6029C37CE10F
The trace identity gives a necessary condition for $\mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ to be nonempty: every Gauduchon degree of $\theta $ must be nonnegative. The condition is also sufficient. A Hahn–Banach separation produces a positive current with the prescribed pairings, and a scalar elliptic equation shows that its difference from $\theta $ is $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$-exact.
Theorem 11.6.1 (The generalized Lamari criterion).88BE3B63D9E5 For a smooth real $(1,1)$-form $\theta $, the following conditions are equivalent:
There exists $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$.
$\int _ X\theta \wedge \gamma ^{n-1}\geq 0$ for every Gauduchon metric $\gamma $.
To apply separation, we express the test in terms of smooth strictly positive $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$-closed $(n-1,n-1)$-forms $\Gamma $. Every strictly positive $(n-1,n-1)$-form $\Gamma $ has a unique strictly positive $(1,1)$-root $\gamma $, that is, $\Gamma =\gamma ^{n-1}$. Indeed, in a frame in which $\Gamma $ is diagonal, and with the same wedge normalization on both sides, the coefficients $g_ i$ of $\Gamma $ are the products $\prod _{j\neq i}\lambda _ j$ of the eigenvalues $\lambda _ j$ of $\gamma $. Hence
\[ \lambda _ i=\frac{(\prod _ jg_ j)^{1/(n-1)}}{g_ i}. \]
This spectral formula uses only a positive determinant and a matrix inverse, so the root depends smoothly on the coefficients of $\Gamma $, also at repeated eigenvalues, and pointwise uniqueness makes the local roots agree on overlaps. Consequently, $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\Gamma =0$ says exactly that the root $\gamma $ is Gauduchon.
of theorem 11.6.1.
Necessity is proposition 11.5.1. For sufficiency, let $F$ be the real vector space of smooth real $(n-1,n-1)$-forms, and let
\[ E=\{ \Gamma \in F:\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\Gamma =0\} ,\qquad \ell (\Gamma )=\int _ X\theta \wedge \Gamma \quad (\Gamma \in E). \]
Fix a strictly positive $\Gamma _0\in E$, which exists by theorem 11.4.2. By the root calculation above, the hypothesis says that $\ell $ is nonnegative on the strictly positive elements of $E$. Adding $\epsilon \Gamma _0$ and letting $\epsilon \downarrow 0$, we see that $\ell $ is also nonnegative on the semipositive elements of $E$.
Step 1: a positive extension of $\ell $. For $\Phi \in F$ put
\[ p(\Phi )=\inf \{ \ell (\Gamma ):\Gamma \in E,\ \Gamma \geq \Phi \} . \]
This is a finite sublinear function. To see finiteness, choose $C$ with $-C\Gamma _0\leq \Phi \leq C\Gamma _0$. The admissible element $C\Gamma _0$ gives an upper bound, while every admissible $\Gamma $ satisfies $\Gamma +C\Gamma _0\geq 0$ and hence $\ell (\Gamma )\geq -C\ell (\Gamma _0)$. Sublinearity follows by adding and rescaling competitors. For $\Phi \in E$, the nonnegativity of $\ell (\Gamma -\Phi )$ for admissible $\Gamma $ shows that $p(\Phi )=\ell (\Phi )$.
The Hahn–Banach theorem gives a real linear extension $T$ of $\ell $ to $F$ with $T(\Phi )\leq p(\Phi )$ for all $\Phi \in F$. If $\Phi \geq 0$, the zero form is admissible for $p(-\Phi )$, so $T(-\Phi )\leq 0$, that is, $T(\Phi )\geq 0$. Moreover, the bounds by $C\Gamma _0$ show that $T$ is continuous for the uniform norm. It is therefore a positive $(1,1)$-current, and the current $S=T-\theta $ annihilates $E$.
Step 2: $S$ is $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$-exact. To recover a potential from $S$, consider the scalar operator
\[ Dv=\frac{\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(v\Gamma _0)}{\mathrm{d}V}, \]
where $\mathrm dV$ is the smooth positive volume form fixed above. Since $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\Gamma _0=0$, this is an elliptic scalar operator with no zeroth-order term. Its kernel consists of the constants and its index is zero, while Stokes' theorem gives $\int _ XDv\, \mathrm{d}V=0$. Consequently its range is exactly the space of smooth functions of integral zero, and by elliptic estimates its inverse on functions normalized by $\int _ Xv\, \mathrm{d}V=0$ is continuous in the smooth topology.
