Pome

Theorem 11.45.972A7418012F7

Theorem 11.45.9.72A7418012F7 Let $a_ j,d_ j>0$ converge to $a,d>0$, let smooth positive functions $b_ j$ converge uniformly to $b$, and let continuous positive functions $H_ j$ converge uniformly to $H$. For any $\sigma _ j>0$ tending to zero, put

\[ \begin{aligned} \theta _ j& =(a_ j+d_ j)\omega _1+b_ j\kappa ,& \psi _ j& =d_ j\log \ell ,& \phi _ j& =\phi _{a_ j,d_ j},\\ f_ j& =N b_ j^ kH_ j,& m_ j& =\int _{\mathbb P^1}H_ j\omega _1,& c_{0,j}& =a_ j/m_ j. \end{aligned} \]

Let $s_ j$ be the greatest solution of (11.45.5) for these data, and set $v_ j=s_ j-\sup _ Xs_ j$, $c_ j=\mathrm{e}^{\sigma _ j\sup _ Xs_ j}$. Then

\[ v_ j\longrightarrow v_0=\psi +w_0-S_0,\qquad s_ j-\sigma _ j^{-1}\log c_{0,j}\longrightarrow s_0=\psi +w_0-J \]

in $L^1(X)$, in capacity, and locally uniformly on $X\setminus D$. Moreover,

97B5C8E6D45D 11.45.10
\begin{equation} c_ j\longrightarrow c_0,\qquad \sigma _ j^{-1}\log (c_ j/c_{0,j})\longrightarrow S_0-J, \end{equation}

and $\mathrm{MA}_{\theta _ j}(v_ j)\to c_0 f\, \mathrm{d}W$ in total variation. The limit has ordinary type $\phi _{a,d}$ and belongs to $\mathcal E_{\mathrm{env}}(X,\theta ,\phi _{a,d})$, with

\[ \mathrm{MA}_\theta (v_0)=c_0 f\, \mathrm{d}W. \]

There is no restriction on the relative rates of parameter and exponent convergence.

Proof. We construct uniformly bounded residuals on the curve, then use their equation to determine both the normalized limit and the scalar error.

Uniform construction. The kernel has uniformly integrable logarithmic tails and $C_ G=\sup _ x\int |G(x,z)|\omega _1(z)<\infty $. These facts follow by rotation invariance and the radial integral of $|\log \ell +1|$ on $0<\ell <1$; the Poincaré–Lelong formula and $\int _0^1\log \ell \, \mathrm{d}\ell =-1$ give its curvature and mean. Truncating the kernel shows that convolution of bounded densities is continuous.

Temporarily omit subscripts. On continuous mean-zero functions on the curve define

\[ T_\sigma (w)=G*(A(w)-a),\qquad A(w)=\frac{aH\mathrm{e}^{\sigma (\psi +w)}}{Z(w)},\qquad Z(w)=\int _{\mathbb P^1}H\mathrm{e}^{\sigma (\psi +w)}\omega _1. \]

For all late parameters choose fixed bounds $a\leq a_{\max }$, $d\leq d_{\max }$ and $0<h_{\min }\leq H\leq h_{\max }$. Put $B=4a_{\max }h_{\max }/h_{\min }$ and choose $R_0>C_ G(B+a_{\max })$. On the ball $\| w\| _\infty \leq R_0$, for sufficiently small $\sigma $,

\[ Z(w)\geq \frac{h_{\min }\mathrm{e}^{-\sigma R_0}}{1+\sigma d_{\max }} \geq h_{\min }/2,\qquad 0\leq A(w)\leq B. \]

Here $\int \ell ^{\sigma d}\omega _1=(1+\sigma d)^{-1}$. Thus $T_\sigma $ maps the mean-zero ball into itself. Since $\int A(w)\omega _1=a$, its density derivative in direction $h$ is

\[ \sigma A(w)\left(h-a^{-1}\int hA(w)\omega _1\right). \]

It follows that $\| T_\sigma (w)-T_\sigma (v)\| _\infty \leq 2\sigma B C_ G\| w-v\| _\infty $. The map is a contraction for all sufficiently small exponents, uniformly over the late parameters. Its fixed point $w_ j$ has mean zero and $\| w_ j\| _\infty \leq R_0$.

