Pome

Lemma 10.17.321B7909B2B52

Lemma 10.17.3.21B7909B2B52 The current $R_ v=\eta _ v+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w$ is positive and has bounded local potentials, and its class $b_ v$ is nef. Moreover,

477AB76A3ADC 10.17.4
\begin{equation} \int _ Z\langle (\alpha _ Z+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_\pi )^ k\rangle =\int _ ZR_ v^ k =\int _ Zb_ v^ k =\mathcal R_ Z(b_ v). \end{equation}

If $v_1,\ldots ,v_ k$ satisfy the same conditions on $Z$, possibly for different closed backgrounds, then

33AAF0E25AE8 10.17.5
\begin{equation} \int _ ZR_{v_1}\wedge \cdots \wedge R_{v_ k} =\int _ Zb_{v_1}\wedge \cdots \wedge b_{v_ k}. \end{equation}

Proof. Off the support $|\Gamma |$, we have $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\ell =-\sum _ jc_ j\gamma _ j$, so the current $\alpha _ Z+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_\pi $ equals $\eta _ v+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w$ there and is positive. After the addition of a smooth local potential for $\eta _ v$, the bounded function $w$ is plurisubharmonic off $|\Gamma |$. By lemma 5.24.7, it extends across the divisor as a bounded plurisubharmonic function that agrees almost everywhere with the original one; we use this extension to represent $w$. Thus $R_ v\geq 0$ on $Z$, and the Poincaré–Lelong formula gives

\[ \alpha _ Z+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_\pi =[\Gamma ]+R_ v. \]

Since $w$ is bounded, $b_ v$ is nef by lemma 20.4.17. The non-pluripolar measure on the left of (10.17.4) agrees with $R_ v^ k$ off the divisor, and neither measure charges the divisor. This gives the first equality.

Fix a Kähler form $\kappa $ on $Z$. For all sufficiently large real $t$, the smooth closed form $\eta _ v+t\kappa $ is Kähler, and $w$ is a bounded potential for it. Therefore

\[ \int _ Z(R_ v+t\kappa )^ k=\int _ Z(\eta _ v+t\kappa )^ k \]

by theorem 11.1.7, or by Stokes' theorem when $k=1$. Both sides are polynomials in $t$, so their constant coefficients agree; this gives $\int _ ZR_ v^ k=\int _ Zb_ v^ k$. The last equality in (10.17.4) is (10.16.6). Applying the same polynomial argument to positive linear combinations of the $R_{v_ i}$ and comparing coefficients gives (10.17.5). $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.