Pome

10.31.46 Stability under changes of reference4D69742DF215

By theorem 10.31.30, convergence of the models for $d_\theta $ keeps limits in the relative class of the limiting model. For equations, convergence of the densities provides, after extraction, the fixed dominating measure required there. For a positive exponent, uniqueness then identifies the limiting potential; at exponent zero, uniqueness of the scalar identifies the limiting measure.

Theorem 10.31.47.50B353C1E23B Let $\varphi _ j,\varphi \in \mathcal M_\delta (\theta )$ for some $\delta >0$, with $d_\theta (\varphi _ j,\varphi )\to 0$. Let $\nu $ be a finite non-pluripolar measure and let $f_ j,f$ be nonnegative nonzero functions in $L^1(\nu )$ with $f_ j\to f$ in $L^1(\nu )$. Put $\mu _ j=f_ j\nu $ and $\mu =f\nu $.

  1. For a fixed $\lambda >0$, the solutions

    \[ u_ j\in \mathcal E_{\varphi _ j},\qquad \mathrm{MA}_\theta (u_ j)=\mathrm{e}^{\lambda u_ j}\mu _ j \]

    converge in $L^1(X)$ and in capacity to the solution $u\in \mathcal E_\varphi $ with datum $\mu $. Their Monge–Ampère measures converge to $\mathrm{MA}_\theta (u)$ in total variation.

  2. Let $u_ j\in \mathcal E_{\varphi _ j}$ satisfy $\sup _ Xu_ j=0$ and $\mathrm{MA}_\theta (u_ j)=c_ j\mu _ j$. Then $c_ j\to c$, where $c$ is the scalar for the reference $\varphi $ and the datum $\mu $, and

    \[ \mathrm{MA}_\theta (u_ j)\longrightarrow c\mu \quad \text{in total variation}. \]

    The potentials form a relatively compact family in $L^1$. Every $L^1$ cluster limit $u$ lies in $\mathcal E_\varphi $, has supremum zero and solves $\mathrm{MA}_\theta (u)=c\mu $. Each subsequence converging in $L^1$ converges to its limit in capacity.

Proof. Write $M_0=\overline{\operatorname {vol}}_\theta (V_\theta )$. Every solution above has mass between $\delta $ and $M_0$. In the first case let $s_ j=\sup _ Xu_ j$. Then

\[ s_ j\geq \lambda ^{-1}\log \frac{\delta }{\mu _ j(X)}, \]

which is a uniform lower bound since $\mu _ j(X)\to \mu (X)>0$. To bound $s_ j$ from above, suppose that $s_ j\to +\infty $ along a subsequence. By normalized compactness, after a further extraction, $v_ j=u_ j-s_ j\to v$ in $L^1$ with $\sup _ Xv=0$. The fixed-measure lemma lemma 5.44.2 and $f_ j\to f$ in $L^1(\nu )$ imply

\[ \int _ X\mathrm{e}^{\lambda v_ j}f_ j\, \mathrm{d}\nu \longrightarrow \int _ X\mathrm{e}^{\lambda v}f\, \mathrm{d}\nu >0. \]

The limit is positive because $f\nu $ is nonzero and does not charge the poles of $v$. But the left-hand side equals $\mathrm{e}^{-\lambda s_ j}\mu _{u_ j}(X)\leq M_0\mathrm{e}^{-\lambda s_ j}$, which tends to zero, a contradiction. Thus $s_ j$ is bounded, and the $u_ j$ form a relatively compact family in $L^1$ whose limits are not identically $-\infty $.

Start with any subsequence and extract $u_ j\to u$ in $L^1$. Extract again so that $\sum _ j\| f_ j-f\| _{L^1(\nu )}<\infty $. The function

\[ g=f+\sum _ j|f_ j-f|\in L^1(\nu ) \]

dominates all retained $f_ j$. If $C$ is a common upper bound for the $u_ j$, then $\mu _{u_ j}\leq \mathrm{e}^{\lambda C}g\nu $. By theorem 10.31.30, $u\in \mathcal E_\varphi $, the potentials converge in capacity, and the measures converge weakly to $\mu _ u$. On the other hand,

\[ \mathrm{e}^{\lambda u_ j}f_ j\longrightarrow \mathrm{e}^{\lambda u}f\quad \text{in }L^1(\nu ). \]

Indeed, the error coming from $f_ j-f$ is at most $\mathrm{e}^{\lambda C}\| f_ j-f\| _{L^1(\nu )}$, and lemma 5.44.2 for the fixed measure $f\nu $ controls the remaining term. Hence $\mu _ u=\mathrm{e}^{\lambda u}\mu $, with convergence in total variation. By the uniqueness in theorem 10.31.44, every cluster limit is this solution, and the subsequence criterion gives all three convergences for the original sequence.

In the second case, integrating the equation gives

\[ \frac{\delta }{\mu _ j(X)}\leq c_ j\leq \frac{M_0}{\mu _ j(X)}. \]

Since $\mu _ j(X)\to \mu (X)>0$, these scalars stay in a compact subinterval of $(0,+\infty )$. After extraction, normalized compactness gives $u_ j\to u$ in $L^1$ with $\sup _ Xu=0$, and $c_ j\to c'>0$. Extract a summable density error as above. Then $\mu _{u_ j}\leq Cg\nu $ for a fixed $C$, so theorem 10.31.30 gives $u\in \mathcal E_\varphi $, convergence in capacity and weak convergence to $\mu _ u$. Since $c_ jf_ j\to c'f$ in $L^1(\nu )$, the limiting equation is $\mu _ u=c'\mu $, and the uniqueness of the scalar in theorem 10.31.45 gives $c'=c$. Hence the whole sequence of scalars converges to $c$, and $c_ j\mu _ j\to c\mu $ in total variation. Applying the same argument within any $L^1$-convergent subsequence proves its convergence in capacity and the equation for its limit. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.