Proposition 16.8.9.EE590FE41862 Given $\varphi ,\psi \in \mathrm{QPSH}(X)$, the following are equivalent:
ABA41C3D6B24For any $k\in \mathbb {Z}_{>0}$, we have
\[ \mathcal{I}(k\varphi )\subseteq \mathcal{I}(k\psi ); \]C970FD27DA7Dfor any $\lambda \in \mathbb {R}_{>0}$, we have
\[ \mathcal{I}(\lambda \varphi )\subseteq \mathcal{I}(\lambda \psi ); \]EE2809B429C8for any modification $\pi \colon Y\rightarrow X$ and any $y\in Y$, we have
\[ \nu (\pi ^*\varphi ,y)\geq \nu (\pi ^*\psi ,y); \]F03432967BABfor any proper bimeromorphic morphism $\pi \colon Y\rightarrow X$ from a Kähler manifold and any $y\in Y$, we have
\[ \nu (\pi ^*\varphi ,y)\geq \nu (\pi ^*\psi ,y); \]7B8BA50C8017for any prime divisor $E$ over $X$, we have
\[ \nu (\varphi ,E)\geq \nu (\psi ,E). \]
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.