination for each competitor.
Proof. Put $p=\mathrm e^ x/(1+\mathrm e^ x)$, $T=1-\log p$ and $a=\alpha T^{\alpha -1}$. Differentiating (11.46.3) gives
Since $T\geq 1$ and $0<a\leq \alpha <1$, these formulas give the asserted positivity and bounds. On the left, $A(x)=1-(1-x)^\alpha +o(1)$ and $A-xA'$ has leading term $-(1-\alpha )(-x)^\alpha $. On the right, $A=x+(1-\alpha )\mathrm e^{-x}+O(\mathrm e^{-2x})$ and $A'=1-(1-\alpha )\mathrm e^{-x}+O(\mathrm e^{-2x})$. The tangent at $x$ is $y\mapsto A'(x)y+A(x)-xA'(x)$, so both uniform limits follow. Finally $A'-1<0$ gives the decreasing right-end limit. $\square$
11.47.3 The convex minorant and its residual2FEAC06EE6DB
Put $g=A+F$, $K_ F=\| F\| _\infty $, and let $C_ F$ be the supremum of all affine functions below $g$ on $\mathbb R$. Since $A-K_ F$ is convex and is the supremum of its supporting lines,
In particular $C_ F$ is a finite convex function.
Theorem 11.47.5.7444FA94A222 The envelope (11.47.1) is
on the punctured affine chart, with its canonical extensions at both ends. It has ordinary type $u_\alpha $. The residual $R_ F=E_ F-u_\alpha $ off $o$ extends to $C^{1,1}(\mathbb P^ k)$, is zero near $o$ and is smooth near infinity. The function $C_ F$ is affine on each component of $\{ C_ F<g\} $, and, with $L_2=\sup _{\mathbb R}\max (g'',0)$,
7B822F7684AE
11.47.6
Proof. We first identify the full envelope, then examine contact and the two ends. Every supporting slope of $C_ F$ lies in $[0,1]$, by the left growth $g\to -\infty $ and the right growth $g=x+o(1)$. The sandwich forces its asymptotic slopes to be $0,1$.
The competitor family is invariant under the unitary group $U(k)$ acting on the affine coordinates. Its regularized supremum is therefore radial. Adding smooth local potentials of $\kappa $ gives a locally upper-bounded family of plurisubharmonic functions, so the envelope is $\kappa $-plurisubharmonic. The competitor $u_\alpha -K_ F$ prevents collapse, and upper semicontinuity of the obstacle preserves the everywhere bound after regularization, including at $o$. A radial plurisubharmonic total potential $B(\log r)$ has convex profile $B$: restriction to a complex line gives this from radial subharmonicity. Positivity in a direction orthogonal to $z$ gives $B'\geq 0$. Conversely a convex nondecreasing profile has nonnegative tangential and radial Hessian eigenvalues $B'/r$ and $B''/r$, first for smooth profiles and then by convex smoothing on annuli. The envelope's total profile is consequently a convex minorant of $g$, and is at most $C_ F$.
The same criterion makes $C_ F(\log r)$ plurisubharmonic on the punctured chart. Its upper bound near $o$ and (11.47.4) give a removable extension with value $-\infty $. Since $C_ F'\leq 1$, the function $C_ F-x$ is nonincreasing and, by the sandwich, has a finite right-end limit. The proposed $E_ F$ is thus locally bounded above near infinity. Add a local smooth potential of $\kappa $ and apply lemma 5.24.7 across the hyperplane. This gives a global competitor, hence the formula. The sandwich proves ordinary equivalence without subtracting the infinite values at $o$.
On a compact interval in the free set the gap $g-C_ F$ is positive. Replacing $C_ F$ on a sufficiently short subinterval by its chord preserves convexity at both endpoints and stays below $g$. Unless $C_ F$ is locally affine this would give a larger minorant. It follows that it is affine on each free component. At a contact point $y$, domination by $g$ gives $C'_{F,-}(y)\geq g'(y)\geq C'_{F,+}(y)$, and convexity reverses the outer inequality. Thus $C_ F$ is differentiable at contacts, with derivative $g'$, and it is differentiable on free intervals as well. Its derivative is continuous. For $a<b$ outside one common free interval, move $a$ to its right contact endpoint and $b$ to its left contact endpoint whenever necessary. These points $a',b'\in [a,b]$ have the same respective derivatives. An unbounded free interval lacking the needed endpoint contains both original points, in which case the difference is zero. Otherwise
which proves (11.47.6).
For all sufficiently negative $x$, the tangent to $A$ at $x$ lies below $g$ on $\operatorname {supp}F$, by lemma 11.47.2, and below $A=g$ elsewhere. Hence $C_ F=A$ on a left tail. The residual is zero near $o$.