Write $Z_ j=Z(w_ j)$ and $A_ j=A(w_ j)$. The fixed-point equation gives $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w_ j=(A_ j-a_ j)\omega _1$, and the potential

9E6339686644 11.45.11
\begin{equation} \psi _ j+w_ j+\sigma _ j^{-1}\log (a_ j/Z_ j) \end{equation}

has residual form $A_ j\omega _1+b_ j\kappa $, continuous and semipositive. On coordinate balls, mollification of $w_ j$ converges together with its continuous complex Hessian. The local bounded product, expanded after a common strict smooth correction, therefore equals $N b_ j^ kA_ j\, \mathrm{d}W$. Removing $D$ identifies the singular product with the same measure. The identity

\[ N b_ j^ kA_ j=\mathrm{e}^{\sigma _ j(\psi _ j+w_ j)}(a_ j/Z_ j)f_ j \]

shows that (11.45.11) solves the exponential equation in the ordinary type. By lemma 11.45.4, it is $s_ j$.

Residual and normalized limits. Uniform boundedness and dominated convergence give $Z_ j\to m$ and $A_ j\to A_0$ in $L^1(\omega _1)$, with a common bound on $A_ j$. For uniformly bounded densities $F_ j\to 0$ in $L^1$, one has

\[ \| G*F_ j\| _\infty \leq \| F_ j\| _\infty \sup _ x\int _{\{ |G(x,z)|>M\} }|G(x,z)|\omega _1(z) +M\| F_ j\| _1. \]

First letting $j\to \infty $ and then $M\to \infty $ proves $w_ j\to w_0$ uniformly. Although $A_ j=0$ on $D$ and $A_0>0$ there, the $L^1$ convergence suffices for this argument.

Put $S_ j=\sup _ X(\psi _ j+w_ j)$. A point with $\ell =1$ supplies a uniformly bounded competing value. Since $d_ j\geq d_{\min }>0$, the upper bound $d_{\min }\log \ell +R_0$ tends uniformly to $-\infty $ near $D$, so all maximizing points stay in a fixed compact subset of $X\setminus D$. Uniform convergence there gives $S_ j\to S_0$. Hence $v_ j=\psi _ j+w_ j-S_ j$ has the asserted $L^1$ and local uniform limits. For capacity convergence, the complements of $\{ \psi <-T\} $ are compact subsets of $X\setminus D$. Choose a fixed Hermitian form for which $\psi $ is plurisubharmonic and apply (5.29.4); their omitted sublevels have capacity at most $C/T$. Local uniform convergence, followed by $T\to \infty $, proves convergence in capacity, with the common poles omitted.

The measure formula and uniform convergence of $b_ j$ give total-variation convergence to $N b^ kA_0\, \mathrm{d}W=c_0 f\, \mathrm{d}W$. The same bounded product calculation gives this equation for $v_0$. The residual extensions in proposition 11.45.3 show directly that $v_0\sim \phi _{a,d}$. Choose $C$ with $v_0\geq \phi _{a,d}-C$. For every $t\geq 1$, the potential $q_ t=\phi _{a,d}-tC$ satisfies

\[ t^{-1}q_ t+(1-t^{-1})\phi _{a,d}\leq v_0, \]

which proves membership in the relative envelope class by definition 16.28.61.

Scalar centering. The exact formula is $c_ j=a_ j\mathrm{e}^{\sigma _ j S_ j}/Z_ j$. In the difference quotient

\[ \frac{Z_ j-m_ j}{\sigma _ j} =\int H_ j\frac{\mathrm{e}^{\sigma _ j(\psi _ j+w_ j)}-1}{\sigma _ j}\omega _1, \]

the negative part is bounded by $h_{\max }(d_{\max }|\log \ell |+R_0)$ and the positive part by a constant. Dominated convergence gives a limit $\int H(\psi +w_0)\omega _1=mJ$. Since $m_ j\to m>0$,

\[ \sigma _ j^{-1}\log (Z_ j/m_ j)\longrightarrow J. \]

The identity $c_ j/c_{0,j}=m_ j\mathrm{e}^{\sigma _ j S_ j}/Z_ j$ proves (11.45.10). Subtracting $\sigma _ j^{-1}\log c_{0,j}$ in (11.45.11) leaves $\psi _ j+w_ j-\sigma _ j^{-1}\log (Z_ j/m_ j)$, proving the centered limit in all three topologies. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.