Proof of theorem 10.24.16.
The initial data and the resolution. Take $X=\mathbb P^1_ Z\times \mathbb P^1_ W$, with the pulled-back normalized Fubini–Study forms $\alpha ,\beta $ of the two factors, and put
\[ \omega =6(\alpha +\beta ),\qquad \mathrm{d}V_ X=\omega ^2=72\alpha \wedge \beta . \]
Let $H=(Z_1=0)$ and $p=([0:1],[1:0])=(\infty ,0)$. Define
\[ \begin{gathered} h_ H=\frac{|Z_1|^2}{|Z_0|^2+|Z_1|^2},\qquad \eta =\frac{|Z_0|^2}{|Z_0|^2+|Z_1|^2} +\frac{|W_1|^2}{|W_0|^2+|W_1|^2},\\ \phi _0=2\log h_ H+2\log \eta . \end{gathered} \]
The zero sets of $h_ H$ and $\eta $ are $H$ and $\{ p\} $, which are disjoint. Let $\pi :Y\to X$ be the blowup at $p$, write $E$ for the exceptional curve, and set $H_ Y=\pi ^{-1}H$ and $D=H_ Y+E$. The surface $Y$ is smooth, compact, connected and projective, and $\pi $ is an isomorphism off $p$.
Use $|\sigma _ H|^2=\pi ^*h_ H$ and $|\sigma _ E|^2=\pi ^*\eta $. Near $p$, put $x=Z_0/Z_1$ and $y=W_1/W_0$. In the blowup chart $x=a$, $y=ab$,
\[ \pi ^*\eta =|a|^2A(a,b),\qquad A(a,b)=\frac1{1+|a|^2}+\frac{|b|^2}{1+|ab|^2}>0. \]
Thus $\pi ^*\eta $ defines a smooth Hermitian metric on $\mathcal O_ Y(E)$ across $E$. The second chart is obtained by interchanging $x$ and $y$, and the metric factors satisfy the transition rule.
The sections $Z_0W_0$, $\sqrt2Z_0W_1$, $Z_1W_1$ of $\mathcal O(1,1)$ have summed squared Fubini–Study norm $\eta $, and near $p$ they generate the ideal $(x,\sqrt2xy,y)=(x,y)$. Dividing their pullbacks by $\sigma _ E$ gives a morphism $F:Y\to \mathbb P^2$ with
0053482330EE
10.24.21
\begin{equation} F^*\gamma =\pi ^*(\alpha +\beta )-\Theta _ E,\qquad \Theta _ H=\pi ^*\alpha , \end{equation}
where $\gamma $ is the normalized Fubini–Study form on $\mathbb P^2$. In the first chart $F=[1:\sqrt2ab:b]$, so $F|_ E$ is an isomorphism onto a line.
Near $p$,
\[ \eta =\frac{|x|^2+|y|^2+2|xy|^2}{(1+|x|^2)(1+|y|^2)}. \]
Thus $\phi _0$ has analytic singularities. In the convention $\frac1{2m}\log \sum |f_ j|^2$, the coefficient $2$ is obtained by raising the numerator to the fourth power and expanding it as a sum of squared holomorphic monomials. The resolved identities are
82395B883364
10.24.22
\begin{align} \pi ^*\phi _0& =2\log |\sigma _ H|^2+2\log |\sigma _ E|^2,\\ R_0& =\pi ^*\omega -2\Theta _ H-2\Theta _ E =2\pi ^*\alpha +4\pi ^*\beta +2F^*\gamma .\notag \end{align}
The first two terms of $R_0$ are positive away from $E$, and along $E$ their kernel is $TE$, on which $F^*\gamma $ is positive. Hence $R_0$ is Kähler. The resolved current is $2[H_ Y]+2[E]+R_0$, which shows that $\phi _0$ is $\omega $-plurisubharmonic away from $p$; since it is bounded above, it extends across $p$. In the notation of (10.24.14), $m_ H=m_ E=2$ and $\ell _0=0$.