For the other end, put $L_ F=\inf _{\mathbb R}(g(x)-x)\leq 0$. If this infimum is attained at $y$, the affine minorant $x+L_ F$ touches $g$ there. The bound $C_ F'\leq 1$ forces $C_ F=x+L_ F$ for $x\geq y$. A negative infimum is always attained, since $g-x$ tends to $+\infty $ on the left and to zero on the right. With $R=1/r$, the envelope on this tail is
If $L_ F=0$ is not attained and $F\ne 0$, the continuous function $g(y)-y$ has a positive minimum on $\operatorname {supp}F$. The right tangents of $A$ approach the line $y$ uniformly there, so every sufficiently late tangent lies below $g$ and gives $C_ F=A$ at its contact point. Thus $C_ F=A$ on a right tail; for $F=0$ this holds everywhere. Both alternatives give a smooth residual near infinity, because $R$ and $u_\alpha $ are smooth there.
On the intervening finite annulus,
Composing with the smooth coordinate function $x=\log r$ gives $C^{1,1}$ regularity. The exact end formulas extend it over the whole projective space. $\square$
Corollary 11.47.8.EA98BEE991F7 The non-pluripolar measure of $E_ F$ has mass one and satisfies
It vanishes on every free interval. For any $F,G\in C_ c^2(\mathbb R;\mathbb R)$,
2FE2F9FAF60D
11.47.9
Proof. On an annulus, the radial flux formula (11.46.4), followed by convex smoothing and bounded Bedford–Taylor continuity, gives the displayed measure. Continuity of $C_ F'$ excludes boundary atoms. The non-pluripolar truncations discard $o$, and smoothness at infinity excludes hyperplane mass. The asymptotic slopes $0,1$ therefore give mass one. An affine profile has zero radial eigenvalue and hence zero top-degree measure. Finally, if $\delta =\| F-G\| _\infty $, subtracting $\delta $ from a competitor for $F$ gives a competitor for $G$, and conversely. The resulting value bound for the envelopes gives (11.47.9) off $o$, and continuity of the residuals extends it across both ends. $\square$
For example, take a nonnegative smooth compactly supported bump $\chi $ with $\chi (x_0)=1$ and $F=-M\chi $, where $M>A(x_0)-x_0$. Then $L_ F<0$, and (11.47.7) gives an open free region of zero density. The envelope still has its sublogarithmic pole, while its residual is globally $C^{1,1}$.
11.47.10 Uniform bounds through moving contactCFB34E7820F0
For a fixed interval $[a,b]$ and $M>0$, let $\mathcal F_{a,b,M}$ consist of real $C^2$ functions supported in $[a,b]$ with $\| F\| _\infty +\| F''\| _\infty \leq M$. Take all norms in one fixed finite smooth projective atlas.
Theorem 11.47.11.278AD9E56CEA There is $K=K(k,\alpha ,a,b,M)$ such that
For every $0<\gamma <1$ and $F,G\in \mathcal F_{a,b,M}$ with $\delta =\| F-G\| _\infty \leq 1$,
where $K_\gamma $ has the same fixed-parameter dependence. These bounds hold across changes of the infinity alternative in theorem 11.47.5.
Proof. The left tangents of $A$ lie below $A-M$ on $[a,b]$ once their contact point is less than a common $a_0<a$. They are minorants of every $A+F$, so all residuals vanish on the same neighborhood of $o$. The sandwich and slope bound give uniform real Hessian bounds on any fixed finite annulus, since $L_2\leq \| A''\| _\infty +M$. It remains to control infinity, where the right contact point need not stay bounded.
Put $B=\max (b,0)+1$. For $x>B$, the obstacle is $A$. At contact $C_ F'=A'$. On a free interval with finite right contact endpoint $d$, its constant slope is $A'(d)\geq A'(x)$; an unbounded right free interval has slope one. Thus
The locally Lipschitz functions $C_ F',A'$ agree on the contact set, so their derivatives agree almost everywhere there. Indeed, a differentiable Lipschitz function has derivative zero at almost every density point of its zero set. On the free set $C_ F''=0$. The reference formula consequently gives
624221938CEB
11.47.12
In a chart $Z_ j\ne 0$, $j\geq 1$, use $\zeta =Z_0/Z_ j$ and $y=(Z_ i/Z_ j)_{i\geq 1,i\ne j}$. Then
On fixed relatively compact chart pieces, $|\nabla R|\leq c\sqrt R$ and $|\nabla ^2R|\leq c$. Write the envelope as $\mathcal E_ F(R)=C_ F(-\log R)+\log R-\log (1+R)$ for $R>0$. Its derivatives are
The tail bounds give $|(\mathcal E_ F)_ R|\leq 2$ and $|(\mathcal E_ F)_{RR}|\leq c_\alpha /R+1$. The real chain rule therefore bounds its Hessian uniformly, and its gradient tends to zero as $\zeta \to 0$. Also $L_ F=\lim (C_ F-x)\in [-M,0]$, and integrating $d_ F\leq \mathrm e^{-x}$ gives $|C_ F(x)-x-L_ F|\leq \mathrm e^{-x}$. Hence $\mathcal E_ F-L_ F=O(R)$, so the extended envelope is differentiable on the hyperplane with zero gradient. The Hessian bound makes the gradient Lipschitz off the hyperplane. Apply it along straight coordinate segments and use the continuous zero gradient at a crossing; on segments contained in the hyperplane the gradient is zero. This proves a uniform $C^{1,1}$ extension. Subtract the fixed smooth $u_\alpha $ near infinity and join this estimate to the common pole neighborhood and a fixed annulus.