For a smooth top-degree form $\zeta $ with $\int _ X\zeta =0$, solve $Dv=\zeta /\mathrm{d}V$ with this normalization and set $R\zeta =v\Gamma _0$. Then $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}R\zeta =\zeta $, and $R$ is continuous. Define a distribution $u$ on such top-degree forms by
\[ \langle u,\zeta \rangle =S(R\zeta ), \]
and extend it to all top-degree forms by assigning an arbitrary value on one fixed volume form of integral one. For every $\Phi \in F$, the form $\Phi -R(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\Phi )$ belongs to $E$, and $S$ annihilates it. It follows that
\[ \langle \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u,\Phi \rangle =S(R(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\Phi ))=S(\Phi ). \]
Thus $\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u=T\geq 0$, and proposition 5.22.2 gives a representative of $u$ in $\mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$.
$\square$
Applying the criterion to $\theta -a\omega $, for $a\in \mathbb R$, determines the largest lower curvature bound attainable in the background $\theta $.
Corollary 11.6.2.F83E15A1F529 For a smooth real $(1,1)$-form $\theta $, set
\[ \kappa _\omega (\theta )= \inf _{\gamma \ \mathrm{Gauduchon}} \frac{\int _ X\theta \wedge \gamma ^{n-1}}{\int _ X\omega \wedge \gamma ^{n-1}}. \]
This is a finite real number, and it is the largest real $a$ for which there is a quasi-plurisubharmonic function $u$ satisfying
\[ \theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u\geq a\omega . \]
In particular, this largest value is attained, and $\theta $ is big, in the sense of section 5.40, precisely when $\kappa _\omega (\theta )>0$.
Proof.
Since $\theta $ is smooth, $-C\omega \leq \theta \leq C\omega $ for some $C$, so the infimum lies in $[-C,C]$. If $\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u\geq a\omega $, the trace identity applied to the background $\theta -a\omega $ shows that $a$ is at most each of the ratios in the definition, hence $a\leq \kappa _\omega (\theta )$. Conversely, for $a=\kappa _\omega (\theta )$, all Gauduchon degrees of $\theta -a\omega $ are nonnegative, and theorem 11.6.1 applied to this smooth form gives the required $u$. The last assertion follows, since bigness means the existence of a $\theta $-plurisubharmonic $u$ with $\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u\geq \delta \omega $ for some $\delta >0$.
$\square$
Whether the infimum defining $\kappa _\omega (\theta )$ is attained by a smooth Gauduchon metric is decided by a rigidity property of the trace: a positive current $\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u$ with vanishing Gauduchon degree is zero.
Lemma 11.6.3.91B8C8A3C10E Let $\theta $ be a smooth real $(1,1)$-form with $\mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )\ne \varnothing $. If
\[ \int _ X\theta \wedge \gamma ^{n-1}=0 \]
for one Gauduchon metric $\gamma $, then $\theta =\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}f$ for a smooth real function $f$. Conversely, a form $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}f$ with $f$ smooth has zero degree with respect to every Gauduchon metric. The same conclusions hold for $n=1$, with $\gamma ^{n-1}=1$.
Proof.
Choose $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ and put $S=\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u\geq 0$. By proposition 11.5.1, $\int _ XS\wedge \gamma ^{n-1}=0$. Since the trace measure $S\wedge \gamma ^{n-1}$ of the positive current $S$ controls all its coefficient measures, $S=0$. Taking the trace of the equation $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u=-\theta $ with respect to $\omega $ gives an elliptic equation with smooth right-hand side, so $u$ is smooth by elliptic regularity, and $f=-u$ has the required property. The converse is Stokes' theorem. For $n=1$, the trace measure is $S$ itself and the same argument applies.
$\square$
For a smooth real $(1,1)$-form $\theta $, put $a=\kappa _\omega (\theta )$. By corollary 11.6.2, the form $\theta -a\omega $ admits a positive current $\theta -a\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u$. A Gauduchon metric $\gamma $ attains the infimum defining $\kappa _\omega (\theta )$ precisely when the Gauduchon degree of $\theta -a\omega $ with respect to $\gamma $ vanishes. Hence lemma 11.6.3 shows that the infimum is attained by a smooth Gauduchon metric if and only if
\[ \theta -a\omega =\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}f\quad \text{for some }f\in C^\infty (X,\mathbb R), \]
and in that case every Gauduchon metric attains it. Thus a positive current at the threshold always exists, whereas a smooth minimizing Gauduchon metric exists only in this exceptional situation.
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.