Pome

Lemma 13.20.1EDD01F5B65E5

Lemma 13.20.1.EDD01F5B65E5 Let $u,r\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$, with $u\leq r$, and assume $\underline{\operatorname {vol}}_\theta (u)>0$. For a Hermitian form $\Omega \geq \theta $, set

\[ b_0=1+\frac{\underline{\operatorname {vol}}_\theta (u)}{2^{n+1}n\, v_+(\Omega )}. \]

Then $\mathcal A_ b(u,r)\neq \varnothing $, so that $Q_ b(u,r)$ is defined, for $1\leq b\leq b_0$, and

\[ \lim _{b\downarrow 1}\overline{\operatorname {vol}}_\theta (Q_ b(u,r)) =\overline{\operatorname {vol}}_\theta (u). \]

Proof. Put $K=v_+(\Omega )$. Since $0<\underline{\operatorname {vol}}_\theta (u)\leq K$, we have $1<b_0\leq 2$. After a common translation we may assume $u\leq r\leq 0$. Suppose, to reach a contradiction, that $\mathcal A_ b(u,r)=\varnothing $ for some $1<b\leq b_0$. Set

\[ u_ j=\max (u,r-j),\qquad v_ j=u+(b-1)u_ j, \qquad q_ j=P_\theta (v_ j-(b-1)r). \]

Here, as for stretching envelopes, a competitor $g$ for $q_ j$ is required to satisfy $g+(b-1)r\leq v_ j$, which is meaningful also at common poles. Off the poles the obstacle $v_ j-(b-1)r=u+(b-1)(u_ j-r)$ lies between $u-(b-1)j$ and $u$. Hence $q_ j$ is $\theta $-plurisubharmonic and $q_ j\sim u$. As $j$ increases, $q_ j$ decreases. A $\theta $-plurisubharmonic decreasing limit would belong to $\mathcal A_ b(u,r)$, so the limit is identically $-\infty $, and $\sup _ Xq_ j\to -\infty $ by theorem 5.25.2.

Let $C_ j=\{ q_ j+(b-1)r=v_ j\} $. By the contact theorem, $\mu _{q_ j}$ is carried by $C_ j$. The current $b\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(q_ j+(b-1)r)$ equals $(\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}q_ j)+(b-1)(\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}r)\geq \theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}q_ j$. Positivity of the mixed products and ordered contact in background $b\theta $ therefore give

\[ \mu _{q_ j}\leq \mathbf1_{C_ j}\bigl ((\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)+(b-1)(\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ j)\bigr )^ n. \]

On $C_ j$ we have $q_ j=u+(b-1)(u_ j-r)\geq bu$, because $u_ j\geq u$ and $r\leq 0$. Fix $k>0$. For all sufficiently large $j$, $q_ j\leq -bk$ everywhere, so $C_ j\subset \{ u\leq -k\} $, and consequently

080E895C193D 13.20.2
\begin{equation} \underline{\operatorname {vol}}_\theta (u) \leq \mu _{q_ j}(X) \leq \int _{\{ u\leq -k\} }\bigl ((\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)+(b-1)(\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ j)\bigr )^ n. \end{equation}

To estimate the right-hand side, note that for any $s,t\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ and $0\leq i\leq n$, positivity of the non-pluripolar mixed products and proposition 13.14.16 imply

\[ \begin{aligned} & \binom ni\int _ X(\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}s)^{n-i}\wedge (\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}t)^ i\\ & \quad \leq \binom ni\int _ X(\Omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}s)^{n-i}\wedge (\Omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}t)^ i\\ & \quad \leq 2^ n\int _ X\mathrm{MA}_\Omega ((s+t)/2)\leq 2^ nK. \end{aligned} \]

The second inequality follows by expanding $(\Omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\frac{s+t}2)^ n$; for the possibly unbounded average, apply this expansion to its truncations at constant levels, which remain $\Omega $-plurisubharmonic. Expanding the integrand in (13.20.2), and using $(b-1)^ i\leq b-1$ for $i\geq 1$, gives

\[ \underline{\operatorname {vol}}_\theta (u) \leq \mu _ u(\{ u\leq -k\} )+n2^ nK(b-1). \]

The measure $\mu _ u$ is finite and puts no mass on the pole set of $u$, so the first term tends to zero as $k\to \infty $. By the choice of $b_0$, the remaining error is at most half of $\underline{\operatorname {vol}}_\theta (u)>0$, a contradiction. Thus $\mathcal A_ b(u,r)\neq \varnothing $ for $1<b\leq b_0$; for $b=1$ the family contains $u$, and $Q_1(u,r)=u$.

Put $h_0=Q_{b_0}(u,r)$ and, for $1<b\leq b_0$, $t=(b-1)/(b_0-1)\in (0,1]$. The inequality $h_0\leq b_0u-(b_0-1)r$ shows that $(1-t)u+th_0$ is a competitor for $Q_ b(u,r)$, and $Q_ b(u,r)\leq bu-(b-1)r\leq u$. Hence

\[ (1-t)u+th_0\leq Q_ b(u,r)\leq u. \]

Addition, homogeneity and volume monotonicity give

\[ (1-t)^ n\overline{\operatorname {vol}}_\theta (u) \leq \overline{\operatorname {vol}}_\theta (Q_ b(u,r)) \leq \overline{\operatorname {vol}}_\theta (u). \]

Letting $b\downarrow 1$ proves the limit. Undoing the common translation changes neither the volumes nor the nonemptiness of the competitor families. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.