The continuous solutions constructed above have low regularity when the density is merely integrable. If the density is a smooth positive function of the point and the potential, every bounded solution is smooth. Differentiating that density directly would require derivatives of the solution. We instead freeze its occurrence in a smooth approximation and solve a proper exponential equation. A square of the prescribed potential in the maximum-principle function gives a trace estimate independent of its derivatives.
We first prove this estimate, retaining the matrix notation $g,h$, the traces $S,B$ and the torsion trace $\tau $ of lemma 14.5.1.
Lemma 14.19.31.55D3763AB355 Fix $M\geq 0$ and a smooth real function $G$ on $X\times [-M,M]$. There is $C$, depending only on $\omega $, $M$ and $\| G\| _{C^2}$, with the following property. If $v,u$ are smooth, $\omega _ v,\omega _ u>0$, $|v|\leq M$, and
\[ \omega _ u^ n=\mathrm e^{u+G(x,v)}\omega ^ n, \]
then
\[ |u|\leq \| G\| _{C^0},\qquad C^{-1}\omega \leq \omega _ u\leq C\omega . \]
Proof.
The extrema of $u$ give the first bound, as in theorem 14.7.2. Put $k=g+(v_{i\bar j})$, $S_ v=\operatorname {tr}_ gk$, and $D=2\| G\| _{C^0}$. The chain rule and Cauchy–Schwarz give, for $H=u+G(x,v)$,
\[ \Delta _ gH\geq -C_0\bigl (1+S_ v+|\partial v|_ g^2\bigr ). \]
Indeed $\Delta _ gu=S-n\geq -n$, $\Delta _ gv=S_ v-n$, and the mixed derivatives of $G(x,v)$ are bounded below by $-C_0(1+|\partial v|_ g^2)$. Here and below constants depend only on the declared data.
Set $r=v+M+1$, $R=2M+1$ and $s=u-\inf _ Xu+1$, so $1\leq r\leq R$ and $1\leq s\leq D+1$. For constants $A,L>0$ to be chosen, maximize
\[ Q=\log S+Ar^2-Lu+s^{-1} \]
on $X$. If $S<1$ at the maximum, the bounded ranges of $r,u,s$ already bound $S$ everywhere. Otherwise lemma 14.5.1 applies there. Positivity gives
\[ SB\geq n^2,\qquad S_ v\leq S\operatorname {tr}_ hk, \qquad |\partial v|_ g^2\leq S|\partial v|_ h^2. \]
The middle inequality follows by diagonalizing $h$ relative to $g$: every eigenvalue of $h$ is at most $S$, and the diagonal entries of $k$ are positive. Consequently,
\[ \frac{\Delta _ gH}{S} \geq -C_1 B-C_0\operatorname {tr}_ hk-C_0|\partial v|_ h^2. \]
At the maximum,
\[ \frac{\partial S}{S}=(L+s^{-2})\partial u-2Ar\partial v. \]
Since $|\tau |_ h^2\leq C_ gB$, Young's inequality bounds the torsion term by
\[ \left|\frac2{S^2}\operatorname {Re}(h^{i\bar j}\tau _ iS_{\bar j})\right| \leq s^{-3}|\partial u|_ h^2+A|\partial v|_ h^2 +\frac{C_ g\bigl ((L+1)^2(D+1)^3+AR^2\bigr )}{S^2}B. \]
Also
\begin{align*} \Delta _ h(Ar^2)& \geq 2A\operatorname {tr}_ hk-2AR B+2A|\partial v|_ h^2,\\ \Delta _ h(-Lu+s^{-1})& =(L+s^{-2})(B-n)+2s^{-3}|\partial u|_ h^2. \end{align*}
Combining these inequalities with (14.5.2) yields
\[ \begin{split} 0\geq \Delta _ hQ\geq {}& \left(L-2AR-C_2- \frac{C_ g((L+1)^2(D+1)^3+AR^2)}{S^2}\right)B-n(L+1)\\ & +(2A-C_0)\operatorname {tr}_ hk+(A-C_0)|\partial v|_ h^2 +s^{-3}|\partial u|_ h^2. \end{split} \]
Choose $A>C_0+1$ and then $L>2AR+C_2+2$. If the fraction in the coefficient of $B$ is at least one, $S^2$ at the maximum is bounded by its numerator. Otherwise the displayed inequality gives $B\leq n(L+1)$ there. For $n\geq 2$, the bounded determinant gives
\[ S\leq n\mathrm e^{2\| G\| _{C^0}}B^{n-1}. \]
For $n=1$, $S=\mathrm e^{u+G(x,v)}$ directly. Thus $S$ is bounded at the maximum in every case. Maximality of $Q$ and the bounded ranges of $r,u,s$ give the same bound globally. The positive lower determinant bound then bounds every eigenvalue of $h$ away from zero.
