Pome

13.14.5 Contact sets900BB92BD0E3

The bounded contact inequality of lemma 5.28.3 extends to unbounded potentials on common finite levels. As in the previous section, local positive corrections are needed, because the global truncations need not remain $\theta $-plurisubharmonic.

Proposition 13.14.6.17AF37734177 Let $\theta $ be a smooth real $(1,1)$-form and let $u,v\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ satisfy $u\leq v$. Then

\[ \mathbf1_{\{ u=v\} }\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_\theta (u) \leq \mathbf1_{\{ u=v\} }\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_\theta (v). \]

Proof. Fix a coordinate ball with a constant positive form $\kappa $, a level $t>0$, and $\epsilon >0$. On smaller neighborhoods, freeze $\theta $ to a constant form $\theta '$ with $-\epsilon \kappa \leq \theta -\theta '\leq \epsilon \kappa $, and choose a quadratic function $r$ with $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}r=\theta '+\epsilon \kappa $. Then $u+r$ and $v+r$ are plurisubharmonic. For a large integer $k$ put

\[ a_ k=\max (u+r,-k)-r,\qquad b_ k=\max (v+r,-k)-r. \]

These functions are bounded on relatively compact neighborhoods, satisfy $a_ k\leq b_ k$, and

\[ \theta +2\epsilon \kappa +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}a_ k =\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\max (u+r,-k)+(\theta -\theta '+\epsilon \kappa )\geq 0, \]

with the same inequality for $b_ k$. We may therefore apply the top-degree case of lemma 5.28.3 with background $\theta +2\epsilon \kappa $.

On $D_ t=\{ u>-t\} $, both $u$ and $v$ are larger than $-t$. Taking $k>t+\sup |r|$ makes $a_ k=u$ and $b_ k=v$ on $D_ t$. Restricting the bounded inequality to $\{ u=v\} \cap D_ t$ and using locality, we obtain the contact inequality for the background $\theta +2\epsilon \kappa $ on that set. The smaller neighborhoods cover the original ball, so the restricted inequality holds throughout it.

Choose a Hermitian form $\Omega \geq \theta $. The truncations $u_ t=\max (u,-t)$ and $v_ t=\max (v,-t)$ are bounded and $\Omega $-plurisubharmonic, so their signed products with background $\theta $ are defined. On $D_ t$, the products used above are the restrictions of $(\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ t+2\epsilon \kappa )^ n$ and $(\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_ t+2\epsilon \kappa )^ n$. These are polynomials in $\epsilon $ whose coefficients have locally finite variation, so they converge in local total variation as $\epsilon \downarrow 0$, also after restriction to $\{ u=v\} \cap D_ t$. This proves the inequality for the background $\theta $ on each finite level. Finally let $t\to +\infty $: the common pole set has zero extended mass, and the sets $\{ u=v\} \cap D_ t$ exhaust its complement in the contact set. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.