Pome

Proposition 12.21.541097C9AFBD2

Proposition 12.21.5.41097C9AFBD2 For every $0<\alpha <\beta <1$ there is a smooth semipositive nonclosed background on $X$, with the same $\mu $ and $h$, such that

\[ \bigl (\underline a(\theta ),\overline a(\theta )\bigr ) =(1+\alpha ,1+\beta ). \]

For every $0<\sigma <1$ there is such a background with common order $1+\sigma $.

Proof. We use the rank-one formula (12.21.3), with coefficients that vanish to infinite order at one point at a prescribed oscillating rate.

Step 1: the coefficients. For all sufficiently large $t$, define

\[ p(t)=\frac{\alpha +\beta }{2} +\frac{\beta -\alpha }{2}\sin (\log \log t),\qquad P(t)=tp(t). \]

Choose $T$ so large that $0<c_0\leq P'(t)\leq d_0<1$ for $t\geq T$; this is possible because

\[ P'(t)=p(t)+\frac{\beta -\alpha }{2\log t}\cos (\log \log t) \]

and $\alpha \leq p\leq \beta $. Fix $z_0\in E$ and a flat coordinate $\zeta $ centered at $z_0$. On $E\setminus \{ z_0\} $ choose a smooth function $t(z)\geq T$ that equals $|\zeta |^{-2}$ near $z_0$ and is bounded outside every neighborhood of $z_0$. Put

\[ q=\mathrm{e}^{-t},\qquad a=\mathrm{e}^{-P(t)},\qquad r=\mathrm{e}^{-(P(t)+t)/2}, \]

and set all three equal to zero at $z_0$. These functions are smooth and vanish to infinite order at $z_0$: we have $P(t)\geq \alpha t$, and every fixed derivative of $P$ grows at most polynomially in $t$, so by the chain rule each coordinate derivative is bounded by a polynomial in $|\zeta |^{-1}$ times $\mathrm{e}^{-c/|\zeta |^2}$ for some $c>0$. Since $|r|^2=aq$, the resulting $\theta $ is semipositive. It is not closed: the component $\mathrm{d} q\wedge \omega _2$ of $\mathrm{d}\theta $ contains both fiber differentials, and derivatives of the remaining terms cannot cancel it.

Step 2: asymptotics of $I$ and $K$. Write $\epsilon =\mathrm{e}^{-L}$, and let $T_0\geq T$ be such that $t=|\zeta |^{-2}$ on the disk $\{ |\zeta |^2<1/T_0\} $. Outside this disk the integrands of $I$ and $K$ in (12.21.3) are bounded, so their contributions are $O(1)$, while polar coordinates on the disk give

\[ I_{\mathrm{loc}}=\pi \int _{T_0}^\infty \frac{t^{-2}\, \mathrm{d} t}{\mathrm{e}^{-t}+\mathrm{e}^{-L}},\qquad K_{\mathrm{loc}}=\pi \int _{T_0}^\infty \frac{\mathrm{e}^{-P(t)}t^{-2}\, \mathrm{d} t}{\mathrm{e}^{-t}+\mathrm{e}^{-L}}. \]

The part of $I_{\mathrm{loc}}$ over $t\geq L$ is at least a fixed multiple of $\mathrm{e}^ L/L$. For an upper bound, use $(\mathrm{e}^{-t}+\mathrm{e}^{-L})^{-1}\leq \mathrm{e}^ t$ for $t\leq L$ and $(\mathrm{e}^{-t}+\mathrm{e}^{-L})^{-1}\leq \mathrm{e}^ L$ for $t\geq L$, and split $[T_0,L]$ at $L/2$. Thus

12515D2FB078 12.21.6
\begin{equation} \log I=L-\log L+O(1). \end{equation}

The derivatives of $P$ and of $t-P(t)$ are positive and bounded away from zero. Splitting the integral for $K$ at $t=L$ therefore gives $K\leq C\mathrm{e}^{L-P(L)}$. On $[L,L+1]$ the denominator is at most $2\mathrm{e}^{-L}$ and $P(t)\leq P(L)+1$, so

\[ c_1L^{-2}\mathrm{e}^{L-P(L)}\leq K\leq c_2\mathrm{e}^{L-P(L)}; \]

the complementary $O(1)$ term is absorbed because $P(L)\leq \beta L$. Consequently $\log K=L-P(L)+O(\log L)$, and $K\to \infty $.

Step 3: the orders. Combining these estimates with (12.21.3) and (12.21.6) yields

CFDC623C2AF7 12.21.7
\begin{equation} \log \mathcal V_\mu (\theta +\mathrm{e}^{-L}h)=-L-P(L)+O(\log L), \qquad \frac{\log \mathcal V_\mu (\theta +\epsilon h)}{\log \epsilon } =1+p(L)+o(1). \end{equation}

Since $\sin (\log \log L)$ oscillates between $-1$ and $1$, the lower and upper limits of $p(L)$ are $\alpha $ and $\beta $, which proves the first assertion. If instead $P(t)=\sigma t$, the same smoothness and integral estimates give the common order $1+\sigma $. In particular, $\sigma =\sqrt2-1$ gives an irrational common order. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.