$\square$
Theorem 14.19.32.B9E6E7C4706B Let $F\in C^\infty (X\times \mathbb R,\mathbb R)$. Every bounded $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\omega )$ satisfying
\[ (\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)^ n=\mathrm e^{F(x,u)}\, \mathrm dV \]
is smooth on $X$, and $\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u>0$.
Proof.
The density $\mathrm e^{F(x,u)}$ is bounded and strictly positive, so corollary 14.19.29 makes $u$ continuous. Choose smooth strictly $\omega $-plurisubharmonic $v_ j\downarrow u$ by theorem 5.32.1. They have a common bound $M$ and converge uniformly by Dini's theorem. Define
\[ G(x,t)=F(x,t)-t+\log \frac{\mathrm dV}{\omega ^ n}. \]
By theorem 14.7.2, there is a smooth strictly $\omega $-plurisubharmonic $a_ j$ with
\[ \omega _{a_ j}^ n=\mathrm e^{a_ j+G(x,v_ j)}\omega ^ n. \]
Put $\delta _ j=\| G(x,v_ j)-G(x,u)\| _{C^0}\to 0$. The given $u$ solves the proper equation with coefficient $G(x,u)$. The weighted measures of $a_ j-\delta _ j$ and $a_ j+\delta _ j$ bracket its coefficient, so corollary 14.19.12 gives
\[ a_ j-\delta _ j\leq u\leq a_ j+\delta _ j. \]
Hence $a_ j\to u$ uniformly. By lemma 14.19.31, $C^{-1}\omega \leq \omega _{a_ j}\leq C\omega $ uniformly. In particular $\Delta _ ga_ j$ is uniformly bounded. Fixed-operator elliptic estimates give uniform $W^{2,q}$ bounds for every finite $q$, so $u\in C^{1,\alpha }(X)$ for every $0<\alpha <1$.
We explain the uniformly elliptic passage to higher regularity, using the concave extension from corollary 14.5.8. On a relatively compact coordinate chart, let $P$ send a real Hessian to its complex Hermitian part, with the coordinate normalization of $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$. All matrices $g(x)+P(D^2a_ j)$ lie in a fixed compact interval $\mathcal K=\{ \lambda I\leq A\leq \Lambda I\} $ of positive matrices. Define
\[ \mathcal F(x,N)=\inf _{A\in \mathcal K} \left\{ \log \det A+\operatorname {tr}\bigl [A^{-1}(g(x)+P(N)-A)\bigr ]\right\} -\log \det g(x). \]
The tangent inequality for the concave logarithmic determinant shows that this is the original operator whenever $g(x)+P(N)\in \mathcal K$. It is concave and uniformly elliptic on real symmetric matrices: for $N'\geq 0$, $P(N')\geq 0$ and its trace is a fixed positive multiple of $\operatorname {tr}N'$, while $A^{\pm 1}$ have uniform bounds. Its dependence on $x$ is uniformly Lipschitz on this chart. Thus the $a_ j$ are classical, and hence viscosity, solutions of
\[ \mathcal F(x,D^2a_ j)=a_ j+G(x,v_ j). \]
Both sides converge uniformly except for the Hessian variable. Stability of viscosity solutions gives $\mathcal F(x,D^2u)=u+G(x,u)$ in the viscosity sense. The right-hand side is Hölder because $u\in C^{1,\alpha }$. The local Evans–Krylov estimate therefore gives $u\in C^{2,\beta }$ for some $\beta >0$. The metric bounds pass to the limit, so the original equation is now uniformly elliptic with $\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u>0$. Differentiating it and applying Schauder estimates repeatedly proves $u\in C^\infty (X)$.
$\square$
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.