Pome

Theorem 10.24.18A2E8673E914

Theorem 10.24.1.8A2E8673E914 There exist a smooth projective surface $Y$, a smooth irreducible divisor $E$, a smooth closed real $(1,1)$-form $\theta $ with big class $\alpha $, a Hermitian metric on $\mathcal O_ Y(E)$, a defining section $\sigma $ of $\mathcal O_ Y(E)$, and a smooth positive volume form $\mathrm{d}V_ Y$ with the following properties. The equation

0340B9B3D110 10.24.2
\begin{equation} \left\langle (\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\rho )^2\right\rangle =\mathrm{e}^{\rho }|\sigma |^{-2}\, \mathrm{d}V_ Y \end{equation}

has a unique solution $\rho \in \mathcal E^1(Y,\theta )$, and this solution has minimal singularities. Moreover,

\[ \operatorname {Amp}(\alpha )=Y\setminus E \]

is precisely the open set on which $\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\rho $ is smooth and strictly positive. The restriction of this metric to every nonempty connected open subset of $Y\setminus E$ is incomplete. In particular, no dense Zariski open subset carries a complete induced metric.

Proof of theorem 10.24.1. The surface and the divisor. Use the incidence model

\[ Y=\{ ([Z_0:Z_1:Z_2],[W_1:W_2])\in \mathbb P^2\times \mathbb P^1: Z_1W_2=Z_2W_1\} . \]

The projections $\pi :Y\to \mathbb P^2$ and $q:Y\to \mathbb P^1$ identify $Y$ with the blowup of $\mathbb P^2$ at $p$, with exceptional divisor $E=\pi ^{-1}(p)$. Let $\omega _1$ be the Fubini–Study form on $\mathbb P^1$ with the same normalization as $\omega _2$, and write

\[ \beta =\pi ^*\omega _2,\qquad \gamma =q^*\omega _1, \qquad \Omega =\beta +\gamma . \]

The form $\Omega $ is Kähler, being the restriction of a product Kähler metric.

The linear map $(Z_0,Z_1,Z_2)\mapsto (Z_1,Z_2)$ defines a section $\sigma $ of

\[ \pi ^*\mathcal O_{\mathbb P^2}(1)\otimes q^*\mathcal O_{\mathbb P^1}(-1), \]

because on $Y$ the vector $(Z_1,Z_2)$ lies in the tautological line $[W_1:W_2]$. The section vanishes simply along $E$, which identifies this line bundle with $\mathcal O_ Y(E)$. For the product of the Fubini–Study metric and the metric induced on the tautological bundle, its squared norm is

\[ s=|\sigma |^2= \frac{|Z_1|^2+|Z_2|^2}{|Z_0|^2+|Z_1|^2+|Z_2|^2}. \]

In a blowup chart $\pi (t,w)=(t,tw)$, $q(t,w)=[1:w]$, one has

4BD50BB63FAE 10.24.3
\begin{equation} s=\frac{|t|^2(1+|w|^2)}{1+|t|^2(1+|w|^2)}, \qquad \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\log s=[E]+\gamma -\beta . \end{equation}

The current identity follows either from this formula and the second blowup chart or from the Poincaré–Lelong formula.

The big class and its equation. Set

8F4A3AEF872F 10.24.4
\begin{equation} \theta =3\beta -2\gamma ,\qquad \rho =2\log s, \qquad T=\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\rho =\beta +2[E]. \end{equation}

Thus $\rho \in \mathrm{PSH}(Y,\theta )$. The class $\alpha =\{ \theta \} $ is big, because the potential $\psi =(5/2)\log s$ satisfies

4035514E1789 10.24.5
\begin{equation} \theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\psi =\tfrac 12(\beta +\gamma )+\tfrac 52[E]\geq \tfrac 12\Omega . \end{equation}

It is not nef, since $\int _ E\theta =-2$: the restriction of $\beta $ to $E$ vanishes and $q|_ E$ is an isomorphism onto $\mathbb P^1$. A nef class has nonnegative degree on every curve, by its defining smooth approximations.

On $Y\setminus E$ define $\mathrm{d}V_ Y=\beta ^2/s$. To check that it extends across $E$, put

\[ \mathrm{d}\lambda _{t,w} =\tfrac {\mathrm{i}}2\mathrm{d}t\wedge \mathrm{d}\bar t \wedge \tfrac {\mathrm{i}}2\mathrm{d}w\wedge \mathrm{d}\bar w, \]

and let $\mathrm{d}\lambda _{z_1,z_2}$ be the analogous Euclidean volume in affine coordinates of $\mathbb P^2$. The normalized Fubini–Study volume is

\[ \omega _2^2=\frac{2}{\pi ^2} \frac{\mathrm{d}\lambda _{z_1,z_2}}{(1+|z_1|^2+|z_2|^2)^3}. \]

Since the complex Jacobian determinant of $(t,w)\mapsto (t,tw)$ is $t$, we obtain

\begin{align*} \beta ^2& =\frac{2}{\pi ^2} \frac{|t|^2\, \mathrm{d}\lambda _{t,w}}{[1+|t|^2(1+|w|^2)]^3},\\ \mathrm{d}V_ Y& =\frac{2}{\pi ^2} \frac{\mathrm{d}\lambda _{t,w}}{(1+|w|^2)[1+|t|^2(1+|w|^2)]^2}. \end{align*}

The second expression is smooth and strictly positive at $t=0$. Interchanging the two homogeneous coordinates gives the extension on the other chart. The two extensions agree off $E$, hence everywhere on their overlap.