The Jacobian determinant of the blowup in the chart is $a$, so $b_ E=1$ and $b_ H=0$. Directly, $\mathrm{e}^{-q\phi _0}$ is integrable near $H$ exactly when $q<1/2$ and near $p$ exactly when $q<1$. Consequently $\lambda =\max \{ 2,1\} =2$, and
8B89C7F09EDA
10.24.23
\begin{equation} \Theta =\Theta _ H+2\Theta _ E,\qquad \theta =2\Theta +R_0=\pi ^*\omega +2\Theta _ E. \end{equation}
Since $\Theta _ E|_ E=-\omega _{\mathrm{FS}}$, the class $\{ \theta \} $ has degree $-2$ on $E$, so it is not nef. It is big, since the potential $3\log |\sigma _ E|^2$ gives the current
\[ (\pi ^*\omega -\Theta _ E)+3[E],\qquad \pi ^*\omega -\Theta _ E=5\pi ^*(\alpha +\beta )+F^*\gamma >0. \]
The prescribed volume. Define $\mathrm{d}V_ Y=\pi ^*\omega ^2/|\sigma _ E|^2$ off $E$. In the chart above,
\[ \mathrm{d}V_ Y=\frac{72\, \mathrm{d}A_ a\mathrm{d}A_ b}{\pi ^2A(a,b)(1+|a|^2)^2(1+|ab|^2)^2}, \]
since the factor $|a|^2$ from the Jacobian cancels exactly. The second chart gives the extension on the rest of $E$, and the extensions agree on overlaps. Thus $\mathrm{d}V_ Y$ is a smooth strictly positive volume form with $\pi ^*\mathrm{d}V_ X=|\sigma _ E|^2\mathrm{d}V_ Y$, as required in (10.24.15). Since $H_ Y$ and $E$ are disjoint, the measure $|\sigma _ H\sigma _ E|^{-2}\mathrm{d}V_ Y$ has a nonintegrable pole with smooth positive coefficient along each component.
The solution and the minimal reference. Take $u$ from lemma 10.24.18 with $c=6$, pulled back to $X$ from the first factor, and put $g_ X=(6\alpha +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)+6\beta $. This form is smooth and strictly positive near $p$, and
\[ g_ X^2=\mathrm{e}^{u}h_ H^{-1}\omega ^2. \]
Set $P=2\log |\sigma _ E|^2$ and $\rho =P+\pi ^*u$. Then
\[ \theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}P=2[E]+\pi ^*\omega ,\qquad \theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\rho =2[E]+\pi ^*g_ X. \]
Off $D$, the equation follows from the identity
\[ \mathrm{e}^{\rho }|\sigma _ H\sigma _ E|^{-2}\mathrm{d}V_ Y =\mathrm{e}^{\pi ^*u}|\sigma _ H|^{-2}|\sigma _ E|^2\mathrm{d}V_ Y =\pi ^*g_ X^2. \]
Both measures extend by zero on $D$, which proves the global non-pluripolar equation.
Let $\psi $ be $\theta $-plurisubharmonic. Off $E$, the function $\psi -P$ descends to an $\omega $-plurisubharmonic function on $X\setminus \{ p\} $, which by lemma 5.24.8 extends across $p$ and is bounded above on $X$. Thus $\psi \leq P+C_\psi $ off $E$, and lemma 5.24.3 gives the inequality everywhere. Since $P$ itself is $\theta $-plurisubharmonic, it has minimal singularities.
The current of $P$ has non-pluripolar mass $\int _ X\omega ^2=72$, which is therefore the volume of the class, whereas the cup-product square of the class is $72+4E^2=68$. The cusp has mass $6$ and no atom, so the current of $\rho $ also has mass $\int _ Xg_ X^2=72$, and $\rho $ has full mass. Near $E$, $\pi ^*u$ is smooth, so $\rho $ has the Lelong numbers of $P$; along $H_ Y$ the cusp has zero Lelong number. The solution $\rho $ does not itself have minimal singularities, because $u$ is unbounded below near $H$.
