Pome

12.10.16 A smooth maximizing form with an analytic degeneracy set8D604EFF48DF

We now allow the smooth maximizing form to degenerate. Where it is strictly positive, the argument of corollary 12.10.12 still determines the solution current and gives the equation. If the degeneracy set is a proper analytic subset, neither side of the equation charges it, so the equation holds on all of $X$. Uniqueness follows by passing to the maximum of two threshold subsolutions and applying lemma 5.38.2.

Theorem 12.10.17.51F452E9F8D1 Let $0\leq f\in L^1(\mathrm{d}V)$ be nonzero, and assume $b=b_\omega (f)>0$. Suppose that $D_{f^{1/n}}$ has a smooth semipositive maximizer $T\in \mathscr G_\omega $ that is strictly positive on $X\setminus Z$, where $Z$ is a proper analytic subset of $X$. Then every threshold subsolution $u$ is smooth on $X\setminus Z$ and satisfies

\[ \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_\omega (u)=bf\, \mathrm{d}V \]

on $X$. In particular a threshold solution exists, and it has finite mass. The function $f^{1/n}$ has a smooth nonnegative representative on $X\setminus Z$.

Any two threshold subsolutions differ by a constant.

Proof. Put $p=f^{1/n}$ and $A=\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u$, where $u$ is any threshold subsolution; one exists by theorem 15.28.4. Fix a smooth strictly positive $T_0\in \mathscr G_\omega $, and for real $\varepsilon >0$ set $T_\varepsilon =(T+\varepsilon T_0)/(1+\varepsilon )$. Each $T_\varepsilon $ is a smooth strictly positive member of $\mathscr G_\omega $, so proposition 12.10.11 gives

\[ A\wedge T_\varepsilon \geq b^{1/n}p k_{T_\varepsilon }\, \mathrm{d}V. \]

For a smooth semipositive form $T$ with coefficient matrix $P'$ relative to $\omega ^ n$, (12.7.1) gives $k_ T\, \mathrm{d}V=f_0(\det P')^{1/n}\omega ^ n$, so that $k_ T=f_0^{1-n}(\det P')^{1/n}$ is a continuous function of that matrix. Thus $k_{T_\varepsilon }\to k_ T$ uniformly on the compact manifold $X$. Since $p\in L^1$, passing to the limit gives

\[ A\wedge T\geq b^{1/n}p k_ T\, \mathrm{d}V. \]

The left side has mass one by Stokes' theorem and $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}T=0$, and the right side has mass $b^{1/n}D_ p(T)=1$ because $T$ maximizes. Their difference is positive and has mass zero, hence

E32DBBA007AF 12.10.18
\begin{equation} A\wedge T=b^{1/n}p k_ T\, \mathrm{d}V. \end{equation}

On $U=X\setminus Z$ write $T=\gamma ^{n-1}$, where $\gamma $ is smooth and strictly positive, and set $a=(bf\, \mathrm{d}V/\gamma ^ n)^{1/n}$. The trace equality becomes $A\wedge \gamma ^{n-1}=a\gamma ^ n$ on $U$. On relatively compact subsets of $U$, it controls every coefficient measure of $A$ by an $L^ n$ density. The trace inequalities for all Hermitian forms and the matrix arithmetic–geometric mean inequality, used exactly as in the proof of corollary 12.10.12, force $A=a\gamma $ on $U$. This step uses only the positivity of $\gamma $ on $U$, since the Hermitian test forms needed there can be taken to be global forms obtained by extension from smaller coordinate charts.

The local regularity lemma lemma 5.22.4 makes $u$ and $a$ smooth on $U$. Taking the top power proves the equation on $U$, and $f^{1/n}=b^{-1/n}a(\gamma ^ n/\mathrm{d}V)^{1/n}$ is smooth and nonnegative there. Both $\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_\omega (u)$ and $f\, \mathrm{d}V$ put no mass on the pluripolar set $Z$. Hence the equality holds on $X$, and its total mass is $b\int _ Xf\, \mathrm{d}V<+\infty $.

It remains to prove uniqueness. Let $v$ be another threshold subsolution and put $w=\max (u,v)$. By proposition 13.14.6,

\[ \mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_\omega (w)\geq \mathbf1_{\{ u\geq v\} }\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_\omega (u) +\mathbf1_{\{ u<v\} }\mathrm{MA}^{\mathrm{ext}}_\omega (v) \geq bf\, \mathrm{d}V. \]

Here the pole sets carry no mass for any of the measures involved. Thus $w$ is also a threshold subsolution, and the preceding argument gives the same smooth current $\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u=\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v=\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w=a\gamma $ on $U$.

We apply lemma 5.38.2 to $u\leq w$ and to $v\leq w$: their complex Hessians agree on $X\setminus Z$, so $w-u$ and $w-v$ are constant. Hence $u-v$ is constant. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.