Pome

Theorem 11.6.1 (The generalized Lamari criterion)88BE3B63D9E5

Theorem 11.6.1 (The generalized Lamari criterion).88BE3B63D9E5 For a smooth real $(1,1)$-form $\theta $, the following conditions are equivalent:

  1. There exists $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$.

  2. $\int _ X\theta \wedge \gamma ^{n-1}\geq 0$ for every Gauduchon metric $\gamma $.

of theorem 11.6.1. Necessity is proposition 11.5.1. For sufficiency, let $F$ be the real vector space of smooth real $(n-1,n-1)$-forms, and let

\[ E=\{ \Gamma \in F:\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\Gamma =0\} ,\qquad \ell (\Gamma )=\int _ X\theta \wedge \Gamma \quad (\Gamma \in E). \]

Fix a strictly positive $\Gamma _0\in E$, which exists by theorem 11.4.2. By the root calculation above, the hypothesis says that $\ell $ is nonnegative on the strictly positive elements of $E$. Adding $\epsilon \Gamma _0$ and letting $\epsilon \downarrow 0$, we see that $\ell $ is also nonnegative on the semipositive elements of $E$.

Step 1: a positive extension of $\ell $. For $\Phi \in F$ put

\[ p(\Phi )=\inf \{ \ell (\Gamma ):\Gamma \in E,\ \Gamma \geq \Phi \} . \]

This is a finite sublinear function. To see finiteness, choose $C$ with $-C\Gamma _0\leq \Phi \leq C\Gamma _0$. The admissible element $C\Gamma _0$ gives an upper bound, while every admissible $\Gamma $ satisfies $\Gamma +C\Gamma _0\geq 0$ and hence $\ell (\Gamma )\geq -C\ell (\Gamma _0)$. Sublinearity follows by adding and rescaling competitors. For $\Phi \in E$, the nonnegativity of $\ell (\Gamma -\Phi )$ for admissible $\Gamma $ shows that $p(\Phi )=\ell (\Phi )$.

The Hahn–Banach theorem gives a real linear extension $T$ of $\ell $ to $F$ with $T(\Phi )\leq p(\Phi )$ for all $\Phi \in F$. If $\Phi \geq 0$, the zero form is admissible for $p(-\Phi )$, so $T(-\Phi )\leq 0$, that is, $T(\Phi )\geq 0$. Moreover, the bounds by $C\Gamma _0$ show that $T$ is continuous for the uniform norm. It is therefore a positive $(1,1)$-current, and the current $S=T-\theta $ annihilates $E$.

Step 2: $S$ is $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$-exact. To recover a potential from $S$, consider the scalar operator

\[ Dv=\frac{\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(v\Gamma _0)}{\mathrm{d}V}, \]

where $\mathrm dV$ is the smooth positive volume form fixed above. Since $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\Gamma _0=0$, this is an elliptic scalar operator with no zeroth-order term. Its kernel consists of the constants and its index is zero, while Stokes' theorem gives $\int _ XDv\, \mathrm{d}V=0$. Consequently its range is exactly the space of smooth functions of integral zero, and by elliptic estimates its inverse on functions normalized by $\int _ Xv\, \mathrm{d}V=0$ is continuous in the smooth topology.

For a smooth top-degree form $\zeta $ with $\int _ X\zeta =0$, solve $Dv=\zeta /\mathrm{d}V$ with this normalization and set $R\zeta =v\Gamma _0$. Then $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}R\zeta =\zeta $, and $R$ is continuous. Define a distribution $u$ on such top-degree forms by

\[ \langle u,\zeta \rangle =S(R\zeta ), \]

and extend it to all top-degree forms by assigning an arbitrary value on one fixed volume form of integral one. For every $\Phi \in F$, the form $\Phi -R(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\Phi )$ belongs to $E$, and $S$ annihilates it. It follows that

\[ \langle \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u,\Phi \rangle =S(R(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\Phi ))=S(\Phi ). \]

Thus $\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u=T\geq 0$, and proposition 5.22.2 gives a representative of $u$ in $\mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.