Pome

Theorem 12.11.19ECB2B21B601

Theorem 12.11.1.9ECB2B21B601 For every nef background $\theta $ and every Hermitian form $h$,

\[ \lambda _\mu (\theta ) =\lim _{\epsilon \downarrow 0}\lambda _\mu (\theta +\epsilon h), \qquad \mathcal V_\mu (\theta ) =\lim _{\epsilon \downarrow 0}c_{\theta +\epsilon h}(\mu ). \]

Both quantities on the right decrease as $\epsilon \downarrow 0$, and their limits do not depend on $h$.

Proof. For $0<\epsilon '<\epsilon $ the difference of the two backgrounds is the positive form $(\epsilon -\epsilon ')h$, so the monotonicity in proposition 12.2.2 shows that $\lambda _\mu (\theta +\epsilon h)$ decreases as $\epsilon \downarrow 0$. Its limit is therefore the infimum over $\epsilon >0$. Infima over $\epsilon >0$ and over Gauduchon metrics commute, and for a fixed metric the quotient is affine in $\epsilon $. Hence

\[ \begin{split} \inf _{\epsilon >0}\lambda _\mu (\theta +\epsilon h) & =\inf _\gamma \inf _{\epsilon >0} \frac{\int _ X\theta \wedge \gamma ^{n-1} +\epsilon \int _ Xh\wedge \gamma ^{n-1}}{D_\mu (\gamma )}\\ & =\lambda _\mu (\theta ). \end{split} \]

Here the second equality holds because the coefficient of $\epsilon $ is positive, so the inner infimum is the value at $\epsilon =0$. This proves the first identity, and its right side is the definition of $\lambda _\mu (\theta )$, which does not involve $h$. The second identity follows by raising the first to the $n$th power, since $\lambda _\mu (\theta +\epsilon h)^ n=c_{\theta +\epsilon h}(\mu )$ by theorem 12.2.3. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.