Pome

Proposition 10.31.26AABBF080DAD2

Proposition 10.31.26.AABBF080DAD2 Let $z\in \mathcal E_\eta $ and let $Q=P_\theta [\varphi ](z)=\bigl (\lim _{C\to \infty }P_\theta (\varphi +C,z)\bigr )^*$ be its projection onto the relative class of $\varphi $. Then $Q\in \mathcal E_\varphi $, $Q\leq z$, and

\[ \mu _ Q\leq \mathbf1_{\{ Q=z\} }\mu _ z. \]

Proof. For $C\geq 0$ put $p_ C=P_\theta (\varphi +C,z)$. The preceding proposition gives $p_0\in \mathcal E_\varphi $. Since $p_0\leq p_ C\preceq \varphi $, upward stability gives $p_ C\in \mathcal E_\varphi $. The envelope identity, together with $p_ C\leq z$, yields the uniform bound

\[ p_ C\leq \varphi +\sup _ Xp_ C\leq \varphi +\sup _ Xz. \]

Consequently the increasing regularized limit $Q$ is not identically $-\infty $, belongs to $\mathcal E_\varphi $ and is at most $z$. The monotone convergence holds in capacity by lemma 5.29.19.

Finally, lemma 13.19.4, applied with $u=\varphi $ and $w=z$, gives

8D4561FAF76A 10.31.27
\begin{equation} \mu _ Q\leq \mathbf1_{\{ Q=z\} }\mu _ z. \end{equation}
$\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.