Theorem 10.22.7.FF884313C070 For the normalized family in theorem 10.22.1, put $L=\log (1/s)$ for $0<s<1$.
If $D(s)\sim Cs^{\ell -n+1}L^{-b}$ with $C>0$, $\ell >-1$ and $b\in \mathbb R$, put $\gamma =(\ell +1)/n$ and $K=(C/\gamma )^{1/n}$. Then
940248BAAEE210.22.8\begin{equation} m\sim Ks^\gamma L^{-b/n},\qquad U(s)-U(0)\sim \frac K\gamma s^\gamma L^{-b/n},\qquad m'\sim \gamma K s^{\gamma -1}L^{-b/n}. \end{equation}The residual is bounded and Hölder continuous. In bounded blowup charts, its metric is comparable to $L^{-b/n}(|z|^{2\gamma -2}|\mathrm{d} z|^2+|z|^{2\gamma }|\mathrm{d} w|^2)$, and its distance to $E$ is of order $|z|^\gamma (\log (1/|z|))^{-b/(2n)}$. In particular, the metric is incomplete near $E$.
If $D(s)\sim Cs^{-n}L^{-b}$, the local mass is finite precisely for $b>1$. In that range put $a=(b-1)/n$ and $K=(nC/(b-1))^{1/n}$. Then
The potential has a finite limit at the origin, the solution has minimal singularities, and the distance is finite, each precisely when $b>n+1$; in that case $U(s)-U(0)\sim K L^{1-a}/(a-1)$. At $b=n+1$, $U$ diverges as $-K\log L$, and for $1<b<n+1$ as $-K L^{1-a}/(1-a)$. In these unbounded cases the solutions have full mass but not minimal singularities, and their metrics are complete near $E$. Their densities on the blowup lie in no $L^ p$ with $p>1$.
If $D(s)\sim Cs^{-n}L^{-(n+1)}(\log L)^{-d}$ with $d\in \mathbb R$, put $C_*=C^{1/n}$. Then
5C6F9700C17210.22.10\begin{equation} m\sim C_*L^{-1}(\log L)^{-d/n},\qquad m'\sim C_*s^{-1}L^{-2}(\log L)^{-d/n}. \end{equation}The potential is bounded precisely when $d>n$, with $U(s)-U(0)$ of order $(\log L)^{1-d/n}$. At $d=n$ it diverges as $-C_*\log \log L$, and for $d<n$ as $-C_*(\log L)^{1-d/n}/(1-d/n)$. The distance is finite precisely when $d>2n$, with remaining length of order $(\log L)^{1-d/(2n)}$. Thus for $n<d\leq 2n$ the residual is bounded and continuous but not Hölder, the solution has minimal singularities, and the metric is complete near $E$. All these critical densities have finite mass and lie in no $L^ p$ with $p>1$.
In all cases the logarithmic coefficient of the solution along $E$ is $c$, whereas by proposition 15.23.2 a strict barrier can be chosen with coefficient $c+\delta $, for some $\delta >0$ independent of $\ell ,b,d$.
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.