For the stability estimate put $Z=R_ F-R_ G$. By (11.47.9), $\| Z\| _\infty \leq \delta $, and its gradient has a uniform Lipschitz bound. On a smaller fixed chart, a real directional increment of length $h$ gives $|\partial _ e Z|\leq 2\delta /h+Kh$. Taking $h$ of order $\sqrt\delta $, or enlarging the constant when limited by the chart radius, yields $\| \nabla Z\| _\infty \leq c\sqrt\delta $. For points a distance $t$ apart,
Dividing by $t^\gamma $ and splitting at $t=\sqrt\delta $ gives the estimate in a finite atlas. When $\delta =0$, the value bound gives equality. This argument does not assert convergence in $C^{1,1}$. $\square$
11.47.13 The full envelope on a Hermitian productC6C2D9DCA88F
Let $(Y,h_0)$ be a connected compact Hermitian manifold of dimension $m\geq 1$, and on $X=\mathbb P^ k\times Y$ put $H=\operatorname {pr}_1^*\kappa +\operatorname {pr}_2^*h_0$, $N=k+m$ and $V_0=\int _ Yh_0^ m$. Pull $u_\alpha $ and $F$ back to $X$, and define $E_ F^ H$ by (11.47.1) using the full family $\mathrm{PSH}(X,H)$.
Proposition 11.47.14.E4713F2FEF7D One has $E_ F^ H=\operatorname {pr}_1^*E_ F$ and
The pulled-back residual is globally $C^{1,1}$, and $E_ F^ H$ belongs to $\mathcal E_{\mathrm{env}}(X,H,u_\alpha )$. On each fixed product the uniform bounds and derivative stability of theorem 11.47.11 hold for these residuals.
Proof. Every competitor restricts to a projective slice as a $\kappa $-plurisubharmonic function or as $-\infty $ identically. To check the exact lower bound when $H$ is nonclosed, choose a smooth quadratic correction $q$ with $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}q\geq H$ on a coordinate polydisk and let $v_\epsilon =(v+q)*\eta _\epsilon -q$ on a smaller polydisk, where $\eta _\epsilon $ is the rescaling of a fixed smooth nonnegative radial probability kernel. Radial plurisubharmonic convolutions decrease to the canonical $v+q$, and
Restrict this smooth inequality to a fixed slice. The corrected restrictions decrease either to $-\infty $ or to a plurisubharmonic function in local $L^1$; in the latter case the background error tends to zero distributionally. Subtracting $q$ gives the exact $\kappa $ bound, and these canonical restrictions patch on the connected slice. The everywhere obstacle constraint now gives $v\leq \operatorname {pr}_1^*E_ F$ on every slice. Upper regularization preserves this bound. Conversely every base competitor lifts, since $h_0>0$, proving equality of the full envelopes.
The bounded truncations $\max (E_ F^ H,-j)$ are pullbacks. By proposition 5.28.2, lemma 5.28.4, dimensional multilinearity leaves only the term with $k$ projective factors and $m$ factor entries. Restrict to strict superlevel sets and let $j\to \infty $ to obtain the stated non-pluripolar measure and its finite mass. The residual regularity and uniform estimates pull back in a fixed smooth product atlas. Finally $E_ F^ H\geq u_\alpha -K_ F$. At $t=1$ take the stretching witness $v_1=E_ F^ H$; for $t>1$ take $v_ t=u_\alpha -tK_ F$, so that
Together with ordinary domination this is definition 16.28.61, including the canonical values at the common pole. $\square$
Example 11.47.15.1E30DC99E57B There is a nonclosed positive background on a non-Kähler fourfold for which the preceding full envelope formula and uniform residual estimates hold.
Proof. Take $Y=(\mathbb C^2\setminus \{ 0\} )/\langle \zeta \mapsto \mathrm e\zeta \rangle $. With $s=\log |\zeta |^2$, the form $h_0=\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}s+\mathrm ds\wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}s$ is invariant under the quotient. Its two summands are positive on the tangential and radial complex directions, respectively, so it is Hermitian. Moreover $\mathrm dh_0=-\mathrm ds\wedge \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}s\ne 0$. The Hopf surface is diffeomorphic to $S^3\times S^1$ and has odd first Betti number. Thus $X=\mathbb P^2\times Y$ is a non-Kähler fourfold with $\mathrm dH\ne 0$, and proposition 11.47.14 applies. $\square$
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.