The non-pluripolar product of $T$ agrees with $\beta ^2$ off $E$ and gives no mass to $E$. The smooth measure $\beta ^2$ also gives no mass to $E$, so

\[ \langle T^2\rangle =\beta ^2, \qquad \mathrm{e}^{\rho }|\sigma |^{-2}\, \mathrm{d}V_ Y =s^2s^{-1}\frac{\beta ^2}{s}=\beta ^2. \]

The right side of (10.24.2) is defined on $Y\setminus E$ and extended by zero on $E$, so no product of zero and infinity occurs. This proves the equation and gives $\int _ Y\langle T^2\rangle =\int _{\mathbb P^2}\omega _2^2=1$.

Minimal singularities and energy. Let $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(Y,\theta )$. Since

\[ \beta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(u-\rho )=\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u\geq 0 \quad \text{on }Y\setminus E, \]

the function $u-\rho $ on $Y\setminus E$ descends to an $\omega _2$-plurisubharmonic function on $\mathbb P^2\setminus \{ p\} $. By lemma 5.24.8, it is bounded above, so $u\leq \rho +C_ u$ there. This inequality holds almost everywhere on $Y$, and lemma 5.24.3 makes it hold everywhere. In particular $u=-\infty $ on $E$, and $\rho $ has minimal singularities.

Let $V_\theta $ be the normalized envelope of section 5.40. Since $s\leq 1$, we have $\rho \leq 0$, and minimality gives

\[ \rho \leq V_\theta \leq \rho +C. \]

Thus $\rho -V_\theta $ is bounded off $E$, and the energy is

\[ E_\theta (\rho )=\frac13\sum _{j=0}^2 \int _ Y(\rho -V_\theta ) \left\langle (\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\rho )^ j\wedge (\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}V_\theta )^{2-j}\right\rangle . \]

The mixed measures have finite mass in the closed Kähler theory and do not charge $E$. Hence $E_\theta (\rho )>-\infty $, so $\rho \in \mathcal E^1(Y,\theta )$. A potential with minimal singularities has full mass; in this example that mass is $1$.

Uniqueness. Suppose $u\in \mathcal E^1(Y,\theta )$ is another solution, and let $\mathrm{d}\mu =s^{-1}\mathrm{d}V_ Y$ on $Y\setminus E$, extended by zero on $E$. This measure is smooth and positive off $E$, but has infinite total mass. The classical comparison principle for full-mass potentials in the closed theory gives

\[ \int _{\{ u<\rho \} }\mathrm{e}^{\rho }\, \mathrm{d}\mu \leq \int _{\{ u<\rho \} }\mathrm{e}^{u}\, \mathrm{d}\mu . \]

Both integrals are finite, since the two Monge–Ampère measures have mass $1$. The integrand on the left is strictly larger, which forces $\mu (\{ u<\rho \} )=0$. Interchanging $u$ and $\rho $ gives $\mu (\{ \rho <u\} )=0$ as well. Therefore $u=\rho $ almost everywhere on $Y\setminus E$ with respect to a smooth volume form, hence almost everywhere on $Y$, since $E$ has zero volume. By lemma 5.24.3, $u=\rho $ everywhere.

The ample locus and incompleteness. The Kähler current in (10.24.5) is smooth off $E$. On the other hand, every $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(Y,\theta )$ satisfies $u\leq \rho +C_ u$, so its Lelong numbers at points of $E$ are at least those of $\rho =2\log s$, which are positive. Thus every Kähler current in $\alpha $ is singular at every point of $E$, and theorem 10.13.2 gives

\[ \operatorname {Amp}(\alpha )=Y\setminus E_{\mathrm{nK}}(\alpha ) =Y\setminus E. \]

The current $T$ equals $\beta $ there, and it is strictly positive because $\pi $ is a biholomorphism away from $E$. Its nonzero divisorial part $2[E]$ prevents smoothness at every point of $E$.

Let $U\subset Y\setminus E$ be a nonempty connected open set, and set $W=\pi (U)$. The map $\pi :(U,T|_ U)\to (W,\omega _2|_ W)$ is an isometry. Choose $x\in W$ and a smooth path $c:[0,1]\to \mathbb P^2$ from $x$ to $p$. Its first exit time

\[ t_0=\min \{ t\in [0,1]:c(t)\notin W\} \]

is positive, and $c([0,t_0))\subset W$. The path has finite Fubini–Study length. For $t_ k\nearrow t_0$, the lengths of its tails show that $c(t_ k)$ is a Cauchy sequence for the intrinsic metric of $W$. It has no limit in $W$: intrinsic convergence implies ambient convergence, and the ambient limit is $c(t_0)\notin W$. Thus $U$ is incomplete. Applying this argument to each connected component proves the assertion for a dense Zariski open set, which may be disconnected. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.