Relative energy and uniqueness. Choose $M$ with $u-M\leq 0$ and use the potential $P+M$, which has minimal singularities, as reference. The canonical approximants of $\rho $ are
\[ \rho _ k=\max (\rho ,P+M-k)=P+M+\pi ^*u_ k,\qquad u_ k=\max (u-M,-k), \]
and their difference from the reference off $E$ is $\pi ^*u_ k$. On the curve let $b(t)=6\log (1+\mathrm{e}^ t)$ and $V(t)=b(t)+u(t)$. For large $k$ there is a unique level $t=T_ k$ in the cusp with $u(T_ k)-M=-k$. If $S_ k=-T_ k$, the asymptotics of lemma 10.24.18 give $S_ k\asymp \mathrm{e}^{k/2}$.
The local potential of the truncated curve current is $b+u_ k=\max (V-M,b-k)$. On $\{ t<T_ k\} $ its mass is $b'(T_ k)$, and at $t=T_ k$ its derivative jumps upward by $u_ t(T_ k)$. Smooth convex approximation and continuity of Bedford–Taylor products of bounded potentials therefore give total mass $V'(T_ k)=O(S_ k^{-1})$ on the cutoff region $\{ t\leq T_ k\} $. There $u_ k=-k$, so the absolute energy contribution of this region is
\[ kV'(T_ k)=O(k\mathrm{e}^{-k/2})\longrightarrow 0. \]
Outside it the density and the potential are unchanged, and $\int |u|g_1$ is finite. Consequently $\int |u_ k|g_{1,k}$ has a finite limit, where $g_{1,k}=6\alpha +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ k$, and $\int |u_ k|\alpha $ converges by dominated convergence.
The mixed measures of the product current and of its reference are
\[ \omega ^2=72\alpha \wedge \beta ,\quad (g_{1,k}+6\beta )\wedge \omega =6g_{1,k}\wedge \beta +36\alpha \wedge \beta ,\quad (g_{1,k}+6\beta )^2=12g_{1,k}\wedge \beta . \]
Their pullbacks are exactly the mixed non-pluripolar measures on $Y$, which do not charge $E$. All three relative energy integrals of the canonical approximants therefore have finite limits. This proves $\rho \in \mathcal E^1(Y,\theta )$; replacing $P+M$ by the normalized envelope $V_\theta $ changes the reference by a bounded amount and does not affect this conclusion.
Uniqueness follows from the full-mass comparison argument in the proof of theorem 10.24.1. The measure $|\sigma |^{-2}\mathrm{d}V_ Y$ has infinite mass, but the two exponential densities being compared have mass $72$. Comparison on the strict sublevel sets forces equality almost everywhere, and hence equality of the quasi-plurisubharmonic potentials everywhere.
The missing metric boundary. The set on which the current is smooth and strictly positive is $Y\setminus (H_ Y\cup E)$: the cusp coefficient diverges at $H_ Y$, and the nonzero current $2[E]$ excludes smoothness along $E$. The smooth part $\pi ^*g_ X$ also degenerates along $TE$.
Let $U$ be a dense Zariski open set on which the current is smooth and strictly positive. As in the proof of theorem 10.24.7, choose a point of $E$ avoiding every other component of the analytic set $Y\setminus U$; in a small chart around it the complement of $U$ is exactly $E$. A transverse path $a=\xi >0$, $b=b_0$ lies in $U$ for small $\xi $ and approaches that point. Since $g_ X$ is smooth near $p$ and $\pi $ is smooth, the coefficients of $\pi ^*g_ X$ are bounded in the chart, so the path has bounded speed and finite remaining length. Its tails give an intrinsic Cauchy sequence with no limit in $U$, since its only ambient limit is the removed point and a smooth positive Riemannian metric induces the manifold topology. Hence every such $U$ is incomplete.
$\square$
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.