Theorem 11.31.2.160CE026081B The trace map $\mathcal T_\gamma $ is an affine homeomorphism from the compact convex set $\mathcal K^0_{\theta ,\mathrm{d}V}$, with its $L^1$ topology, onto a compact convex set of positive measures of mass $M_{\theta ,\gamma }$, with the weak topology. In other words, for $u_ j,u\in \mathcal K^0_{\theta ,\mathrm{d}V}$,
\[ u_ j\longrightarrow u\text{ in }L^1 \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad \mathcal T_\gamma (u_ j)\rightharpoonup \mathcal T_\gamma (u). \]
If $M_{\theta ,\gamma }=0$ and $\mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )\ne \varnothing $, both sets consist of a single point.
Proof.
The set $\mathcal K^0_{\theta ,\mathrm{d}V}$ is convex. It is the image of the compact set $\mathcal K_\theta $ of theorem 5.25.2 under the continuous map $v\mapsto v-\int _ Xv\, \mathrm{d}V$, and is therefore compact.
If $u_ j\to u$ in $L^1$, then $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ j\to \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u$ as currents, so the trace measures converge in the sense of distributions. Since they are positive measures of the same finite mass, and every continuous function is a uniform limit of smooth functions, they also converge weakly as measures. Thus $\mathcal T_\gamma $ is continuous.
To prove injectivity, suppose that $\mathcal T_\gamma (u)=\mathcal T_\gamma (v)$. Then $A(u-v)=0$ in the sense of distributions. Elliptic regularity for $A$ shows that $u-v$ agrees almost everywhere with a smooth function, and the maximum principle shows that this function is constant. Its mean is zero, so $u=v$ almost everywhere, and hence everywhere by lemma 5.24.3.
A continuous injection from a compact space into a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism onto its image; here the target is the space of positive measures of mass $M_{\theta ,\gamma }$ with the weak topology. Since $\mathcal T_\gamma $ is affine, its image is convex. If $M_{\theta ,\gamma }=0$, every trace measure is zero, so injectivity shows that $\mathcal K^0_{\theta ,\mathrm{d}V}$ has at most one point; it has exactly one when $\mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ is nonempty, since the mean of any $\theta $-plurisubharmonic function can be subtracted. In this case lemma 11.6.3 also gives $\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u=0$ for the unique normalized potential $u$, which is therefore smooth.
$\square$
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.